logo
A real-estate tycoon's loan went bad. Then they came for his Ferraris and fine wine

A real-estate tycoon's loan went bad. Then they came for his Ferraris and fine wine

Mint21-07-2025
In France's Provence region late last year, a group of men entered Château de Chausse, the 138-acre home and vineyard of Charles Cohen. While the New York real-estate tycoon was away, the men scoured the palatial house, taking high-priced artworks, furniture and Cohen's collection of fine wines.
They weren't thieves. The men were following orders of the French court, and they seized hundreds of thousands of dollars of Cohen's personal belongings in the château on behalf of Fortress Investment Group.
Fortress says it was simply taking what it is owed. In 2022, the New York-based investment firm made a $535 million loan to Cohen Realty Enterprises as a way to consolidate his previous debt. Cohen's collateral included a Manhattan office tower, the Le Méridien Dania Beach hotel in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and four other properties, according to records from New York State Supreme Court, where Fortress is suing Cohen.
But crucially, Cohen also personally guaranteed $187.2 million of that loan. That 'recourse" portion of the debt gave Fortress additional powers to go after Cohen personally if his business defaulted.
Now, that's what's happening.
Cohen's business defaulted last year, and Fortress took control of most of the collateral. But the firm said that the value of those properties falls far short of what Cohen owes.
Now the lender is trying to confiscate Cohen's personal possessions. Fortress launched legal efforts to seize Cohen's houses in Provence and Greenwich, Conn., according to New York court records. Fortress is also going after his 25 luxury automobiles including two Ferraris and other valuable belongings.
Earlier this month, an Italian judge ruled that a 220-foot yacht couldn't leave the Port of Loano without court approval. The superyacht, valued at $49.6 million, is one of five yachts that Fortress is trying to seize from the real-estate mogul. Cohen transferred ownership of the yacht in Port of Loano to his wife last year, court records show.
Each side accuses the other of impropriety. Fortress says Cohen improperly blocked the firm's enforcement of his guarantee by transferring his yachts and other valuable assets—including his $20 million Greenwich home and Château de Chausse—to family members, according to court records.
Cohen's net worth is nearly $2 billion, according to a financial statement that he filed with the court. He said the transfers were legitimate and made for estate and tax-planning purposes. A French court ruled in his favor on the Provence château.
In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Cohen said he is in the process of selling some properties to pay Fortress but needs more time to complete complicated deals.
'They keep pecking at us, like a bird would peck at something," he said in a February deposition about his negotiations with Fortress. 'Enough was never enough."
Personal-recourse debt has a long, bruising history in commercial real estate. Developers often turn to personal guarantees because they would have no other way to obtain enough financing, and because they are convinced they can easily pay back their loans.
'They think if you hold on to a property long enough, the values are always going to justify the loan," said Mark Edelstein, chair of Morrison Foerster's global real-estate group.
Donald Trump famously used recourse loans to build his property empire in the 1980s, only to find himself on the brink of personal bankruptcy in the early 1990s because of these personal guarantees. Trump said during a TV appearance that in 1991 he pointed to a homeless person and said he 'is worth $900 million more than I am."
Personal guarantees were also a big reason why New York developer Harry Macklowe faced near financial ruin during the 2008-09 financial crisis, after he took out a $1.2 billion bridge-equity loan from a group including Fortress with recourse contingencies. Macklowe said that the situation was resolved and is now 'old history."
Cohen has used personal guarantees before, but said he has never had this kind of problem. His business is countersuing Fortress. His dust-up with the investment firm is one of the nastiest in commercial real estate for many years.
Attorneys for Cohen say that Fortress's actions amount to improper harassment. The investment firm has put restraints on Cohen's personal brokerage accounts, and on brokerage accounts held by his mother and sister. Cohen cannot withdraw money from his personal accounts without Fortress's approval.
'His family's lives are being disrupted," said Christopher Caffarone, Cohen's attorney, at a court hearing in May. 'They are getting subpoenaed. They are getting deposed."
Fortress subpoenaed Cohen's family members because he transferred personal assets to them and because they are involved in running or financing his companies, a Fortress spokesman said.
Fortress, an investment giant owned in part by Abu Dhabi government fund Mubadala Capital, said that it has a duty to its investors that include retirement and pension funds. 'Fortress is left with no choice but to begin enforcing its judgment against Cohen's assets," the firm said, according to court records.
Charles's father and his two uncles went from selling cars to building what would become a real-estate empire, developing towers on Manhattan's Third Avenue as the old elevated railway was dismantled. Charles became president of the company in 1983 and more than tripled it in size to 12 million square feet.
Nowadays, Cohen, 73 years old, is a widely recognizable figure in New York real-estate circles, where he is known for his tailored suits and reflective stainless-steel glasses.
He also has invested tens of millions of dollars in filmmaking. Cohen's production firm has distributed more than 100 films including 'The Salesman," which won the Academy Award for best foreign language film in 2017. Cohen also purchased movie theaters in Europe and the U.S.
Fortress and Cohen's business relationship goes back decades. The investment giant has lent hundreds of millions of dollars to Cohen, and it financed many of his real-estate deals in the years leading up to the pandemic.
Then during Covid-19, demand for office space plummeted. People also stopped going to the movies, upending Cohen's movie-theater holdings.
Other office-building owners at the time were conceding defeat, giving properties back to lenders. Cohen said he felt the market would rebound soon. He also felt emotionally attached to the properties, some which had been in his family for decades. The two sides agreed on a restructuring plan, which included the personal guarantee.
But the market didn't rebound quickly. The two sides modified the 2022 loan four times but the properties weren't able to generate enough cash to pay the debt service. In March 2024, Cohen's business defaulted.
Cohen said that he had a handshake agreement with Fortress for another extension, according to court records. But the firm said there was no such deal, and the state supreme court ruled for Fortress.
Cohen says now he is selling properties to raise cash to meet his obligations to Fortress.
'I've always been good at hanging on," Cohen said. 'That's what we've always done and we will continue to do that."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NCLT admits BluSmart Mobility into insolvency
NCLT admits BluSmart Mobility into insolvency

