logo
Reddit sues AI company Anthropic for allegedly ‘scraping' user comments to train chatbot Claude

Reddit sues AI company Anthropic for allegedly ‘scraping' user comments to train chatbot Claude

Social media platform Reddit sued the artificial intelligence (AI) company Anthropic on Wednesday, alleging that it is illegally 'scraping' the comments of millions of Reddit users to train its chatbot Claude.
Reddit claims that Anthropic has used automated bots to access Reddit's content despite being asked not to do so, and 'intentionally trained on the personal data of Reddit users without ever requesting their consent'.
Anthropic said in a statement that it disagreed with Reddit's claims 'and will defend ourselves vigorously'.
Reddit filed the lawsuit Wednesday in California Superior Court in San Francisco, where both companies are based.
'AI companies should not be allowed to scrape information and content from people without clear limitations on how they can use that data,' said Ben Lee, Reddit's chief legal officer, in a statement Wednesday.
The Anthropic logo is seen in this illustration taken March 31, 2023. Photo: Reuters
Reddit has previously entered licensing agreements with Google, OpenAI and other companies that are paying to be able to train their AI systems on the public commentary of Reddit's more than 100 million daily users.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge approves US$2.8 billion deal that paves way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
Judge approves US$2.8 billion deal that paves way for US colleges to pay athletes millions

South China Morning Post

time4 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Judge approves US$2.8 billion deal that paves way for US colleges to pay athletes millions

A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, US Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal, which had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes would lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to US$20.5 million with athletes over the next year and US$2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes – some have already begun – is difficult to overstate. The professionalisation of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programmes. The agreement will resonate in almost all the NCAA's 1,100 member schools, boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. The road to a settlement

US retailers demand Chinese firms pay shipping costs as trade pressure grows
US retailers demand Chinese firms pay shipping costs as trade pressure grows

South China Morning Post

time5 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

US retailers demand Chinese firms pay shipping costs as trade pressure grows

US retail giants are demanding that their Chinese suppliers split or even bear the full cost of shipping goods across the Pacific, as freight rates skyrocket amid the disruption caused by the trade war, sources at Chinese export firms told the Post. Advertisement The move is the latest sign of the intense pressure America's biggest retailers are putting on Chinese factories to absorb more of the additional costs created by the trade war, with the companies facing calls at home to 'eat the tariffs'. Until recently, it was standard practice for major American retailers to pay the full cost of shipping goods from China to the United States, with the companies able to leverage long-standing relationships with global shipping firms to keep costs low, sources from exporters in eastern China's Zhejiang province said. But that is now changing. Factories in Zhejiang supplying the US' 'dominant' hypermarket chains are now having to foot part – or, in some cases, all – of the cost of transporting goods to America, according to the sources. Stage Group, a leading garment maker from Zhejiang, has been paying the logistics costs on 60 per cent of its US-bound shipments since the end of May, a sales representative from the company said. Advertisement

AI content detector: why does China dismiss it as ‘superstition tech'?
AI content detector: why does China dismiss it as ‘superstition tech'?

South China Morning Post

time6 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

AI content detector: why does China dismiss it as ‘superstition tech'?

With the graduation season approaching, many Chinese universities have introduced regulations setting clear requirements for the proportion of artificial intelligence -generated content – or the 'AI rate', as it is called – in theses. Advertisement Some universities have used the AI rate as a deciding factor in whether a thesis is approved. The rule is intended to prevent academic misconduct, as educators have become increasingly concerned about the unregulated use of AI in producing scholarly literature, including data falsification and content fabrication, since the public debut of generative AI models such as ChatGPT However, an official publication of the Ministry of Science and Technology has warned that using AI content detectors to identify AI writing is essentially a form of 'technological superstition' that could cause many unintended side effects. AI detection tools could produce false results, the Science and Technology Daily said in an editorial last Tuesday, adding that some graduates had complained that content clearly written by them was labelled as AI-generated. Advertisement Even a very famous Chinese essay written 100 years ago was evaluated as more than 60 per cent AI-generated, when analysed by these tools, the article said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store