
8 Pieces of Free Advice for Trump's National Security Team
1. Trust Your People.
The military and civilian professionals assigned to you are very competent and possess deep knowledge about your organizations and national security. They want to help you succeed. My staff would have kept me from violating the rules you appear to have ignored or blundered through. If your staff knew you were sharing details of pending military operations on Signal, a commercially available app, and didn't stop you, that's a big problem. I'm assuming they weren't involved. Mr. Waltz, senior officials don't build their own chat groups. That should be done by support staff — if at all. I've worked with many of our senior military leaders. Many had extensive combat experience, including in missions not unlike those on March 15 targeting the Houthis. If they had known Signal was being used, or the nature of the communications being shared there, I cannot imagine that they would not have intervened. This is what happens when you disregard expertise.
2. Maintain the dignity and professionalism of your office.
All of you are under constant scrutiny. You are being judged by the American people, by those who report to you and by the world at large. Anything you do may be reported on by the media and recorded for posterity. This isn't about you — it's about the office you hold. You do a disservice to yourselves and to the nation when you conduct yourselves unprofessionally. Emojis are not professional. Using Signal for sensitive matters is not professional. Using childish insults to characterize a reporter is not professional. Airstrikes that kill people are serious business and should be treated as such. The authority to deploy the armed forces of the United States is an awesome and humbling responsibility. Demonstrate by your conduct and by how you communicate that you fully appreciate that fact.
3. Trust and use the systems.
All members of the national security team have extensive, sophisticated and secure communications systems standing by to support them 24/7, wherever they may be. In the case of the secretary of defense, there is both the National Military Command Center and the organization in the Pentagon known as 'cables,' where professionals stand by to set up one-on-one or group calls globally. Those systems can support any contingency up to and including a nuclear conflict. There is no good reason to ignore them.
4. Own obvious mistakes.
Denying that you did anything wrong just won't fly. You may deceive some of the public or your supporters into thinking you did nothing wrong, or that this was no big deal, but I can assure you that the people you lead all know better. Everyone in uniform, every member of the intelligence community and everyone in our diplomatic services — the people you lead — know that what you did was seriously wrong. They also know that if any of them had committed a similar offense they would have been fired or severely disciplined. When Airman Jack Teixeira revealed highly sensitive classified information to his online buddies, he was trying to impress them. He wasn't a spy, just stupid and immature. He is facing years in prison for civil offenses plus a military court-martial.
A phrase I heard occasionally in the Air Force was, 'We're not a one-mistake Air Force.' That meant we can make mistakes and then, instead of getting fired, be given the opportunity to learn and move on. My response to that was, 'It depends on the mistake.' In this case, by sheer good fortune (and the journalist's discretion), there was no apparent direct consequence to U.S. troops from your security breach. It was perhaps a rookie mistake made only two months into your various jobs, with no experience at these senior levels. That would make it more understandable. But if you want any chance of leading effectively, you need to own that you screwed up royally and won't repeat the mistake.
5. Don't exclude senior military personnel.
All the National Security Council meetings I've attended or known about at this level also included relevant senior military leaders, such as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs or the vice chairman and the relevant combatant commanders. I know that Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., who was fired as chairman by President Trump, would have ensured that any such conversation was done through approved channels and at the right level of security. And I'm sure that Adm. Christopher Grady, the acting chairman, would have done the same. Why were they excluded?
6. Understand you are always a target for spies.
The group of people on this Signal chat are probably, except for the president, the most targeted group of people for espionage on the planet. Our adversaries will use every means available to spy on you, including and especially trying to penetrate any commercial devices or applications you may be using. Never forget that for a second.
7. Don't embarrass the president or the country again.
If there is one deadly sin for political appointees, it is to embarrass the president. In every case I can remember, political appointees who break that rule have not stayed in office long. The current president may be less sensitive about this than those I have served under, but I expect some of you are pretty close to even his limit. I suggest that you take a more cautious approach.
