Trailblazing Black journalist Sarah-Ann Shaw loved her Roxbury library. Now it bears her name.
'She would just want to encourage people to come to the library, to get books, to be literate, to share their love of learning and literacy, and, as importantly, to give their time and money to support programs at the library for the community,' Klare Shaw said.
The BPL board of trustees has voted to rename the library, the largest branch in the BPL system, highlighting Shaw's civil service.
The Roxbury branch, which opened in 1978, was the result of a merger of two branches, the Mount Pleasant Branch and the Fellowes Athenaeum branch. Klare Shaw said her mother supported the merger, but rallied to make sure that some of the money BPL made in the process went back to the local community in the form of scholarships and library programs.
Advertisement
Sarah-Ann Shaw was also a member of the 'Friends of the Library' group, which raises funds to promote and enrich library materials.
'She's kind of with me anyway, so I don't need a reminder on a building, but I think it is an honorable testimony to the work that she and so many others did to sustain that branch,' her daughter said.
Dion Irish, chief of operations for the City of Boston, who grew up in Roxbury, said the decision to rename the library came about after over a year of community leaders asking Mayor Michelle Wu's administration to consider the honor.
'This is a great thing. It's not often that we have buildings named after people of color in Boston,' Irish said.
Irish said the library plans to honor other important community members who knew Shaw, such as civil rights activist Mamie Jones, and Francine Gelzer, the first Black librarian at the Roxbury BPL branch.
Shaw was born in 1933 and grew up in Roxbury. She was the daughter of two civil rights activists, and she covered public affairs in Boston after the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.
Before then, Shaw was already an advocate for education and literacy. She was the cofounder of the Northern Student Movement, where she ran a tutoring program for kids at the time of desegregation lawsuits.
Shaw's program 'Say, Brother,' now called 'Basic Black,' focused on
Advertisement
'The symbolism of the library and Sarah is a perfect match. In a library, you get to imagine, share ideas, and explore, and all of that spoke to the foundation of who Sarah-Ann was,' said Peter Brown, a former colleague of Shaw at WBZ.
Brown said that although Shaw covered hard-hitting issues like the
'Whenever she could cover a story about young people in the city doing something good, she would fight for it,' Brown said.
For her work, Shaw holds the Chuck Stone Lifetime Achievement Award of the National Association of Black Journalists, an honor she shares with Oprah Winfrey.
Alfreda Harris, legendary basketball coach and the
'We all worked for the same thing, which was the betterment of young people and our community and to support things that we felt made our community better,' Harris said.
Community member Toy Burton, founder of the Roxbury Unity Parade, said naming the library after a Roxbury local is essential to uplifting the community.
'Sarah-Ann is a connection to the community,' Burton said.
Burton said during the pandemic, she organized a 'Caravan for Sarah-Ann Shaw,' and locals drove by her house beeping and waving with gratitude for her years of community work.
'I hope that when kids walk through the halls of a public library named after somebody who grew up in the same neighborhood that they did, that they know they can do great things,' Burton said.
Advertisement
Maria Probert can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
My brother didn't give me a plus-one for his wedding. I was upset at first, but I'm actually so relieved I went alone.
