MCG braces for relocating 50K stray dogs after SC directive
The directive, issued in response to a surge in dog-bite cases, mandates that all stray dogs be shifted to shelters and prohibits their release back on the streets, a measure that directly contradicts the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, which require sterilised dogs to be returned to their original locations. The court has also warned against any obstruction to relocation efforts.
Gurugram has seen a sharp rise in dog bite cases, climbing from 2,612 in 2021 to over 10,000 in 2024, averaging nearly 27 incidents a day, district officials said.
Severe capacity shortfall
Gurugram has only two operational dog shelters, each housing up to 50 animals, with two more facilities under construction that will add another 100 spaces, taking total capacity to just 200 dogs. This is a fraction of the roughly 50,000 stray dogs in the city, according to a 2023 census.
Joint commissioner (SBM) Dr Preet Pal Singh said, 'We have not yet received the official order from the Supreme Court. Once we do, we will study it carefully and take steps in compliance. If required, we will identify land and create larger facilities, but our immediate priority will be to ensure humane treatment while safeguarding public safety.'
The MCG has announced plans for a large-capacity shelter for 5,000 animals, with joint commissioner Piyawan Singh tasked with preparing a detailed project plan. The proposal was discussed at an MCG House meeting at the Haryana Institute of Public Administration in Sector 18, chaired by Mayor Rajrani Malhotra.
Current practice
Explaining the existing system, Singh said, 'Two agencies are working on sterilisation and vaccination drives. Stray dogs are taken to an animal birth control centre, treated, sterilised, vaccinated, and then released back, as per ABC rules. We currently have no facility that can accommodate even 1,000 dogs. If the order requires permanent housing, it will require massive infrastructure expansion.'
Residents have expressed both support and concern. 'It's a good step for safety, but the challenge will be keeping the shelters clean, well-staffed, and humane,' said Neha Gupta of Sector 46. Rajiv Mehta from DLF Phase 3 said sterilisation must continue alongside relocation: 'If sterilisation stops, the problem will simply return in a few years.'
Animal welfare advocates have questioned the feasibility and ethics of mass relocation. 'Right now, it's absolutely untenable,' said local environmentalist Vaishali Rana. 'This crisis exists because MCG and RWAs failed to conduct mandated vaccination and sterilisation drives. Forcing all dogs into shelters without the resources to care for them will be cruel and unworkable.'
In reaction to the SC order, co-founder of Janm Foundation, Smita Joshi, said, 'This isn't 'management' — it's removal and culling. History shows culling is cruel, ineffective, and creates fresh waves of unsterilized, unvaccinated dogs, raising rabies risk. Even at 1,000 catches a day, it would take 300 days — plenty of time for births to replace removals.'
Targets and expansion plans
MCG sterilised more than 20,000 dogs this year and plans to hire four new agencies, one for each city zone, after current contracts expire in December, officials said. Even so, officials acknowledged that creating adequate shelter space for tens of thousands of animals while ensuring their welfare will be a huge logistical and financial challenge.
For now, the corporation is awaiting the Supreme Court's official communication, a document that could trigger one of the largest urban animal relocation efforts attempted in the region, officials said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
Prince William once spent a night on London streets in –4°C to ‘imagine what it's like…'
In December 2009, years before launching his national Homewards project, Prince William spent a winter night sleeping rough in London to better understand life without a home. Then in his late 20s, he lay in a sleeping bag in a quiet alleyway near rubbish bins, alongside Centrepoint chief executive Seyi Obakin, ABC reported. The temperature plunged to –4°C, and the future king endured not only bitter cold but also moments of danger, including a close call with a road sweeper. Speaking to ABC News at the time, William admitted he could not 'even begin to imagine what it is like to 'sleep rough' night after night.' He said he hoped the experience would deepen his understanding so he could 'do [his] bit to help the most vulnerable.' William's commitment to tackling homelessness is rooted in his mother's example. Princess Diana took both her sons to The Passage, a London shelter, when they were young – visits he has said left a lasting mark. According to People, William became Centrepoint's patron in 2005, following in Diana's footsteps. From the start, Obakin said, he aimed to be more than 'an ornamental patron', wanting to learn about the challenges and how he could make a difference. The People report stressed that his sleep-out was far from a publicity stunt. In the years since, William has continued to visit shelters, prepare and deliver meals during the Covid-19 pandemic, and commit to long-term action. In 2023, he launched Homewards – a five-year plan to make homelessness 'rare, brief, and unrepeated' in the UK. Mick Clarke of The Passage described him as 'a catalyst' helping shift the conversation from 'managing homelessness' to 'ending it'. Homewards marks its second anniversary this July and is testing new local approaches to ending homelessness in six UK regions. Centrepoint remains a key partner. 'Sleeping out was the starting point,' Obakin said. 'Homewards is the continuation.'
