Anaya Bangar's Emotional Reunion With Sarfaraz Khan's Family Goes Viral: ‘We Held Bats Before Phones'
In a heartwarming moment that tugged at the strings of nostalgia and resilience, Anaya Bangar, daughter of former India allrounder Sanjay Bangar, recently reunited with childhood friend and India Test cricketer Sarfaraz Khan. The bond between the two cricketers, forged on dusty maidans long before smartphones became a staple, was beautifully encapsulated in Anaya's Instagram post: 'We held bats before we held phones. Friends since the beginning.' Accompanied by a series of candid pictures and a video featuring Sarfaraz's young daughter, Romana Zahoor, the reunion was more than just a casual meet-up—it was a powerful reminder of friendship, identity, and the relentless spirit of those who dare to be themselves.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Anaya Bangar (@anayabangar)
Musheer Misses Out as Nostalgia Takes Center Stage
Although Sarfaraz's younger brother Musheer Khan couldn't join the reunion due to IPL commitments with Punjab Kings, Anaya didn't forget to tag him: 'Missed you @musheerkhan.97.' The gesture further underlined the familial warmth and the deep connections she shares with the Khan household, led by their cricket-obsessed father Naushad Khan, who has coached both his sons into the domestic and international spotlight.
Sarfaraz Khan: Between Highs and Uncertainty
Sarfaraz Khan's cricketing journey has been as eventful as it has been emotional. Despite a promising Test debut and a commendable highest score of 150, Sarfaraz went unsold at the IPL 2025 auction held in Jeddah. His exclusion from the league remains a talking point, especially considering his domestic dominance and short yet impactful stint with Delhi Capitals, Punjab Kings, and Royal Challengers Bengaluru.
Yet, his absence from the IPL has seemingly brought him closer to his roots, both literally and metaphorically, as evident from this reunion.
Anaya Bangar's Journey: Resilience Beyond the Crease
While the social media posts radiated warmth and childhood camaraderie, Anaya's story is also one of intense struggle and transformation. Assigned male at birth and formerly known as Aryan Bangar, she began her gender transition in 2023 through Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT). The shift, although deeply personal and affirming, came with professional sacrifices.
In a candid interview with Lallantop, Anaya revealed the brutal realities she faced after coming out as a transgender woman: 'My father was just stating facts—there's no place for me in cricket. So, I knew I had to take a stand for myself.'
Cricket, Society, and the Silence in Between
The emotional scars run deep. Anaya bravely opened up about facing harassment, exclusion, and even mental health crises, including suicidal thoughts. Her testimony about inappropriate behavior from fellow cricketers—including unsolicited explicit messages and advances—has sparked crucial conversations around gender identity and safety in Indian sports.
'I still had space from my family's point of view. But it wasn't there in society, cricket, or the exterior world,' she stated, laying bare the dichotomy between personal support and institutional neglect.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
How much money does a superstar need?
Remember Leo Tolstoy's famous short story where a greedy peasant could claim all the land he could walk in a day? Spoiler alert: his ambition wrote checks his body couldn't cash, and he collapsed at sunset—leaving him with just enough earth for his grave. If Tolstoy were alive today and writing about Indian cinema, his fable might ask: how much money does a superstar need? And it might go something like this: Once upon a time in Bollywood, a talented, struggling actor finally hits the jackpot. After years of eating instant noodles and taking the bus to auditions, he becomes box office gold. Suddenly, producers are throwing money at him, and as if to make up for all the struggles, he starts demanding more and more, sometimes accounting for even 80% of the film budget. "But I'm worth it!" he insists. "People come to see ME!" The desperate producer, seeing visions of houseful boards across theatres in the country, reluctantly agrees. What choice does he have, he thinks: in a star-obsessed industry, you need them to guarantee screen numbers and opening weekend earnings. But what happens next would make even Tolstoy rub his pearly white beard in thought. When Stars Eat The Sky: The remaining 20% of the budget now has to become elastic and stretch to cover everything else: the supporting cast (told to think of the "exposure"), the crew (promised future projects), action sequences (downgraded now), and visual effects meant to transport audiences to another world now looking worse than an audition reel. And I almost forgot: this 20% also has to budget for a star's vanity… I mean, vanity van, or vans, and the entourage that comes with the man, which can be a dozen or more people. The film releases. The audience, who apparently didn't get the WhatsApp forward that they should be amazed by star power alone regardless of film quality, collectively shrugs. "Meh," says social media. The producer loses his shirt, his pants, and possibly his beach house in Alibaug. Meanwhile, our star has already moved on to his next victim—I mean, project—leaving behind a path of cinematic destruction Godzilla could take notes from. The Steering Wheel Syndrome: Let's get real for a minute. A star claiming sole credit for a film's success is like a steering wheel, thinking it's the entire car. "Look at me, turning left and right! I am THE vehicle!" Sorry, dude, but without the engine, tyres, chassis, and thousands of nuts and bolts holding everything together, you're just a circular ornament. For proof, conduct this thought experiment: imagine your favourite megastar, leave them alone in a room with an iPhone and let them act their heart out for two hours. Release this 'masterpiece' in theatres