Philippines concerned over higher U.S. tariffs, will continue to negotiate, minister says
Secretary Frederick Go told reporters that the Philippines remains committed to talking with the United States in pursuit of a bilateral deal, such as a free trade agreement.
"We remain committed to continuing negotiations with the U.S. in good faith to pursue a bilateral, comprehensive, economic agreement, or if possible an FTA," Go told a media briefing.
Philippine officials are scheduled to travel next week for talks with their U.S. counterparts before the tariff rate takes effect on August 1.
Manila's ambassador to the United States Jose Manuel Romualdez said on Thursday that the Philippines will seek to lower that tariff rate, which remains among the lowest reciprocal duties in Southeast Asia.
"We are still planning to negotiate that down," Romualdez said in a phone message.
The United States remains a vital export destination, accounting for nearly 16% of the Philippines' total exports in the first five months of the year.
Go said the Philippines will continue to pursue key economic reforms to ensure the country remains competitive, and seek more trade deals with other countries to diversify and expand markets for the country's products.
U.S. goods trade with the Philippines reached an estimated value of $23.5 billion in 2024, according to data from the Office of the United States Trade Representative.
U.S. exports to the Philippines stood at $9.3 billion, a 0.4% increase from 2023, while imports from the Philippines totalled $14.2 billion, up 6.9% year-over-year.
The resulting U.S. goods trade deficit with the Philippines widened to $4.9 billion in 2024, a 21.8% increase from the previous year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Morning Bid: The art of hogging headlines, using tariffs
July 14 (Reuters) - A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Wayne Cole. It looks increasingly clear that for President Trump, tariffs are mainly a convenient means of dominating the news cycle and staying in the headlines. Not for him are months of tortuous, complex trade talks aimed at a win-win outcome. Why do that when you can tweet a 30% tariff threat on a Saturday morning and own the news for an entire weekend? Figuring this is mostly a negotiation tactic, markets have eased only modestly in Asia. S&P 500 futures are off 0.4% or so while most regional indices are down only slightly. The euro is down a fraction, but European futures have lost a larger 0.7% as it's hard to see how Brussels could ever satisfy Trump's demands, in part because it's not clear what he wants. EU tariffs on U.S. goods are already so minor there is little to cut, while granting exemption to domestic taxes and regulations is politically fraught. It's also possible the market's stoic reaction will prove to be too clever by half. Investors figure Trump really, really wants to avoid another market melt-down, so will ease up on tariffs when the crunch comes. But with U.S. stocks hitting record highs and bond yields well off their peaks, Trump could be forgiven for thinking markets are now on his side and realise how "beautiful" tariffs really are. At any rate, it seems certain that the effective U.S. tariff rate will be akin to the Smoot-Hawley levies that contributed so much to the Great Depression and we'll get to see if Trump is right and the vast majority of professional economists are wrong. They don't yet look to have magically solved the U.S. trade deficit. China today reported its surplus with the U.S. rose 48% in June to almost $27 billion, while its overall exports beat forecasts. Trump also found time to stoke his feud with Fed Chair Jerome Powell, saying it would be "a great thing" if he stepped down - eight years after he nominated Powell to the role. Worryingly, White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett over the weekend warned Trump might have grounds to fire Powell because of renovation cost overruns at the Fed's Washington headquarters. Analysts assume a Trump pick for Fed chief would do his bidding by trying to cut interest rates aggressively, though whether the rest of FOMC voters would agree is in doubt. This could push short-term market rates lower, but longer-term yields would likely rise as investors demand compensation for the risk of faster inflation, much as happened in Turkey. Key developments that could influence markets on Monday: - ECB board member Piero Cipollone appears at the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's housing revolution threatens another mortgage meltdown
Donald Trump is eyeing up what might become 'the biggest deal in history' and the stakes could not be higher. It could feasibly bring in hundreds of billions of dollars for the public purse and boost homeownership. Or it could send mortgage rates soaring. The deal is the fate of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the two mortgage giants that together back around $7 trillion (£5.2 trillion) of America's $12 trillion mortgage market – a sum roughly double the size of the UK economy. The two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) nearly went under during the financial crisis and were bailed out by the US Treasury in 2008. For the last 17 years, they have been in government conservatorship, meaning they are governed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), with an explicit government guarantee behind their loans. Now, the president wants to start cashing out. Shaky foundations 'I am giving very serious consideration to taking Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac public,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on May 21. 'Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are doing very well, throwing off a lot of CASH, and the timing would seem to be right. Stay tuned!' The two GSEs have a combined net worth of almost $161bn. Selling a portion of these shares could rival the $25.6bn Saudi Aramco initial public offering (IPO) as the biggest listing in history. But there are big potential problems. It is not clear what the trade-off will be between the Treasury's stake in the GSEs and those of private investors, who include several of Trump's billionaire backers. The deal raises questions about threats to financial stability, and there is a risk it could drive mortgage rates higher. In early June, a group of 14 Democrat senators led by Elizabeth Warren wrote to FHFA director William Pulte warning the result could be 'disastrous'. Fannie and Freddie are enormous. Between them, they support about 70pc of the US mortgage market. 