Woman speaks after being hit by car that sped through Chicago anti-ICE protest
Heather Blair said Wednesday that she was heading home when the car started accelerating.
Around 6:19 p.m. Tuesday, a maroon sedan was seen barreling down the street as the protesters marched at Monroe Street and Wabash Avenue. Police confirmed Wednesday that they were looking for the driver of the car.
Meanwhile, Blair talked with CBS News Chicago as she recovered from home Wednesday.
"The acceleration is what, that that was shocking — accelerating toward a crowd," Blair said.
Blair was injured as she ran from the car. She is not sure how she was hit.
"I don't have a memory of it, maybe because I was struck by a car," she said.
But CBS News Chicago's cameras caught the driver — a woman in a yellow tank top — among the protesters just minutes before. She had a can of spray paint in her hand as she faced police.
CBS News Chicago's Sabrina Franza was reporting live from the scene less than two minutes later when the screaming started.
There was a sudden rush to help anyone who may have been injured. Protesters had to jump out of the way, and some tried to get the driver to stop, while others helped Blair.
Blair would be taken to Northwestern Memorial Hospital for treatment. She said she has a broken arm, another fracture, injuries to her face and mouth requiring further treatment.
City leaders are now strategizing to prevent future injuries.
"We already had a morning this meeting with some of our team on additional resources we will need in place," said Chicago Deputy Mayor of Community Safety Garien Gatewood. "We've been in contact directly with the Governor's office about some of the support they can provide as well."
CBS Skywatch followed the maroon car for more than six minutes as the driver left the scene. She drove into oncoming traffic and made turns in front of other cars.
The driver first proceeded east on Monroe Street to Michigan Avenue, and drove past an unsuspecting Divvy bike. A witness, protester Dr. Howard Ehrman, said the car sped up as the driver fled.
"They continued to accelerate. It started off at State Street about 30 miles an hour," Ehrman said. "By the time it got to Michigan [Avenue], it was going 50 miles an hour."
The driver of the maroon car stopped only after her vehicle broke down on State Street in the South Loop. She got out, and then got right back behind the wheel.
Police said they are still investigating.
As for Blair, she had planned to be at the upcoming "No Kings" protest against the Trump administration on Saturday — but with her injuries, she will hand off her poster to a friend.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Going Just 1 MPH Under Speed Limit Could Land You in Jail in Louisiana
Going Just 1 MPH Under Speed Limit Could Land You in Jail in Louisiana originally appeared on Autoblog. Louisiana drivers lingering in the left lane now have even less margin for error. A new law that took effect August 1 allows police to ticket anyone driving just 1 mph under the speed limit in the passing lane without a valid reason. First-time offenders face a $150 fine, a second offense within 12 months rises to $250, and a third can bring $350 or up to 30 days in jail. Lawmakers say the aim is to keep traffic flowing and reduce dangerous slowdowns, but critics argue it's an overreach that could criminalize cautious driving. From Ten Miles Under to Just One The previous rule only targeted drivers going at least 10 mph under the limit in the left lane. The revised statute tightens that to a single mile per hour, with exceptions for overtaking or turning left. Senator Jay Luneau, who introduced the bill, said the idea came from frustration during his commute between Baton Rouge and Alexandria. The stricter approach mirrors other recent driving crackdowns nationwide, such as one state's controversial new speeding law that threatens offenders with jail time. A National Patchwork of Speed Policy Louisiana's change comes amid a broader debate on how states should set and enforce speed laws. While some are clamping down on both fast and slow drivers, others are going the opposite direction. Earlier this year, one state raised its speed limits on certain highways — but paired the move with strict penalties for reckless behavior. These contrasting approaches show the lack of a uniform national standard, leaving drivers to navigate a patchwork of rules as they cross state lines. No One's Above the Law Enforcement isn't limited to everyday motorists. In July, Harry Potter star Emma Watson lost her license after accumulating 12 penalty points for speeding in the U.K., highlighting that stricter driving laws — on either side of the Atlantic — can catch even high-profile of Louisiana's law argue that by making left-lane discipline a serious matter, they can reduce road rage, prevent accidents, and make highways safer for everyone. Will It Change Driving Behavior? The law's supporters believe it will unclog traffic and reduce collisions caused by sudden lane changes or tailgating. Critics warn that it could be used to justify unnecessary stops or escalate minor infractions into costly — even criminal — consequences. Whether it proves effective or becomes another flashpoint in the driver–police relationship remains to be seen. For now, the message from Baton Rouge is clear: the left lane is for passing, not for pacing the limit. Going Just 1 MPH Under Speed Limit Could Land You in Jail in Louisiana first appeared on Autoblog on Aug 12, 2025 This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Aug 12, 2025, where it first appeared.
Fox News
14 minutes ago
- Fox News
Adam Schiff accused by fellow Democrat of leaking classified 'Russiagate' scandal information
Fox News senior congressional correspondent Chad Pergram reports on the latest in the claims that Sen. Adam Schiff leaked classified information about President Donald Trump while he was House Intelligence Committee chairman on 'Special Report.'
The Verge
14 minutes ago
- The Verge
Russia might be responsible for the PACER hack
Just a few days after administrators announced that the 'federal Judiciary is taking additional steps to strengthen protections for sensitive case documents in response to recent escalated cyberattacks,' the New York Times reports investigators have found evidence Russia is 'at least partially responsible' for a recent hack. Politico reported on the breach last week, saying it was 'believed to have exposed sensitive court data across multiple U.S. states' and that while the system's managers had been aware of its impact since around July 4th, they are still trying to figure out its full extent. Searches by the attackers reportedly included cases 'involving people with Russian and Eastern European surnames,' and may have compromised sealed records that weren't publicly available. After the SolarWinds breach in 2021, new procedures called for highly sensitive documents to be filed using paper or a secure electronic device, and not uploaded to CM/ECF. In 2022, the DOJ reportedly informed the judiciary of another ongoing breach. According to the Times, district court chief judges were warned last month to keep cases with documents 'related to criminal activity with an overseas tie' off of the usual document management system for federal cases, which is made up of the Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) where files are uploaded and managed, as well as PACER, a database that's available to the public. It points to this order issued Friday by Eastern District of New York chief judge Margo Brodie, saying that, until further notice, 'criminal cases and in cases related to criminal investigations are prohibited from being filed in CM/ECF,' and are instead to be uploaded to a separate system that doesn't connect to PACER. Last week's notice from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said: The vast majority of documents filed with the Judiciary's electronic case management system are not confidential and indeed are readily available to the public, which is fundamental to an open and transparent judicial system. However, some filings contain confidential or proprietary information that are sealed from public view. These sensitive documents can be targets of interest to a range of threat actors. To better protect them, courts have been implementing more rigorous procedures to restrict access to sensitive documents under carefully controlled and monitored circumstances. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Richard Lawler Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Law Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Security Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech
