logo
The flat tax regimes that inspired Farage's plan to lure back rich non-doms

The flat tax regimes that inspired Farage's plan to lure back rich non-doms

Telegraph4 hours ago

Nigel Farage is hoping an Italian-style flat tax regime will lure wealthy foreigners to Britain's shores.
The leader of the Reform UK party has promised to impose a Robin Hood-style levy on rich non-doms, with the proceeds then redistributed among the lowest-paid workers.
At first glance the policy may seem Left-wing, but in practice it is the wealthiest non-doms who would benefit the most from this generous scheme.
The one-off payment would grant them a 'Britannia Card' which comes with an indefinite tax-free exemption on their offshore income and gains.
It could potentially save a high-income worker tens of thousands in tax over the years. Reform said the tax status could be renewed every decade at no extra cost.
The proposal comes amid fears that Rachel Reeves's decision to abolish the non-dom regime last August has triggered an exodus of high-income workers and entrepreneurs. Estate agent Knight Frank has estimated that the Treasury faces a £401m loss in stamp duty receipts thanks to a drop in sales of multimillion-pound homes since the reforms were first announced.
The non-dom regime was replaced in April 2025 by the Chancellor's foreign income and gains regime, which allows new arrivals to avoid tax on offshore earnings for only their first four years of residence. Controversially, it also applies inheritance tax to the worldwide assets of individuals who have been in the country for over 10 years.
By comparison, Mr Farage's proposal would shield eligible individuals from inheritance tax for 20 years.
Writing in The Telegraph, Mr Farage said the policy would 'actively encourage the return of wealth and talent to the United Kingdom'.
However, experts questioned how successful it would be in practice.
The think tank Tax Policy Associates warned it could cost the UK £34bn in lost Government revenue.
Miles Dean, of tax adviser Andersen, said: 'I fear that the damage has already been done and I doubt that this alone is enough to entice wealthy non-doms back, especially given that implementation is at least four years away.'
David Denton, of wealth manager Quilter, said: 'Offering wealthy non-doms the chance to effectively buy their way out of UK tax may provide a short-term revenue boost, but risks creating a two-tier tax system that undermines public confidence.'
Mr Denton also said there was no guarantee the regime would attract enough wealthy individuals to build a sizable pot for low-income workers.
'The idea of redirecting funds to support lower earners has populist appeal, yet it assumes significant and sustained uptake from globally mobile individuals – something far from guaranteed, particularly if future governments reverse course.'
But the flat tax regime is far from a new concept. Other countries including Italy and Switzerland have also tried to entice wealthy expats through similar tax breaks.
Italy
Reform's offer to non-doms appears to be considerably more generous than Italy's, which first unveiled a flat tax regime for wealthy foreigners in 2017. Costing €200,000 (£171,390) per year, the scheme is renewable for 15 years and exempts non-doms from tax on foreign assets, with the option to add additional family members for €25,000 (£21,423) per person per year.
It has proven to be a runaway success. While just 98 people used the scheme in 2017, by 2023 more than 2,000 taxpayers were enroled, according to citizenship by investment firm Relocate&Save.
Mr Farage will give high-net-worth individuals a 20-year reprieve from UK tax, including inheritance tax, on worldwide assets and income for a one-off cost of £250,000. By comparison, to use the Italian scheme for 15 years would cost €3m in flat tax fees, making Reform's plan extremely competitive.
Dominic Lawrence, partner at law Charles Russell Speechlys, said: 'The Reform proposal does appear to be more generous than the Italian lump sum tax regime, which requires payment of an annual levy of €200,000. If the proposed £250,000 payment really is one-off and there is no additional annual charge to access the remittance-style regime… then on the face of it this is remarkably generous.'
Switzerland
Mr Farage's proposals also go further than tax reliefs available to non-doms in Switzerland, which pioneered tax breaks to lure wealthy foreigners.
Don-doms in Switzerland do not pay a flat fee to take advantage of favourable tax rules. Instead, taxes are based on the living costs incurred whilst in the country, which includes costs for housing, food, transport and leisure.
The minimum these costs must be to qualify for the scheme is CHF 434,700 (£396,844) a year. The sum is then subject to tax rates that vary by region in the Alpine country, typically resulting in a tax burden between CHF 150,000 (£136,937) and CHF 350,000 (£319,520).
In return, foreign income and assets of non-tax-residents are exempt from taxes and Switzerland imposes no federal inheritance or gift tax. Different minimum tax bases apply for EU and non-EU applicants depending on the region of Switzerland in which they reside.
Greece
Greece has been tipped as one of the countries set to benefit from the abolition of the UK's non-dom regime.
Since 2019, it has offered a favourable tax regime which requires high-net-worth individuals to pay a lump sum of €100,000 per year on foreign-sourced income. They can claim the tax break for up to 15 years. For an additional €20,000 a year, they can also extend the tax benefit to members of their family.
To use the scheme, the high-net-worth individual must invest at least €500,000 in Greece within three years, for example by purchasing a property or buying shares.
Gibraltar
The British Overseas Territory, located on the southern coast of Spain, offers an attractive tax regime for individuals worth more than £2m.
Under the so-called 'Category 2' rules, qualifying individuals only pay tax on the first £118,000 of their worldwide income. This means a maximum tax charge of about £45,000 per year. To qualify, individuals must either own or rent a property in Gibraltar.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘We were never friends.' JK Rowling rebuffs Stephen Fry in trans row
‘We were never friends.' JK Rowling rebuffs Stephen Fry in trans row

Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Times

‘We were never friends.' JK Rowling rebuffs Stephen Fry in trans row

JK Rowling has issued a withering rebuff to Sir Stephen Fry after he claimed she had become 'radicalised' over trans issues and described her as being a 'lost cause'. The broadcaster and author previously dined regularly with Rowling and narrated the audiobook versions of her seven Harry Potter novels. However, last week he claimed the Edinburgh-based writer's views had become 'inflammatory and contemptuous'. Jolyon Maugham, the barrister and author, took to social media to echo Fry's views. 'Really creditable this, from Stephen Fry. I've spoken to so many of JKR's once friends who now despair at her privately but won't do so publicly, which is very much the British way and why nothing ever changes for the better,' he wrote. 'So well done Stephen'. Rowling, however, appeared to suggest that Fry was mistaken in his belief that they were once close. 'It is a great mistake to assume that everyone who claims to have been a friend of mine was ever considered a friend by me,' she wrote, responding to Maugham on X. Rowling has become one of the most outspoken campaigners for women-only spaces, becoming a target for criticism from transgender rights activists. Supreme Court judges ruled in April that under equality law the definition of a woman is based on biological sex and biological men cannot become women regardless of whether they hold a gender recognition certificate. The ruling was the culmination of a long-running legal battle and has significant implications for how sex-based rights apply across Scotland, England and Wales. The court sided with campaign group For Women Scotland, which brought a case against the Scottish government challenging its guidance on gender representation. Rowling had donated £70,000 to the group to help fund their challenge. Fry, speaking on The Show People podcast, suggested her views had become extreme. 'She started to make these peculiar statements and had very strong, difficult views,' he said. 'She seemed to wake up, or kick, a hornets' nest of transphobia, which has been entirely destructive. I disagree profoundly with her on this subject.' Fry, who is gay, said he was angry that Rowling had failed to disavow 'some of the more revolting and truly horrible' things people say. 'She says things that are inflammatory and contemptuous, mocking and add to a terribly distressing time for trans people. She has been radicalised, I fear,' he said, suggesting she had been hardened by the vitriol thrown at her. 'I am sorry because I always liked her company. I found her charming, funny and interesting and then this thing happened and it altered the way she talks and engages with the world.'

My simple plan for affordable homes that keeps everyone happy
My simple plan for affordable homes that keeps everyone happy

Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Times

My simple plan for affordable homes that keeps everyone happy

I have lived in the same village in Worcestershire for the past 50 years, on the same land that my family has farmed since the middle of the 18th century, in the area that inspired the village of Ambridge from The Archers. To sustain employment on the land, which had fallen from more than 60 people when I began down to three in the Eighties, we have diversified into hydroelectricity, housebuilding, hosting weddings and the invention of flower petal confetti, for which we grow more than 30 acres of flowers in a field that is visited by people from all over the world. In summer, we can employ more than 80 people. However this success in the rural economy is coupled with an incongruity. Many of these employees, including people who grew up in the village, complain that they can't afford to raise their families here.

