&w=3840&q=100)
Has Yemen cancelled Nimisha Priya's death sentence? Here's what we know
This comes after a report by news agency ANI claimed that Priya's execution had been overturned and completely cancelled, citing the office of 'Grand Mufti' Kanhapuram AP Abubakker Musliyar.
According to the report, the Grand Mufti's office made the statement on July 28, following a high-level meeting in the Yemeni capital, Sanaa. Her execution had previously been suspended after diplomatic efforts by the Indian government and an appeal by the Grand Mufti.
Nimisha's execution, originally scheduled for July 16, was temporarily halted just a day earlier after Musliyar urged Yemeni authorities to reconsider.
Execution delayed after diplomatic efforts
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had been actively engaged in efforts to save Nimisha. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said that a lawyer had been appointed to assist her family and that the government had been exploring options for clemency under Sharia law.
These efforts gained urgency after Yemen's Supreme Judicial Council upheld her death sentence in November 2023. The latest development represents a major breakthrough in the campaign to secure her release.
Nimisha was convicted in the killing of her business partner, Yemeni national Talal Abdo Mahdi, in 2017. Musliyar reportedly engaged in extensive talks with Yemeni religious authorities, calling for the release of the 37-year-old nurse.
His last-minute intervention, supported by a prominent Yemeni Sufi scholar, is believed to have been instrumental in stopping her execution.
Who is Nimisha Priya?
Nimisha Priya, 37, is a trained nurse from Kerala who worked in private hospitals across Yemen for several years. In 2014, her husband and young daughter returned to India due to financial hardship. That same year, Yemen's civil war began, and the country suspended the issue of new visas, making it impossible for her family to return.
Setting up a clinic in Sanaa
In 2015, Nimisha established a clinic in Sanaa with the assistance of Talal Abdo Mahdi, a Yemeni citizen. Since Yemeni law prohibits foreign nationals from owning clinics, Mahdi was made a legal partner.
However, during a visit to Kerala, Mahdi allegedly stole a wedding photograph of Nimisha and used it to falsely claim they were married. According to her mother's statement, Mahdi then began harassing her.
Allegations of abuse and fraud
Mahdi reportedly forged clinic ownership documents and took control of Nimisha's finances. He is also accused of seizing her passport, drugging her, threatening her with a firearm, and physically abusing her over a prolonged period. When she approached local police, Nimisha was instead arrested and jailed for six days.
Upon her release, the abuse reportedly escalated. In July 2017, Nimisha sought help from a jail warden. Following his advice, she attempted to sedate Mahdi in order to retrieve her passport and escape the country. The first attempt failed, but during the second, Mahdi — reportedly a drug user — died from an overdose.
Conviction and sentencing
In June 2018, Nimisha was convicted of Mahdi's murder and sentenced to death. Her appeal was rejected in 2023. Her execution was scheduled for July 2025 before India's diplomatic and religious intervention led to its postponement.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Lord Meghnad Desai passes away; PM Modi expresses anguish over demise of renowned economist and author
Lord Meghnad Desai, an eminent economist and House of Lords member, passed away on Tuesday. Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed anguish over Desai's death, stating how the economist 'played a role in deepening India-UK ties.' 'Anguished by the passing away of Shri Meghnad Desai Ji, a distinguished thinker, writer and economist. He always remained connected to India and Indian culture. He also played a role in deepening India-UK ties. Will fondly recall our discussions, where he shared his valuable insights. Condolences to his family and friends. Om Shanti," PM Modi posted on X, along with a photo of the prominent economist. Born in Gujarat's Vadodara, Meghnad Desai was the emeritus professor of Economics at the London School of Economics. In 1992, Desai established the Centre for the Study of Global Governance at the eminent institution. Sanjeev Sanyal, an economist and member of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Economic Advisory Council, also condoled Lord Meghnad Desai's death. 'Very sorry to hear that eminent economist Meghnad Desai has passed away. I had known him for over two decades. He was always cheerful and open to new ideas. I will cherish the many long discussions and debates that we had over the years. Om Shanti,' Sanjeev Sanyal posted on X. (This is a developing story. Keep checking for more updates)


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
HC rejects Pune teacher's plea against FIR for posts against PM, country
