logo
Call It What It Is—Pogroms and Attempts at Ethno-Religious Cleansing of the Druze in Syria

Call It What It Is—Pogroms and Attempts at Ethno-Religious Cleansing of the Druze in Syria

Newsweek25-07-2025
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
"We heard gunfire outside; we heard them calling out all the Druze. The neighbors. They killed them. We heard it," Angela—a pseudonym to protect her identity—told me over the phone.
Angela recently described what happened to her family in Suwayda, southern Syria. They lived in what's called a Byut Arabi—a stately house with a courtyard. Her family and her uncle's family had gathered in one room.
"Then they came to us. They said they wouldn't hurt anyone. They demanded all the money and gold. With weapons pointed at us, they told the women and girls to go upstairs."
Her voice trembled. They killed all the women and girls. Angela was shot in the leg and fell. She lay among the corpses, and didn't move a muscle—her relatives' blood pooling over her.
"I lay there for hours; I lost track of time. Some were screaming on the street. They said they were Druze and had come to help."
Women mourners from the Druze minority attend a funeral on April 17, 2025, in Suwayda, Syria.
Women mourners from the Druze minority attend a funeral on April 17, 2025, in Suwayda, Syria.Angela didn't know if the murderers were returning. She heard a familiar voice, went downstairs. There lay the rest of her family—the men and boys.
As I scroll through social media, many human rights groups, lawmakers, influencers, and celebrities are silent about what's happening in Syria.
The Druze, a religious minority comprising about 3 percent of Syria's population, are facing systematic persecution in Suwayda. Today, some 30,000 Druze and Christians are besieged—without water, electricity, food, or medicine.
I received a link to a Swedish news article. Druze in Sweden have begun speaking to the press about threats against them. I messaged Sarah Al Reem, a Swedish Druze activist whose two brothers have been killed in Syria.
"We must be brave, even though we're threatened. How could we live with ourselves if we stayed silent? What would we tell our children in the future—that we did nothing?" Al Reem said.
Outside Sweden's Parliament in Stockholm on July 22, the Druze held a spontaneous demonstration. Every person I met told me about murdered or kidnapped relatives. One of the demonstrators showed me videos of relatives—birthdays, weddings—and then newly recorded horror.
"I've lost 27 family members. Please, look at this," he said. His words drowned in tears.
Another man showed me videos of kidnapped Druze women being used as trophies—four were his relatives. Demonstrators, Druze, Alawites, Sunnis, and Christians embraced, crying. Several demonstrators said they cannot eat or sleep.
The propaganda machine claims this is a dispute between the Druze and Bedouins, neighbors for centuries. The Syrian regime allegedly intervened to protect Bedouins from Druze violence.
But the timeline tells another story. Hatred, threats, and murders of the Druze began in December 2024. In April, earlier this year, 13 people were killed in clashes in Damascus.
I recently spoke with a colleague from my organization, the human rights advocacy group ADFA. We've gathered information daily since July 10. She said things are starting to shift—major media outlets like the BBC are now reporting from the hospital in Suwayda where patients, staff, doctors, and cleaners were brutally murdered.
When we first received reports about the hospital massacre, we hoped survivors' minds had imagined it—trauma playing tricks. We thought the same about the pastor and his 11 family members who were slaughtered. When we saw the video of the American killed on camera with his relatives, we hoped it was fake.
We are aware of brutality shown by the Druze against Bedouins. That, too, is horrific. We understand the geopolitical game. The U.S., Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Russia, and Turkey all have stakes in what's happening in Syria. But most Syrians—regardless of religion or ethnicity—just want peace and to live as neighbors. These outside interests make that nearly impossible.
That's why we need more accuracy and responsibility from those who report—from journalists, analysts, and influencers. Those who claim to champion human rights should speak up for Syria's vulnerable indigenous communities.
What some news outlets call "clashes" or "conflicts between groups" should be labeled what they are: the Druze pogroms and attempts at ethno-religious cleansing. This follows a pattern of attacks against Syria's indigenous peoples—like the massacre of Alawites in March and the suicide bombing that killed Christians in a Damascus church last month—all crimes against humanity.
We are seeing some progress. In the United States, a resolution has been introduced to block lifting sanctions on Syria unless the interim government can end the violence against indigenous minorities. A similar resolution passed the European Parliament. In Germany, a political party, Die Linke, organized a press conference urging their government to investigate the massacres in Suwayda.
We can only hope the words of lawmakers do not remain as only ink on paper—but lead to concrete action.
As Al Reem said, how can we tell our children that we watched horrors unfold in Syria and didn't do anything to help?
Nuri Kino is an independent investigative multi-award-winning reporter and minority rights expert.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Relationship With Modi Sours Over Putin
Trump's Relationship With Modi Sours Over Putin

Newsweek

time24 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump's Relationship With Modi Sours Over Putin

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The praise U.S. President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi lavished on each other only months ago seems a distant memory amid a deepening trade row involving Vladimir Putin's oil revenues. A standoff between Trump and India has emerged after the president imposed 25 percent tariffs on the country and followed this up on Wednesday with another 25 percent levy due to its purchase of Russian oil that funds Putin's aggression in Ukraine. But things between the pair had already started going south in May when Trump waded into a sensitive dispute between India and Pakistan. "That started the downward slide," Dhruva Jaishankar, executive director of the Observer Research Foundation America (ORF America)—which analyses foreign policy challenges for India, the U.S. and partners—told Newsweek. Newsweek has contacted the U.S. State Department and India's Ministry of External Affairs for comment. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Associated Press/Canva Modi's White House Visit Modi visited the White House in February as one of the first world leaders to visit Trump after his return to the presidency. They touted a friendship cemented throughout the Republican president's first term. But friendships can go through bumpy periods, and India was left peeved when Trump took credit for India and Pakistan agreeing to a ceasefire after four days of clashes in the Kashmir region both neighbors claim in full but administer it only in part. It followed weeks of clashes and missile and drone strikes across borders, triggered by a gun massacre of tourists that India blamed on Pakistan. Pakistan denied involvement. "India has had a policy of not inviting third-party mediation between India and Pakistan and Trump has gone against that," said Jaishankar. "For India, that's a pretty strong red line." Trump's Tariffs Trump's claims of intervention in a decades-long geopolitical spat were then followed by stalling trade negotiations. Trump imposed a 25 percent tariff on all Indian exports to the U.S. from August 1, while at the same time giving China another extension. India—the world's fourth largest economy—called the tariffs unjustified. Trump added another 25 percent to this levy on Wednesday because like most of Ukraine's allies, he linked the proceeds from Russian energy to the continued funding of Putin's aggression. Exemptions remain for goods already covered under other sector-specific tariffs, such as steel and aluminum. Trump also insulted India's economy as "dead" and accused the country of buying "massive amounts" of oil from Russia and then selling it on the open market for big profits. These comments reflect international concern over the fact that Russian oil now accounts for nearly 40 percent of India's oil imports—a more than tenfold increase since before the war. Both New Delhi and Beijing have capitalized on the steep discounts offered by Moscow amid Western sanctions. India and China's vastly increased purchases of Russian oil have been viewed by Kyiv's allies as undermining the G7-led sanctions on Russia's energy exports, which aimed to choke the Kremlin's key revenue generator. This image from September 22, 2019 shows Indian Prime Minster Narendra Modi with Donald Trump during a rally on September 22, 2019 in Houston, Texas. This image from September 22, 2019 shows Indian Prime Minster Narendra Modi with Donald Trump during a rally on September 22, 2019 in Houston, Texas. Trump's anger with India reflects his frustration with the pace of trade talks, according to The Associated Press, citing a White House official. The AP said this has stung Modi's administration, which had been negotiating a trade deal that balanced India's protectionist system with opening up to American goods. It means that ties built up over the last 25 years are being put at risk by Trump's tariffs and social media statements, Ashok Malik, a former policy adviser in India's Foreign Ministry, told the news agency. "Trump risks tanking 25 years of U.S.-India relations," Evan Feigenbaum, vice president for studies at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace wrote in analysis for the think tank released Monday. Feigenbaum also referred to Trump's criticism of U.S. companies that manufacture in India, as well as the U.S. leader's White House meeting with Pakistan's army chief as well as giving Islamabad a tariff rate of just 19 percent and a pledge to jointly explore Pakistan's oil reserves. After more than two decades of ties, "Trump is now in the process of dismantling this painstakingly built relationship," Feigenbaum added. Vladimir Putin greets Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia, on October 22, 2024. Vladimir Putin greets Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia, on October 22, Role Modi's first foreign trip upon his return to office for a third term was to Moscow to meet with Putin in June 2024. For Putin, India is part of his vision away from a U.S.-led world and a pivot toward the Global South. However, Modi's view is less anti-Western and more attuned to acting as a bridge between the West and the Global South, and he is not interested in Putin's hope for a de-dollarization of the world economy, Jaishankar said. The India-Russia relationship was based on strategic technologies but has faced problems in recent years, with defense imports from Russia more than halving between 2014 and today. This is partly due to the war in Ukraine, challenges with Russian supply chains and payment mechanisms. However India has shown no signs of turning away from Russia, despite Trump's threats. It doubled down on its cooperation with Moscow committing on Tuesday to increasing defense ties. Over the course of the war Putin started, differences between India and the U.S. over New Delhi's ties with Russia were communicated more privately under the Biden administration, Jaishankar said. "Differences over Russia were kept within a certain channel. The challenge with Trump is that a lot of the haranguing has been quite public," he said. As the world waits to see whether or not Modi will agree to Trump's demands, business-to-business ties between India and the U.S. so far remain intact, Jaishankar said. But if the spat deepens, "one wonders how other aspects of the relationship that have so far been somewhat firewalled might be affected."

