logo
Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts: Judge will not unseal Jeffery Epstein companion's documents

Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts: Judge will not unseal Jeffery Epstein companion's documents

West Australian14 hours ago
A US federal judge on Monday denied the government's request to unseal grand jury transcripts from its investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime companion of Jeffrey Epstein who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for sexually exploiting and abusing teenage girls.
Unsealing the transcripts would be an exception to the secrecy of grand juries, wrote the judge supervising Maxwell's case, Paul A Engelmayer.
Permitting such an exception 'casually or promiscuously' would erode confidence in people called to testify before future panels, Engelmayer wrote in a 31-page opinion.
He said the Justice Department's 'entire premise — that the Maxwell grand jury materials would bring to light meaningful new information about Epstein's and Maxwell's crimes, or the government's investigation into them — is demonstrably false.'
Epstein, a financier who moved in some of America's most exclusive circles, was indicted in 2019 on sex trafficking charges. He was found dead in his cell the next month while awaiting trial. The death was ruled a suicide, but spurred improbable theories, including that he was killed by Democrats and that he was blackmailing rich and famous people.
Top aides to US President Donald Trump promoted some of those theories before they entered government, and the administration's failure to disclose any revelations about Epstein has threatened to drive a wedge between Mr Trump and some of his fervent supporters.
Mr Trump has tried to subdue criticism by pushing for the transcripts' disclosure. Another Manhattan federal judge, Richard Berman, is considering a separate Justice Department request to unseal grand jury materials from the investigation into Epstein.
Maxwell was arrested a year after Epstein's death and in December 2021 was found guilty of sex trafficking and other charges. Her conviction was affirmed on appeal. She has asked the Supreme Court to review her case.
The government argued the transcripts should be released because of intense public interest in the case, but Engelmayer wrote that anyone familiar with the trial record would 'learn next to nothing new.'
'The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor,' the judge wrote.'They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's. They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes.'
Maxwell's lawyers have argued that she had been scapegoated by prosecutors who had no one else to pursue after Epstein died. The lawyers had opposed the government's request to release the transcripts, writing that while Epstein is dead, 'Ghislaine Maxwell is not.'
'Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, Maxwell's lawyers said, 'that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable and her due process rights remain.'
Monday's order came weeks after a federal judge in Florida denied a request by the Justice Department to release transcripts from two federal grand juries there that investigated Epstein in 2005 and 2007.
For months, Attorney General Pam Bondi had promised the release of material that could show damaging details of the investigation. But in February, when Bondi released documents connected to the case, she failed to appease Mr Trump's supporters and conservative media figures.
The documents primarily had information that had already been in the public domain and did not reveal wrongdoing by people other than Epstein.
The Justice Department announced last month that it had closed an 'exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein.'
In a memo, the FBI and the Justice Department said a review 'revealed no incriminating 'client list'' or evidence that 'Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals.' It indicated that there would be no more disclosures about Epstein.
The announcement merely fueled the backlash. In recent weeks, Todd Blanche, Bondi's deputy, held two days of interviews with Maxwell in Florida, in an effort to quell criticism that the government was hiding information about Epstein.
Last week, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for its files related to the Epstein case.
In his opinion Monday, Engelmayer said that government had conceded that the grand jury information it wanted released largely duplicated the public record.
The push to unseal the records might be seen as an effort not 'aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such,' he wrote.
This article originally appeared in
The New York Times
.
© 2025 The New York Times Company
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Almost 70 per cent of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles
Almost 70 per cent of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles

7NEWS

time2 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Almost 70 per cent of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles

Two thirds of Britons believe Prince Andrew should be stripped of his remaining royal titles, according to a new poll. Research by YouGov found that 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Prince Andrew's York dukedom, as well as his princely title. An unflattering biography of the disgraced duke by Andrew Lownie in August delved into the private life of the late Queen's son, depicting him as sex-obsessed, a 'useful idiot' and easy prey for Jeffrey Epstein. Some 13 per cent opposed the removal of his titles and 21 per cent were unsure, the survey suggested. Three years ago, 62 per cent believed Andrew should have his York title removed, with the current 67 per cent in-favour figure seeing a jump of five percentage points. Another YouGov survey found that just five per cent have a positive view of the King's brother, with Andrew languishing at the bottom of the royal favourability tables, beneath the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle who has a 20 per cent positive rating and Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, at 28 per cent. Legislation would be required for Parliament to prevent Andrew continuing as the Duke of York, while his birthright to be a prince, as the son of a monarch, could be changed if a Letters Patent were issued by the King. The duke stopped using his style of his royal highness following his disastrous Newsnight interview, but it could be removed entirely by a Letters Patent. Andrew stepped away from his public role in 2019 amid the furore over his friendship with convicted billionaire paedophile Epstein. He later paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case with Virginia Giuffre, who was trafficked by Epstein as a teenager and who Andrew claimed never to have met.

