logo
What made the cut in Senate's nearly 1,000-page policy megabill?

What made the cut in Senate's nearly 1,000-page policy megabill?

Yahoo11 hours ago
Senate Republicans on Tuesday jammed through a major package advancing President Trump's tax priorities, paid for by a host of cuts to the social safety net, including Medicaid and food assistance. The bill also slashes green energy and includes changes to student loan programs.
The nearly 1,000-page package, released Friday, has undergone notable changes since initial pieces of the plan first came into view weeks ago. Republicans have also sought to make several tweaks to the bill in the past several days.
The expansive bill now awaits consideration in the House, where leaders hope to push it across the finish line before a self-imposed July 4 deadline.
Live updates: Senate sends tax bill to House; Trump visits 'Alligator Alcatraz'
Here are some of the most significant changes that made the cut through a frenzied 27-hour debate — and what didn't.
A centerpiece of the legislation is making permanent the expiring provisions in Trump's signature tax law — which nonpartisan scorers and think tanks estimate would cost trillions of dollars over the next decade.
One of the most costly proposals is extending the individual rate reductions in the 2017 law. The bill would also seek to cement existing federal tax brackets, boost the standard deduction and maintain the termination of personal exemptions.
It also seeks to deliver on several key promises the president made on the campaign trail last year. That includes deductions for taxes on tips, overtime pay and car loan interest. However, the measures are not fully deductible.
Republicans setting up tax cliff at end of Donald Trump's term
The final version of the legislation includes restrictions on Medicaid, the joint state-federal program that provides health care for more than 70 million low-income and disabled Americans.
Like the House-passed version, the Senate bill will require beneficiaries to prove they are working or in school at least 80 hours a month to keep their health insurance starting Dec. 31, 2026. The Senate version extends the work requirement to low-income parents of children older than 14, in addition to childless adults without disabilities. It also requires more frequent eligibility checks.
But the Senate parliamentarian said a measure cutting federal funds to states that use their own money to provide health care coverage to immigrants lacking permanent legal status, along with a provision banning Medicaid from covering gender transition services, weren't in compliance with Senate rules.
The steep cuts to taxes levied by Medicaid expansion states on hospitals and other providers remained in the bill despite objections by some Republicans in the Senate and House, though they will now be delayed by a year, to start in 2028.
The bill also requires people above the poverty line to pay out-of-pocket copays for most Medicaid services, like lab tests or doctor visits. States will be allowed to charge up to 5 percent of a person's income per year, though some Democratic-led states may opt for a smaller amount.
The Senate made sweeping cuts to climate-friendly energy tax credits — especially for wind and solar — that were passed as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
The final legislation does not allow a project to get the tax credit if it does not begin producing electricity by 2028. This is stricter than an earlier Senate version, which would have allowed projects that begin construction in the next few years to qualify for the credits.
The bill would require some states for the first time to cover a share of the cost of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits — which are currently completely funded by the federal government — if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent.
If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent and 15 percent. The proposal in the megabill would also allow states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent.
Republicans say the proposal is aimed at incentivizing states to get their payment error rates down, while Democrats have argued the measure could lead to states having to cut benefits.
However, last-minute changes have been made to the plan that would allow for delayed implementation for states with the highest payment error rates after concerns from Republican senators in Alaska, which had the highest rate in fiscal 2024.
The final bill would introduce numerous changes to student loans, including limits on borrowing and consolidation into only two repayment plans.
Republicans want to cap graduate-level federal student loans at $20,500 a year, at $50,000 for law or medical school government loans, and at$20,000 for Parent PLUS loans for undergraduate students.
If passed, student loan borrowers will have two repayment options: a new standard plan and a new income-driven repayment plan. Under the latter, starting in 2028, borrowers will have access to the Repayment Assistance Plan and the income-based repayment option.
It would also eliminate economic hardship and unemployment deferments. The bill does allow loans to be rehabilitated twice, up from once before.
Pell Grants would get additional funding in 2026 and exclude students who received full-ride scholarships to a school.
It also establishes workforce Pell Grants offering help to students who enroll in short-term work programs that don't end with a college degree.
The bill would add $5 trillion the nation's debt limit, which caps how much money the Treasury Department can owe to pay the country's bills.
Congress last acted on the debt limit in 2023 as part of a deal that suspended the ceiling through 2024. Since January, the Treasury Department has been implementing 'extraordinary measures' to buy time for lawmakers to raise or suspend the debt limit and stave off the threat of a national default.
The national debt stands at more than $36 trillion.
Republicans passed a tax credit refund that would go to individuals or companies that donate to organizations that provide K-12 school choice scholarships.
The provision is a major win for the school choice movement, as it will create a national program to bypass Democratic states that have been resistant to school choice initiatives.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) had been pushing for a provision that would have required the sale of hundreds of thousands of acres of public land, but he abandoned that effort over the weekend.
In a post on social platform X, he said, 'Because of the strict constraints of the budget reconciliation process, I was unable to secure clear, enforceable safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families — not to China, not to Blackrock and not to any foreign interests.'
'For that reason, I've decided to withdraw the federal land sales provision from the bill,' he added.
Lee had originally proposed to sell up to 3.3 million acres of land owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Forest Service, but he later revised his proposal to pertain to up to 1.2 million acres of the BLM land.
He said he was pushing the measure to build more affordable housing. He received opposition from not only Democrats but also members of his own party, some of whom said they would vote against the bill if it contained public land sales.
The legislation omits a contentious change that floated over the weekend — an excise tax on new solar and wind projects if they contain Chinese components.
This surprise provision met pushback from moderate lawmakers who did not want to add an additional tax on these industries.
The Senate stripped a provision barring states from regulating artificial intelligence (AI).
The most recent version of the provision would have barred states from regulating AI for five years if they wanted access to $500 million in AI infrastructure and deployment funding. It cut in half the timeline of the original provision, which sought to bar state AI regulation for 10 years.
Tobias Burns and Julia Shapero contributed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Senate and the Supreme Court
The Senate and the Supreme Court