nationwide. Would you pay 300 rupees to watch that? Would anyone? If your answer is "no," then perhaps we need to reconsider the notion that stars single-handedly "carry" films, that often by their stubborn insistence on more everything, they bury the films prospect. So what does a fair system of compensation look like? Hollywood's Money Math: Hollywood has figured out a more equitable formula. A-list Hollywood actors typically receive a base salary of 10-20% of a film's budget. For a $100 million blockbuster, that comes to $10-20 million—enough to buy a few islands, yet have change enough for a Ferrari ki sawari. But here's where Hollywood scores an ace: they've created a concept called "gross points," which is the percentage of a film's total revenue paid to participants, such as a star, director, or producer, from the very first dollar earned. In contrast, there is the concept of 'net points,' which is prevalent in Bollywood, where one waits for the film to reach profitability before doling out cash. Stars typically negotiate between 5-15% of the gross points on top of their fee, which can be substantial earnings if the film performs well. This creates what business types call "alignment of interests", which mere mortals like us call win-win. When a film succeeds, the producers pop champagne, the studio executives buy another flat, and the star buys another farmhouse in Beverly Hills. The Bigger Pie Philosophy: Think about it this way: should a star rather have 80% of a small, sad, underfunded pie or 20% of a spectacular, crowd-pleasing, critics-adoring, award-winning pie that keeps growing bigger with every box office record it smashes? Some stars have done the math and, guess what, have chosen Door Number Two. Take Aamir Khan, for instance—Bollywood's very own Professor of Economics. He says he doesn't charge upfront fees for his films. Instead, he takes a percentage of the gross revenue. When "Dangal" conquered China faster than the Brits could, Khan's bank account experienced escape velocity. He made significantly more than any fixed fee he'd have taken–by some estimates close to ₹300 crores–while ensuring the production itself had enough resources to tell its story properly. Marvel initially doubted casting Robert Downey Jr. Naturally, they were unwilling to pay him a substantial upfront fee. Instead, they spent time creating quality films in which stories became the main draw. Yet, by the time "Avengers: Endgame" finally rolled around, Downey Jr.–who dies in the film–reportedly made up to $600 million for his roles in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) movies. His 'gross points' compensation didn't prevent the movie from having spectacular effects, an ensemble cast, and enough marketing to make sure even a Rohtak grandmother knew who Thanos was. Beyond Megastars–The Forgotten Film Family: There's a cinematic family tree that gets overshadowed when just one branch takes all the sunlight. There's the screenwriter fighting monsters in her head to craft the story that'll become the blockbuster; a salt and pepper, bearded director who keeps the vision together; a sunburnt director of photography turning ordinary locations into visual poetry; a costume designer with the magic to turn dull cloth into fairy tales; music composers blessed by the muse to create tunes that'll stay stuck in peoples whistles for decades; the stuntmen and stuntwomen who literally break their back so the stars don't have to; and let's not forget the humble spot boys running around in the scorching heat to make sure everyone stays hydrated. These aren't just "film crew"—they're artists, craftspeople, who've spent years and decades honing their craft and how to keep the beating heart of cinema alive. When a star's paycheck devours a film's budget, these essential contributors get the financial equivalent of table scraps. Over my 15 years of active work in the industry, I've seen many talented professionals leave the industry altogether, frustrated, because, you know, they have this weird desire to pay rent and feed their families. The irony in all this? When stars insist on astronomical fees that handicap the production quality of their own films, they're ultimately shooting themselves right in their foot under the expensive sneaker. A string of mediocre films damages their brand. Audiences naturally wise up, eventually, and the very stardom they're cashing in on begins to fade. Finding the Sweet Spot: No one's suggesting stars should work for peanuts, even if their acting chops remind us of monkeys. If you can command audiences, create cultural moments, and make people forget their troubles even for a few hours in a dark theatre, you deserve substantial rewards. But perhaps there's a sweeter spot: a system where the star shines brightly without eclipsing everyone else. Where the grip, the gaffer, the costume designer, and the composer can all earn dignified livings. Where there is enough budget to actually realise the filmmaker's vision. In Tolstoy's tale, the greedy peasant ends up with just six feet of earth—exactly what we all ultimately need, regardless of our Instagram follower count or how many times our face has appeared on a movie poster. However, the question of "How much money does a superstar need?" is one each performer must answer personally. But perhaps the wisest stars understand that their legacy will be measured by the quality of stories they help tell, not by what they leave behind for their children. And if they want to leave something for their children, they must remember that every paisa wrongfully earned will be squandered by their children or grandchildren. There is no other way. It is the Circe of life. Yes, Circe, not circle, the sorceress from Greek mythology who turns men into swine. Six feet; that's how much land a man needs. How much money does a superstar need? Perhaps this nursery rhyme can answer. Twinkle Twinkle Greedy Star, Bleeding budgets near and far, Up above Tinsel Town, so bright, Dimming others' creative light.