Time of India

time16 minutes ago

  • Time of India

NCLT admits BluSmart Mobility into insolvency

BENGALURU: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Ahmedabad has admitted Catalyst Trusteeship's petition against electric‑cab operator BluSmart Mobility for defaulting on dues of about Rs 1.28 crore. The tribunal's order initiated the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) and appointed NPV Insolvency Professionals Private Ltd as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). BluSmart, once a high‑profile player in India's EV‑based ride‑hailing market, has been battling mounting liabilities and cash flow pressures. Despite attracting venture backing and expanding its fleet, the company struggled to keep pace with operating costs and payment obligations, culminating in the admitted default that triggered the insolvency process. The proceedings come at a time when BluSmart's key shareholder, Gensol Engineering, and its subsidiary Gensol EV Lease are also under insolvency. The tribunal recently admitted separate petitions by the Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (Ireda) for defaults of Rs 510.10 crore against Gensol Engineering and Rs 218.95 crore against Gensol EV Lease. According to Ireda's filings, cross‑default provisions linked the two entities, which had availed term loans for electric vehicle leasing and infrastructure. Personal guarantees by promoters Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi and corporate guarantees from Gensol Engineering were also invoked. Troubles at Gensol and BluSmart deepened after a Sebi investigation two months ago alleged that the Jaggi brothers diverted loans taken in Gensol's name to buy a luxury flat, inflate Gensol's stock price and fund personal ventures, while also forging no‑default letters from lenders such as Ireda and Power Finance Corporation to falsely claim that the company was not in default. 'The NCLT's decision, despite BluSmart's attempt to resist insolvency proceedings by citing temporary financial difficulties and minor technical defaults that were later fixed, reinforces that defaulters cannot take shelter under vague grounds,' said Akshit Goyal, partner at Goyel & Goyal. 'It upholds the sanctity of the IBC and reflects that insolvency is a last‑resort remedy to protect the lending ecosystem, not a tool for routine recovery. ' As part of the BluSmart order, the tribunal imposed a moratorium that bars any recovery proceedings, transfer of assets or enforcement of security interests against the company while the CIRP is underway. The IRP has been directed to take control of assets within seven days, invite claims from creditors, and file progress reports with the tribunal. Catalyst has been asked to provide Rs 10 lakh as interim funding to run the process, a procedural deposit that will later be adjusted by the committee of creditors. The Registrar of Companies has also been instructed to reflect BluSmart's insolvency status on the MCA portal. A significant concern for customers arises from BluSmart's wallet system. The company operated a closed‑system prepaid payment instrument (PPI), which is essentially an app‑based wallet that could only be used for BluSmart rides and related services. As per the Reserve Bank of India's master directions, these instruments do not permit cash withdrawal or redemption and do not require authorisation from the Reserve Bank. This means funds parked in such wallets are outside the purview of RBI regulation and lack the protections available to regulated payment instruments. 'There is a chance that customers may get refunds because the company's wallet operates through a PPI licence. If there was no PPI, customers would have had to file their claims, as they rank last in the recovery waterfall," Sonam Chandwani, managing partner at KS Legal & Associates, told TOI. 'The larger concern will likely be for investors rather than customers, given that wallet balances are usually small. Since BluSmart has tangible assets, the case could attract serious resolution interest, and there is also a possibility of a group insolvency angle. ' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025

Security guard caught stealing IPL jerseys worth INR 6.52 lakh from BCCI office on CCTV; arrested
Security guard caught stealing IPL jerseys worth INR 6.52 lakh from BCCI office on CCTV; arrested

Hindustan Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Security guard caught stealing IPL jerseys worth INR 6.52 lakh from BCCI office on CCTV; arrested

