logo
King or crook?: the enduring legacy of Queensland's political strongman Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen

King or crook?: the enduring legacy of Queensland's political strongman Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen

The Guardian21-06-2025
'Sir Joh will be remembered, and he will long be remembered. But not for what he wanted to be remembered for.'
This was my prediction when Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen died in 2005, heading up one of a number of obituaries.
Propelling my pen was a sense of obligation to do justice to the stunted opportunities and deliberate and casual cruelties inflicted on the state and many, many, Queenslanders under Australia's most blinkered, authoritarian and corrupt postwar regime.
The balance in the initial flood of obituaries was about two-thirds more adulation than condemnation.
Cranes on the skyline and huge holes in the ground carried more weight than stamping on civil liberties and corruption.
There is much better balance in newly minted television documentary Joh: Last King of Queensland, airing on Stan this weekend.
Its signature touch is having Sir Joh present as actor Richard Roxburgh delivering characteristic monologues to answer or more typically homily his way around any questions or criticisms of his conduct. Vignettes from family, friends, political luminaries, journalists, historians and opponents and a wealth of available footage keep the narrative going.
Back then, Joh's quite deliberate – even trained – incoherent rambling was all too frequently excessively tidied up by reporters and then judged by commentators as evidence of his political acumen.
Of course, it also opened up opportunities for us reporters. Once, on a slow news day when he was still speaking to me, I asked Joh whether he was contemplating sending the then Liberal leader, Sir Llew Edwards, off to a coveted London posting.
Nothing in his 'Well, you know Phil …' constituted a direct denial so yes, there was a story.
It is easy to caricature much of Bjelke-Petersen's reign. Presumably Sir Joh had a hand in the wording of the citation for his 1984 knighthood, which noted he was 'a strong believer in the concept of parliamentary democracy' who had made 'many improvements in the parliamentary process'.
This not long after the Liberals had abandoned the Coalition due to Joh's refusal to countenance parliamentary committees and while the legislative assembly continued to turn in new records for the brevity of its sitting sessions.
In truth, Sir Joh (1968-1987) was the last and second-longest lasting of a string of strongmen Australian state premiers – Robert Askin (New South Wales: 1965-1975), Henry Bolte (Victoria: 1955-1972), Sir Charles Court (Western Australia: 1974-1982) and Thomas Playford (South Australia: 1938-1965).
All were conservative and variously notorious for riding roughshod over Westminster traditions and disregard of civil liberties, abuse of the electoral system, and tolerance or participation in corruption.
Even considering Askin's organised crime associations, Bjelke-Petersen was to surpass them all. Of many biographies, my vote for both best and best titled goes to Evan Whitton's The Hillbilly Dictator.
That Queensland suffered for longer and graduated into such a relic of poor governance was, in Sir Joh's only valid defence, in part because a long string of Labor governments had demolished an inconvenient upper house and thoroughly gerrymandered the electorate.
The Coalition government which fell, somewhat surprised, into government in 1956 ignored the pungent smell of corruption around Frank Bischof and appointed him police commissioner.
In 1963, in the National Hotel royal commission, a future chief justice of the high court of Australia was successfully hoodwinked into a finding of negligible police corruption. Tony Fitzgerald, looking at many of the same names in much more senior positions 24 years later, found otherwise.
Sir Joh, initially an impassioned critic of Labor's gerrymander, went on to embrace the innovation of making islands of Aboriginal communities within other electorates.
Policing became political, increasingly aimed at opponents of the regime.
A notable shortage of real communists (Queensland police had nearly beaten Australia's only ever Communist member of parliament to death in 1948) did not deter the anti-communist rhetoric Joh aimed at the Labor party, unions, university students and Aboriginal activists.
