Trump Wants Coca-Cola To Use Cane Sugar In Sodas, But Consumers Want...
Coca-Cola Zero Sugar, which was introduced in 2017, uses both the artificial sweetener aspartame and the natural sweetener stevia in its recipe. It's one of Coke's fastest-growing products, with global case volumes up 14% in the first quarter of the year. By comparison, the company's total case volumes were up 2%.
PepsiCo also noted Thursday that 60% of its sales volumes in major markets in the second quarter came from low- or no-sugar drinks.
'When you look at colas, the percentage of growth coming from zero sugar is significant,' said Duane Stanford, the editor and publisher of Beverage Digest.
The scrutiny over Coke's sweeteners began Wednesday, when President Donald Trump announced that Atlanta-based Coca-Cola Co. had agreed to switch to using cane sugar in the regular version of its beverage manufactured in the US.
'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' Trump wrote on his social media site. 'I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!'
"I have been speaking to @CocaCola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so. I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!" –President Donald J. Trump pic.twitter.com/9L27oxlYUj
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 16, 2025
Coca-Cola didn't confirm the change. In a statement, the company said it appreciated Trump's enthusiasm and would share details on new offerings soon.
Stanford said he doubts Coca-Cola will fully shift away from high fructose corn syrup, which has sweetened Coke in the US since the 1980s. There would be tremendous supply chain and logistics headaches, he said, and the US doesn't make enough sugar for Coke's needs.
He expects the Atlanta-based company will offer a cane sugar-sweetened version in the US just like its rival Pepsi has been doing since 2009. He noted that Coke has indulged US fans by importing Mexican Coke, which is made with cane sugar, since 2005. Coke positions Mexican Coke as an upscale alternative and sells it in glass bottles.
The corn industry wasn't happy with the speculation. In a statement Wednesday, Corn Refiners Association President and CEO John Bode said replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar makes no sense and would cost thousands of American manufacturing jobs.
Shares in ADM, a maker of high fructose corn syrup, dipped nearly 2% Thursday after Trump's announcement.
In a message on X, Coca-Cola defended high fructose corn syrup, saying it's no more likely to contribute to obesity than table sugar or other full-calorie sweeteners.
'It's safe; it has about the same number of calories per serving as table sugar and is metabolized in a similar way by your body,' the company said. 'Please be assured that Coca-Cola brand soft drinks do not contain any harmful substances.'
The Food and Drug Administration also says there is no evidence of any difference in safety among foods sweetened with high fructose corn syrup and those that sugar, honey or other traditional sweeteners.
Soft drink preferences are highly subjective, as anyone who has been in a Pepsi vs Coke or 7-Up vs. Sprite debate knows. But recent trends indicate that Coke and other drink makers need to focus on the kinds of low- and no-sugar drinks that a growing number of consumers are seeking, according to Stanford.
He said his data shows original Coke was the top seller by volume in the US last year, with 19% market share, while Coke Zero Sugar was seventh and had a 4% market share. But Coke Zero Sugar's share grew 10%, while original Coke's share was flat.
Paige Leyden, the associate director of food service, flavors and ingredients reports at the market research company Mintel, said drinks with a health halo like Olipop — which has 1 gram of sugars compared to original Coke's 65 grams — are also pressuring legacy soda makers. Mintel expects full-sugar sodas will see a 3.4% rise in US sales this year, while diet sodas will see 11.8% growth.
Still, nutritionists suggest avoiding added sugars, no matter the form, since they provide empty calories with no nutrients. The 2020 US dietary guidelines advise people to limit foods and beverages higher in added sugars, and say children under 2 should not be fed them at all.
Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy, whose nutrition views often diverge from mainstream nutrition science, has spoken out against sugar. His agency is expected to release updated nutrition guidelines later this year.
'There's things we'll never be able to eliminate, like sugar,' Kennedy said at an April news conference. 'And sugar is poison, and Americans need to know that.'
