
The flat tax regimes that inspired Farage's plan to lure back rich non-doms
The leader of the Reform UK party has promised to impose a Robin Hood-style levy on rich non-doms, with the proceeds then redistributed among the lowest-paid workers.
At first glance the policy may seem Left-wing, but in practice it is the wealthiest non-doms who would benefit the most from this generous scheme.
The one-off payment would grant them a 'Britannia Card' which comes with an indefinite tax-free exemption on their offshore income and gains.
It could potentially save a high-income worker tens of thousands in tax over the years. Reform said the tax status could be renewed every decade at no extra cost.
The proposal comes amid fears that Rachel Reeves's decision to abolish the non-dom regime last August has triggered an exodus of high-income workers and entrepreneurs. Estate agent Knight Frank has estimated that the Treasury faces a £401m loss in stamp duty receipts thanks to a drop in sales of multimillion-pound homes since the reforms were first announced.
The non-dom regime was replaced in April 2025 by the Chancellor's foreign income and gains regime, which allows new arrivals to avoid tax on offshore earnings for only their first four years of residence. Controversially, it also applies inheritance tax to the worldwide assets of individuals who have been in the country for over 10 years.
By comparison, Mr Farage's proposal would shield eligible individuals from inheritance tax for 20 years.
Writing in The Telegraph, Mr Farage said the policy would 'actively encourage the return of wealth and talent to the United Kingdom'.
However, experts questioned how successful it would be in practice.
The think tank Tax Policy Associates warned it could cost the UK £34bn in lost Government revenue.
Miles Dean, of tax adviser Andersen, said: 'I fear that the damage has already been done and I doubt that this alone is enough to entice wealthy non-doms back, especially given that implementation is at least four years away.'
David Denton, of wealth manager Quilter, said: 'Offering wealthy non-doms the chance to effectively buy their way out of UK tax may provide a short-term revenue boost, but risks creating a two-tier tax system that undermines public confidence.'
Mr Denton also said there was no guarantee the regime would attract enough wealthy individuals to build a sizable pot for low-income workers.
'The idea of redirecting funds to support lower earners has populist appeal, yet it assumes significant and sustained uptake from globally mobile individuals – something far from guaranteed, particularly if future governments reverse course.'
But the flat tax regime is far from a new concept. Other countries including Italy and Switzerland have also tried to entice wealthy expats through similar tax breaks.
Italy
Reform's offer to non-doms appears to be considerably more generous than Italy's, which first unveiled a flat tax regime for wealthy foreigners in 2017. Costing €200,000 (£171,390) per year, the scheme is renewable for 15 years and exempts non-doms from tax on foreign assets, with the option to add additional family members for €25,000 (£21,423) per person per year.
It has proven to be a runaway success. While just 98 people used the scheme in 2017, by 2023 more than 2,000 taxpayers were enroled, according to citizenship by investment firm Relocate&Save.
Mr Farage will give high-net-worth individuals a 20-year reprieve from UK tax, including inheritance tax, on worldwide assets and income for a one-off cost of £250,000. By comparison, to use the Italian scheme for 15 years would cost €3m in flat tax fees, making Reform's plan extremely competitive.
Dominic Lawrence, partner at law Charles Russell Speechlys, said: 'The Reform proposal does appear to be more generous than the Italian lump sum tax regime, which requires payment of an annual levy of €200,000. If the proposed £250,000 payment really is one-off and there is no additional annual charge to access the remittance-style regime… then on the face of it this is remarkably generous.'
Switzerland
Mr Farage's proposals also go further than tax reliefs available to non-doms in Switzerland, which pioneered tax breaks to lure wealthy foreigners.
Don-doms in Switzerland do not pay a flat fee to take advantage of favourable tax rules. Instead, taxes are based on the living costs incurred whilst in the country, which includes costs for housing, food, transport and leisure.
The minimum these costs must be to qualify for the scheme is CHF 434,700 (£396,844) a year. The sum is then subject to tax rates that vary by region in the Alpine country, typically resulting in a tax burden between CHF 150,000 (£136,937) and CHF 350,000 (£319,520).
In return, foreign income and assets of non-tax-residents are exempt from taxes and Switzerland imposes no federal inheritance or gift tax. Different minimum tax bases apply for EU and non-EU applicants depending on the region of Switzerland in which they reside.
