1732012115-0%2FUntitled-design-(14)1732012115-0.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
CM's Inspection Team fails to perform
Since the past 21 years, the Chief Minister's Inspection Team (CMIT) has been functional in Punjab. Comprising seven members along with a chairman and a secretary, the work of the team has been organized by allocating districts and divisions to different members. Each member of the team conducts monthly inspections regularly on the Chief Minister's directives. The CMIT has a staff of 110 officers and employees, resulting in an annual expenditure of Rs180 million on salaries and petrol.
According to the information received by the Express Tribune, the CMIT has steadily faced a reduction in its workload over the years since the anti-corruption department and other institutions are also investigating their own matters. Hence, the number of inquiries under investigation has decreased from 600 during the era of Pervez Musharraf to an average of 150 per year in the current tenure.
According to Salman Abid, a public policy advisor, the Chief Minister's Inspection Team has been used politically in every era. "This office is just a mini stop of service for Pakistan's administrative officers. When they get a good posting chance in the field, they leave the team. Hence, the team is a burden on the exchequer and is acting as a white elephant. While anti-corruption works on the source report, the Chief Minister's Inspection Team works on the Chief Minister's directive," noted Abid.
As per the Chief Minister's Inspection Team Office, there are four types of complaints processed by the CMIT. The first type comes as the Chief Minister's directive, the second comes from the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), the third comes from the Facilitation and Accountability Cell while the fourth is a general complaint.
Reportedly, a former member of the Chief Minister's Inspection Team and former President Provincial Management Service Rai Manzoor Hussain Nasir, had suggested to the Punjab government last year that the office of the CMIT should be shifted to GOR-1 near the CM's office. The move was expected to activate the office of the CMIT, but this did not happen. Furthermore, six chairmen of the CMIT have been changed in the last two years, out of which four were changed only last year.
Malik Ahmad Khan Bhachar, Leader of the Opposition in the Punjab Assembly, opined that the inspection team was used as political revenge. "Petrol worth millions of rupees is wasted by officials in the name of inspection. The government should close all institutions that are a burden on the treasury and use this money for the welfare of the people," said Bhachar.
The spokesman of the Punjab government refuted the claims that the CMIT was not performing well. "The Chief Minister issues directives for inspections and inquiries about various departments on a daily basis. This is yielding encouraging results. The team is also reviewing complaints from various departments," claimed the spokesman.
The correspondent tried contacting the Chairman of the CMIT Salman Ijaz several times to inquire about the performance of the team, but he failed to respond.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Govt to restore executive magistracy system
The government has decided to reinstate the executive magistrate system, which had been discontinued in 2001. According to sources, the Ministry of Law has completed all constitutional and legal consultations, and the system will be restored down to the police station level. Executive magistrates will be empowered to inspect police stations, conduct price checks, and monitor protests and public gatherings. Law enforcement will not be allowed to use force during protests without a magistrate's approval. Additionally, magistrates will be authorised to conduct trials for minor offences with punishments up to two years, including summary trials for small fines and traffic violations. Originally introduced during the British colonial era in the 1800s, the executive magistracy was a powerful administrative arm. Post-independence, both the Congress and the Muslim League retained the system, which ensured state writ at the district level. The system included district magistrates, subdivisional magistrates, and executive magistrates. The system was abolished in 2001 by then-President Pervez Musharraf under the new local government framework. Though provinces like Punjab have long demanded its restoration, the federal government is now moving forward with amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure (1898) to grant magistrates these powers once again. In 1996, the judiciary-administration separation was ordered by the Sindh High Court and upheld by the Supreme Court. The then Benazir Bhutto government removed administrative magistrates at the police station level but retained judicial powers with district and divisional magistrates until 2000. Musharraf's local government reforms ultimately abolished these powers entirely.
