logo
It was supposed to be the best spring homebuying season in years. Then came the tariffs.

It was supposed to be the best spring homebuying season in years. Then came the tariffs.

Yahoo19-04-2025

All the ingredients for a busy spring homebuying season were there: Buyers had more inventory to choose from, mortgage rates were holding steady, and showings and mortgage applications were picking up.
Now, the volatility that gripped financial markets after President Trump announced sweeping tariffs on US trading partners — and continued even after he delayed many of the higher levies — threatens to upend it all. Consumer confidence has plummeted as buyers fear the tariffs will lead to inflation and a recession. Prospective homebuyers, fretting about their job security and investments, are rethinking their searches, and sellers are worried too.
'Sellers are concerned about their home values,' said Jacob Barker, a New York-based broker at Coldwell Banker Warburg. 'Buyers, even if they are not personally worried about their own financial position, are loath to put in an offer when the price might be 7% less a few months from now.'
Another weak spring would put the country on course for a third straight year of dismal home sales. Just over 4 million previously owned homes were sold last year, the lowest level since 1995. Early signs, including an uptick in sales in February, suggested this year would be better. Now, no one is sure.
On some corners of the internet, tongue-in-cheek posters have long rooted for a recession, saying they'll be ready to jump into the market as soon as home prices crater. But what happens to home sales and prices during and immediately after a major stock market decline is more complicated.
With the exception of the 2008 financial crisis, which was caused in part by the housing market, home prices have risen through past stock market corrections and in the 24 months that followed, Morgan Stanley analysts led by James Egan wrote in a note last week analyzing 50 years of data.
Home sales also usually drop during that period and then rebound sharply when the correction ends.
The steepest sales declines typically happen during periods when stocks fall but mortgage rates rise. That's where the housing market finds itself now. The S&P 500 (^GSPC) has entered correction territory, down 10% year to date and off 14% from its all-time high. Mortgage rates, meanwhile, have risen more than 20 basis points in recent weeks to 6.83%.
Read more: Historical mortgage rates: How do they compare to current rates?
Some level of buying and selling has to persist no matter how high mortgage rates and home prices go, Egan's team argues. After all, people relocate for jobs or see their housing needs change after big life events like marriage, divorce, births, or deaths.
But the combination of falling stock prices and rising rates 'could be an argument for further declines in sales volumes from their already rather anemic levels,' the analysts wrote.
The market volatility has had mixed effects on buying and selling around Seattle, said Jacob Weaver, an agent in Bellevue, Wash., who specializes in luxury properties. Interest has been steady in homes below $1.5 million, and some entrepreneurs who think they can make more money during volatile financial markets are eager to explore purchasing in the ultra-high-end segment. But demand has been weaker for homes between $1.5 million and $3 million — a price point many of the area's tech workers target.
'There's a lot more hesitation,' Weaver said. 'Buyer decisions in that price range have a lot to do with how people are feeling about their own bank accounts.'
A Redfin survey conducted from April 10 to 14 found that 24% of respondents are canceling plans to make a major purchase like a car or a home due to tariffs, and 32% of those surveyed say they're planning to delay.
By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's
Terms
and
Privacy Policy
Despite the recent market volatility, homebuying is still fiercely competitive in much of the country. Inventory is still low in many markets, especially along the coasts and in the Midwest, and home prices remain near all-time highs.
In Detroit, Redfin principal agent Desiree Bourgeois said that the tariffs may have slowed down the start to spring selling season, but sellers still maintain an upper hand. Many listings in the area still command multiple offers and sell for over their asking prices.
'I think it shows a lot of confidence in the market, even though there are some wild things going on with our trade wars right now,' she said.
Read more: What is the best time of year to buy a house?
Sara Kronon, a Chicago-based management consultant hunting for a home in the city, is also no stranger to bidding wars. She's seen properties listed at $600,000 that end up selling for $675,000.
Now, the market volatility and potential for a looming recession have her questioning what she should look for. After initially targeting larger homes, she's begun viewing smaller one- and two-bedroom options that would come with a lower monthly mortgage payment, with plans to upgrade later when she knows the economy is on firmer footing. At the same time, to hedge against a possible job loss, she's seeking to boost the income she brings in from side gigs like running an Airbnb in Italy, consulting with prospective international homebuyers, and selling vintage housewares.
'Should I really sign up for a mortgage that's that expensive?' said Kronon, 37. 'Now, I'm rethinking my strategy.'
Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tariffs and tax bill look like a 'Greek tragedy' that could tank the economy and stocks, former IMF official warns
Trump's tariffs and tax bill look like a 'Greek tragedy' that could tank the economy and stocks, former IMF official warns

