Irish start-ups say their biggest concern is funding
The poll, by Scale Ireland, found that 80pc say attracting private capital is 'difficult' or 'very difficult', echoing previous surveys conducted by the organisation.
The poll also reported that nearly two-thirds of start-up leaders say Ireland is 'not doing enough' to help indigenous tech firms attract and retain talent.
The survey suggests that tech employment remains tipped in favour of workers, with more than half of founders saying that staff retention was as difficult as the previous year. Almost 17pc found it more difficult. A third of those polled say their company lost staff over the last 12 months, and almost 75pc either did not lay off any staff or it was not an issue for them. Over half of respondents rated the contribution of non-EU workers as 'very significant' with a further 35pc describing it as 'significant'.
Meanwhile, 88pc of founders are deploying or preparing to deploy AI, even though nearly half do not know what impact the EU's AI Act will have on their business.
Uptake of state supports remains 'difficult', according to the survey, with just 10pc of founders using the KEEP share options scheme to help recruit or retain staff, while 58pc say that they are not availing of R&D tax credits. A third of those polled said they found the Employment and Incentive Investment Scheme (EIIS) process difficult or very difficult and almost 40pc believe the KEEP scheme needs reform.
Over half of companies (58pc) polled now have a female founder in their leadership team, up from 51pc in 2024.
'The survey demonstrates the challenging investment landscape facing start-up and scaling companies and the need to attract more private investment,' said Brian Caulfield, chairman of Scale Ireland.
'We need to significantly support greater levels of angel and VC investment, revenue growth capital and IPOs. We also need to unlock pension fund savings into indigenous companies. Even a small change would have a significant impact. Our findings also show that we need to do more to attract and retain staff if we are to meet our ambitious goals for the growth of the Irish tech sector.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Price pinch taking toll on pension savings
The high cost of living in Ireland is taking a major toll on pension savings, according to 60% of financial advisors surveyed. The survey of over 130 advisors was undertaken by pension trustees, Independent Trustee Company. It examined why financial advisors believe people are not saving adequately for their pension. While the survey shows that lack of knowledge or awareness of pensions is the top reason Irish people are falling behind on their retirement savings, with 61% of advisors citing this as a key factor, Ireland's high living costs come a close second, with 60% of financial experts saying these costs are to blame. The Top 5 reasons people are not saving enough into their pensions are: Lack of knowledge/awareness of pensions High day-to-day living costs Unaffordable housing Lack of interest in pension savings Poor budgeting & money management skills Glenn Gaughran, head of business development with the ITC said: "Ireland is the second most expensive country in the EU, with prices for basic goods and services a staggering 42% above the EU average, according to a recent Eurostat report. "Inflationary pressures are still very much a reality in Ireland and this has far-reaching consequences for Irish people, not just for affording the immediate day-to-day – but also for saving and planning for future retirement years." He said, unless more is done by the Government to tackle Ireland's high living costs so that people can save adequately for their retirement, "many simply won't have a comfortable or even basic standard of living when they retire".
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Challenge of AI is to bridge the culture gap between its creators and custodians
'I have a growing sense that everything I've learned over the last 30 years has led me to this place and to this moment.' That was how Jony Ive – former chief design officer at Apple and the creative mind behind the iPhone, iPad and the iMac – described his latest chapter: the announcement that OpenAI is acquiring his AI hardware venture, io, in a deal reportedly worth $6.5 billion (€5.7 billion). The pace and scale of developments in AI is now staggering. The OpenAI/io deal is just one high-profile example in a surge of breakthroughs. Google has released a suite of new AI-powered tools. Elon Musk's xAI launched a new version of its Grok chatbot. And the United States announced its $500 billion 'stargate' project to boost national AI capabilities. These examples underscore just how rapidly AI is advancing, not only in terms of technical capacity but also in how it is embedding itself into the fabric of our daily lives. READ MORE What makes the OpenAI/io acquisition particularly significant isn't just the companies involved – though OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, is the front-runner in generative AI. It signals a new phase, where AI moves beyond software into physical products and spaces. [ Can Jony Ive replicate the Apple magic at OpenAI? Opens in new window ] Ive's design ethos, combined with OpenAI's technological muscle, reflects a belief in a future where AI is not just a tool; it's a companion. It's a bold bet, underwritten by deep expertise. On the other side of the Atlantic, in an altogether different setting, another AI moment was unfolding. The new Oireachtas convened its first committee on AI . The committee's formation reflects growing awareness of AI's impact on employment, public services and democratic processes. Chairman Malcolm Byrne has acknowledged both the opportunities and risks of AI, distinguishing himself from the doom-laden narratives often found in public debate. He has emphasised AI's potential to transform public services, foster innovation and unlock new industries. The committee is tasked with exploring these dynamics, gathering expert input and making legislative and policy recommendations. How the committee's work unfolds will be telling, especially given how complex the AI landscape is and how difficult collaboration between governments, regulators and innovators can be. Two cultures, one challenge What's already clear is that those building AI and those trying to govern it often come from two very different cultures. Technologists like OpenAI's