![AHF – A global force in healthcare and empowerment [VIDEO]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.citizen.co.za%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F12%2FWorld-Aids-Day.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
AHF – A global force in healthcare and empowerment [VIDEO]
South Africa's HIV response is at a critical turning point.
The AIDS Healthcare Foundation leadership gathered in Sandton over breakfast to discuss impactful programmes and their continued commitment to addressing HIV/AIDS and related public health challenges.
The AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) is the world's largest non-profit HIV/AIDS healthcare provider, delivering medical care and advocacy across 47 countries, 14 of which are in Africa.
Since its founding in 1987, AHF has combined clinical services with bold policy advocacy to reach communities that are often underserved or forgotten.
'We advocate for adequate resource allocation so that we can sustain the gains in HIV response, close the potential gaps, and ensure that we continue to reach the communities that need the resources the most,' said Ngaatendwe Murombedzi from the AIDS Healthcare Foundation.
'I think the young people are quite important in this space because it is required that young people bring energy, and they also bring technical skills that are so much important in the fight against HIV and TB,' said Gauteng provincial legislature member, Dr Bandile Masuku.
Masuku continued by saying more work needs to be put into formalising community health work.
'Part of prevention, part of treatment is more done in the community level, not in hospitals, not in clinics, but it should be done on a street level as well as community level,' said Dr Masuku.
With operations spanning Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas, AHF continues to fight for equitable access to life-saving healthcare and challenge systems that fail the most vulnerable.
Also read: VIDEO & PICTURES: 'We need help!' – Suspected Zama Zama explosion rocks Slovo Park, Springs
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
12 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
SA moving closer to producing adult TB vaccine
South Africa hosted a milestone event this week: the first national TB vaccine preparedness workshop, co-convened by the department of health and the World Health Organisation. It marked the beginning of a new chapter in the fight against TB — one in which we no longer talk only of treatment and preventive therapy, but of vaccines that may finally protect adolescents and adults from TB disease, and reduce TB transmission. ..
Daily Maverick
13 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
When xenophobia rears its ugly head it is time to ask the right questions
Have you noticed how, without fail, the ugly head of xenophobia always seems to re-emerge in the run-up to local elections? It's no accident. It's a strategy, and one we've seen play out time and again. When political failures pile up and service delivery grinds to a halt, scapegoating foreign nationals becomes a convenient distraction. Instead of holding local government accountable for broken promises, potholes, power cuts and clinics without doctors, we're told the problem is 'illegal foreigners'. It's a dangerous misdirection and it's costing lives. Instead of directing our rightful anger towards dysfunctional municipalities and inept leadership, we're encouraged sometimes by officials themselves to lash out at those even more vulnerable than us. It's easier to point fingers at desperate migrants in clinic queues than to question how our cities became places of neglect. Nowhere is this more evident than in the deeply troubling scenes unfolding outside public healthcare facilities across South Africa. Foreign nationals or those merely suspected of being foreign are being chased away, blocked from entering clinics and denied their constitutional rights. These acts aren't just inhumane; they are illegal. Let's be clear, section 27 of the South African Constitution guarantees everyone – yes, everyone – the right to access healthcare services. This includes migrants, asylum seekers and undocumented persons. It is not a matter of opinion. It is the law. And here's the part too many people overlook: having all people healthy within our borders is a public good. Allowing anyone, regardless of nationality, to suffer from untreated TB, measles or HIV does not just threaten their health, it endangers ours. Public health doesn't discriminate, and neither should we. What makes this even more dangerous is the recent targeting of human rights organisations like the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (Seri), Helen Suzman Foundation and the South African Human Rights Commission by xenophobic movements like Operation Dudula. These organisations grounded in constitutionalism and justice have dared to remind us that we are a country governed by laws, not mob sentiment. In the face of these attacks, Abahlali baseMjondolo showed us what real solidarity looks like. Their decision to form a human chain outside Seri's offices, physically defending the space and its staff, was an act of profound courage. It reminded us that human rights are not abstract principles, they must be defended in action, in public and with conviction. This is not just about foreign nationals. This is about the soul of our democracy. If we allow attacks on human rights defenders and on organisations like Seri to go unanswered, we set the stage for broader repression. Today it's them. Tomorrow it's all of us. We must stand up, speak out and defend what is right. Human rights are not a suggestion. They are the foundation of our Constitution. They are the promise of 1994. And they are under threat. Operation Dudula together with March and March are attacking our democratic values, our hard-won freedoms and the rule of law. If groups like Seri, Helen Suzman Foundation and the South African Human Rights Commission are silenced, who will speak up when your rights are next in line? We must not allow anger to be weaponised against the wrong people. It is time to ask better questions. Why are our clinics underresourced in the first place? Why are there not enough trained healthcare workers? Why is the housing backlog growing year after year? And why are we not holding local councillors and officials to account for this? Foreign nationals didn't fail to maintain your community's water infrastructure. They didn't loot public funds meant for housing and healthcare. They didn't shut down your clinic or redirect its budget. That was your government. South Africa is at a crossroads and we can continue being played, turning on each other in frustration. We must start organising, demanding better services, transparent leadership and a government that serves everyone who lives here.