8. Look at yourselves in the mirror.
You all hold positions of vast and awesome responsibility. Are your experiences and capabilities up to the jobs you hold? If not, you have a duty to the American people and to the president to acknowledge this and step aside. You might give that option some serious thought.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK foreign minister faces fine after JD Vance fishing trip licence error
UK foreign minister faces fine after JD Vance fishing trip licence error LONDON (Reuters) -Britain's foreign minister David Lammy could be on the hook for a 2,500 pounds ($3,394) fine following his fishing trip last week with U.S. Vice President JD Vance, after admitting he didn't have the required licence. Vance and Lammy were pictured by invited media as they fished in the lake at the foreign minister's Chevening country residence in southeast England before a bilateral meeting as part of the vice president's working holiday to Britain. The vice president later joked on camera that the only strain on the U.S.-British special relationship was that while his three children had caught fish, the British foreign minister had not. All anglers are required by law to have a valid rod licence while they are fishing, regardless of whether they catch anything and whether they are on private land. Breaches can be punished with a fine of up to 2,500 pounds ($3,394). Lammy's office on Wednesday said he had not purchased the licence before the trip and had since sought to rectify the mistake. "The Foreign Secretary has written to the Environment Agency over an administrative oversight that meant the appropriate licences had not been acquired for fishing on a private lake as part of a diplomatic engagement at Chevening House last week," a spokesperson for Britain's Foreign Office said in a statement. "As soon as the Foreign Secretary was made aware of the administrative error, he successfully purchased the relevant rod fishing licences." The spokesperson had no immediate comment on whether a licence had been purchased for Vance too. Vance is in England with his wife Usha and their children, who are spending this week in the hamlet of Dean in the picturesque Cotswolds, following their stay at Chevening. ($1 = 0.7367 pounds)


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
What the world loses when America stops fighting for free elections
The Trump administration's 'America First' approach to international relations is transforming the democratic world order the U.S. helped create. An internal instruction from Secretary of State Marco Rubio to U.S. diplomats may be the arrow that finishes off what the U.S. has meant to those fighting through the ballot box for freedom and democracy. In an apparent pursuit of policies that promote ' national interests,' no longer will the United States comment on foreign elections except to offer 'short, congratulatory' messages 'toward the winner.' Also, such messages 'should avoid opining on the fairness or the integrity of an electoral process, its legitimacy, or the democratic values of the country in question.' The integrity of democratic elections has been a cornerstone of international law and an important source of legitimacy for sovereign governments under the United Nations Charter's Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The long-accepted standard has been that the votes of citizens in a free and fair election is a fundamental right. Elections engage every major societal institution and constitute a dramatic stress test for societies. The reaction to a stolen election can be extreme and can result in violence. At a minimum, a stolen election undermines the legitimacy of the sitting government. An election infected by fraud that undermines a sovereign government is hardly in America's national interest. The U.S. has been a global leader in election observation for the past 40 years. The process used to determine whether an election is free and fair has evolved. It involves an assessment of a nation's election law, the integrity of its election commission's rulings, the conduct of political parties during the pre-election period, the fairness of access to the media and a rigorous observation of the vote and the tabulation of results by local and international observers. While there had been observation efforts by human rights groups in the 1980s, the most important breakthrough came when the U.S. sponsored major international observer groups for the 'snap' election in the Philippines in 1986. The U.S. government sponsored an official delegation to observe the election and USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy supported an international delegation organized by the National Democratic Institute and the International Republican Institute. The international delegation sent observers from 30 nations to all corners of the Philippine archipelago. They partnered with a Philippine organization called the National Citizens Movement for Free Elections, a civic group with sponsorship from the business community and the Catholic Church. The National Citizens Movement for Free Elections undertook a parallel vote count. Its members turned in the vote tabulations from every voting place, thus making it difficult for the ruling party to cheat in the vote counting process. The citizens movement count and the examples of fraud collected by the National Democratic Institute-International Republican Institute delegation provided all the evidence that was needed. The voters rose up and a ' People Power ' revolution forced the Ferdinand Marcos regime to step down. Less than two years later, Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet lost in a plebiscite that had been designed to keep him in power for another eight years. The National Democratic Institute sponsored another international delegation, this one led by a former President of Spain, Adolfo Suarez. A parallel vote count was employed, and Chilean political leaders on the left and right who had witnessed the Philippines vote joined Suarez in calling upon