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC orders return of four infant girls to adoptive parents
The Supreme Court has ordered the return of four infant girls from the custody of the child welfare committee (CWC) in Telangana to their adoptive parents, prioritising the welfare and emotional security of children. The Supreme Court, however, took a different view, stressing that institutionalisation should be a measure of last resort. (File photo) The apex court, invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, set aside a Telangana High Court order that had directed CWC to retain custody until statutory adoption procedures were completed. A bench of justices BV Nagarathna and KV Viswanathan noted that the children, aged between a few months and three years, had been living with their adoptive parents long enough to form strong emotional bonds, and that uprooting them would be contrary to the 'best interest of the child' principle enshrined in the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The case arose after the Telangana police took custody of the four children in May 2024 and placed them with CWC, citing non-compliance with the adoption procedures under the 2015 Act. The adoptive parents challenged the action, claiming their adoptions were valid under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Also Read: Supreme Court orders probe into Noida land compensation payouts In one case, a couple adopted a nine-day-old baby girl in March 2024 while in another, a two-day-old girl was adopted in November 2021. A third adoption involved a 20-day-old baby girl in January 26, 2024, and in the fourth case concerned a two-day-old baby girl, adopted in January 2024. While a single judge of the high court had earlier held that the 2015 Act did not apply to these cases and ordered that the police action was illegal, a division bench overturned that decision in November 2024. This bench stressed that statutory requirements under Sections 36, 37, and 38 of the 2015 Act, covering inquiry, CWC orders and the declaration of a child as legally free for adoption, had not been met, and directed CWC to complete the process before granting custody. The Supreme Court, however, took a different view, stressing that institutionalisation should be a measure of last resort and that restoration to a family environment, wherever possible, is preferable. 'This is in the interest of the children owing to the bonding between the 'adoptive parents' and the respective children,' the bench said, also citing the principles of family responsibility, safety, and repatriation laid down in the 2015 Act. Ordering that custody be restored to the adoptive parents by August 14, 2025, 5pm, the top court also put in place safeguards. The state legal services authority or district legal services committees will monitor the welfare and progress of the children through quarterly reports from November 2025 onwards. Child welfare experts may also be deputed to inspect the homes to ensure the children's well-being. The bench clarified that the order was passed in the peculiar facts of the case to 'do complete justice' and should not be seen as diluting statutory adoption procedures. 'We have passed the aforesaid order in the best interest of the children concerned… as they have been with their adoptive parents for a few months up to three years in these cases,' the judgment stated.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
The stray dog crisis is real. But the solution cannot be cruelty
Towards the end of the Mahabharata, the five Pandavas and Draupadi renounce their kingdom, wear clothes of bark and begin the arduous walk to Mount Meru. Only the most righteous gain heaven, and this is their goal. During their long walk, a stray dog tags along, as strays tend to do. One by one, each of the Pandavas drops dead because each has a flaw that makes them unfit for heaven. Only Yudhishthira, son of Dharma, reaches the gates of Heaven — with the dog. They are met by Indra, who welcomes Yudhishthira in, but tells him to leave the dog behind: 'Dogs disrupt sacrifices and offerings, make them impure. You abandoned your wife and brothers on the journey. Now abandon the dog!' To this, Yudhishthira says he would rather give up heaven than a loyal friend: 'This dog is alive and has taken refuge with me. I will not abandon one who is devoted to me. That would be a sin equal to killing a woman, robbing a Brahmin, or harming a friend.' It turns out