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's tariffs and tax bill look like a 'Greek tragedy' that could tank the economy and stocks, former IMF official warns

Trump's economic policies pose the risk of inflation and recession, says former IMF official Desmond Lachman. He is among a chorus of experts that have expressed concern over Trump's proposed tariffs and tax cuts. Rising inflation and bond yields as a result of these policies could hurt stocks, Lachman warns. Like a protagonist in a Greek tragedy, President Donald Trump is exhibiting a concerning level of hubris in his handling of the US economy, former IMF official Desmond Lachman worries. Despite warnings from credible sources — like Fed Chair Jerome Powell, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, and BlackRock CEO Larry Fink — about what tariffs would mean for inflation and growth, and what his tax cut bill would mean for bond yields and the US dollar, Trump is doubling down on these policies, Lachman said in a June 10 post for the American Enterprise Institute, where he is a senior fellow. Unless Trump changes course, Lachman said, he could end up reigniting inflation, pushing up long-term bond yields, further tanking the US dollar, and sending the US economy into recession. "To Trump, these warnings are like water off a duck's back. Instead of dialing back his tariff policy, Trump has recently raised the import tariff on all aluminum and steel imports to a staggering 50%," Lachman wrote. He continued: "At the same time, instead of coming up with belt-tightening revenue and spending measures to address the country's gaping budget deficit of 6.25% of GDP, Trump is making every effort to secure the passage of his budget-busting One Big Beautiful Bill." So far, inflation has been tame and the labor market has held up as businesses have started to digest tariffs. But Lachman said the US economy is not out of the woods yet. Since businesses stockpiled inventory to prepare for Trump's tariffs, their effects won't start to show up until the second half of the year, he told Business Insider on Friday. "The fact that you're not seeing it in the May, June, July data, it doesn't mean anything," Lachman said. Here's the US trade deficit showing a surge in foreign goods buying from US businesses in late 2024 and early 2025. But tariffs aren't the only inflationary factor potentially at play. Lachman said that if you add the implications of Trump's tax bill on the value of the US dollar as the the national debt and budget deficit grow, consumers could end up paying even higher prices. With the dollar's value down 10%, for example, it means foreign goods are more expensive in addition to the 10% tariffs, or more, already being paid. In an inflationary environment — and with no indication that the US government is looking to reduce its debt and budget deficit — foreign investors have started to flee, and could continue to do so. That could send long-term Treasury rates soaring, Lachman said, slowing the US economy as the cost of lending follows suit. All of this puts US stocks in danger with valuations elevated, Lachman said. For example, here's the Shiller cyclically-adjusted price-to-earnings ratio for the S&P 500, which measures current stock prices against a rolling average of earnings over the last 10 years. "Start with the fact that the stock market has got very high valuations, and then overlay that with the likelihood that you could have either a bond or a dollar crisis, and it would seem to me that stocks don't do very well," he said. The myth probably most associated with hubris and its sometimes disastrous consequences is the tale of Icarus. Looking to escape from a labyrinth, his father builds him wings made of wax. Icarus succeeds in getting off the ground, but in the end ignores his father's warnings and flies too close to the sun, melting his wings. Trump having imposed steep universal tariffs without sparking inflation or a recession has so far defied conventional wisdom and warnings from top economists. But with Trump's tax bill on the way, will his wings, along with the US economy and stock market, soon start to melt? Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