Greece
Greece has been tipped as one of the countries set to benefit from the abolition of the UK's non-dom regime.
Since 2019, it has offered a favourable tax regime which requires high-net-worth individuals to pay a lump sum of €100,000 per year on foreign-sourced income. They can claim the tax break for up to 15 years. For an additional €20,000 a year, they can also extend the tax benefit to members of their family.
To use the scheme, the high-net-worth individual must invest at least €500,000 in Greece within three years, for example by purchasing a property or buying shares.
Gibraltar
The British Overseas Territory, located on the southern coast of Spain, offers an attractive tax regime for individuals worth more than £2m.
Under the so-called 'Category 2' rules, qualifying individuals only pay tax on the first £118,000 of their worldwide income. This means a maximum tax charge of about £45,000 per year. To qualify, individuals must either own or rent a property in Gibraltar.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ukraine-Russia war latest: Trump ramps up pressure on Putin with ‘10 European nations' offering ground troops
Donald Trump has signalled his support for a package of security guarantees for Ukraine, including foreign boots on Ukrainian soil from around 10 European countries, in a new push to pressure Russian president Vladimir Putin into ending the conflict. Trump ruled out sending US boots on the ground, but said America could offer air support to maintain peace. A day after their high-stakes talks in the White House on Monday, European leaders yesterday discussed the details of how a peacekeeping force would be deployed from roughly 10 countries, according to Bloomberg. 'When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground. We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably ... by air," Trump said in an interview on Fox News. Trump continues to push Putin to meet Zelensky while admitting the conflict was a 'tough one' to solve and that it is possible the Russian leader "doesn't want to make a deal". "I think Putin is tired of it," Trump said. "I think they're all tired of it. But you never know. We're going to find out about president Putin in the next couple of weeks." Trump is prepared to 'crush' Russia's economy if no progress on peace talks, senator says Senator Lindsey Graham has indicated that Donald Trump may now be prepared to back a bipartisan sanctions bill aimed at crippling Russia's economy, following a phone call between the two. Speaking to The Associated Press on Tuesday, Senator Graham stated that if peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia do not show significant progress by next month, then a 'Plan B' would need to be activated. For months, the Republican senator has been a vocal proponent of imposing severe tariffs on nations that provide financial support for Russia's military actions. Following his conversation with Mr Trump, Senator Graham suggested a shift in the president's stance. He told reporters in South Carolina: 'Trump believes that if Putin doesn't do his part, that he's going to have to crush his economy. Because you got to mean what you say.' Oliver O'Connell20 August 2025 04:30 ANALYSIS: This was worse than the last time Trump met Zelensky. It was also deeply weird Holly Baxter writes: After Friday's red carpet love-in with Russian president Vladimir Putin, President Trump sat down with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky today at the Oval Office to talk peace and the world hoped it would go better than the last White House meeting between the U.S. and Ukraine. Before meeting with Zelensky, or any other world leaders in town for the event, Trump was already telling reporters that peace could come 'almost immediately' if Zelensky ditched NATO and gifted Putin Crimea - the diplomatic equivalent of telling someone to end a mugging by handing over their wallet and the deed to their house. Zelensky, of course, is a man in the awkward position of being the democratically elected leader of the country Trump's friend is currently trying to dismantle. And the body language of today's meeting told its own story: gone were the grinning asides and admiring jokes, replaced with the brittle civility of a man forced to pose with the victim while still swooning over the perpetrator. This was so much worse than the last time Trump met Zelensky Analysis: The low point among a sea of low points was probably the U.S. president laughing and saying, 'So you're saying if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections?' Holly Baxter writes. Oliver O'Connell Over half of Americans say they want the U.S. to be involved in Ukraine-Russia peace talks: poll President Donald Trump announced on Monday that he has begun making arrangements for a trilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. A new poll shows that more than half of Americans want the U.S. to be 'involved' in peace negotiations between the two countries. A YouGov poll, released Tuesday, shows that 62 percent of Americans say the U.S. should be involved in peace talks, with 24 percent saying the U.S. should be 'very' involved, while 37 percent say it should be 'somewhat' involved. By contrast, only 22 percent say the country should not be involved. On Monday, Trump met with Zelensky and a group of European leaders at the White House, days after meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday. The poll also revealed that 41 percent of Americans 'strongly or somewhat approve' of Trump's recent meeting with Vladimir Putin in Russia to discuss the war, while 38 percent disapprove. Similarly, 35 percent of Americans said they approve of how Trump is handling the Russia-Ukraine conflict, while 45 percent disapprove. Oliver O'Connell20 August 2025 03:30 