Express Tribune
27-07-2025
- Express Tribune
Energy-starved Pakistan's solar rush
Solar panels are now seen installed on the rooftops of houses across the country. Photo: AFP Pakistanis are increasingly ditching the national grid in favour of solar power, prompting a boom in rooftop panels and spooking a government weighed down by billions of dollars of power sector debt. The quiet energy revolution has spread from wealthy neighbourhoods to middle- and lower-income households as customers look to escape soaring electricity bills and prolonged power cuts. Down a cramped alley in Karachi, residents fighting the sweltering summer heat gather in Fareeda Saleem's modest home for something they never experienced before — uninterrupted power. "Solar makes life easier, but it's a hard choice for people like us," she says of the installation cost. Saleem was cut from the grid last year for refusing to pay her bills in protest over enduring 18-hour power cuts. A widow and mother of two disabled children, she sold her jewellery — a prized possession for women in Pakistan — and borrowed money from relatives to buy two solar panels, a solar inverter and battery to store energy, for Rs180,000. As temperatures pass 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit), children duck under Saleem's door and gather around the breeze of her fan. Mounted on poles above homes, solar panels have become a common sight across the country of 240 million people, with the installation cost typically recovered within two to five years. Making up less than two percent of the energy mix in 2020, solar power reached 10.3 percent in 2024, according to the global energy think tank Ember. But in a remarkable acceleration, it more than doubled to 2 4 percent in the first five months of 2025, becoming the largest source of energy production for the first time. It has edged past gas, coal and nuclear electricity sources, as well as hydropower which has seen hundreds of millions of dollars of investment over the past decades. As a result, Pakistan has unexpectedly surged towards its target of renewable energy, making up 60 percent of its energy mix by 2030. Dave Jones, chief analyst at Ember, told AFP that Pakistan was "a leader in rooftop solar". Soaring fuel costs globally, coupled with demands from the International Monetary Fund to slash government subsidies, led successive administrations to repeatedly hike electricity costs. Prices have fluctuated since 2022 but peaked at a 155-percent increase and power bills sometimes outweigh the cost of rent. "The great solar rush is not the result of any government's policy push," Muhammad Basit Ghauri, an energy transition expert at Renewables First, told AFP. "Residents have taken the decision out of clear frustration over our classical power system, which is essentially based on a lot of inefficiencies." Pakistan sources most of its solar equipment from neighbouring China, where prices have dropped sharply, largely driven by overproduction and tech advancements. But the fall in national grid consumers has crept up on an unprepared government burdened by $8 billion of power sector debt, analysts say. Pakistan depends heavily on costly gas imports, which it sells at a loss to national energy providers. It is also tied into lengthy contracts with independent power producers, including some owned by China, for which it pays a fixed amount regardless of actual demand. A government report in March said the solar power increase has created a "disproportionate financial burden onto grid consumers, contributing to higher electricity tariffs and undermining the sustainability of the energy sector". Electricity sales dropped 2.8 percent year-on-year in June, marking a second consecutive year of decline. Last month, the government imposed a new 10-percent tax on all imported solar, while the energy ministry has proposed slashing the rate at which it buys excess solar energy from consumers. "The household solar boom was a response to a crisis, not the cause of it," said analyst Jones, warning of "substantial problems for the grid" including a surge during evenings when solar users who cannot store energy return to traditional power. The national grid is losing paying customers like businessman Arsalan Arif. A third of his income was spent on electricity bills at his Karachi home until he bought a 10-kilowatt solar panel for around 1.4 million rupees (around $4,900). "Before, I didn't follow a timetable. I was always disrupted by the power outages," he told AFP. Now he has "freedom and certainty" to continue his catering business. In the eastern city of Sialkot, safety wear manufacturer Hammad Noor switched to solar power in 2023, calling it his "best business decision", breaking even in 18 months and now saving 1 million rupees every month. The cost of converting Noor's second factory has now risen by nearly 1.5 million rupees under the new government tax.
