Canada, US, Mexico brace for World Cup extravaganza
THE LARGEST and most complex World Cup in history kicks off in just over a year's time, with the United States, Canada and Mexico co-hosting the football extravaganza against a backdrop of political tension triggered by Donald Trump.
Forty-eight teams and millions of fans are set to descend on North America for the first ever World Cup shared by three nations, with the tournament getting under way on June 11 next year.
In theory, the 23rd edition of the most popular sporting spectacle on the planet has all the makings of a successful tournament.
An array of venues ranging from Mexico's iconic Estadio Azteca to the glittering $5 billion SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles will play host to 104 games spread over nearly six weeks.
The United States will host the bulk of those fixtures -- 78 -- with Canada and Mexico staging 13 each.
All games from the quarter-finals onwards will be held in the United States, with the tournament culminating in the final at New Jersey's 82,500-seater MetLife Stadium on July 19, 2026.
'Like 104 Super Bowls'
American officials believe the return of the World Cup to the country -- 32 years after the United States hosted the 1994 finals -- could represent a watershed moment for football in the country.
'The World Cup is going to raise the attention of the sport in ways that nobody ever dreamed of,' said Don Garber, the commissioner of Major League Soccer.
FIFA's President Gianni Infantino meanwhile has been hyping next year's finals as the equivalent of '104 Super Bowls', contrasting the World Cup's estimated six billion viewers to the 120 million or so who tune in for the climax of the NFL season.
There are historical precedents which suggest the hype might be justified. The 1994 World Cup in the United States remains the best attended World Cup in history, with an average of 68,600 fans flocking to each game.
Yet while organisers eagerly anticipate a commercial success, with one FIFA estimate suggesting it could generate a mammoth $11 billion in revenues, questions over other aspects of the tournament remain.
The 48 teams -- up from 32 in 2022 -- will be spread into 12 groups of four, with the top two teams in each group advancing to the knockout rounds, and the eight best third-placed teams joining them to make up a last 32.
That expansion is likely to reduce the sense of jeopardy in the first round, a problem seen in other major championships which have increased in size in recent years.
Visa backlog
There is also the question of how the polarising policies of US President Trump may impact the tournament.
Since taking office, Trump has launched a global trade war, repeatedly threatened to annex World Cup co-host Canada and launched an immigration crackdown at US borders which has seen overseas visitors from countries like France, Britain, Germany and Australia either detained or denied entry in recent months.
Trump this week signed a travel ban on 12 countries including Iran, who have qualified for the World Cup, but the ban will not apply to players taking part in the tournament.
Trump, who is chairman of a White House task force overseeing preparations for the World Cup, says overseas fans travelling to the tournament have nothing to fear.
'Every part of the US government will be working to ensure that these events are safe and successful, and those traveling to America to watch the competition have a seamless experience during every part of their visit,' Trump said last month.
FIFA chief Infantino, who has forged a close relationship with Trump, echoed that point, insisting that America was ready to 'welcome the world.'
'Everyone who wants to come here to enjoy, to have fun, to celebrate the game will be able to do that,' Infantino said.
With one year to go however, it is by no means clear that Infantino's pledge will hold up.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said last month that some embassy staff may be required to work double-shifts to expedite visa processing, citing the example of Colombia, where US visa wait times are currently 15 months.
'If you haven't applied for a visa from Colombia already, you probably won't get here in time for the World Cup unless we go to double shifts,' Rubio told lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
Those fans who do make the trip to North America may also find themselves having to fork out a small fortune due to FIFA's reported decision to use dynamic pricing to determine ticket prices.
That system, where prices on ticketing websites fluctuate according to demand, may well force fans to shell out thousands of dollars to obtain tickets for the highest profile games.