Trump comes, not to bury Nato, but to save it
Trump comes, not to bury Nato, but to save it

Telegraph

time32 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump comes, not to bury Nato, but to save it

This week Nato will mark its first 76 years at its summit in The Hague. All eyes will be on Donald Trump and his robust 'America First' approach on the world stage, which has already involved the use of decisive military force against Iran's nuclear facilities. The US president has been a firm critic of Nato, but has also been responsible for a dramatic revival of the alliance. Trump has made it clear that Nato's survival depends on America's fellow members stepping up to fully participate in burden sharing with the US. The Russians have clearly viewed Nato as weak and divided and are increasingly willing to test its resolve. The US presidency must apply concerted pressure on America's allies to do far more to foster partnership rather than dependency, especially as the United States must increasingly focus on the immense threat in the Indo-Pacific presented by Communist China. In 2024, only 22 Nato members spent the 2 per cent of GDP on defence agreed to by the alliance in 2014. This is unacceptable. It leaves the alliance dangerously vulnerable when it should be projecting strength and resolve. Countries that spent less than 2 per cent of real GDP on defence last year included Italy (1.5 per cent), Canada (1.4 per cent), Spain (1.3 per cent), and Belgium (1.3 per cent). In contrast, Poland (4.1 per cent), Estonia (3.4 per cent), Latvia (3.2 per cent), and Greece (3.1 per cent) all spent above 3 per cent of GDP. Justin Trudeau's now departed Canadian government was among the very worst Nato slackers, consistently underinvesting in Canada's military with shockingly low figures for a nation with the 10 th largest GDP in the world. His successor as prime minister, Mark Carney, has vowed to raise Canadian defence spending to 2 per cent, but this is simply not enough. Ottawa needs to be serious about Nato's mission, and playing a full part in the alliance in the coming decades. As Heritage Foundation research has shown, 'European Nato members have collectively underfunded their own defence by $827.91 billion since 2014 – nearly equal to the entire annual US defence budget.' This is a staggering figure – a damning indictment of a culture of complacency and dependency in many Nato allies over the past decade. Not only should every Nato member immediately invest the minimum agreed level of spending on their own defence, they should also commit to matching the current US level of 3.5 per cent of GDP, and pledge to reach 5 per cent of GDP, which is expected to be the new benchmark set at the forthcoming Nato summit according to Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte. President Trump's pressure on Nato partners to spend more on defence is already having a major impact. After decades of reckless underinvestment, Germany, the world's fourth-largest economy and the biggest in Europe, has announced plans for a dramatic increase in defence spending, and has accepted in principle that German spending must eventually rise to 5 per cent of GDP if it is serious about defending its own borders from a potential attack by Russia. France, which has barely reached the agreed minimum 2 per cent of GDP on defence in recent years, has announced that it will push European defence spending levels to 3-3.5 per cent of GDP ahead of the Hague summit. Even Belgium, one of Nato's most lacklustre members, has declared it will boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. The UK has just announced a $20 billion investment in its nuclear warhead programme, and the construction of 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines, as part of its new Strategic Defence Review, released this month. The Baltic States and Poland are already building on their robust records by pledging significant further increases in the years ahead. Poland will spend 4.7 per cent of GDP on defence this year, while Estonia has committed to spending 5.4 per cent through until 2029. Lithuania will spend 5-6 per cent on defence from 2026 to 2030, and Latvia will spend 5 per cent by 2026. The positive developments in Europe should be warmly welcomed in Washington. In just the first few months of his presidency, Donald Trump has already significantly strengthened Nato. President Trump is not the alliance's destroyer, as his critics have alleged, but is in fact its saviour. Previous US presidents had urged European allies to do more, but their entreaties fell on deaf ears. It took the no-nonsense straight talk of Donald Trump to make European leaders sit up and take notice. In many ways the Trump presidency has been the antithesis of the weak-kneed Biden presidency. The humiliating debacle of Biden's reckless Afghanistan withdrawal would not have happened under Donald Trump, and nor would Russia's reckless invasion of Ukraine. With bold US leadership at the helm, Nato still has the vision, capacity and energy to thrive and prosper for another 76 years. American exceptionalism is the most powerful force for liberty in the world today. It is greatly strengthened by America's alliances with key partners, and Nato is at the very heart of the transatlantic partnership.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store