Leaked Signal messages that allegedly shared military information bring more ‘bad news' for US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth
The Pentagon's watchdog is investigating whether aides to
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth
were asked to delete
Signal
messages that may have shared sensitive military information with a reporter. This inquiry focuses on how information about the March 15 airstrikes on Houthi targets in Yemen was disseminated through the messaging app. The investigation comes as Hegseth is scheduled to testify before Congress next week for the first time since his confirmation hearing. He is expected to face questions under oath regarding his handling of sensitive information, as well as broader turmoil within the
Pentagon
, including recent senior aide departures and an internal probe into information leaks.
Previously, Hegseth has faced scrutiny over the installation of an unsecured internet line in his office, which reportedly bypassed Pentagon security protocols. He has also drawn attention for sharing details about the military strikes in multiple Signal chats, including one that inadvertently included The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg. Two people familiar with the investigation and documents reviewed by the news agency Associated Press confirmed the probe.
The
Pentagon investigation
is checking whether Hegseth's Signal chats, which included his wife, brother, top national security officials, and, inadvertently, The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, shared sensitive information about upcoming military strikes.
Investigators are also probing whether anyone was asked to delete messages and who had access to Hegseth's phone. Critics argue that posting such detailed information before the strikes could have endangered pilots, a move that would typically lead to disciplinary action for lower-ranking military members.
What US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said about the 'leaked' Signal messages
Hegseth maintains that no classified information was shared, though current and former military officials dispute that claim.
In April, following reports about the chat that included his family members, Hegseth said to Fox News Channel: 'I said repeatedly, nobody is texting war plans. I look at war plans every day. What was shared over Signal then and now, however you characterise it, was informal, unclassified communications, for media coordinations and other things. That's what I've said from the beginning.'
Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has reaffirmed his support for Hegseth, praising him during a Memorial Day speech despite the ongoing Signal chat controversy.
Since the incident, Hegseth has kept a low public profile, avoiding Pentagon press briefings, with his spokesman addressing reporters only once, the AP report claims.
Realme GT 7 Dream Edition: Unboxing and first look!
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Democrats press Trump officials for large-scale effort on Gaza starvation
Washington, Jul 29 (AP) Senate Democrats are imploring the Trump administration to address the suffering and starvation in Gaza. More than three dozen senators signed a letter Tuesday urging the resumption of ceasefire talks and sharply criticising an Israeli-backed American organisation created to distribute food. Their letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff says the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation created with backing from the Trump administration has 'failed to address the deepening humanitarian crisis and contributed to an unacceptable and mounting civilian death toll around the organisation's sites". Trump on Monday expressed concern about the worsening humanitarian situation and broke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's claim that people are not starving in the Gaza Strip. But it is unclear how Trump will proceed. (AP) SCY Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
India used ballistic matching to identify Pahalgam attack terrorists. Here's how it works
Home Minister Amit Shah on Tuesday confirmed that the three terrorists killed in Operation Mahadev carried out the Pahalgam terror attack. He said this has been established with the aid of forensic and ballistic tests. But what do we know about ballistic matching? How does it work? read more Indian security officers inspect the site a day after where terrorists indiscriminately opened fire at tourists in Pahalgam. AP File Home Minister Amit Shah has confirmed that the three terrorists killed in Operation Mahadev carried out the Pahalgam terror attack. The three terrorists, including Pahalgam mastermind Hashim Musha aka Suleman Shah, were cornered and killed by Indian security forces in a joint operation on Monday. Shah, speaking in Parliament during a discussion on Operation Sindoor, said this has been established with the aid of forensic and ballistic tests. 'Security forces went to great extent to establish that identity of terrorists was same as those responsible for Pahalgam attack,' Shah said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He confirmed that all three were Pakistani citizens. 'All three terrorists were Pakistani and we have their voter ID numbers as well. The chocolates recovered from them were also made in Pakistan,' he added. But what is the ballistic matching test Shah spoke about? How does it work? How did India establish the link? What is it? First, let's take a look at ballistics – the study of projectiles and firearms. Ballistics as a science dates back to the 16th Century. It came into its own during the early part of the 20th Century. The science made several advancements during World War I and World War II. Ballistics is vital when it comes to studying crime scenes. This is because it helps identify which firearms have been used. A fired .38 Special hollow-point bullet viewed from the side, showing the intended terminal ballistics, By Rickochet at English Wikipedia, It can also help prosecute those who committed the crime by being entered as evidence into court. Ballistic matching is done to find out if a specific gun fired a certain bullet or used a specific cartridge. It is done by examining bullet fragments or cartridge cases retrieved at the crime scenes or the weapons themselves. This evidence are then sent to ballistic experts who have gone extensive training, sometimes for years, to perform these duties. