Robert Francis Prevost, now Pope Leo XIV, had visited Pollachi school 19 years ago
Robert Francis Prevost in front of Shenbagam Matriculation Higher Secondary School.
COIMBATORE:
Robert Francis Prevost
, who has been elected as the new pope, had visited Pollachi in Coimbatore district almost two decades ago when he was the prior general of the Order of St Augustine.
He visited the monastery of Sancta Monica Community of Augustinian Fathers at Zamin Uthukuli near Pollachi on Oct 6, 2006. He also visited
Shenbagam Matriculation Higher Secondary School
run by Augustinian fathers at Zamin Uthukuli.
'He conducted a mass with priests in the monastery and interacted with the students and teachers,' said Jacob Mullassery, Order of Saint Augustine (OSA) in Cuba, who had accompanied the prior general during his visit to Kochi in Kerala and Pollachi in Tamil Nadu.
Fr Wilson Injerappu, OSA, regional vicar of the Augustinian Order in India, said Fr Robert Francis Prevost, who has now chosen the name Leo XIV after being elected pope, had encouraged the students in the school.
Operation Sindoor
How India shut down Pakistan's second desperate bid to escalate tensions
Pak used civilian planes as shield to launch failed drone attack: India
S-400, Spyder, Akash: What is in India's air defence arsenal?
'He travelled from Kochi to Pollachi in a car, and it took more than seven hours. He is a very kind and humble person,' said Wilson.
Fr Binu Yesudasan, correspondent of Shenbagam Matriculation Higher Secondary School, said, 'We feel very proud that he visited our school.'
Fr Jacob Mullassery said he participated in a mass conducted by Fr Robert Francis Prevost during his visit to Kochi in 2004. "He is a very simple and polite person.
He supports the rights of poor people. He visited many countries, and he knows about the culture of these countries. He treats others with equality. He always says that he is one among us," said Fr Jacob.
He visited St Francis Assisi Cathedral in Kathrikadavu in Kochi in Kerala on April 22, 2004, and took part in the anointing ceremonies. He visited Augustinian House in Mariyapuram in Aluva to participate in the Asia-Pacific Meeting of the Order of St Augustine from Oct 3 to Oct 6, 2006.
'He listens to others, and he is a good listener. He visited many countries, and he values the social and cultural aspects of other countries. He is not authoritative, and he is one of the people among us. He does not believe in hierarchical authority, and he believes in service-related authorities. He always stands for the rights of poor people,' said Fr Jacob Mullassery.
The Vatican has announced that Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost will be formally installed as pope in a mass on May 18.
He will be the first US-born pope.
On Friday evening, Tamil Nadu chief minister M K Stalin congratulated the new pope. "Congratulations to His Holiness
Pope Leo XIV
on being chosen to lead the Roman Catholic Church. May his message of peace and unity inspire harmony across the world," said Stalin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Watch: How Israel used covert Mossad ops to strike deep into Iran's heartland
Israel's Mossad spy agency released rare footage that reportedly shows the country's covert operations and targeted drone strikes inside Iran. Israel launched a major attack on Iran on Friday, drawing their long-running shadow war into open conflict in a way that could spiral into a wider, more dangerous regional war. The strikes set off explosions in Tehran as Israel said it was targeting Iranian nuclear and military facilities. Among those killed were three of Iran's top military leaders, one who oversaw the entire armed forces, Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, one who led the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, Gen. Hossein Salami, and another who ran the Guard's ballistic missile program, Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh. Two top nuclear scientists also had been killed. Israel said it killed additional Revolutionary Guard a covert operation dubbed "Rising Lion," Israeli Mossad commandos infiltrated central Iran under the cover of darkness. Their mission was to deploy precision-guided missiles near critical anti-aircraft sites, including S-300 batteries and radar installations, The Times of Israel reported. This strategic move was part of Israel's broader effort to neutralize Iran's missile capabilities and air defense systems, ensuring air superiority for subsequent Israeli airstrikes. According to an Israeli official, the Mossad built a secret explosive drone base in Iran for the operation. The drones were used to strike ballistic missile launchers at a base near Tehran, preventing Iran from firing projectiles at Israel as strikes InMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Iran launches hundreds of ballistic missiles on Israel as conflict widens