1 Energy Stock With a Dividend Yield Over 7% Right Now
1 Energy Stock With a Dividend Yield Over 7% Right Now

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

1 Energy Stock With a Dividend Yield Over 7% Right Now

MPLX has a much higher dividend yield than the average energy stock. The master limited partnership's payout is on a sustainable foundation. It has been growing its earnings and distribution at healthy rates, and should continue to do so. 10 stocks we like better than MPLX › The energy sector can be a great place for income investors to find higher-yielding options. The average energy stock in the S&P 500 has a yield of around 3% at its current share price, which is more than double the 1.3% yield of the broad market index. Many energy stocks have even higher yields. One of them is MPLX (NYSE: MPLX). The midstream energy company yields more than 7% right now. Here's why income investors will want to take a closer look at MPLX. A yield above 7% might seem like a higher-risk income stream at first glance. However, that's not the case with MPLX's payout. The master limited partnership (MLP) has a rock-solid financial foundation supporting its big-time distribution. MPLX has a diversified midstream operation that generates lots of stable cash flow backed by long-term contracts and government-regulated rate structures. It produced nearly $1.5 billion in distributable cash flow during the first quarter -- enough to cover its distribution by a comfortable 1.5 times. The MLP produced about $500 million in excess free cash flow during the period. That was enough money to cover its organic capital spending with room to spare. (Its net cash used in investing activities was about $364 million after adjusting for acquisitions.) MPLX also has a robust balance sheet. It ended the first quarter with a leverage ratio of 3.3. That's comfortably below the 4.0 or so ratio its stable cash flows can support. MPLX stands out among higher-yielding dividend stocks because it's growing at a healthy clip. Its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) rose by 7% in the first quarter. Meanwhile, its distributable cash flow was up 8.5%. The company has been growing its earnings and cash flow at a nearly 7% compound annual rate since 2021. That strong growth, along with the company's top-notch financial profile, has allowed MPLX to increase its distribution at a 10.7% compound annual rate since 2021, including by 12.5% last year. The MLP has plenty more growth coming down the pipeline. It has secured several new investments this year. MPLX and its partners recently made a final investment decision to build the Traverse Pipeline, which should enter commercial service in 2027. It's also building two Gulf Coast fractionators and a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) export terminal, expanding its BANGL pipeline, building the Blackcomb and Rio Bravo pipelines, and constructing two more natural gas processing plants. These projects have in-service dates through 2029, giving the MLP lots of visibility into its earnings growth. "We continue to anticipate mid-teen returns on these projects, which will support mid-single digit adjusted EBITDA growth," said CEO Maryann Mannen in the first-quarter earnings press release. "This growth is expected to allow us to reinvest in the business and support annual distribution increases in the future." MPLX also continues to use its strong balance sheet to make acquisitions. Early this year, it agreed to buy the 55% of the BANGL pipeline it didn't already own for $715 million, another 5% interest in the Matterhorn Express pipeline for $151 million, and a crude oil gathering system for $237 million. Given its low leverage ratio, it has ample financial flexibility to continue making bolt-on acquisitions as opportunities arise. These and future deals will further enhance its earnings growth rate, giving it more fuel to increase its distribution. MPLX is currently paying over 7%, which is much higher than the average energy stock and the S&P 500. The MLP's big-time payout is on a very sustainable foundation. Further, it should continue growing for the next several years. That makes it a great option for income-seeking investors as long as they are comfortable receiving the Schedule K-1 federal tax form the MLP sends them each year. Before you buy stock in MPLX, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and MPLX wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Matt DiLallo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Energy Stock With a Dividend Yield Over 7% Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool

Were Boise homeowners illegally taxed? Idaho Supreme Court to weigh in
Were Boise homeowners illegally taxed? Idaho Supreme Court to weigh in

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Were Boise homeowners illegally taxed? Idaho Supreme Court to weigh in