Aspartame and other artificial sweeteners are also named as a concern in a government report Kennedy issued in May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
22 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Trump is looking for 'fraud' in US Fed office renovation
The Trump administration is planning a visit to the Federal Reserve's Washington headquarters this week to review its $2.5 billion renovation project, according to a report by Semafor on Monday citing White House Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair. Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott is also in discussions to join the visit, the report said, citing a source familiar with the plans. According to Reuters, President Trump has increasingly scrutinised the renovation, implying—without offering evidence—that the project could involve fraud. He has floated the renovation as a possible justification for removing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, a move he has been pushing as the central bank resists cutting interest rates. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to Blair, Powell recently informed the administration that the renovation's design plans had changed from previous proposals. 'We just want to know whether or not that's true,' Blair said. The White House did not respond to Reuters' request for comment outside of normal business hours. The Federal Reserve also declined to comment, referring inquiries back to the officials quoted by Semafor. Last week, Powell addressed concerns from a Trump administration official regarding possible cost overruns, explaining that the large-scale renovation involves significant safety upgrades and the removal of hazardous materials. The renovation, estimated to cost between $2.5 and $2.7 billion, covers two historic buildings at the Fed's D.C. headquarters. Trump and his allies have criticized the project, with his former budget director, Russ Vought, calling it 'ostentatious.' According to reports from Bloomberg and The New York Times last week, administration officials called for an on-site inspection of the renovations. Vought stated that the White House is collaborating with the National Capital Planning Commission to examine the renovation's execution and escalating costs. He also confirmed discussions were ongoing to involve Republican lawmakers and potentially William J Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, in the tour. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has not directly accused anyone of wrongdoing, but he has strongly implied that financial misconduct could be a factor in the project. In public remarks, he said it was 'highly unlikely' that he would remove Powell, unless fraud was discovered. He added that 'it's possible there's fraud involved with the $2.5, $2.7 billion renovation,' raising eyebrows about his true motive for spotlighting the Fed's construction efforts. Though presidents have limited power to fire a sitting Fed chair due to the central bank's independence, Trump has reportedly been privately discussing Powell's removal with allies, including circulating a draft termination letter. Legal experts argue that fraud could potentially justify such an action, though no evidence of it has been presented. Powell defends the renovation In response to mounting political pressure, Powell issued a formal letter to Vought defending the renovation. He stated that the Fed had followed proper procedures and approvals for the project, which involves buildings from the 1930s that require extensive structural repairs. Powell dismissed claims of extravagance, noting that no unnecessary amenities, such as private elevators or luxurious dining rooms, were included in the final design. Powell further emphasised that the Fed had voluntarily worked with the National Capital Planning Commission during the planning phase, even though the central bank is not generally subject to its authority. His letter repeated much of the content already available on the Fed's website and reiterated testimony he had provided during a June 25 congressional hearing, which administration officials have criticised as misleading. Inflation and cost overruns? Fed Governor Christopher Waller added a practical perspective, suggesting that part of the cost increase stems from inflation and broader economic conditions. He argued that construction projects across the country have faced similar overruns due to unforeseen spikes in costs since 2017, when early estimates were likely drawn. Despite Waller's explanation, Trump-aligned figures have maintained their aggressive posture. Pulte, one of Powell's vocal critics, has accused the chair of giving deceptive testimony about the renovations, though he has not detailed specific falsehoods. Meanwhile, Republican Representative Anna Paulina Luna announced on social media that she would refer Powell to the Justice Department for investigation over potential perjury—a move that carries symbolic weight but no legal mandate. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A convenient political opening? Observers have noted the timing of Trump's interest in the renovation project. The Fed has held interest rates steady throughout the year, seeking to balance inflation control with labour market stability. Trump has been frustrated with the Fed's resistance to cutting rates, which he sees as vital to sustaining economic momentum during his campaign. Some believe the president is using the renovation controversy as a political lever to pressure Powell into lowering borrowing costs. Trump has openly lashed out at the Fed chair in the past, reviving old jabs such as calling Powell 'Too Late' and pushing his demand on social media for immediate rate cuts, citing economic indicators like a recent drop in jobless claims. Inspections, politics and independence Vought has made clear that the White House wants to send its officials into the Fed building to 'go over' the renovation. He said the president has substantial concerns over Powell's management and that the administration is working closely with Republican members of Congress to investigate the situation. While no formal legal action has yet been taken, the heightened scrutiny is part of a broader campaign to challenge Powell's authority. Despite the push from the White House, Powell has remained firm. He noted that the changes to the renovation plan were made to streamline construction and avoid further delays or cost increases. The central bank has committed to transparency and accountability, but has also stressed its statutory independence from political interference. Underlying motives remain clear Ultimately, the controversy surrounding the Fed's renovation appears to serve multiple purposes for Trump. It provides a plausible excuse to question Powell's leadership without confronting the legal limitations of removing a Fed chair outright. At the same time, it reinforces Trump's longstanding narrative that the Federal Reserve is obstructing his economic agenda. While the suggestion of fraud has not been substantiated with hard evidence, it remains a rhetorical tool in Trump's arsenal. By drawing attention to the costly renovation, the president is leveraging public suspicion and government oversight mechanisms in a bid to shape monetary policy from the outside—a move that risks clashing with the norms of central bank independence. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As political tension over interest rates continues to mount, the Fed's construction site may become yet another battleground in the ongoing struggle between the executive branch and the nation's monetary authority.