Iran fired hundreds of ballistic missiles against Israel following an unprecedented direct attack on its nuclear facilities, ramping up a conflict between sworn enemies that threatens to engulf the Middle East and disrupt global oil supplies. Multiple waves of missiles targeting Israeli cities amount to the most forceful step yet by Tehran since Israel's overnight raids killed top Iranian generals and badly damaged key military infrastructure. Israel said it identified missiles launched from the Islamic Republic and reported explosions from interceptions and falling debris from incoming projectiles. There was dramatic video footage of at least one large explosion in Tel Aviv, and reports of explosions over Jerusalem. The extent to which Israel's air defenses were pierced remains to be seen, with US forces helping to intercept and shoot down Iranian attacks. Markets took another hit from the surge in tensions: The S&P 500 lost over 1 per cent, wiping out this week's advance. West Texas Intermediate crude futures surged more than 7 per cent, the most since March 2022. Gold and the dollar rose. When the pair targeted each other last year, there was a greater time lag and a sense that after an exchange of fire, there would be a détente. This time, Israel has indicated this is an operation that could last weeks. This poses an existential problem for Iran, and a question of whether it can match its fiery rhetoric with actions. Israel has dramatically exposed its weaknesses, decimated its proxies and taken out key leaders. Additional escalations — particularly any targeting of American military or diplomatic facilities in the region — could rally domestic political support, but could dramatically intensify the conflict. It was unclear if Tehran was entertaining last-resort options such as blocking the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most vital oil arteries, in a scenario that investors fear the most. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowed to 'act forcefully' in a pre-recorded video message carried by state TV. His statement was released after Iran started its retaliation. Unlike previous responses, this one came much faster. Given Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has followed through on his long-promised threat to dismantle Iran's nuclear program, Iran was feeling the pressure to find a commensurate answer. So far, Israel has chosen to keep the US out of the conflict — a decision that an analysis by Bloomberg Economics suggested was the most likely since Tehran can't afford to go to war with the world's biggest economy and mightiest military. The backdrop are indirect nuclear talks between the Islamic Republic and the US, with a sixth round of negotiations scheduled to take place on Sunday. But the damage to its standing in the region is real. The head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Hossein Salami, and the military's chief of staff, Mohammad Bagheri, were both killed in Israeli strikes. At least two other senior IRGC members also died and several nuclear facilities were targeted. Iran informed the International Atomic Energy Agency that Israel struck the nuclear sites at Fordow and Isfahan as part of its wave of attacks in the last 24 hours, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi told the UN Security Council on Friday. Grossi said the IAEA doesn't have information beyond indications that military activity took place around those facilities. But the move is important — if the facility at Isfahan is disabled, it would seriously crimp Iran's ability to enrich uranium in large volumes. Israel 'should not think that it is over. We won't allow them to escape unscathed from this great crime they have committed,' Khamenei said. But the Iranian supreme leader's terse statement shows Iran is probably not prepared to make any concessions. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Friday's attacks have derailed diplomacy. Meanwhile, with the Group of Seven leaders gathering in the Canadian Rockies, the attention will focus on how US President Donald Trump will react — or not. Going into the summit, there was a common desire to keep fraught geopolitical issues off the table but that will be difficult to do given the knock-on effects of a spike in oil prices on inflation and energy exports. Given the region is such a big crossroads for shipping of not just oil but consumer goods, any all-out war will further strain a global trading system disrupted by the trade wars. For his part, Trump gave brief telephone interviews to a smattering of journalists, particularly those from cable news networks, but otherwise didn't take to the cameras to make public remarks. The White House said Trump was not expected to emerge Friday night, though he could always turn to social media or additional interviews with the media. On Saturday, Trump's 79th birthday, he's scheduled to host a military parade ostensibly to celebrate the US Army's 250th year. He took to social media to warn Iran to make a deal 'before it is too late.' Come Saturday, the extent of the damage on both sides will come into focus. Israel said more than 200 aircraft participated in the operation that targeted around 100 locations across Iran. At least 95 people were wounded and several residential buildings in Tehran's suburbs were hit, according to Iranian media. Iran's ambassador to the United Nations said 78 people were killed in the attacks. One woman was killed in the Tel Aviv area, a police spokesman in Israel said. Netanyahu and Trump spoke by phone Friday to discuss the conflict, according to a White House official. The US has said it did not play a role in Israel's initial volley, and warned Iran against retaliation against American service members. The US role assisting Israel's aerial defense is customary, but what it does next will be critical.