What could US and Europe security guarantees look like for Ukraine? World leaders gathered in Washington on Monday for a summit billed as a potential turning point in efforts to end the most significant ground war in Europe since the Second World War. In the Oval Office, Donald Trump hosted Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky and senior European figures to thrash out what security guarantees for Ukraine might look like if a peace deal with Russia can be reached. The meeting was described as 'historic' by Sir Keir Starmer, who has emerged as one of the driving forces behind Europe's response. Tom Watling has the story. What could US and Europe security guarantees look like for Ukraine? Sir Keir Starmer has led a follow-up meeting to the White House gathering with 30 international leaders to discuss the next steps for ensuring Ukraine's security Oliver O'Connell20 August 2025 03:00 Witkoff calls Trump 'legend' at dealmaking — Americans aren't so sure, poll shows On Tuesday evening, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff told Sean Hannity on Fox News that President Donald Trump is a 'legend' when it comes to dealmaking. Witkoff made the remark during a discussion about the talks he has held over the past week with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and the leaders of European allied nations. However, Americans might need more convincing, given the results of the latest Economist/YouGov poll. Per The Economist: Donald Trump claims to have ended six wars in six months and has been angling for a Nobel Peace Prize. Americans are less convinced of his diplomatic prowess. In February, his net approval rating—the share who approve, less the share who disapprove—for foreign policy was 2. It has since fallen steadily. In this week's survey—which began on the day that Mr Trump met Vladimir Putin, Russia's president, in Alaska and ended on the day Volodymyr Zelensky, his Ukrainian counterpart, visited the White House—it was -14. More Americans think Mr Trump is an ineffective negotiator with foreign leaders than believe he is an effective one. Just 32% said that the American and Russian presidents made at least some progress towards ending the war. Mr Trump's net approval rating for his handling of the Ukraine-Russia conflict is -10. Oliver O'Connell20 August 2025 02:49 Trump holding court in Oval Office branded 'embarrassing' as world leaders sit around his desk New pictures showing Donald Trump sitting in the Oval Office in front of major world leaders has been criticized as an "embarrassing" power play by the president, in what should have been a display of global unity. Some on social media noted that the set up, with Trump behind the Resolute Desk and his European counterparts on chairs opposite him, presented the president as hosting a bunch of 'unruly schoolchildren.' Mike Bedigan reports. Pics of Trump holding court in Oval Office branded 'embarrassing' for world leaders Some on social media noted that the set up, with Trump behind the Resolute Desk and his European counterparts on chairs opposite him, presented the president as hosting a bunch of 'unruly schoolchildren' Oliver O'Connell20 August 2025 02:40 ICYMI: Zelensky says he's ready to talk to Trump and Putin to end war in Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky said he was prepared to meet Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin at a joint summit to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. The Ukrainian president made the pledge during talks with his US counterpart at the White House, hastily convened after President Trump's encounter with Putin last Friday. When Mr Trump suggested that all three leaders could gather if Monday night's talks went well, Mr Zelensky added: 'We are ready for trilateral.' Sam Kiley and Andrew Feinberg filed this report on Monday's meeting. Zelensky says he's ready to talk to Trump and Putin to end war in Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump met for a second time in the White House before meeting senior European leaders including Keir Starmer Oliver O'Connell20 August 2025 02:20 Reporter who attacked Zelensky over suit in February responds to Ukrainian president's zinger Marjorie Taylor Greene 's boyfriend, Real America's Voice correspondent Brian Glenn, laughed off Volodymyr Zelensky's zinger about him wearing the same suit during Monday's press conference in the Oval Office as he did during February's now-infamous showdown between the Ukrainian leader and President Donald Trump. Gustaf Kilander has the story. MTG's boyfriend speaks out after Zelensky's Oval Office suit zinger 'I apologized to him, and then he threw a little zinger back at me…I actually loved it,' Brian Glenn says Oliver O'Connell20 August 2025 02:00 Ukrainian sniper claims to have killed two Russian soldiers with 'longest ever shot' of 2.5 miles The record shot was fired on 14 August with the assistance of artificial intelligence using a 14.5mm Alligator rifle, a Ukrainian military blogger said on Telegram. Alex Croft has the story. Ukrainian sniper kills two Russians with 'longest ever shot' of 2.5 miles The sniper was part of the 'Pryvid' sniper unit defending the key Ukrainian town of Pokrovsk from advances by Putin's forces Oliver O'Connell20 August 2025 01:45 Russia pounded Ukraine with largest aerial bombardment in a month hours after Trump-Zelensky meeting Russia 's army launched its largest aerial attack in a month on Ukraine hours after Donald Trump held fresh peace talks with Volodymyr Zelensky. Troops launched 270 drones and 10 missiles at central Ukraine in the latest attack, hitting key parts of the country's energy infrastructure shortly after the US and Ukrainian presidents concluded talks at the White House Bryony Gooch filed this report earlier today.