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These experts can then narrow down the type of gun used at a particular scene or match the gun with the casings and the cartridge. How does it work? The experts first examine the evidence retrieved. They use calipers and balances to examine the bullet fragments and shell casings. They also use stereo microscopes and comparison microscopes to find out which bullets have been fired. They also have special equipment which helps them analyse the trigger pull of the firearm and the interior of the barrel. All this helps them determine the calibre of the gun fired. This can be done because most modern guns are built to certain specifications. If the examiners have the weapon, they also look at rifling marks – spiral grooves inside the gun barrel that spin the bullet as it exits. They also study the firing pin marks, which is left on the back of the cartridge when the gun fires and Breechface marks – which comes from the back part of the gun that presses the cartridge. They also look at extractor and ejector marks that are left when the gun ejects the used cartridge. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Experts also sometimes test-fire the weapons and recover the spent bullets and cartridge cases. They do so firing the weapon into a large tank of water with an opening to retrieve the bullets. However, some people have also expressed scepticism about how accurate ballistics is as a science. A study by the US Defence Department's Forensic Science Centre indicated that examiners got a 'false positive' in every one of 66 cases. They said it could be as high as one in 46. Others have expressed similar worries. A piece in Scientific American noted that a study performed by the Ames Laboratory, know as Ames II, found a false positive rate of 52 per cent in bullets and cartridge cases comparisons. It said researchers who were sent the same evidence, which was later sent to other examiners, came to different conclusions at least two-thirds of the time. Different examiners reached the same conclusions under a third of the time. This, the piece argued, undermines claims of the science's efficacy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How did India establish the link? India in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack had sent the cartridges recovered for forensic analysis. Then, on Monday, after Operation Mahadev, India recovered a cache of weapons from the hideout of the neutralised terrorists. Among the weapons were M-9 and AK-47 rifles. Shah said the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report of the cartridges from the Pahalgam terror attack was already prepared. PTI These were sent to Chandigarh on Monday night via special aircraft to be tested at the Central Forensic Science Laboratory. The weapons recovered were then test fired and their casings collected. Shah said the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report of the cartridges from the Pahalgam terror attack was already prepared. The test results were compared to the earlier reports prepared and were found to be a match. Shah said it has thus been confirmed that these three terrorists had carried out the terror attack in April. He added that six ballistic experts had signed off on the same. 'There's no room for doubt. I have the ballistic report in my hand, verified and signed by six top scientists. At 4:46 AM, I received a video call confirming a 100 per cent match between the bullets fired at the site and the rifles recovered during the operation,' Shah said in Parliament. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Tariff impact: Donald Trump's new import duties could push US factory costs up to 4.5%, economists warn; flag risks to jobs, AI growth and margins
AI image As President Donald Trump prepares to implement a sweeping set of new import tariffs starting August 1, a new analysis suggests these policies could significantly strain US manufacturers by raising their costs between 2% and 4.5%. The research, conducted by the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, warns that such increases may crimp already-thin profit margins, potentially leading to stagnation in wages, layoffs, or even plant closures. 'There's going to be a cash squeeze for a lot of these firms,' said researcher Chris Bangert-Drowns, quoted AP. 'Those seemingly small changes could lead to stagnation of wages, if not layoffs and closures of plants." Trump has unveiled new trade frameworks with the EU, Japan, the Philippines, Indonesia, and the UK, each featuring import duties ranging from 15% to 50%. The administration argues these tariffs will reduce the budget deficit and bolster domestic manufacturing. 'The 'Made in USA' label is set to resume its global dominance under President Trump,' White House spokesperson Kush Desai said. However, the new analysis highlights how manufacturers are also bearing the brunt. 'We're getting squeezed from all sides,'' said Justin Johnson, president of Jordan Manufacturing Co. in Michigan, which has seen steel coil prices rise 5–10% despite not using imported steel. Trump's tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium — now at 50% — have allowed US producers to hike prices due to reduced competition, Johnson said, AP reported. A June survey by the Atlanta Fed found that companies planned to pass half of the new tariff burden onto consumers. The Labor Department reported a loss of 14,000 US manufacturing jobs following the April tariff rollout. In Michigan and Wisconsin, more than 1 in 5 jobs are in sectors exposed to Trump's trade duties, including construction, manufacturing, and oil. Even AI investments — which Trump recently promoted as America's economic future — face hurdles, with 20% of electronics inputs reliant on imports. The Budget Lab at Yale University estimates that households could lose up to $2,400 annually due to the tariffs. Economist Ernie Tedeschi disputed the Trump administration's claim that inflation is under control, stating that import prices have been accelerating despite contrary conclusions by the Council of Economic Advisers. Small business owners such as Josh Smith of Montana Knife Co. said the tariffs are affecting expansion plans. Smith paid $77,250 in import duties on a $515,000 German machine he needs for knife production — enough to hire a new worker, he said. With no American alternative, Smith said tariffs are 'the difference between hiring people and standing still.' Trump's legal justification for the new tariffs under "emergency" powers is now being challenged in court, even as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed the global community is 'willing to pay a toll' to maintain access to US markets. But for small firms like Smith's, the toll may be too steep. 'I want to buy more equipment and hire more people. That's what I want to do,' he said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