that Dharma himself has taken on the guise of a dog. The test of integrity in this greatest of epics is a man's treatment of a stray dog. Indra tells Yudhishthira, 'King, you are the greatest of kings, with intelligence, morality and compassion. You have given up a chariot to heaven for the sake of a loyal dog. Because of this you have gained the highest heaven.' It would be futile and wrong to deny that the population of stray dogs in our country, and their capacity to cause injuries and fatal disease, is a huge problem. Other countries manage stray dogs efficiently, and we have only to look to the West or to China for two templates. The former is based on respect for non-human lives, sanity and compassion; the latter is as brutal and draconian as ethnic cleansing. India long ago opted for the former, with policies to control dog populations and make it safe for both animals and humans. Corruption, laziness, and apathy have made sure those policies failed. As a consequence, humans and animals both suffer. Stray dogs multiply, they starve, they are subjected to horrifying cruelties. Human lives are lost to rabies and the dogs die wounded and in pain. This is not a situation that ought to continue. But the solution is not an authoritarian sweeping of the streets; it needs to be more humane, knowledge-based, and measured than the recent order of the Supreme Court. It needs to take into confidence those who look after strays all over the country: Ordinary people, NGOs. A couple of years ago, there was a rabies outbreak in Ranikhet, where I live. A few dogs died of it, and panic spread. The response from the population at large was to arm itself with sickles and lathis and attack any passing dog. The solitary animal NGO here, Himalayan Tails, went around tirelessly and fearlessly netting stray dogs and vaccinating them against rabies while euthanising those that were infected. In time, the threat passed. Since there is no government sterilisation facility here, the NGO holds camps, the public contributes funds, and dogs are vaccinated, sterilised, and returned to their spots on the streets. 'Why should that stray dog come back to that locality… What's the idea behind it?' asks Justice Pardiwala. This reveals a lack of understanding about animals, most of whom, from birds to dogs, have a homing instinct embedded in their genes. Like leopards and tigers, dogs are territorial. There are legendary stories of lost dogs running alone for hundreds of miles to return home. When you propose to vacuum them from their streets and cram thousands together in cages, it is an extermination order in disguise. The dogs have no idea that a cleansing is around the corner. There they still are: Wagging their tails and trying to be friends, cadging a bit of paneer here or a biscuit there, ambling around, scrounging for scraps, trying to survive somehow, as they always have. Those who look after them have long been pilloried for caring about dogs but not for humans — as if the two are mutually exclusive. In this myopic, petty, vindictive worldview, if you care for animals you do not care for the suffering of the underprivileged or oppressed human, nor for the mother who has lost her child to rabies. Compassion for animals is seen as the lordly affectation of the privileged. I've seen how at dawn, in Kolkata, patient knots of street dogs wait — for ordinary people, who are neither rich nor privileged, to come around with tubs of food and medicines. In the worn-out parks of East Delhi, I've seen labourers share scraps of their rotis with dogs. The stray dogs of our cities have always been cared for this way rather than by the state. A starring role in the Mahabharata hasn't cut much ice for strays in the ages since. Bulls get away with goring people to death because they are holy, and when tigers turn maneater, those particular animals are tranquillised and caged. The former is protected by religious beliefs, the latter by wildlife laws. The dog has neither. It is time for that to change, for protection to be put in place for this most gentle and loyal of animals. Those who have never known the love of a dog have never known heaven. Ever since 9/11, entire human populations have been punished for acts of violence by a few. If the Supreme Court has its way, all of Delhi's strays will pay the price for the few that have caused death or disease. What should the Indian state choose: Yudhishthira's dharma or blind brutality? Roy is a writer based in Ranikhet