A security manager in his 40s at Mumbai's iconic Wankhede Stadium was arrested for allegedly stealing 261 IPL 2025 jerseys worth ₹6.52 lakh from the BCCI office premises, in a bizarre case that only came to light after an internal board audit flagged missing inventory. Representational image of sports jerseys The accused, identified as Farooque Aslam Khan, reportedly spirited away an entire carton of jerseys from a storeroom located within the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) office at Wankhede, Churchgate. According to police, each jersey was worth around ₹2,500, and the total value of the stolen merchandise amounts to over six and a half lakh rupees. An audit conducted by BCCI officials earlier this month revealed discrepancies in jersey stock. Upon checking CCTV footage, staffers spotted Khan carrying a large cardboard box out of the storeroom on June 13 — raising immediate suspicion. A complaint was subsequently filed at the Marine Drive police station on July 17. Police investigations revealed that Khan had sold the stolen jerseys to an online dealer based in Haryana, whom he had contacted via social media. The guard reportedly told the dealer that the jerseys were being offloaded as part of a "stock clearance sale" due to renovation work at the BCCI office. 'The dealer claims he had no idea the jerseys were stolen,' said a police official involved in the investigation. So far, only 50 of the 261 jerseys have been recovered. During questioning, Khan confessed to using the money earned from the sale to fund his growing addiction to online gambling. 'He received the payment directly into his bank account and claims to have lost it all on gambling platforms,' the officer added, noting that bank records are being reviewed to corroborate this claim. It is unclear whether the stolen jerseys, which represented multiple teams, were intended for official use by IPL players or for public merchandise distribution. The police have summoned the Haryana-based dealer for further inquiry, and the investigation remains ongoing. Khan, who was arrested a few days ago after being booked under relevant sections for theft and criminal breach of trust, is currently out on bail. Meanwhile, BCCI has not issued an official comment but is said to be reviewing its internal security protocols following the incident.

Boeing/Saab in talks with BAE on UK jet trainer bid, sources say
Boeing/Saab in talks with BAE on UK jet trainer bid, sources say

Time of India

time24 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Boeing/Saab in talks with BAE on UK jet trainer bid, sources say

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel PARIS/LONDON, - Boeing and Sweden's Saab are in talks with Britain's BAE Systems about teaming up on a future replacement of Britain's Hawk trainer in a growing niche of the fast jet industry, three people familiar with the matter and Saab have jointly developed the T-7 advanced trainer for the U.S. Air Force, while Britain has said it plans to replace its out-of-production Hawk fleet, part of which is instantly recognisable through its Red Arrows display are at an early stage and details are still to be worked out, with no guarantee that an agreement can be reached, one of the sources said."We don't comment on rumour and speculation," said a spokesperson for BAE Systems, whose corporate predecessor developed the successful Hawk trainer in the early 1970s."Training remains an important pillar of our air sector strategy. We continue to explore and develop our footprint in this area across both live and synthetic capabilities."A Saab spokesperson said: "We have a long-term partnership with Boeing on the co-development of T-7. Saab will not comment on rumours or speculation."Boeing had no immediate June, a UK defence strategy review recommended that the Hawk be replaced, and the government said it would welcome interest from UK-based has said it has not decided whether to develop a new jet to replace the Hawk, whose production line closed in was not immediately clear whether any potential co-operation would be restricted to the UK contest or eventually seek to take advantage of BAE's incumbency in the wider export market, where over 1,000 Hawks have been sold to 18 of the sources said it was premature to think beyond the British for nimble trainers is to U.S.-based consultancy AeroDynamic Advisory, the market for military trainer aircraft is expected to rise to $3.7 billion in 2030 from $2.8 billion, excluding substantial related spending on support, sustainment and training suppliers include the Boeing-Saab T-7, Leonardo's Aermacchi M-346 and the Korea Aerospace Industries T-50 Golden a privately owned early-stage British company, has designed a new jet trainer that it says could replace the analysts have expressed concerns, however, that the case for an all-new fleet is being driven in part by Britain's Red Arrows, a diplomatic symbol abroad and a popular feature of royal events at home. Their jets are due to retire in publication Defence Eye reported last week that Britain is looking at buying a first batch of new trainers over the next five years to replace the Red Arrows' Hawk T1s, followed by a larger second batch of T2 replacements in the late 2030s."A major complicating factor is the need for the Red Arrows aircraft to be British-designed, or at least British-assembled, to allow the aircraft to act as a promotional tool for the UK aerospace industry," the report by UK defence expert Tim Ripley choice of trainer also has potential implications in the bigger global market for fighter defence committee has warned the T2 will not meet training requirements for future fighters envisaged by Britain, Japan and Italy known as the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP).For Boeing and Saab, a UK sale would not only provide a key European market, but could potentially mean getting a toe-hold in the training requirements for GCAP and generate potential future trainer business from exports of the combat BAE, having a ready-made trainer could be one extra marketing point for its future combat jet system, Ripley said."It would increase the value that you can export with GCAP," he told the other hand, analysts say BAE's existing Italian partner in GCAP, Leonardo, is likely to press the industrial and strategic case of its own M-346 as the GCAP trainer of could not immediately be reached for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store