Leader Live
27 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Government strikes returns deal with Iraq in latest bid to deter small boats
The deal, signed by Home Office minister Dan Jarvis, will set up a formal process to return Iraqis who have arrived in the UK with no right to stay in the country. It comes after an £800,000 deal last year with Baghdad to help the country crack down on smuggling networks and organised crime. Earlier this year Sir Keir Starmer and Iraq's prime minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani agreed to strengthen co-operation on migration. Mr Jarvis signed the agreement during a visit to the UK by Iraq's deputy foreign minister Faud Hussein. The Home Office said the accord would allow the 'swift' return of illegal migrants. Home Office statistics said since previous deals, the number of Iraqis arriving in the UK by small boat has fallen to 1,900 in the year to March 2025, down from 2,600 in the previous year. Mr Jarvis said: 'By working together on security, development and migration challenges, we are building stronger relationships that benefit both our countries whilst tackling shared challenges like organised crime and irregular migration.' The returns deal is the latest as part of the Home Office's policies to stop small boats crossing the channel. Similar agreements have already been made with Albania and Vietnam since Labour came into power. Another deal with France recently came into force, where small boat migrants who have arrived over the English Channel from the French coast can be returned to the country. The small boats migrant will then be exchanged for a legitimate asylum seeker in France who can demonstrate a genuine family link to the UK. The number has been capped, but it is hoped it will act as a deterrent to those crossing the Channel. The latest figures from the Home Office showed 116 migrants arrived aboard two small boats on August 15. Mr Jarvis said: 'This visit reinforces the strength of the UK-Iraq partnership and demonstrates our government's commitment to serious diplomacy that delivers real results. 'As someone who served in Iraq, I understand first-hand the importance of building enduring relationships in the region, and the new agreement we have signed is a testament to the trust and co-operation we've built with our Iraqi counterparts.' However, the announcement was criticised by Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp. He said: 'Over 50,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the Channel in Labour's short time in power, the worst illegal immigration crisis in our history. 'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals. 'Now they boast about a measly returns deal with Iraq, but barely any small boat arrivals are Iraqi, and most would qualify for asylum anyway. It's a sham designed to look tough while crossings keep soaring. 'Labour has scrapped Conservative deterrents and created the conditions for chaos, leaving the British people to foot the bill. Only the Conservatives will stop the crossings and restore control of Britain's borders.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Epping migrant hotel is set to CLOSE as council wins legal battle following weeks of anarchy after resident was charged with sexual assault
Migrants are set to be moved out of a controversial asylum hotel after a council was granted a injunction to shut it down. Council leaders won the first stage of their battle to close the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, on planning permission grounds after it became an epicentre of anti-immigration protests, including some which turned violent. The demonstrations were sparked when a migrant living at the hotel was charged with a series of sexual offences, including some against a 14-year-old girl. Epping Forest District Council was today granted a temporary injunction by the High Court in London - with the decision welcomed by jubilant locals. It came after the Home Office unsuccessfully attempted to block the legal challenge, claiming its closure would cause 'acute difficulties' and breach asylum seekers' 'fundamental human rights'. The injunction means the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, must stop housing asylum seekers at the site by September 12. Ministers will now fear other areas of the country will attempt similar tactics to get unpopular migrant hotels shuttered. Mother Sarah White, 40, one of the protest organisers, said the news was 'amazing'. She said: 'This is great news - it is fantastic. This is not just for Epping but the rest of the country. Hopefully this is the sign of things to come. 'I really do hope they do not put these people in houses of multiple occupancy within our community now. 'That would be a kick in the face and we would fight it. 'But today's news is really positive. Families and women will be able to sleep easier at night knowing they will not be there. 'It's been a disgrace we have had to fight like this.' Sarah said they would be talking to other towns where migrant hotels are. She added: 'We will start protesting with towns up and down the country. We are standing shoulder to shoulder with them as well. 