Sir Joh long denied even the possibility of corruption in the police force, well beyond the optimum point to beat a hasty retreat to 'I knew nothing'. It is hard to reconcile this with the Fitzgerald inquiry's ability to acquire the records of any cabinet meeting of interest but one – the one that saw Terry Lewis appointed as commissioner of police.
All of this is relatively well canvassed in Last King. My only quibble is that it leaves the question of whether Sir Joh was personally corrupt unnecessarily unresolved.
When Sir Joh died, so did the defamation writ that he had issued years before for my publishing the details of the corruption charges that had been prepared against him in relation to brown paper bags of cash delivered to his office. True, he never faced these particular charges, but allegations of lying to Fitzgerald about the brown paper bags was the essence of the trial that brought him within a Young National juryperson of becoming the first Australian premier to be consigned to a term in prison.
The special prosecutor judged Sir Joh too old to face a second trial before a fresh jury – unfortunate for the sake of history, and also in that it would have deterred Sir Joh from launching a ludicrous $338m claim against Queensland and Queenslanders for personal damages arising from the Fitzgerald inquiry.
Other tribunals, however, were able to make definitive rulings.
An outstanding A Current Affair program in 1989 detailed the largesse given to Bjelke-Petersen by construction magnate Sir Leslie Thiess. Thiess immediately sued for defamation and lost, the jury finding that Sir Leslie had bribed Sir Joh on an extravagant scale, defrauding his own shareholders in the process.
Bjelke-Petersen's pioneering role in the bribe by way of defamation settlement racket was then highlighted by the Australian Broadcasting Tribunal. When Alan Bond let it slip that threats to his business were a feature of a 1986 $400,000 payment to Sir Joh in settlement of a 1983 defamation case, the tribunal delved deeper into whether Bond was a fit and proper enough person for a sizeable lump of the broadcast spectrum.
Backing up the tribunal, the high court outlined Bond's proposal to pay Bjelke- Petersen the $50,000 Channel Nine's lawyers thought was a reasonable or at least defensible sum, with the $350,000 balance to meet his demands to come as 'a payment overseas related to assets, a loan without obligation to repay or an excessive payment for the sale of property'.
But Bjelke-Petersen was too greedy and too needy – or too vengeful – for any of this, and the settlement made the television news and ultimately put Bond out of the television business.
Karma also seems to have intervened after Bjelke-Petersen cajoled a large loan out of a foreign bank, with the internal documentation showing this as a balance of inducements and menaces decision somewhat at variance to the applicable credit rating. But appreciation of the Swiss franc then brought the Bjelke-Petersen family enterprises close to penury.
Last King does note Bjelke-Petersen's deficient understanding of conflicts of interest, in his trying to put it over that it was perfectly OK for his wife, Florence, to hold the preferentially issued Comalco and Utah shares.
In essence, enough evidence with enough in the way of judicial proceedings was lying for Last King not to leave the question of Bjelke-Petersen's personal corruption hanging.
Last King deserves a notable place in the voluminous memorabilia around Sir Joh.
The life and times (and crimes) of Sir Johannes Bjelke-Petersen are indeed pertinent to the current state of the world and Last King should be wheeled out at regular intervals and be a curricula staple to remind us.
Phil Dickie is a Gold Walkley winner and author of bestselling book The Road To Fitzgerald: Revelations of Corruption Spanning Four Decades. His reporting on the Bjelke-Petersen government is credited, along with an ABC Four Corners program, with sparking the Fitzgerald corruption inquiry
Joh: Last King of Queensland premieres on Stan on 22 June
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Politics needs to involve more young people', say Suffolk pupils
'Politics needs to involve more young people', say Suffolk pupils