'Dynamic pricing does not belong in football because it is an exploitation of fans' loyalty,' Ronan Evain, the executive director of the Football Supporters Europe fan group told The Times. 'It would be a fiasco for FIFA to use it for the World Cup.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
The lesson Asean must draw from the Trump-Musk quarrel
THE public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk should be viewed with detached clarity by Asean policymakers and observers. It is neither a signal of a shift in American foreign policy nor does it foreshadow a major realignment in the global tech landscape. In his second term, Trump has doubled down on his view that the US must be ruled not by institutions but by personalities. He has no patience with those who challenge his centrality. Musk, once an object of Trump's admiration, has become a rival personality. The former's influence spans multiple domains — space, artificial intelligence, electric vehicles and digital media. In the eyes of Trump, this influence must be subordinate to political loyalty. Musk's criticism of Trump, whether on policy, personality or principle, has thus drawn an inevitable response. Yet Musk is no innocent bystander. His relentless need to comment, provoke and insert himself into the political arena has increasingly eroded the neutrality that once insulated Tesla and SpaceX from partisan warfare. Since acquiring Twitter — renamed X — Musk has made the platform a personal amplifier of his views, often blurring the line between corporate strategy and personal vendetta. Just as Trump cannot resist attacking, Musk cannot help but respond. The result is a digital 'blood sport'. At a deeper level, Musk's recent provocations may be to deflect attention from his growing troubles. Tesla, long seen as the undisputed champion of electric vehicles, is now steadily losing global market share to China's BYD. Despite Musk's early-mover advantage, the Chinese EV juggernaut has surpassed Tesla in both unit sales and technological innovation, especially in markets across Asia and the Global South. This shift is not just commercial — it is geopolitical. China's industrial policy, from lithium refining to battery standardisation, has enabled firms like BYD to undercut and outpace American competitors. Tesla, by contrast, faces domestic regulatory scrutiny, investor fatigue and inconsistent leadership. Musk, who once rode the wave of futuristic optimism, is now increasingly seen as a mercurial figure whose ventures are overextended and reactive. While American media and pundits obsess about this feud, Asean must resist being distracted. The region is entering a critical decade in which its ability to lead on green transition, artificial intelligence governance and maritime security will define its global role. Whether Musk and Trump call each other names or trade blows on social media is irrelevant to the Asean Outlook on the Indo-Pacific, or to the implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. Moreover, if there is a lesson to draw from this spectacle, it is the danger of personalising power. Asean's strength has always rested in its ability to temper egos through consensus and consultation. That is not a flaw but a survival mechanism. The bloc should be wary of importing political styles rooted in personality cults, where institutions are hollowed out in favour of personal charisma and performative leadership. Musk and Trump are both creatures of the same American pathology: the belief that individual willpower, when fused with wealth or fame, is enough to override complex systems. But Asean is different. The region's success depends not on dominant personalities but on the patient weaving of trust, rules and interdependence. Ultimately, Asean must tune out the noise. There are far more pressing issues to confront — from resolving the Myanmar crisis and addressing climate-induced migration, to strengthening regional supply chains and ensuring cybersecurity. The Musk-Trump bust-up may dominate headlines in Washington, but it is only a sideshow to the real geopolitical currents shaping Asia's future.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Nepal's US trade preference at risk amid growing tariff tensions
KATHMANDU: New tariff tensions could further undermine the modest gains of least developed countries (LDCs), small island developing states (SIDS) and landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), according to a recent report. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, in its May publication titled 'Sparing the Vulnerable: The Cost of New Tariff Burdens', warns that these vulnerable economies could face some of the highest new US tariffs. This could lead to a decline in critical exports and pose substantial risks to their long-term development prospects. The report defines 'vulnerable economies' as LDCs, SIDS, and LLDCs—nations already struggling with structural economic and geographic disadvantages. 'US President Donald Trump is creating tariff uncertainty as a bargaining tactic in trade negotiations,' said Purushottam Ojha, a former commerce secretary. 'There is uncertainty in US tariff policy, with new tariffs being imposed, suspended, and then reinstated without predictable patterns.' Ojha noted that Nepal's trade benefits under the Nepal Trade Preference Programme are set to expire this year, potentially creating new hurdles for exporting goods to the US market. 'This tariff uncertainty increases the cost of trade, which can have a wider impact on economies that heavily rely on imports,' he said. 