'Back in 2007, they were a sizeable chunk of the market, now they are almost its entirety,' says Jim Parrott, of the Urban Institute. The GSEs function by buying up mortgage loans from banks. They pool the mortgages into trusts and slice them up to issue mortgage-backed securities (MBS), an investment vehicle similar to a bond. These are then sold to insurers and pension funds. Fannie and Freddie earn a fee by guaranteeing the debt. This is one of the bedrocks of the American financial system. There are many good reasons to end conservatorship, which was supposed to be a temporary crisis measure. Aaron Klein, senior fellow on financial regulation at the Brookings Institution, argues that opening the GSEs up to private capital would free them from the government's risk-averse lending terms and open up mortgage borrowing for first-time buyers. Messing it up, however, would risk triggering contagion across the financial sector. Mortgage risk One of the most important questions is what happens to the government's guarantee – worth some $250bn – if the GSEs leave conservatorship. Analysts have warned losing the government guarantee could add a whole percentage point to mortgage rates. This would take the average rate on a 30-year fix to more than 7.7pc – in line with the 23-year high that was hit in 2023.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Kristi Noem takes NBC host to task after liberal tears over 'inhumane' Alligator Alcatraz
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem made a fiery appearance on NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday as she fiercely defended the Trump administration's controversial new migrant detention center in the Florida Everglades, dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz.' The interview came after Democratic lawmakers described the facility as a humanitarian nightmare. In a blistering exchange with NBC anchor Kristen Welker, Noem accused Democrats of hypocrisy and political theater after a congressional tour of the facility ended with accusations of inhumane treatment and squalid conditions. 'I wish they would've said that during the Biden administration,' Noem said as Welker repeatedly pressed her about reports of overcrowded cells and unsanitary water sources. 'They were piling people on top of each other on cement floors... and they didn't have two feet to move. They never did that, and that's why this politics has to end.' The clash came just 24 hours after Florida Democrat Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and other Democrats toured the newly opened compound and compared it to an internment camp. 'There are really disturbing, vile conditions and this place needs to be shut the hell down,' Wasserman Schultz told reporters. 'This place is a stunt, and they're abusing human beings here.' According to lawmakers on the tour, more than 30 migrants were packed into cage-style cells with just three combination sink-toilets. Temperatures hovered in the mid-80s inside medical intake tents. Grasshoppers, mosquitoes, and other insects were rampant. One detainee reportedly shouted, 'I'm an American citizen!' while others chanted 'Libertad!', Spanish for 'freedom.' Welker confronted Noem with such claims: 'Thirty people stuffed into a jail cell? Drinking water from the same place they use the bathroom?' But Noem appeared unshaken and fired back. 'Our detention centers at the federal level are held to a higher standard than most local or state centers and even federal prisons. The standards are extremely high. This is a state-run facility, but it still exceeds the requirements.' She elaborated: 'I have been there and I have seen the rooms they are in. I will call them jail cells - it's a facility where they are held that are secure and meet the highest levels of what the government requires for detention.' When Welker pushed further, saying Democrats have 'called them cages,' Noem announced that the administration would soon allow cameras into the facility. 'We'll take cameras and show people what the facilities look like. Because if you compare them to what happened under the Biden and Obama administrations, these centers are at the highest levels - even higher than our federal prison standards.' Noem also disclosed plans for expansion. 'We are going to expand,' she told Welker. 'We're actively looking at how to open more detention sites like this one. We are looking for more information and how we can get more detention.' Noem stood by the facility and doubled down, revealing that five Republican governors have already spoken with her about using the Florida site as a model. 'We are going to expand,' Noem said. 'We're actively looking at how to open more detention sites like this one.' Currently, media access remains blocked and journalists were not allowed to attend Saturday's tour. Legislators were also barred from bringing phones or cameras inside. Critics, including attorneys and advocacy groups, claim the facility is little more than a prison camp hidden deep in Florida's swamps. Detainees have reported worms in the food, overflowing toilets, and 24-hour lockdowns in cages teeming with mosquitoes. At least one minor and several individuals with no criminal record are reportedly being held. 'These are human beings who have inherent rights, and they have a right to dignity,' immigration attorney Josephine Arroyo said. 'They're violating a lot of their rights by putting them there.' A Venezuelan detainee described the facility as a 'zoo cage,' adding that detainees were being pressured to sign self-deportation documents. There are several people protesting outside the Alligator Alcatraz facility Republican lawmakers say the criticisms are exaggerated. 'The rhetoric coming out of the Democrats does not match the reality,' Florida State Senator Blaise Ingoglia said. 'The living quarters were clean. The air conditioning worked well. No squalor.' State Senator Jay Collins, a US Army veteran who toured a different section, agreed. 'Would I want that toilet-and-sink combination at my house? Probably not, but this is a transitional holding facility.' Division of Emergency Management spokesperson Stephanie Hartman called the reports of mistreatment 'completely false.' 'The facility meets all required standards and is in good working order,' Hartman said. 'Every detainee gets three meals a day, unlimited drinking water, showers, and other necessities.' The Alligator Alcatraz facility was constructed in days and built on a remote airstrip in the Everglades. It now holds nearly 900 detainees but has a capacity of over 3,000.