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

'Politics needs to involve more young people', say Suffolk pupils

"If we want politics to be representative of the population, we need a large part of the population, the youth, involved in it."That is the view of Saffeen Yamulki, 20, who is of Kurdish heritage and grew up in studying politics, philosophy and economics at the University of Essex, he is one of 17 young people taking part in a two-week summer school run by Ipswich MP Jack said: "I think this opportunity is brilliant [in getting] young people involved in the political realm, and not make it seem like it's a scary place with men in suits that control the world." Alex Harrison, from Needham Market and another of the summer school cohort, is about to head off to Cambridge to study philosophy, although politics is already a part of life."I work with the I Will Movement, and Ipswich is one of their named towns of social action," said the 19-year-old."One of the things we talk about is the power of young people and the power of youth. "So whilst so many of our ambassadors come into the area from a place of something quite negative, a lot of their social action is based on something they've been through and they're turning that into something positive and making change."I think while we can see social media as a place of doom and gloom, and doom scrolling, we should focus on the amazing things that young people like us are doing to create change and make the world a better place." This is the summer school's first year. It is aimed at 18 to 24-year-olds interested in careers in politics, public service and campaigning. Abbott said he was given his chance in politics through a summer school, and he wants to give the same chance to the next generation.A recent report by the Electoral Commission found that while most young people felt politics did not affect their daily lives, about two-thirds thought it was important to learn more about it, and nearly three-quarters believed politics should be taught more in schools and colleges. Another summer school participant is 19 year-old Hannah Laughlin, from is about to start her second year at Oxford, where she is studying politics, philosophy and economics."There's definitely more work we need to be doing to get young people involved," she said."A lot of the time young people really do care, and they really do have emotional reactions to what's going on – not just in the government but around them and seeing what's happening around the country and elsewhere."But they just don't know how to express how much they care." Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Chalmers stares down ‘grumps and cynics' as he claims summit already a success before it begins
Chalmers stares down ‘grumps and cynics' as he claims summit already a success before it begins

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Chalmers stares down ‘grumps and cynics' as he claims summit already a success before it begins

The treasurer claims the economic reform summit has already been a success – despite it not beginning until Tuesday and skepticism from some critics – because it has 'focused' Australians on productivity and red tape. Staring down 'grumps and cynics' in some political and media circles, Jim Chalmers claimed the three-day roundtable would help build the next three federal budgets and lead to greater cooperation between important voices in Australian public life. But even as he claimed the roundtable would 'build some consensus and build some momentum' toward reform, the treasurer downplayed any prospect of immediate major changes from the meeting. Chalmers said even reforms to road user charges for electric vehicles – which has widespread support among states and territories, with an outcome on the proposal expected to come from this week's meeting – didn't have a settled model or proposed start date. 'I'm confident that the effort put into this economic reform roundtable is already worth it,' Chalmers told a press conference on Sunday. 'We've focused the country on the productivity challenge. We've gotten people accustomed to dealing with the economic and fiscal trade‑offs that governments deal with every day.' Sign up: AU Breaking News email The summit will run from Tuesday to Thursday in Parliament House, with a focus on productivity, resilience and budget sustainability. But with the government already having ruled out large changes to tax, spending or contentious settings like negative gearing, some critics in the Coalition and media have said the summit risks devolving into a talkfest without the chance of meaningful outcomes. 'The usual suspects that will want these kinds of efforts to fail, that's pretty obvious,' Chalmers told Sky News on Sunday. 'There will always be the usual kind of grumps and cynics who say the usual grumpy and cynical things about this. Their argument essentially is to involve people less, which would seem to me to be a strange way to go about things.' Chalmers said there were no pre-ordained outcomes for the summit, despite a leaked document showing the Treasury department was preparing for potential changes to the national construction code, speeding up housing approvals and cutting environmental red tape. He said it was 'entirely unsurprising' that Treasury was considering advice about some significant proposals, and that those ideas would be discussed during the meeting. The shadow industry minister, Alex Hawke, said the opposition doesn't 'have a lot of expectations' for what comes after the summit, and said the government was short of ideas. '[Jim Chalmers] talks about his big productivity agenda, but what is it?' Hawke told Sky News. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'After four years in government, he's basically saying, let's have a roundtable and I'll hear all the best ideas and we'll come up with something. But they're already ruling out most of the productivity measures that you would take in this economy if you wanted to do something about productivity.' Anthony Albanese said ideas from the summit would feed into government decision making. 'There'll be some measures that can be done immediately if the government adopts them,' the prime minister said in Perth. 'There'll be some that feed into budget processes, but there'll be some about the long term challenges in the global economy, the impact on Australia and how we deal with those issues.' But despite signalling earlier in the week that a long-awaited outcome on a road user charge to replace the fuel excise could be in the works, Chalmers said important details were still to be decided. 'We haven't settled on a model or on the timing of implementation … we don't have a concluded view on the best model, we don't have a settled view on the best timing, but I think there is appetite,' he said. Chalmers noted the government had spoken about a road user charge for some time, hinting that he could pursue such a change in this term of government, without seeking a fresh election mandate. 'I know that there's appetite amongst the state and territory treasurers to progress this agenda. We did talk about it publicly before the last election. We have been working on it for some time.'