Deccan Herald
3 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Elusive global unity against terrorism
The 'Operation Sindoor' has shown us how deeply fragmented the fight against terror has become. There is a widely held conviction among all major powers that Pakistan is indeed harbouring terrorists and terror groups on its soil and using them as strategic assets against India, just as it had once used the earlier avatar of Taliban. They do not need more convincing. However, while there was widespread condemnation of the terror attack in Pahalgam, no country has called out Pakistan or even asked it to cooperate with apprehending the perpetrators. This is where facts diverge from reality. Before 'Operation Sindoor' was launched, all that the European Union (EU) did was to call the 'rising tensions between India and Pakistan' 'alarming' and advise India that 'escalation helps no one.' It was obvious that rather than taking a stand of zero tolerance to the menace, the EU continued to see terror attacks through a politically frosted glass – the frost that set in due to India's stand on the Ukraine war. The EU, which was peeved over India's abstentions on the UN votes on Ukraine, saw this as an opportunity to pay back in the same coin. However, what they have conveniently forgotten is that when China aggressed our borders in Galwan, all the European Council President could say in front of Prime Minister Narendra Modi was: 'The relationship between the EU and China is complex. We need to tackle different issues and support all the efforts to maintain a channel of dialogue to find peaceful solutions.' Thank you, EU, for this candid admission.. In fact, when an important member of the EU called India in February 2021 to express its indignation at India's stand in the UN Security Council on the Ukraine vote, India asked them politely to send us a copy of their statement issued when the Galwan clashes happened. There was silence at the other end, since it had issued none. Sometimes it is easy for the EU to forget that international relations did not start with the Ukraine war. The United States have, however, been more forthright on terrorism, though all their actions have to meet the touchstone of domestic acclaim in the US. President Donald Trump's administration has jettisoned the narrow internal focus of Joe Biden's administration on REMVE, or racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism. The recent post of FBI Director Kash Patel on X, calling out a 'Pakistani citizen' being extradited to the US for 'support to ISIS and attempting to commit acts of terrorism', signalled a robust anti-terror policy. The extradition of 26/11 plotter Tahawwur Rana from the US to India is a welcome development. However, the US has also found a sudden bonhomie with Pakistan, calling them 'a phenomenal partner' in combating terror. Consequently, while pursuing zero tolerance to terror, the US does not discriminate between whom it is willing to work with as long as its ends are met. This explains its embrace of former Al-Qaeda leader and current President of Syria, Al Shaara, and a separate deal with the Houthis for stopping attacks on American shipping. The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), on the other hand, are now focusing narrowly on terror since the main ambition of most of its members, especially of the Gulf countries, is to break the shackles of their history of support to Islamic radicalism, spawning terrorists and terror groups around the world. Their desire for regional stability and integration with the 'outside' world has made them lukewarm to the Palestine issue and developments in Gaza, the West Bank and the Middle East. India should not expect much from them vis-a-vis Pakistan's terrorist misadventures either. The Saudi minister's shuttle diplomacy immediately after the Pahalgam attack was similar to the one it undertook after the Pulwama attack, ironically by the same minister, and yielded the same results – nothing. The litmus test will come next month when Pakistan takes over the presidency of the UN Security Council. We will see how the OIC countries in the Council – and there are five of them – treat the issue of terrorism and whether they will use Islamophobia to dilute the fight against terror. How the US and the UK react will be the other litmus test. the fight against terror in Africa has been orphaned. The Global Terrorism Index 2025 points out that the Sahel is now the epicentre of terrorism, accounting for over half of all terrorism deaths in the world. But the outside world has no time since it is not affecting them directly. It is a dismal commentary on our collective fight against terror. The inference is simple and, of course, has been self-evident for a long time. Each state will react as per its own geopolitical and other compulsions, especially when it affects it directly. This was how it was before 9/11 happened – the era of 'your terrorist' and 'my terrorist'. That era is returning. The fragmentation of this fight against terror is worse than ever before. In this scenario, Pakistan is not going to stop with the Pahalgam attack unless it knows that the price it will have to pay for sponsoring terrorism will be unacceptably high. It should be India's endeavour to ensure that this happens, if Pakistan is to be deterred. That is why it is even more necessary now for India to take the lead and sustain the high level of engagement to put forward our narrative and call out those responsible. This engagement should also extend to our neighbours. If sending multi-party delegations to neighbours proves to be sensitive, the foreign secretary can visit our neighbours, who are equally susceptible to being influenced by the Pakistani narrative, with Islamic radicals raising their heads again in some neighbouring countries. This will adversely impact our 'Neighbourhood First' policy. (The writer is a former Ambassador and Permanent Representative of India to the UN in New York. He chaired the UN Security Council's Counter-terrorism Committee.)