The Citizen
14 hours ago
- The Citizen
South Africans living longer: Here's the life expectancy rate in 2025
While life expectancy is projected to increase, South Africans are having fewer children. Should we be worried? South Africans are living longer, with the national life expectancy now 12 years more than it was at the turn of the century. The continued rise in life expectancy is thanks to advances in healthcare, HIV prevention, and overall living conditions. According to Statistics South Africa's (Stats SA) 2025 mid-year population estimates, life expectancy at birth is now 64 years for males and 69 years for females. This marks a recovery from the setbacks of recent years, including a major dip during the Covid-19 pandemic and continued health impacts of HIV and AIDS. Life expectancy has improved In 2002, males had an average life expectancy of 52 years, while females averaged 57 years. This year's figures reflect a notable improvement, especially among men. Life expectancy for both sexes declined sharply between 2020 and 2021 due to the Covid-19 pandemic. In just one year, males saw a 3-year drop in life expectancy (from 62.8 to 59.8), while females experienced a 3.6-year decline (from 68.8 to 65.2). Although the pandemic had a devastating impact, Stats SA notes that life expectancy began to recover steadily from 2022. 'Life expectancy at birth in South Africa improved by 1.9 years for males (61.7 years) and 2.2 years for females (67.4 years) in 2022,' it said. As public health programmes expand and treatment coverage improves, particularly among women of reproductive age, the country's long-term outlook continues to stabilise. Progress in healthcare has also resulted in major improvements in child survival. The infant mortality rate (IMR) has declined from 61.9 deaths per 1 000 live births in 2002 to 23.1 in 2025. 'Similarly, the under-five mortality rate (U5MR) declined from 79.9 child deaths per 1 000 live births to 26.1 child deaths per 1 000 live births between 2002 and 2025,' Stats SA noted. The decline in child mortality is attributed to better maternal and child health services, expanded immunisation coverage, and reduced HIV transmission from mother to child. These advances mean that more children are surviving into adolescence, even as fewer are being born. ALSO READ: Why SA has 32.9% unemployment and Zimbabwe 8% Fewer births South Africa's total fertility rate (TFR) has, however, fallen steadily over the last two decades, following global trends. In 2008, the rate stood at 2.78 children per woman. By 2025, it had dropped to 2.21, according to Stats SA's estimates. This is worryingly close to, but still above, the replacement fertility rate of 2.1. 'More rural provinces of Limpopo and Eastern Cape indicate higher total fertility rates, whilst more urbanised provinces such as Gauteng and the Western Cape indicate lower rates of fertility,' Stats SA found. South Africa has one of the lowest fertility levels on the continent, with a study on fertility and childbearing in South Africa noting the extent of the decline. 'Fertility in South Africa declined from an average of 6 to 7 children per woman in the 1950s to an average of 4 to 5 children in the 1980s and about 3.3 children per woman in the mid-1990s'. Among the factors for the decline are delayed marriage, the desire for smaller families or economic challenges, improved healthcare and living conditions, contraceptives, and access to education. Pretoria-based obstetrician and gynaecologist Dr Rogers Mmabatswa told The Citizen that many of his patients said they had decided on smaller families because of the rising cost of living. 'Many complain about the cost of raising their children. Food, clothing, and schooling are expensive. So, for a lot of people, there are financial considerations when deciding whether to have a child, or another.' Should SA be worried? A 2024 study by the economic policymaking institute, Centre for Economic Policy Research, outlined the economic dangers of a low birth rate. 'The challenge of low fertility is magnified by the fact that it causes older-age population shares to swell. Population ageing may naturally hamper economic activity insofar as older people impose significant burdens associated with public expenditures on health and long-term care and economic security and tend to work less than their younger counterparts.' However, Mmabatswa says smaller families that come from reduced birth rates may have positives. 'Parents and caregivers are able to dedicate more time and energy to their children, giving them increased individual attention than if there were many other children vying for their attention. 'This will often translate to better performance at school, sport, or socially.' NOW READ: Are you employed if you work an hour a week? Stats SA says yes