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea by a 46-year-old teacher from Pune, seeking quashing of FIR for allegedly posting objectionable messages on a WhatsApp group against the Prime Minister and the country after the armed forces carried out 'Operation Sindoor' in May this year. The court held that contents of FIR and material on record 'constitute the ingredients of the alleged offences' and the plea with 'no merit' deserved to be dismissed. In doing so, the Bombay HC said it was in 'agreement with the view' taken in the July 2 order of Allahabad HC that rejected bail plea of a man booked for objectionable posts against PM and armed forces. The Bombay HC reiterated, 'it has become a fashion among certain groups of people to misuse social media in the garb of freedom of speech and expression by making baseless allegations against high dignitaries, posting such material that creates hatred and disharmony among the people.' It added, 'such action shows disrespect not only against the Prime Minister of the country but also against the Indian military and its officers.' A division bench of Justices Ajey S Gadkari and Rajesh S Patil on Tuesday passed a verdict on plea by a 46-year-old woman from Pune, seeking quashing of an FIR lodged by Kalepadal police station in Pune on May 15. She was booked for offences punishable under sections 152 (acts endangering sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India), 196 (promoting enmity between different groups on ground of religion, race etc), 197 (imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration), 352 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 353 (statements conducing to public mischief) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS), 2023. The FIR alleged that the petitioner and complainant reside in the same housing society and were members of a women-only WhatsApp group of nearly 380 members. On May 7, the members praised the Indian armed forces for conducting Operation Sindoor, while the petitioner allegedly claimed that the group should not be used as a National News Channel. Another member replied it was the time to show solidarity towards the nation, to which the petitioner allegedly reacted with a laughing emoji, leading to certain exchanges of messages. Subsequently, as per FIR, she posted messages against PM and the country, based on which FIR was lodged. Advocate Harshad Sathe said his client was not in a sound condition during exchange of messages and she deleted the same as soon as she realised reactions of other members and had apologised to the complainant. Sathe argued that the 'petitioner is already at a loss' being expelled from the school and an FIR without merit should be quashed and set aside. The HC observed that the petitioner was a 'well educated' person and though she tendered her apology to the complainant, 'innumerable damage has already been caused' by her already circulated messages. It also referred to 'unrest in local areas' after her messages, resulting in people approaching the local police station in groups. The court said that it was expected of a 'prudent person,' and 'well educated' petitioner teacher to consider 'pros and cons' before posting such messages and her defence that she had realised the messages being 'controversial' and were posting them due to 'deranged mental condition will not be helpful.' The court said her 'intention becomes an essential ingredient to be judged with the kind of language she has used for India, more particularly when the whole country was feeling proud of our army' and 'she could have probably avoided reacting with a laughing emoji.' The HC added the woman did not respond to allegations made in notice sent by police and as chargesheet is yet to be filed in the case, FIR cannot be quashed at this stage.


Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Directly told Pak there's no political will to fight': Rahul Gandhi's accusation
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Tuesday alleged that by informing Pakistan of hitting only non-military targets during Operation Sindoor, India conveyed its "political will" to not fight. Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi speaks during the discussion on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha.(Sansad TV/ANI Grab) Rahul Gandhi was referring to defence minister Rajnath Singh's remarks from the day before. "Rajnath Singh said Operation Sindoor began at 1:05 am, and that by 1:35 am, India had already called Pakistan to inform them that we had hit non-military targets and that we did not want escalation," Gandhi said. 'You directly told Pakistan your political will that you do not have the political will to fight, that you do not want to fight…,' Rahul Gandhi added. The Congress leader asserted that 100 per cent political will and full freedom of operation are needed in order to completely utilise the armed forces. Reading out what he said was a quote by India's defence attache in Indonesia, Rahul Gandhi said, 'I may not agree with him that India lost so many aircraft but I do agree that we did lose some aircraft. That happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment and their air defence.' Rahul Gandhi's remarks came a day after Rajnath Singh told the Parliament that the Indian Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) called up his Pakistan counterpart around 1.35 am on May 7, the day Operation Sindoor launched, and informed him of the strikes. 'Using a hotline, he informed the Pakistan DGMO about the rationale and methodology of Operation Sindoor. He told him the fact that these attacks were not escalatory in nature, and that we did not intend to take these forward,' Rajnath Singh told the House on Monday. Rahul Gandhi questioned the move today, saying "You directly told Pakistan your political will, that you do not want to fight," he alleged. "You attacked Pakistan and simultaneously told them we are not going to hit your army or air defence systems. That is not freedom of manoeuvre; that is surrender," the LoP added. Shortly after Rahul Gandhi's accusations against the government, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the House, repeating Rajnath Singh's remarks and explaining India's rationale behind informing Pakistan after Op Sindoor strikes. "Just in a few minutes after our Operation, our military told the Pakistan military that we had this aim and we have achieved it, to know what they were thinking. We achieved our target 100%," PM Modi said. The remarks came amid a debate in Parliament over Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam attack. (With PTI inputs)