New York Times

time6 minutes ago

  • New York Times

The Senate and the Supreme Court

The Senate narrowly passed Republicans' sprawling bill to slash taxes and social safety net programs. Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaking vote, after three Republican senators — Susan Collins, Thom Tillis and Rand Paul — voted no. The bill extends roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts enacted during Trump's first term and increases funding for border security and the military. It cuts about $1.1 trillion from health care programs, mainly Medicaid, which experts estimate will cause nearly 12 million Americans to lose coverage. The bill, which could affect millions of Americans, is a major political gamble, Carl Hulse writes. The House must now decide whether to pass the Senate's version of the bill or try to reconcile it with its own. Any delays could mean that Congress misses the July 4 deadline that Trump set. The Morning's readers were interested in the bill yesterday (it was our most-clicked link). Here's more from Times reporters who were in the Capitol: In all, senators voted 49 times during a 27-hour marathon session. They wore fluffy blankets and pullover sweatshirts inside the chilly chamber. Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, cast a deciding vote for the bill after winning carveouts for her state. 'Do I like this bill? No,' she told NBC News afterward. 'But I tried to take care of Alaska's interests.' Trump and Elon Musk returned to jousting on social media about the legislation. The bill's policies could inflict major financial pain on poor Americans. Republicans have insisted that the policy package will help seniors and the middle class. Here's a fact check. Covering the court The end of June is some combination of Christmas and Tax Day for Adam Liptak, who has covered the Supreme Court for The Times since 2008. That's when the justices release a dizzying array of rulings: This term's major cases, some of which were decided earlier in the year, touched on guns, porn, police tactics, religion, citizenship, L.G.B.T.Q. rights, vapes and TikTok. How the Supreme Court voted in the last two terms Last term 5-4 6-3 7-2 8-1 9-0 This term 5-4 6-3 7-2 8-1 9-0 Last term 5-4 6-3 7-2 8-1 9-0 This term 5-4 6-3 7-2 8-1 9-0 Note: Chart shows nine-person decisions that were orally argued and signed. Sources: Lee Epstein and Andrew D. Martin, Washington University in St. Louis; Michael J. Nelson, Penn State from the Supreme Court Database By The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Trump keeps saying the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not
Trump keeps saying the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump keeps saying the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump keeps saying that Republicans' mega tax and spending cut legislation will eliminate taxes on federal Social Security benefits. It does not. At best, Donald Trump's 'no tax on Social Security' claim exaggerates the benefits to seniors if either the House or Senate-passed proposals is signed into law. Here's a look at Trump's recent statements, and what the proposals would — or would not — do. What Trump has said Trump repeatedly told voters during his 2024 campaign that he would eliminate taxes on Social Security. As his massive legislative package has moved through Congress, the Republican president has claimed that's what the bill would do. Trump said on a recent appearance on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures" that the bill includes 'no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime.' A temporary tax deduction But instead of eliminating the tax, the Senate and House have each passed their own versions of a temporary tax deduction for seniors aged 65 and over, which applies to all income — not just Social Security. And it turns out not all Social Security beneficiaries will be able to claim the deduction. Those who won't be able to do so include the lowest-income seniors who already don't pay taxes on Social Security, those who choose to claim their benefits before they reach age 65 and those above a defined income threshold. The Senate proposal includes a temporary $6,000 deduction for seniors over the age of 65, contrasted with the House proposal, which includes a temporary deduction of $4,000. The Senate proposal approved Tuesday would eliminate Social Security tax liability for seniors with adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 or less or $150,000 if filing as a married couple. If passed into law, the tax deduction would last four years, from 2025 to 2029. The deductions phase out as income increases. White House touts impact Touting a new Council of Economic Advisers analysis, the White House said Tuesday that '88% of all seniors who receive Social Security — will pay NO TAX on their Social Security benefits," going on to say that the Senate proposal's $6,000 senior deduction 'is estimated to benefit 33.9 million seniors, including seniors not claiming Social Security. The deduction yields an average increase in after-tax income of $670 per senior who benefits from it.' Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation think tank, said conflating the tax deduction with a claim that there will be no tax on Social Security could end up confusing and angering a lot of seniors who will expect to not pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. 'While the deduction does provide some relief for seniors, it's far from completely repealing the tax on their benefits,' Watson said. Economic effect The cost of actually eliminating the tax on Social Security would have massive impacts on the economy. University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits 'would reduce revenues by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase federal debt by 7 percent by 2054" and speed up the projected depletion date of the Social Security Trust Fund from 2034 to 2032. Discussions over taxes on Social Security are just part of the overall bill, which is estimated in its Senate version to increase federal deficits over the next 10 years by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Administration officials have said the cost of the tax bill would be offset by tariff income. Recently, the CBO separately estimated that Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store