Two-thirds of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles
Two-thirds of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles

Perth Now

time5 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Two-thirds of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles

Some 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, according to YouGov. (AP PHOTO) Some 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, according to YouGov. (AP PHOTO) Credit: AAP Two thirds of Britons believe the Duke of York should be stripped of his remaining royal titles, according to a new poll. Research by YouGov found that 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, as well as his princely title. An unflattering biography of the disgraced duke by Andrew Lownie in August delved into the private life of the late Queen's son, depicting him as sex-obsessed, a "useful idiot" and easy prey for Jeffrey Epstein. Some 13 per cent opposed the removal of his titles and 21 per cent were unsure, the survey suggested. Three years ago, 62 per cent believed Andrew should have his York title removed, with the current 67 per cent in-favour figure seeing a jump of five percentage points. Another YouGov survey found that just five per cent have a positive view of the King's brother, with Andrew languishing at the bottom of the royal favourability tables, beneath the Duchess of Sussex who has a 20 per cent positive rating and the Duke of Sussex at 28 per cent. Legislation would be required for Parliament to prevent Andrew continuing as the Duke of York, while his birthright to be a prince, as the son of a monarch, could be changed if a Letters Patent were issued by the King. The duke stopped using his style of his royal highness following his disastrous Newsnight interview, but it could be removed entirely by a Letters Patent. Andrew stepped away from his public role in 2019 amid the furore over his friendship with convicted billionaire paedophile Epstein. He later paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case with Virginia Giuffre, who was trafficked by Epstein as a teenager and who Andrew claimed never to have met.

Helicopter pilot Sebastian Robinson denies being 'raging cocaine junky' during trial of Outback Wrangler Matt Wright
Helicopter pilot Sebastian Robinson denies being 'raging cocaine junky' during trial of Outback Wrangler Matt Wright

Sky News AU

time6 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Helicopter pilot Sebastian Robinson denies being 'raging cocaine junky' during trial of Outback Wrangler Matt Wright

Pilot Sebastian Robinson has admitted to occasional drug use but denied he is a 'raging cocaine junky' during the Supreme Court trial of crocodile wrangler Matt Wright. Wright has pleaded not guilty to three charges of attempting to pervert the course of justice over his alleged actions following the chopper crash that killed his friend and Netflix co-star Chris 'Willow' Wilson in February 2022. Mr Robinson was flying the helicopter on the day of the crash and suffered life-altering injuries, including a permanent brain injury and a severed spinal cord that has left him a paraplegic. The court had earlier heard allegations Mr Robinson was a 'party animal' and 'frequent user of cocaine'. But when questioned by crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci SC, Mr Robinson said he had only used cocaine about 10 times in the five years before the fatal crash. 'Were you a raging cocaine junky Mr Robinson?' Mr Gullaci asked. Mr Robinson replied: 'Not at all.' He told the court that during seven years as a pilot he had never used cocaine within hours of flying or flown a helicopter while intoxicated. Mr Robinson said he was aware cocaine metabolites had been found in his system after the crash. He was also asked about police seizing his phone and downloading its contents. 'Would there be messages on that phone that would confirm your use of cocaine in the five years before the crash?' Mr Gullaci asked. Mr Robinson replied: 'I would think so, yes.' Mr Robinson was also asked about his usual practice when it came to the fuel management of helicopters. He told the court the Robinson R44 helicopters, like the one he was flying on the day of the crash, had a warning light that came on when there was 18 litres of fuel left in the tank. 'The R44 has got a low fuel system in it so with approximately 18 litres left a light in the console will illuminate very brightly and that will mean you've got approximately 18 litres, which is 18 minutes, of fuel left," he said. He said he had never seen the fuel light come on while flying. If it did come on he said he would land the helicopter straight away. Mr Robinson has been asked questions about the day of the fatal helicopter crash, but has told the court his memory is fuzzy and he only recalls glimpses of certain events. He was shown a photograph taken in the helicopter by Mr Wilson on the morning of the crash showing the helicopter's main and auxiliary tanks were each at least three quarters full. Mr Robinson agreed with Mr Gullaci that the helicopter would have had enough fuel to reach the crash site. The trial before Justice Alan Blow continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store