Hong Kong democracy activist granted asylum after fleeing to Australia
Hong Kong democracy activist granted asylum after fleeing to Australia

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Hong Kong democracy activist granted asylum after fleeing to Australia

Australia has granted asylum to Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Ted Hui, he said in a social media post, a move likely to raise tensions with China. Mr Hui, a former Hong Kong parliamentarian, fled the city four years ago and first arrived in Europe in December 2020. In March 2021, he became the first Hong Kong politician to be granted a special travel exemption during coronavirus restrictions to enter Australia. In 2022, Mr Hui was convicted in Hong Kong in his absence on charges of taking part in a pro-democracy protest and was sentenced to three-and-a-half years in jail. On Saturday, Mr Hui said he had 'received formal notification from the Australian Department of Home Affairs that I have been granted asylum in Australia'. In an emotional post, he said: 'When people around me say 'congratulations' to me, although I politely thank them, I can't help but feel sad in my heart. How to congratulate a political refugee who misses his hometown?" "If it weren't for political persecution, I would never have thought of living in a foreign land. Immigrants can always return to their home towns to visit relatives at any time; Exiles have no home." Mr Hui, who is now an Adelaide-based lawyer, said he identifies more closely with Australia today than he did when he arrived four years ago, and said he 'believe[s] asylum also carries responsibility'. 'My family and I are determined to give back to Australia in every way we can—through our work, our civic engagement, and our commitment to the values of democracy and freedom,' he said. The Australian government's 'decision reflects values of freedom, justice, and compassion that my family will never take for granted,' he added. The 42-year-old father, a prominent critic of both the Hong Kong government and Beijing, was one of several overseas activists hit with Hong Kong police bounties of HK$1m (about £94,281) each in 2023. While these bounties have drawn condemnation from Western governments, they are largely viewed as symbolic gestures, since most of those targeted live in countries with little prospect of extradition to Hong Kong or mainland China. In Adelaide, where Mr Hui is based, the campaign against him has taken a more personal turn. Earlier this year, his colleagues received an anonymous letter offering $203,000 Australian dollars for information about his movements and family. Around the same time, fake pamphlets portraying Mr Hui as a pro-Israel lawyer bent on 'waging war' against Islamic terrorism were reportedly circulated to local mosques, apparently in an effort to threaten and discredit him. At that time, Mr Hui blamed 'the Chinese regime's long arm' for harassing him internationally. Mr Hui concluded his post by requesting the Australian government not to forget those still suffering in Hong Kong's prisons, mentioning a number of activists including Jimmy Lai, the media mogul and British citizen who is currently on trial in the city. 'Australia must do more to rescue them and to speak up for their humanity,' Mr Hui said. 'Its stance matters internationally, and its protection of Hongkongers sets a precedent for other democracies.' The Hong Kong government said in a statement that it was 'against the harbouring of criminals in any form by any country'. Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese visited Beijing last month as part of his administration's years-long push to improve ties with China, Australia's number one export market. The relationship suffered a number of blows during the pandemic as both countries hit each other with punitive trade tariffs. During the visit, Xi Jinping said the China-Australia relationship 'has risen from the setbacks and turned around, bringing tangible benefits to the Chinese and Australian peoples'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store