'We want to show this is bigger than Epping, it is impacting the whole country.' Reform leader Nigel Farage added that he hoped Epping council's victory 'provides inspiration to others across the country'. Maureen Chapman, 73, has lived in Epping for 50 years and said she felt 'under threat' by the hotel being there. Today she said: 'This has restored my faith in humanity. It has restored my faith in common sense. Thank God, somebody has actually listened to the people. 'Locals have finally been heard and it feels like it has taken a very long time for that to happen. 'I hope councils up and down the country hear this message loud and clear. These hotels are not wanted and if local people rally around as a community, their voices can be heard.' Admin assistant Sarah Corner, 44, added: 'I am so pleased. Today is a huge day for the people of Epping. It is absolutely amazing. 'I only hope people now don't go through the same hell as we did. 'I was so worried every night. I only live half a mile away from the hotel. 'When there was the news of the alleged sexual assaults, it was horrific. I felt sick. 'We can all now hopefully get on with our lives.' Edward Brown KC, for the Home Office, warned the High Court the move 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. It would also 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's legal duty to avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights, he said. The barrister added: 'The balance of convenience can never favour a course of conduct that creates a real risk of interfering with fundamental human rights. 'If the injunction is granted by the court, it will substantially impact on the Home Secretary's statutory duties. 'The local authority should in fact have given some consideration to the wider public interest in this application.' He added that the injunction bid 'causes particular acute difficulties at the present date'. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said it was 'good news and a victory for the mums and dads I spoke to in Epping who just want their children to be safe'. She added: 'Putting a hotel full of young male illegal immigrants in the middle of a community like Epping was always going to lead to issues. 'They need to be moved out of the area immediately. 'But Epping is just one of many towns struggling with these asylum hotels. 'Labour have no solution, they're not smashing any gangs and small boat arrivals are at record highs. 'I do have a plan - bring back a proper deterrent and remove all illegal arrivals immediately, so towns like Epping never have to deal with this again.' Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'Residents should never have had to fight their own Government just to feel safe in their own town.' He accused Labour of deciding to 'tear up the deterrents the Conservatives put in place', such as the Rwanda asylum scheme. Reform's Mr Farage said: 'This is a victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping. 'They do not want their young women being assaulted on the streets. 'This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far right, and have won. 'They represent the vast majority of decent people in this country. Young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should not be free to walk the streets anywhere. 'They must be detained and deported. 'I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country.' Outside the Royal Courts of Justice, Epping council leader Chris Whitbread said: 'This is a decision that's important to Epping Forest, but also important to have councils up and down the country, and it shows that the Government cannot ignore planning rules, just like no-one else can ignore planning rules.' He added: 'This is only the start of a process and subject to appeal, we recognise that, but all things being equal, the Bell Hotel will be empty by September 12, and that's really important for the students, residents, businesses of Epping Forest.' Addressing local residents, he went on: 'If they decide to go outside the Bell Hotel, don't protest, don't over-celebrate. This is the beginning. It is not the end.' The Home Office had not been represented at a previous hearing in the case on Friday. But today the department asked to be allowed to intervene Mr Justice Eyre was due to hand down his ruling on whether the injunction should be granted. Philip Coppel KC, for Epping Forest District Council, said the Home Office's request was 'a thoroughly unprincipled application made in a thoroughly unprincipled way'. He added that the department knew of the injunction bid last week but 'sat on their hands'. It comes after a series of protests in recent weeks outside the hotel. A resident at the hotel, Hadush Kebatu, 41, from Ethiopia, was charged with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity. The incidents allegedly happened within two days, just over a week after the 41-year-old arrived in the UK by boat. Raphael Pigott, defending, told a hearing at Colchester magistrates' court on July 17: 'I believe he is here as a refugee or asylum seeker, and that he arrived informally on a boat.' It is alleged Mr Kebatu tried to kiss a schoolgirl as she ate pizza near a busy high street, and the next day attempted to kiss an adult near a fish and chip shop in the town centre, telling her she was 'pretty' while putting his hand on her leg. He then encountered the girl again and tried to kiss her, a court was told. Mr Kebatu has denied the offences and is in custody. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences. A series of protests have taken place outside the hotel since the alleged incidents. There was violence outside the premises last month after 'anti-immigration' campaigners clashed with 'anti-racism' demonstrators. Activists brawled in the streets while police battled to contain the chaos. Twenty-eight people have since been arrested in relation to disorder, and 16 of them have been charged. Police chiefs have already described the unrest at The Bell as a 'signal flare' for another summer of disorder. At a hearing on Friday the council told the High Court the housing of asylum seekers at the property was becoming a 'very serious problem' which 'could not be much worse'. Barristers for the council claimed Somani Hotels breached planning rules as the site is not being used for its intended purpose as a hotel, stating there was an 'overwhelming case for an injunction'. Somani Hotels defended the claim with its barristers telling the court in London that a 'draconian' injunction would cause asylum seekers 'hardship'. They added that 'political views' were not grounds for an injunction to be made. They also said that contracts to house asylum seekers were a 'financial lifeline' for the hotel, which was only one per cent full in August 2022, when it was open to paying customers. Opening Friday's hearing Philip Coppel KC, for the council, said: 'Epping Forest District Council comes to this court seeking an injunction because it has a very serious problem. 'It is a problem that is getting out of hand; it is a problem that is causing a great anxiety to those living in the district. 'There has been what can be described as an increase in community tension, the catalyst of which has been the use of the Bell Hotel to place asylum seekers. 'The problem has arisen because of a breach of planning control by the defendant.' He continued that the site 'is no more a hotel than a borstal to a young offender' for asylum seekers and that Somani Hotels had not had 'the courage of conviction to seek a certificate of lawful use', which would have 'resolved the matter in its favour'. Mr Coppel also referenced the alleged sexual assault of the teenage girl, and said several schools were in the nearby area. He said: 'Having this sort of thing go on in such a concentration of schools with no measures in place to stop a repetition is not acceptable. 'It really could not be much worse than this.' Another factor in favour of granting an injunction would be removing a 'catalyst for violent protests in public places'. The barrister added: 'Allowing the status quo to continue is wholly unacceptable, providing a feeding ground for unrest.' Piers Riley-Smith, representing Somani Hotels, said the alleged planning breach was 'not flagrant', and that it was 'entirely wrong' for the council to 'suggest the use has been hidden from them'. The barrister told the court that the hotel previously housed asylum seekers from 2020 to 2021, and from 2022 to 2024, and that the council 'never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use'. He said company applied for planning permission for a 'temporary change of use' in February 2023, but this was later withdrawn as it had not been determined by April 2024. Asylum seekers then began being placed in the Bell Hotel again in April 2025, with Mr Riley-Smith stating that a planning application was not made 'having taken advice from the Home Office'. Addressing the public protests at Epping, the barrister said: 'The court should bear in mind - as recognised by the claimant - that these have spread far beyond locals who might have a genuine concern about their area to a wider group with more strategic national and ideological aims, but that does not necessarily mean the concerns are well-founded. 'Fears as to an increase of crime associated with asylum seekers or a danger to schools are common, but that does not make them well-founded. 'It also sets a dangerous precedent that protests justify planning injunctions.' Mr Justice Eyre refused to give Somani Hotels the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal. In his judgment, he said that while the council had not 'definitively established' Somani Hotels had breached planning rules, 'the strength of the claimant's case is such that it weighs in favour' of granting the injunction. He continued that the 'risk of injustice is greater' if a temporary injunction were not granted. A further hearing on whether the injunction should be made permanent is expected to be held at a later date, and is expected to last two days.