
Gold price prediction: Will gold stay flat as U.S. jobs data battles trade war fears ahead of Fed signals?
Gold prices steady as strong
U.S. jobs data
offsets safe-haven demand amid rising U.S.-China trade tensions-
Gold prices held their ground on Wednesday, June 4, as fresh U.S. labor data showed unexpected strength, balancing out investor demand for safe-haven assets like gold due to ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and China. As of 11:45 GMT, spot gold stood firm at $3,349.19 per ounce, while U.S. gold futures were unchanged at $3,373.10.
The job market gave investors some relief, yet growing global concerns—especially sharp words and tariff moves from President Donald Trump—kept gold from falling further. "U.S. labor data gave markets a bit of relief yesterday, causing a small dip in gold prices. However, tensions between the U.S. and China are still keeping risks high and gold prices supported,' said Zain Vawda, market analyst at MarketPulse by OANDA.
What's holding gold steady despite global uncertainty?
While many expected gold to climb on geopolitical stress, stronger U.S. job numbers provided a counterweight. According to new data, U.S. job openings rose in April, signaling continued hiring demand. However, the same report showed that layoffs hit a 9-month high, adding a layer of uncertainty to the picture.
These mixed signals suggest the labor market isn't entirely stable. Investors are watching closely to see if interest rate cuts are still on the table—or if the economy is stronger than expected.
How are Trump's tariffs and comments on China affecting gold?
On the same day gold prices stayed steady, President Donald Trump said Chinese President Xi Jinping is 'extremely hard to make a deal with.' His comment came days after accusing China of backing out of an agreement to reduce tariffs and trade restrictions.
Live Events
In a sharp move, the U.S. doubled tariffs on steel and aluminum imports on Wednesday. The administration is also pressing trade partners to submit 'best offers' ahead of more penalties expected in early July. This backdrop is adding pressure to global trade flows and supporting demand for gold as a safe-haven asset.
Will the U.S. non-farm payrolls data change gold's direction?
All eyes are now on the U.S.
non-farm payrolls report
, due Friday. The data could heavily influence Federal Reserve policy, particularly around interest rates.
'If the data is stronger than expected, interest rate cut expectations are likely to wane, which would weigh on the gold price,' said Carsten Fritsch, analyst at Commerzbank.
Gold generally performs well in a low-interest-rate environment. When rates are expected to drop, gold becomes more attractive to investors, since it doesn't yield interest itself.
How much movement can we expect in gold prices?
For now, analysts expect gold to trade within a fairly tight range. 'We see gold trading between $3,300 and $3,400 per troy ounce in the short term,' Fritsch added.
With the market split between upbeat labor signals and global trade worries, gold is likely to stay stuck in a range unless one side clearly tips the scale—either through surprise economic data or an escalation in trade tensions.
What's the latest on silver, platinum, and palladium?
Other precious metals showed mixed trends:
Spot silver dipped by 0.5% to $34.32 an ounce
Platinum rose 1.1% to $1,085.50
Palladium fell 0.5% to $1,005.11
These shifts reflect broader market caution as investors look for clarity on rate cuts, global trade, and the strength of the world economy.
FAQs:
Q1. Why did gold prices stay flat despite rising trade tensions?
Stronger U.S. jobs data offset safe-haven demand for gold.
Q2. What role does the non-farm payrolls report play in gold prices?
It helps predict interest rate policy, which directly impacts gold prices.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump vs Harvard: Judge blocks Donald Trump's ban on Harvard foreign students
Trump vs Harvard: A federal judge has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's proclamation banning foreign students from entering the US to attend Harvard University. Donald Trump administration's revocation of Harvard's SEVP is the latest effort by the Republican administration to restrict enrollment at the Ivy League school, which relies heavily on international students for much of its research and scholarship, reported AP. Harvard filed a legal challenge on Thursday, asking for a judge to block Trump's order and calling it illegal retaliation for Harvard's rejection of White House demands. Harvard said the president was attempting an end-run around a previous court order. A few hours later, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston issued a temporary restraining order against Trump's proclamation. Harvard, she said, had demonstrated it would sustain 'immediate and irreparable injury' before she would have an opportunity to hear from the parties in the lawsuit. Burroughs also extended the temporary hold she placed on the administration's previous attempt to end Harvard's enrollment of international students. Last month, the Department of Homeland Security revoked Harvard's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork to them for their visas, only to have Burroughs block the action. Trump's order this week invoked a different legal authority. For the second time in a month, incoming foreign students at Harvard have faced uncertainty only to be saved by court intervention. Alan Wang, a 22-year-old from China set to begin a graduate program at Harvard this August, described the experience as an emotional roller coaster. 'I cannot plan my life when everything keeps going back and forth. Give me some certainty: Can I go or not?' Wang said. Wang was born and raised in China but attended high school and college in the US. He's now in China for summer vacation. Recently he has been exploring options in countries with more appealing immigration policies, including Canada, Australia and New Zealand. A court hearing is scheduled for June 16 to decide if the judge will extend the block on Trump's proclamation. If Trump's measure were to survive the court challenge, it would block thousands of students who are scheduled to go to Harvard's campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for the summer and fall terms. It would also direct the State Department to consider revoking visas for Harvard students already in the US. 'Harvard's more than 7,000 F-1 and J-1 visa holders — and their dependents — have become pawns in the government's escalating campaign of retaliation,' Harvard wrote Thursday in a court filing. While the court case proceeds, Harvard is making contingency plans so students and visiting scholars can continue their work at the university, President Alan Garber said in a message to the campus and alumni. 