'The erratic US tariff policy is not a healthy sign for global trade.' The US recently increased tariffs on steel and aluminium from 25 per cent to 50 per cent and imposed 45–50 percent tariffs on products from several countries, though these have been temporarily suspended for 90 days. According to Ojha, one silver lining is that the tariff differential between Nepal and other countries has temporarily improved the competitiveness of Nepali goods. 'But with the implementation of new US tariffs still unclear, it's hard to rely on this advantage.' In the last fiscal year, Nepal recorded a trade deficit of Rs2.16 billion (US$15.8 million) with the US. According to the Department of Customs data, Nepal exported goods worth Rs17.31 billion to the US while imports totalled Rs19.48 billion. Top Nepali exports to the US included carpets, dog chew, felt goods, readymade garments for men and women, ceramic goods, pashmina, essential oils, musical instruments, handmade paper and cotton bags. Meanwhile, Nepal imported items such as soybeans, coal, oil cake, aircraft and helicopter parts, printed software manuals, artificial filament tow of cellulose acetate, laboratory and diagnostic equipment, wood pulp and almonds from the US. The US introduced the Nepal Trade Preference Programme after the April 2015 earthquake, granting duty-free access to 77 items to support economic recovery. However, trade experts say the preferential treatment has failed to significantly boost exports. The programme applies to 77 tariff lines: 56 textile products, ten footwear items, nine clothing goods and two fodder-related products. According to reports, as of Thursday (June 5), the average effective US tariff rate stands at 15.1 per cent, up sharply from the 2.5 per cent rate before the recent rounds of tariff increases. This rise results from ongoing trade disputes and retaliatory measures, contributing to a highly complex and volatile trade environment. Despite special provisions under multilateral trade rules, the participation of vulnerable economies in global trade remains minimal. They make up less than 0.5 per cent of total US imports and contribute insignificantly to US tariff revenue or trade deficits. According to the report, the least developed and landlocked developing countries account for only 1.3 per cent of global exports—a figure that has largely remained unchanged over the past three decades. This stagnation persists despite the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of significantly increasing the export share of developing countries, with a particular aim of doubling LDC exports by 2020. Instead, export growth for these nations has moved at a 'snail's pace' over the last 30 years, the report says. Though the US market is critical for the exports of these vulnerable economies, their footprint remains small. The report states that LDCs account for 8.9 per cent of total US exports and just 0.9 per cent of US imports. Similarly, LLDCs buy 2.1 per cent of US exports while supplying 0.2 per cent of imports. Regarding trade deficits, LDCs contribute 1.5 per cent to the US deficit, while LLDCs have a negative contribution of 0.2 per cent, meaning the US runs a trade surplus with them. The report emphasises that newly imposed US tariffs, which are layered and vary by the country, represent an added burden for these countries. Under new US tariffs announced between January and mid-May 2025, a ten per cent tariff has been applied across the board, excluding Canada, Mexico, and China. In 2023, the US imports from landlocked developing countries amounted to US$6.2 billion. Of this, 59 per cent of goods were subject to country-specific tariffs, while 41 per cent enjoyed exemptions. Imports from least developed countries stood at US$27.4 billion, with 93 per cent falling under country-specific tariffs and only seven per cent exempt. The exemptions mainly apply to primary goods such as vegetable products, footwear, foodstuffs, and headgear. The report warns that LDCs will bear the brunt of these new tariff policies. The trade-weighted average tariff the US applies to imports from LDCs is 43.9 per cent—far higher than the 7.3 per cent tariff those countries impose on US exports. For LLDCs, the US applies an average tariff of 17.1 per cent, compared to a 5.2 per cent tariff on US exports. The report concludes that shrinking preferential tariff margins threaten to erode export viability for dozens of vulnerable countries, potentially setting back years of slow but hard-earned progress in trade and development. - The Kathmandu Post/ANN
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Carlsen puts meltdown behind him to win Norway Chess tournament
CHESS great Magnus Carlsen recovered from his meltdown against world champion Gukesh Dommaraju last weekend to win the Norway Chess tournament on Friday. The Norwegian world number one drew his last game against India's Arjun Erigaisi but it proved enough for him to finish on 16 points, half a point ahead of American Fabiano Caruana. Indian Gukesh, who lost to Caruana in the final game, ended up third on 14.5 points. 'It's a huge relief after a day like this, a tournament like this,' Carlsen said. Last Sunday, Carlsen had Gukesh on the ropes for much of their game but his composure cracked under the pressure of a ticking clock and he committed a blunder that handed Gukesh a decisive advantage. Carlsen slammed his fist on the table after the defeat before exchanging a quick handshake with Gukesh, apologising for his outburst and storming off. 'Obviously my struggles here have been well documented but at least I fought until the end,' the five-time classical world champion, who did not defend his title in 2023 citing a lack of motivation, said. 'I'm not going to say that this tournament was my last (in standard chess) for sure, but I enjoy other forms of chess a lot more.' (Reporting by Julien Pretot)