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
A real-estate tycoon's loan went bad. Then they came for his Ferraris and fine wine
In France's Provence region late last year, a group of men entered Château de Chausse, the 138-acre home and vineyard of Charles Cohen. While the New York real-estate tycoon was away, the men scoured the palatial house, taking high-priced artworks, furniture and Cohen's collection of fine wines. They weren't thieves. The men were following orders of the French court, and they seized hundreds of thousands of dollars of Cohen's personal belongings in the château on behalf of Fortress Investment Group. Fortress says it was simply taking what it is owed. In 2022, the New York-based investment firm made a $535 million loan to Cohen Realty Enterprises as a way to consolidate his previous debt. Cohen's collateral included a Manhattan office tower, the Le Méridien Dania Beach hotel in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and four other properties, according to records from New York State Supreme Court, where Fortress is suing Cohen. But crucially, Cohen also personally guaranteed $187.2 million of that loan. That 'recourse" portion of the debt gave Fortress additional powers to go after Cohen personally if his business defaulted. Now, that's what's happening. Cohen's business defaulted last year, and Fortress took control of most of the collateral. But the firm said that the value of those properties falls far short of what Cohen owes. Now the lender is trying to confiscate Cohen's personal possessions. Fortress launched legal efforts to seize Cohen's houses in Provence and Greenwich, Conn., according to New York court records. Fortress is also going after his 25 luxury automobiles including two Ferraris and other valuable belongings. Earlier this month, an Italian judge ruled that a 220-foot yacht couldn't leave the Port of Loano without court approval. The superyacht, valued at $49.6 million, is one of five yachts that Fortress is trying to seize from the real-estate mogul. Cohen transferred ownership of the yacht in Port of Loano to his wife last year, court records show. Each side accuses the other of impropriety. Fortress says Cohen improperly blocked the firm's enforcement of his guarantee by transferring his yachts and other valuable assets—including his $20 million Greenwich home and Château de Chausse—to family members, according to court records. Cohen's net worth is nearly $2 billion, according to a financial statement that he filed with the court. He said the transfers were legitimate and made for estate and tax-planning purposes. A French court ruled in his favor on the Provence château. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Cohen said he is in the process of selling some properties to pay Fortress but needs more time to complete complicated deals. 'They keep pecking at us, like a bird would peck at something," he said in a February deposition about his negotiations with Fortress. 'Enough was never enough." Personal-recourse debt has a long, bruising history in commercial real estate. Developers often turn to personal guarantees because they would have no other way to obtain enough financing, and because they are convinced they can easily pay back their loans. 'They think if you hold on to a property long enough, the values are always going to justify the loan," said Mark Edelstein, chair of Morrison Foerster's global real-estate group. Donald Trump famously used recourse loans to build his property empire in the 1980s, only to find himself on the brink of personal bankruptcy in the early 1990s because of these personal guarantees. Trump said during a TV appearance that in 1991 he pointed to a homeless person and said he 'is worth $900 million more than I am." Personal guarantees were also a big reason why New York developer Harry Macklowe faced near financial ruin during the 2008-09 financial crisis, after he took out a $1.2 billion bridge-equity loan from a group including Fortress with recourse contingencies. Macklowe said that the situation was resolved and is now 'old history." Cohen has used personal guarantees before, but said he has never had this kind of problem. His business is countersuing Fortress. His dust-up with the investment firm is one of the nastiest in commercial real estate for many years. Attorneys for Cohen say that Fortress's actions amount to improper harassment. The investment firm has put restraints on Cohen's personal brokerage accounts, and on brokerage accounts held by his mother and sister. Cohen cannot withdraw money from his personal accounts without Fortress's approval. 'His family's lives are being disrupted," said Christopher Caffarone, Cohen's attorney, at a court hearing in May. 'They are getting subpoenaed. They are getting deposed." Fortress subpoenaed Cohen's family members because he transferred personal assets to them and because they are involved in running or financing his companies, a Fortress spokesman said. Fortress, an investment giant owned in part by Abu Dhabi government fund Mubadala Capital, said that it has a duty to its investors that include retirement and pension funds. 