Sam Altman operate in an ecosystem defined by velocity, capital and exponential thinking. They believe that AI will reshape every sector – not if, but when. With access to some of the world's best minds and deep-pocketed investors, they operate on timelines measured in months, not years. Politicians, by contrast, are bound by public accountability, consensus and election cycles. Where technologists see exciting possibilities, politicians often see risk: to trust, to jobs, to social cohesion – and to their own positions. Take education. AI's rise is generating genuine concern: attention spans, cheating and institutional readiness are all under scrutiny. In Ireland, reforms to Leaving Certificate English and accounting syllabuses, incorporating oral, creative writing and applied assessments – tangible responses to this new reality – are now likely delayed by 12 months, partly due to concerns about operational preparedness. [ Teachers are being bullied into accepting reforms that will damage education Opens in new window ] Where AI's creators focus on what's possible, policymakers tilt towards the permissible. As Tony Blair noted in his book, Leading, regulation 'gives the illusion of control'. Reform, on the other hand, requires courage, stepping into the unknown, taking risks and trusting systems outside your direct line of command. This tension isn't theoretical. It's a practical, crystallising conundrum. If AI does even half of what its creators claim it will, we're on the cusp of a societal shift not seen since the Industrial Revolution. Among the most difficult questions being asked are: will entire job categories be replaced?; does it ultimately trigger a move from earned income to universal basic income?; what happens to purpose, identity, and mental health when work is no longer central to daily life? These aren't questions Silicon Valley is built to answer. Nor are they easily resolved in parliamentary committee rooms. But they must be answered. While concerns about unchecked AI adoption are valid, the technology also offers transformational solutions, especially in areas where urgency and complexity collide, such as infrastructure and healthcare. Take the UK, where AI is already being deployed in the NHS to speed up diagnostics, triage patients more efficiently and shorten waiting times. In infrastructure, the UK's Planning Inspectorate is trialling AI to process applications faster and address bottlenecks in housing approvals. These examples show AI's real potential to cut through bureaucratic delays, meet recruitment challenges and improve public delivery, something most citizens would welcome. With Ireland facing growing pressure on State services and a push to drive the digital economy, AI presents both a significant risk and a powerful opportunity. Excessive caution risks stagnation, innovation unchecked risks exclusion. Bridging the gap AI isn't waiting. The decisions we make now on how we design, govern, implement and evolve with this technology will shape not just the future of work, but the future of meaning. How we arrive at them need not be binary. It's not about rejecting change, it's about understanding its implications. Silicon Valley hasn't always earned the benefit of the doubt, so caution is both reasonable and responsible. Technologists will need to understand the human, ethical and societal implications of what they're building. For their part, policymakers will need to engage more proactively, beyond regulation, to reform and reimagine public systems and business operations. Civil society will need to be involved. Can the culture gap between AI's creators and its custodians can be bridged? Like everything with AI, we won't have to wait long to find out. Dan Pender is a business founder, public relations consultant and former government adviser.
Irish Independent
7 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Duty calls for Paschal Donohoe whose Eurogroup role is worth its weight in gold to us
The Finance Minister was speaking at the Centre for Financial Studies of the Goethe University in Frankfurt, on the topic of 'Shaping tomorrow and navigating uncertainty: the future of the euro area'. Given Donohoe is the current president of the Eurogroup, his views are keenly observed by the finance ministers of the 20 countries that use the euro. In his address, Donohoe posed the question of why it is, at a time of rising populism, polarisation and fragmentation, that people increasingly trust the euro. He put it down to 'convenience, co-ordination, and confidence'. 'The euro is a powerful symbol of our shared sovereignty. A powerful symbol that you can feel in your wallet, see in your purse. People have confidence in the euro because they know we will defend and support it. They know we will progress and develop it,' he said. The minister also set out his views on the need for the euro to continue to evolve, move forward and be ambitious. Despite having difficulty pronouncing the minister's first name, the chair of the Frankfurt event, former German central banker Professor Axel Weber, described Donohoe as the 'prime European finance diplomat.' 'You are not just a co-ordinator of your colleagues in finance and budget. You are the prime European finance diplomat. You really showed that you have a diplomatic skill in talking about the eurozone. 'We all appreciate that and I think it is the right focus. Europe needs to grow out of its own strengths, rather than the weakness of others. And I think that is a very well received but also worthy message to deliver.' It's no coincidence Donohoe is upping his profile on the European stage at this time. His second term as Eurogroup president ends next month and the vote on who will take up the role for the next two-and-a-half years is due at the end of the month. He seems intent on a third term and nobody seems to be in any position to take him on as he is so well-regarded. Indeed, he is also among the favourites to become the European Central Bank president when Christine Lagarde's term ends in two years' time. Donohoe's relationships with EU leaders are not just about personal career advancement. His eurozone networking is worth its weight in gold to Ireland as it places us at the heart of EU economic policy-making, perhaps not making the decisions, but at the very least having an influence on powerbrokers' deliberations. Donohoe's 'duty' to take up a third term will benefit Ireland's standing amongst our EU partners.