Express Tribune
21-07-2025
- Express Tribune
Sugar, power and patronage
In the digital age, there's no excuse for opacity as a transparent digital dashboard that tracks sugar from mills to wholesalers to retailers would make it harder for hoarders and profiteers to operate undetected. Photo: file Listen to article Pakistan's recurring sugar crises have become a telling reflection of how entrenched elite interests continue to manipulate the economy under the guise of policy. The latest surge in sugar prices, now hitting between Rs180 and Rs210 per kilogramme despite official claims of intervention, shows just how far removed state actions are from public welfare. What is unfolding isn't simply mismanagement. It's a system that protects the powerful and punishes the public. In July 2024, the federal government announced with much fanfare that it had reached an agreement with sugar mills to sell sugar to wholesalers at Rs165 per kg. This was framed as a breakthrough deal. But within days, the mills began violating the agreed price, resuming supply at Rs175, not Rs165. Even at inflated rates, sugar remains scarce in wholesale markets. The public, meanwhile, continues to pay well over Rs200 per kg in major cities like Karachi and Lahore. This was not just a policy failure. It was the illusion of reform – an orchestrated move to deflect public outrage without touching the roots of the problem. And at the root lies one uncomfortable fact: the sugar sector is not regulated by the government. It is effectively governed by itself. The concentration of political and economic power is stark. The Sharif family, which sits at the core of the current ruling coalition, owns major sugar mills. That the same actors who draft economic policies also control production and pricing of sugar reveals a conflict of interests so blatant that it no longer shocks. This overlap turns policy into patronage, and governance into a tool for private gain. Earlier this year, the government allowed sugar exports even as domestic stocks were under pressure. Predictably, local prices soared. Then came the tax-free import of 500,000 metric tons of sugar; a move that drew criticism from the International Monetary Fund, which questioned both its timing and its lack of transparency. No one has explained who received import licences, under what conditions, or how the decision was justified while government revenues continue to bleed. What the country witnessed was a two-way windfall: profits made on the export side and further gains through duty-free imports. Also there is an issue of price collapse when the shipments arrive in November; around the time sugar mills will be buying from growers, giving them leverage to manipulate buying prices. Throughout all this, regulators have remained silent. The Competition Commission has issued no inquiry into possible cartelisation. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has not released any audits on sugar mill compliance or tax contribution. No action has been taken against mills for openly breaching their agreement with the government. When institutions with legal mandates refuse to act, the market ceases to be a marketplace. It becomes a racket. This isn't new. But it's become more brazen. The previous PTI-led government also faced sugar price hike in 2020. However, its response was markedly different. Then prime minister Imran Khan ordered a wide-ranging inquiry, involving the FIA, SECP, FBR, and other agencies. The investigation looked into hoarding, tax fraud, price manipulation, and the misuse of subsidies. Importantly, it didn't shy away from naming allies or investigating politically connected individuals within PTI itself like Jahangir Tareen. The inquiry report was published in full. While it triggered backlash, it also marked a rare moment where the state asserted its regulatory role over an entrenched industrial elite. The investigation was abandoned and charges dropped when the PTI government was removed. What we are seeing now is the opposite. Instead of confronting the sugar mafia, the current government has aligned itself with it. Instead of enforcing transparency, it has shielded its members from scrutiny. At every step, decisions have served the interests of the few at the expense of many. This has real human costs. Sugar is not just a luxury good. It is a daily essential for households and a critical input for small businesses. Rising sugar prices drive up food inflation, burden already stretched family budgets, and hurt bakeries, tea stalls, and street vendors across the country. When a government facilitates price spiral through weak enforcement and preferential trade decisions, it doesn't just fail the economy. It abandons its moral claim to serve the people. To fix this, Pakistan must first acknowledge that the sugar crisis is not a temporary market blip. It is a symptom of a deeper structural disease: the collusion between political elites and monopolistic interests. The solution begins with cutting these links. Public officeholders, and their immediate families, must be barred from owning or profiting from industries they are in a position to regulate. This principle is basic in any functioning democracy. Without it, policy becomes an instrument of personal enrichment, not public service. Next, regulatory institutions must be depoliticised and empowered. Agencies like the CCP, FBR, and SECP should have independent boards, professional leadership, and the authority to publish findings without seeking ministerial approval. If sugar mills are in violation of tax laws or pricing agreements, the public has a right to know. Trade policy must also be demystified. Export and import decisions, especially for essentials like sugar, should not be made behind closed doors. They must be based on evidence, presented in parliament, and subjected to public scrutiny. Import licences should be granted through open bidding, and their recipients disclosed proactively. In the digital age, there's no excuse for opacity. A transparent digital dashboard that tracks sugar from mills to wholesalers to retailers would make it harder for hoarders and profiteers to operate undetected. It would also empower consumers and watchdog groups with real-time data. Finally, subsidies and tax exemptions must be subjected to rigorous review. No tax waiver or import concession should be granted without a clear, documented public interest rationale. Otherwise, they will continue to be used as vehicles for elite enrichment. The sugar industry has become a symbol of how deeply elite capture runs in Pakistan. But it can also become a turning point. If the state can confront the sugar mafia – not with hollow deals but with real accountability – it can begin to rebuild public trust and economic fairness. If it cannot, the crisis will return. Prices may dip briefly, but the profiteering will continue. This is not just about sugar. It is about who the system is designed to serve and who it leaves behind. The writer is a graduate of the University of British Columbia