'Fortress is left with no choice but to begin enforcing its judgment against Cohen's assets," the firm said, according to court records. Charles's father and his two uncles went from selling cars to building what would become a real-estate empire, developing towers on Manhattan's Third Avenue as the old elevated railway was dismantled. Charles became president of the company in 1983 and more than tripled it in size to 12 million square feet. Nowadays, Cohen, 73 years old, is a widely recognizable figure in New York real-estate circles, where he is known for his tailored suits and reflective stainless-steel glasses. He also has invested tens of millions of dollars in filmmaking. Cohen's production firm has distributed more than 100 films including 'The Salesman," which won the Academy Award for best foreign language film in 2017. Cohen also purchased movie theaters in Europe and the U.S. Fortress and Cohen's business relationship goes back decades. The investment giant has lent hundreds of millions of dollars to Cohen, and it financed many of his real-estate deals in the years leading up to the pandemic. Then during Covid-19, demand for office space plummeted. People also stopped going to the movies, upending Cohen's movie-theater holdings. Other office-building owners at the time were conceding defeat, giving properties back to lenders. Cohen said he felt the market would rebound soon. He also felt emotionally attached to the properties, some which had been in his family for decades. The two sides agreed on a restructuring plan, which included the personal guarantee. But the market didn't rebound quickly. The two sides modified the 2022 loan four times but the properties weren't able to generate enough cash to pay the debt service. In March 2024, Cohen's business defaulted. Cohen said that he had a handshake agreement with Fortress for another extension, according to court records. But the firm said there was no such deal, and the state supreme court ruled for Fortress. Cohen says now he is selling properties to raise cash to meet his obligations to Fortress. 'I've always been good at hanging on," Cohen said. 'That's what we've always done and we will continue to do that."
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
UK government may have ‘good news' for Apple in the case that Donald Trump said, "something you hear about with China"
The UK government is preparing to retreat from its controversial order forcing Apple to provide backdoor access to encrypted user data, following intense pressure from the Trump administration that threatens vital technology partnerships between the two nations. Senior British officials told the Financial Times that the Home Office will likely abandon its January demand for Apple to break end-to-end encryption on iCloud storage , with US Vice President JD Vance leading opposition to the UK's stance. "The Home Office is basically going to have to back down," one technology department official said, noting Vance's strong objections to the encryption order. The standoff has created significant diplomatic friction, with multiple US officials including President Trump, Vice President Vance, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard all raising concerns about the UK's approach. Trump previously compared the British demand to "something you hear about with China" and reportedly told Prime Minister Keir Starmer directly: "You can't do this." UK-US tech partnerships at risk over privacy battle by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo The encryption dispute threatens to derail broader technology cooperation between the allies, particularly around artificial intelligence and data sharing agreements central to Starmer's digital trade strategy. "One of the challenges for the tech partnerships we're working on is the encryption issue," a senior UK official explained. "It's a big red line in the US — they don't want us messing with their tech companies." US officials have warned that the UK order could violate Americans' privacy rights and potentially breach existing data agreements between the countries, with Gabbard calling it an "egregious violation." Apple withdraws secure storage service from UK market In response to the secret government order issued under the Investigatory Powers Act , Apple withdrew its most secure cloud storage service, Advanced Data Protection , from the UK market in February. The tech giant is now challenging the Home Office demand at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, with WhatsApp joining the legal battle in a rare collaboration between Silicon Valley rivals. British officials acknowledge the Home Office has handled the encryption issue "very badly" and now has "its back against the wall" as it seeks an exit strategy from the high-profile privacy confrontation. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