the Chilean military to release the results showing that Pinochet had lost. By now, the world embraced the concept of election observation, and many governments — particularly those in the new democracies of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union — wanted observers who would confirm election results. Longstanding ruling parties, such as the Institutional Revolutionary Party in Mexico and the Socialist Party in Senegal, concerned that their legitimacy was being challenged, requested assistance in reforming their election systems. USAID and other donor agencies began to finance election system reforms and observers. The United Nations Development Program and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe created election monitoring units to meet the new demand. Now it appears that the world's leader in democracy promotion and election observation is turning its back on a vital element of democracy. The underlying motivation seems to be the desire to make 'deals' with authoritarian governments the administration seeks to befriend. If these governments were called out for denying their people the right to a free and fair election, dealmaking might suffer. Better to turn a blind eye! Yet the administration shows no reluctance to lecture our European allies on how to treat right-wing populist parties, as in the case of Germany's neo-Nazi party, the Alternative for Germany Party. Or to endorse a right-wing opposition presidential candidate in Poland, or to chastise the High Court in Romania for canceling a flawed election, or to charge the government of South Africa with genocide because of the way white farmers are being treated. It seems that interfering in the internal affairs of democratic nations is fair game. Yet commenting on the efficacy of elections is forbidden. It is said that democracy is a journey, not a destination. The U.S. has never achieved democratic perfection, but it has worked assiduously to make it work better at home and abroad. President Ronald Reagan called it an obligation of democracies to share best practices with other nations. Tremendous progress has been made in the management of elections around the globe thanks to pro-democracy organizations supported by the U.S. government. Rubio was once a strong supporter of this effort. His latest message to American diplomats marks a sad day for the democracy promotion mission. One hopes that 40 years of progress will not be extinguished by an ill-advised instruction.


UPI
15 minutes ago
- UPI
Gov. Gavin Newsom says California will redraw its districts to counteract Texas
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, shown here in July, said his state will redraw its distrcts to neutralize Texas' redistricting efforts. Photo by Jonathan Alcorn/UPI | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- California Gov. Gavin Newsom said his state will redraw its districts to establish more Democratic congressional seats. Newsom's office said in a post on X signed with his initials that President Donald Trump missed his deadline of Tuesday evening to respond to a letter he sent the White House on Monday. In the letter, he demanded that Trump stop the mid-decade, partisan redistricting efforts in heavily Republican states, like Texas and Ohio. "Donald 'TACO' Trump, as many call him, 'missed' the deadline!!!," Newsom said in an all-caps post mimicking Trump's way of posting on social media. "California will now draw new, more 'beautiful maps,' they will be historic as they will end the Trump presidency (Dems take back the House!). Big press conference this week with powerful Dems and Gavin Newsom -- your favorite governor -- that will be devastating for 'MAGA.' Thank you for your attention to this matter!" The most populous state in the nation, California has 43 Democratic members of the house and nine Republican members. In late July, Newsom and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker warned that they would take this measure. "Donald Trump called up [Texas] Governor [Greg] Abbott for one simple reason: to rig the 2026 elections. California's moral high ground means nothing if we're powerless because of it," Newsom said after meeting with Democrats from the Texas House. "This moment requires us to be prepared to fight fire with fire. Whether that's a special election, a ballot initiative, a bill, a fight in court. If they proceed in Texas, we will be ready." "This is not a bluff. This is real, and trust me, it's more real after listening to these leaders today, how existential this is," Newsom added. In Monday's letter, also posted on X, Newsom asked Trump to call on Texas and other red states to stop the "hyper-partisan gerrymander to rig the upcoming midterm elections." "You are playing with fire, risking the destabilization of our democracy, while knowing that California can neutralize any gains you hope to make," the letter said. "This attempt to rig congressional maps to hold onto power before a single vote is cast in the 2026 election is an affront to American democracy." Ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, Republicans hold a 219-212 advantage in the House with four vacancies -- three Democrats who died and one Republican who resigned. More than a dozen Texas House members fled to Illinois and California -- two blue states -- in late July to meet with Newsom and Pritzker, during which they revealed their intentions. But on Tuesday, the Texas Senate voted 19-2 along party lines to approve a congressional redistricting map that is identical to a version in the Texas House. The measure, Senate Bill 4, redraws the state's U.S. House of Representatives districts. Trump believes an additional five seats could be created by changing the borders. Of the state's 38 districts, 25 are held by Republicans. Democrats hold seats in big cities of Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, Houston, Laredo, McAllen and San Antonio. Nine of the 11 Democrats in the Texas Senate walked out immediately before the chamber voted to approve the new redistricting map.