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Marcus Stoinis wildly thumps his chest in front of Rohit Sharma after dismissing MI great during IPL 2025 Qualifier 2
After over two hours of delay due to rain, Qualifier 2 of IPL 2025 between Punjab Kings and Mumbai Indians began at 9:45 PM, much to the delight of the fans. And soon enough, the blockbuster clash delivered a fiery moment on the field as Marcus Stoinis removed veteran opener Rohit Sharma early in the Powerplay. Rohit had received a lucky reprieve in the second over of the match when Azmatullah Omarzai dropped him off Kyle Jamieson's delivery; however, the former MI captain wasn't too lucky the second time. Rohit looked to capitalise with a big hit against Stoinis as the Australian all-rounder banged one into the pitch. Rohit went for the pull, aiming to clear deep square leg, but mistimed it straight into the hands of Vijaykumar Vyshak in the deep. Stoinis reserved a rather fiery celebration after the dismissal, as he let out a roar and thumped his chest in celebration. The wicket came as a huge relief for PBKS, and particularly for Omarzai. Rohit departed for 8 off seven deliveries. The dismissal was relieving for Punjab, particularly because of Rohit's heroics after he was similarly dropped in MI's Eliminator match against Gujarat Titans. Rohit received double reprieves in the game and he punished the Titans for the lost chances, smashing a brilliant 81 off 50 deliveries which steered the side to a mammoth score of 228/5. MI eventually registered a 20-run win, with Rohit being named the Player of the Match. The toss, which took place at its scheduled time of 7 PM, saw Shreyas Iyer opting to bat under overcast conditions. There was no rain forecast, however, and the umpires and players were ready to take the field when sudden drizzle hit the stadium. Relentless rains meant the fans had to wait for over two hours for the action to begin in Ahmedabad. The winner of the match meets Royal Challengers Bengaluru at the same venue on Tuesday; RCB defeated Punjab Kings by 8 wickets in a thumping performance on Wednesday to book a place in the title clash.
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
For the first time since divorce from Hardik Pandya, ex-wife Natasa Stankovic opens up about silent struggle with an inspiring message
A Candid Note That Resonates Reflecting on a Challenging Year Moving Beyond the Headlines The Story Behind the Split Months after her much-publicized divorce from Indian cricket star Hardik Pandya Natasa Stankovic is stepping into the spotlight with a fresh and inspiring perspective. On June 1, 2025, the actress and model shared a candid Instagram post reflecting her journey of resilience . Her message about perseverance and self-love has struck a chord with fans, showcasing a new, empowered version of posted a raw, makeup-free mirror selfie, flaunting her toned physique and natural glow. But it was her heartfelt caption that truly captured attention:'This version of me didn't come from luck. She came from showing up, again and again – even when it was hard, even when no one noticed. And if you're doing the same? I see you. Keep going.'This message, emphasizing grit and silent strength, has been widely praised, with thousands of fans applauding her honesty and quickly flooded Natasa's comment section with love and admiration, applauding her strength and glow-up. Messages like 'Slaying forever, My Sunshine,' and 'Keep shining, Queen,' reflected the deep connection fans felt with her journey. Many hailed her as a source of inspiration, with one follower writing, 'You're doing amazing, please keep going,' while another simply affirmed, 'You are inspiring.'The past year was a turbulent one for Natasa. Following her separation from Hardik Pandya in 2024, with whom she shares a five-year-old son, Agastya, she has quietly rebuilt her life. In a recent interview with ETimes, she reflected on the hardships and growth, emphasizing the wisdom gained through experience rather than age. Natasa remains optimistic about the future, openly welcoming new opportunities and even the possibility of has consciously chosen to let go of bitterness and public scrutiny. She shared a thoughtful perspective on coping with setbacks: 'Life doesn't always go as planned, but how you respond to challenges defines your growth. Don't try to prove anyone wrong because it will only cost you peace. Just forgive and move on.' This maturity is resonating with many who have faced similar Pandya and Natasa's relationship was once a media favorite. From their chance meeting in 2018 to a grand wedding in 2023, their journey seemed filled with promise. They share a son and continue to co-parent amicably. While the reasons for their divorce remain private, both have maintained respect and cordiality in Natasa turns a new page in her life, her recent social media post signals a strong comeback built on self-awareness and inner strength. Her message encourages anyone facing hardship to keep persevering, reinforcing that growth often happens in silence.