'Each of us is part of a truly global university community,' Garber said Thursday. 'We know that the benefits of bringing talented people together from around the world are unique and irreplaceable.' Trump's proclamation invoked a broad law allowing the president to block 'any class of aliens' whose entry would be detrimental to U.S. interests. It's the same basis for a new travel ban blocking citizens of 12 countries and restricting access for those from seven others. In its challenge, Harvard said Trump contradicted himself by raising security concerns about incoming Harvard students while also saying they would be welcome if they attend other U.S. universities. 'Not only does this undermine any national security claim related to the entry of these individuals, it lays bare the Proclamation's true purpose: to punish Harvard as a disfavored institution,' the school wrote. Harvard has attracted a growing number of the brightest minds from around the world, with international enrollment growing from 11% of the student body three decades ago to 26% today. Rising international enrollment has made Harvard and other elite colleges uniquely vulnerable to Trump's crackdown on foreign students. Republicans have been seeking to force overhauls of the nation's top colleges, which they see as hotbeds of 'woke' and antisemitic viewpoints. Garber says the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. But Harvard, he said, will not stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles,' even after receiving federal ultimatums. Trump's administration also has taken steps to withhold federal funding from Harvard since it rejected White House demands related to campus protests, admissions, hiring and more. Harvard's $53 billion endowment allows it to weather the loss of funding for a time, although Garber has warned of 'difficult decisions and sacrifices' to come.


News18
36 minutes ago
- News18
Donald Trump Feud Wipes $34 Billion From Elon Musk's Net Worth
Last Updated: The plunge was largely driven by a sharp 14% drop in Tesla's share price, which coincided with an increasingly public war of words between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. Tesla CEO Elon Musk's personal fortune shrank by a staggering $34 billion as tensions escalated between him and US President Donald Trump. The drop brought Elon Musk's net worth down to $334.5 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index- marking the second-largest single-day wealth decline ever recorded by the index. Tesla Shares Tumble 14% The plunge was largely driven by a sharp 14% drop in Tesla's share price, which coincided with an increasingly public war of words between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. Elon Musk's wealth is tied heavily to his stake in Tesla, SpaceX, and other private ventures. Clash Over 'Big, Beautiful Bill' At the heart of the feud is the proposed reconciliation package, nicknamed the 'Big Beautiful Bill" by Donald Trump. Elon Musk called it a 'disgusting abomination," accusing it of worsening the US deficit and urging Republican lawmakers to kill it. Donald Trump hit back saying he was 'very disappointed" with Elon Musk's stance and suggesting that the Tesla boss knew electric vehicle subsidies would be slashed under the bill. 'It Was Never Shown to Me', Elon Musk Said Elon Musk denied having seen the bill, saying on X that it 'was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" Elon Musk Is Still World's Richest Man Despite the massive loss, Elon Musk retained his title as the world's richest person. He remains nearly $90 billion ahead of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg (net worth: $241 billion) and around $105 billion ahead of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos (net worth: $229 billion). Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: June 06, 2025, 22:35 IST


Hindustan Times
41 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?
USA, Canada, and Mexico are all set to host the 2026 FIFA World Cup together. However, President Donald Trump's latest travel ban has posed questions about whether certain qualified countries will now be allowed to travel to the US and take part. Starting Monday (June 9), citizens of 12 countries will no longer be allowed to get a US visa, according to a recent decision by Trump. Citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen have been banned by Trump and tighter restrictions have been applied to seven other nations (Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela). Trump explained his move by stating in a video, 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country, by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas. We don't want them.' As of now, Iran is the only country from the list to have already qualified to compete in the FIFA World Cup next year. Cuba, Sudan, and Haiti are currently in contention to contest. Venezuela is five points off the threshold for automatic qualification but a playoff might just cut the deal. Sierra Leone can still be involved through multiple playoff games while Burundi, Equatorial Guinea, and Libya have very slim chances. Under the current policy, sports teams of qualifying countries should still be able to contest since such a provision have been provided for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.' However, this exception will only continue as long as there is no change to the current ban policy adopted by the US. Iranian fans hoping to catch their national team in the spotlight won't be so lucky however since the policy provides no such exceptions for fans of sporting teams. Getting an American visa had already been tough for Iranians even before the ban was implemented due to tougher vetting procedures. However, considering how those indulging in international travel for sporting events are usually from a higher wealth bracket, such individuals could still try to circumvent the process by using different passport options. The move has stirred a debate about the intersection of politics with global sport. Back in 2017, FIFA President Gianni Infantino had said, "Any team, including the supporters and officials of that team, who qualify for a World Cup need to have access to the country, otherwise there is no World Cup." Infantino has since developed close ties with Trump and has re-emphasized that sporting teams of all countries will face no barriers in coming to the US for participation next year. The event is expected to raise a majority of the soccer body's revenue in the 2023-2026 period. Questions have also been raised about the US' legitimacy to hold the upcoming 2028 Olympic Games with such strict travel policies against certain participating countries.