The curtains are closing on a long-running legal battle over Boise's Harris Ranch neighborhood. Since 2021, residents have gathered and fought the area's Boise-based developer and the city of Boise over a special taxing district they say is unlawful and unfair. Both sides presented oral arguments June 9 to the Idaho Supreme Court and now await a decision that could come in weeks. Or, more likely, months. The homeowners say the special taxing district, called a community infrastructure district, forced them to unfairly foot the bill for $22 million in payments to the developer of Harris Ranch in October 2021. Barber Valley Development, which is building the Boise neighborhood on behalf of the Harris Family Limited Partnership, rejected the claims that the payments were illegal and argued that they have followed the rules outlined by the Idaho Legislature. The Legislature permitted community infrastructure districts in 2008 with the hope that they could help make growth pay for itself. In such a district, homeowners pay extra taxes for local public improvements like roads and roundabouts. In theory, this means that a resident of the Boise Bench or North End wouldn't be forced to pay higher taxes for things they wouldn't need or use such as sewer lines. Led by residents Larry Crowley and Bill Doyle, the homeowners with the Harris Ranch CID Taxpayers Association say the district made them pay up to 40% higher taxes than those outside the district — including homes across their street that were intentionally cut out of the district boundaries. An Ada County judge threw out all 16 of the homeowners' arguments in April 2023. The homeowners appealed to the state's highest court almost five months later. 'It's been a lengthy effort,' Crowley said by phone after Monday's oral arguments. 'We've done our part, now it's in their court.' Crowley said that they were hopeful that there could be some relief coming for homeowners, but that he was proud of the work the community had done. 'It's been in many ways a very humbling experience,' Crowley said. 'We're just really thankful for the opportunity to get to this point.' Doug Fowler, the president of Barber Valley Development, said that he was looking forward to putting the legal issues behind him and continuing to build out the neighborhood, some of which has been paused amid the court battle. After chiding both sides for using confidential information from an accidental email in their arguments, the Supreme Court justices grilled lawyers representing the homeowners, the city and Barber Valley Development. They poked holes in arguments, seemed to cast doubt on both sides and tested the boundaries of an issue that has never been litigated before. Though the lawyers and justices touched on several topics on the sprawling lawsuit's one-hour oral argument, possibly the most poignant was whether the district was formed correctly in 2010 and whether that issue could be used in arguments. Nicholas Warden, the attorney for the neighbors, argued that the district was created by the vote of a single resident on land outside the district who would never need to pay the extra taxes. No one who would eventually pay the taxes took part in the vote. This, Warden said, should invalidate the $22 million payment in 2021 because the creation of the bonds required approval by a supermajority of residents. 'Our position is that an assent of a supermajority requires at least one person, in other words more than none, of the people who are going to pay the tax to vote on it,' Warden said. 'That could easily have occurred in this place.' Justice Greg Moeller said there are plenty of cases where people may buy a house, move in and need to pay into something like a school bond or mosquito abatement district even if they hadn't voted for it. The homeowners, he said, bought their homes knowing of the district. 'I understand why they're unhappy with this,' Moeller said. 'But it's not unusual for people to buy land in a district with restrictions that they're helpless to change by the time they move in.' Melodie McQuade, an attorney with Boise's Givens Pursley law firm representing the infrastructure district, said there was no evidence that the vote was illegal, and the creation of the district wasn't up for debate in the case. 'The plaintiffs want to challenge the formation of the district and then multiple decisions that have been made over the past several years,' McQuade said. 'You can't reach back that far.' A key moment came when Moeller asked McQuade if the infrastructure district could be considered a legal form of taxation without representation — an argument that Crowley and Doyle have made since they first sued. 'I don't believe so,' McQuade said. 'I believe this is a mechanism for infrastructure to be paid for in perhaps a slightly different way than if the developer baked it into the lot costs.' Moeller said that it seemed as if it could be a way to hide who voted for tax increases and would prevent them from being able to hold anybody accountable. 'My best answer to that, conceptually, is that it shouldn't be disqualifying that a small group of people would vote to create the district,' McQuade said. 'It's not surprising that these big pieces of land would have very few voters, because they're all owned by maybe even one family.' A new law was supposed to help emergency services handle growth. It isn't working As Boise builds up, Eagle tees up density restrictions with little public input Boise to welcome 'crown jewel' of hotels on Grove Street. What's coming? A Christian college wants to build apartments in Garden City. Neighbors are mad

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store