Number of Green Cards To Increase Under New Proposal
Number of Green Cards To Increase Under New Proposal

Newsweek

time25 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Number of Green Cards To Increase Under New Proposal

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Lawmakers in Congress have introduced the Dignity Act of 2025, a bipartisan proposal that would increase the number of green cards available to immigrants and implement broad immigration reforms. The legislation, H.R. 4393, aims to overhaul visa backlogs, expand eligibility for permanent residency, and address the status of Dreamers alongside major changes to border security and verification rules. Newsweek has contacted the bill's sponsor, Representative Veronica Escobar, for more information via email. Why It Matters Green cards, officially known as permanent residency cards, allow holders to live and work in the U.S. on a permanent basis and are a critical route to citizenship. The proposed changes would provide relief for various groups, including undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as minors (Dreamers), those stuck in visa backlogs, and skilled workers facing lengthy waits due to per-country limits. As workplace needs and demographic shifts intensify, the number of green cards issued has fluctuated, impacting more than a million people annually. Stock image of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services field office in San Jose, California. Stock image of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services field office in San Jose, California. hapabapa What To Know Representatives Maria Elvira Salazar, a Republican from Florida, and Texas Democrat Escobar of Texas introduced the Dignity Act in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 15, 2025. The bill proposes a suite of border security measures and immigration reforms, with several provisions aimed at expanding access to green cards. Under the bill, those who entered the U.S. as children and recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals could adjust their status to lawful permanent resident (LPR) by fulfilling certain criteria, such as graduating from college or a technical school, serving in the U.S. military for at least three years, or maintaining consistent employment for at least four years with a valid work permit. The act also seeks to reduce legal visa backlogs to a maximum of 10 years. To do this, individuals waiting more than a decade in employment or family-based immigration backlogs could pay a $20,000 fee for expedited processing. The current per-country cap for green cards would rise from 7 percent to 15 percent of the yearly total for both employment-based and family-sponsored categories. This would alleviate country-specific bottlenecks that have affected applicants from countries like India and China, who face much longer waits than others. In 2023, around 1.17 million individuals obtained green cards, a 15.2 percent increase from the previous year, reflecting shifts in pandemic restrictions and immigration policy. The majority of green cards (64.6 percent) are family-sponsored, followed by employment-based at 16.7 percent. What People Are Saying Florida GOP Representative Maria Elvira Salazar said in a statement: "The Dignity Act is a revolutionary bill that offers the solution to our immigration crisis: secure the border, stop illegal immigration, and provide an earned opportunity for long-term immigrants to stay here and work. No amnesty. No handouts. No citizenship. Just accountability and a path to stability for our economy and our future." What Happens Next The Dignity Act of 2025 has been referred to multiple House committees, including the Judiciary and Homeland Security, for consideration.

Bill and Hillary Clinton Warned of Jail Time if They Defy Subpoena
Bill and Hillary Clinton Warned of Jail Time if They Defy Subpoena

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Bill and Hillary Clinton Warned of Jail Time if They Defy Subpoena

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former President Bill Clinton and Secretary Hillary Clinton could face jail time if they defy a congressional subpoena regarding an investigation into the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a Republican congressman has implied. House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer said on Wednesday that if someone defies a congressional subpoena "you can hold them in contempt of Congress." "If someone doesn't comply with a subpoena, we've seen it happen in the past, in both my committee, as well as on the Jan. 6 committee, when the Democrats had the majority, and you can hold them in contempt of Congress, and with a Republican attorney general, that's something that I think that the Clinton legal team is going to think long and hard about," he told NewsNation's "The Hill." Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, President Donald Trump's senior trade adviser, were briefly imprisoned after ignoring subpoenas to appear before the January 6th Committee investigating the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Bill and Hillary Clinton speaking in New York City in 2023. Bill and Hillary Clinton speaking in New York City in 2023. Jamie McCarthy/GETTY This is a developing story. More to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store