I was bummed about not getting a plus-one for my brother's wedding — it's hard being a single guest. Turns out, the date I would've brought was messy. I'm glad he didn't get the chance to ruin the day. Now, I'm OK not getting a plus-one. I've also set a new, higher bar for relationships. When my little brother told me he was getting married, I was beyond happy and incredibly proud of him for finding such a wonderful partner and healthy relationship. On top of that, I was stoked that they asked me to be a bridesmaid and give a speech at the reception. However, I was pretty bummed when I found out singles, including myself, weren't getting plus-ones. It can be tough being the single wedding guest, especially as a divorcée Having been married before, I know how expensive weddings are. I didn't give any singles a plus-one to my wedding for that very reason. As such, I knew I was being more than a little hypocritical for feeling hurt that I couldn't bring a date. However, part of me secretly felt like a failure for being divorced and single in a sea of happy couples at all the weddings I've attended since my marriage ended. I knew I'd especially feel the burn at a family wedding like this, where all my cousins attending were also married. The kicker is, if I'd gotten a plus-one, I even would've had a date to bring this time. I had just started seeing a guy who wanted to come to the wedding with me. Nevertheless, I decided not to push the issue. I attended the wedding alone and, in the weeks that followed, I realized my brother made the right call by not letting me bring a nameless date. Looking back, I'm relieved I didn't bring a plus-one who could've ruined my whole night The more I got to know the guy who would've been my wedding date, the more I realized he wouldn't have been a very good plus-one. Shortly after the wedding, I navigated a slew of messy incidents with him — several involved him getting far too drunk, and most left me embarrassed in a public space. Suffice it to say, our relationship didn't last. One of my biggest takeaways, though, was that I dodged a bullet by not bringing him to my brother's wedding. Based on the behaviors I witnessed from him in the weeks after the big day, I probably would've spent most of the evening having to babysit him instead of enjoying the celebration. Again, I can't say for sure how things would've gone, but I'm grateful I didn't give him the chance to embarrass me or cause a scene that would take away the beautiful energy of the happy couple's wedding. I'm glad he's not in any wedding photos, and that I was able to spend the day focusing on the people I truly loved who were in attendance. This experience also taught me more about what I'm really looking for in a relationship Maybe not getting a plus one as a single guest isn't so bad — you get more time to focus on the healthy love around you. Watching my brother and new sister-in-law that day, and in the time since, I have been in awe of seeing what a good relationship looks like, and taking notes. This situation was definitely a wake-up call that prompted me to pause and reflect on my unhealthy patterns and poor relationship decisions. Since then, I've been working on that part of myself and making improvements. I've also learned to be a lot more comfortable being the single person in a group of couples, and I've stopped thinking less of myself for it. The big takeaway for me, though, is that now I know what I'm looking for in a relationship: Someone I'd be proud to bring to a wedding, who the couple would be happy to invite by name. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword
Atlantic
a day ago
- Atlantic
The Pull—And the Risks—Of Intensive Parenting
This is an edition of The Wonder Reader, a newsletter in which our editors recommend a set of stories to spark your curiosity and fill you with delight. Sign up here to get it every Saturday morning. In 2024, Russell Shaw made the case for the Lighthouse Parent. 'A Lighthouse Parent stands as a steady, reliable guide,' Shaw writes, 'providing safety and clarity without controlling every aspect of their child's journey.' The term, used by the pediatrician Kenneth Ginsburg and others, is a useful rejoinder to the strong pull of intensive parenting. Parents' first instinct is often to give a solution, to get involved, to fix it. It's a natural impulse—'we're biologically wired to prevent our children's suffering, and it can be excruciating to watch them struggle,' Shaw writes. But that mindset is both exhausting for adults and damaging for kids. Instead, try to think of yourself as a lighthouse: ready to illuminate the way when your kid needs you, ready to stand back when they don't. On Parenting The Gravitational Pull of Supervising Kids All the Time By Stephanie H. Murray When so many people think hovering is what good parents do, how do you stop? Read the article. The Isolation of Intensive Parenting By Stephanie H. Murray You can micromanage your kid's life or ask for community help with child care—but you can't have both. Read the article. Lighthouse Parents Have More Confident Kids By Russell Shaw Sometimes, the best thing a parent can do is nothing at all. Still Curious? What adults lost when kids stopped playing in the street: In many ways, a world built for cars has made life so much harder for grown-ups. How to quit intensive parenting: It's the prevailing American child-rearing model across class lines. But there's a better way, Elliot Haspel argued in 2022. Other Diversions
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Are Black Mothers Ruining Their Boys?
I am my mother's oldest son. I love who I am today, and despite many issues, she shaped me. My father was gone for goodcby the time I was 10. Even when he was around, he only taught me what I didn't want to be. I love Black mothers, and what I'm bringing up here is a discussion, not a critique. Over years of observations and recent conversations, I've noticed a pattern. Some people may be familiar with the cliche: Black mothers raise their daughters and love their sons. I hadn't heard it before, but I immediately understood it when I did. Several women in my life believe their mothers favor their brothers. The girls were expected to achieve more academically, have more chores, and be more independent. The boys are coddled in a way the girls are not afforded. This isn't just some bias specific to these women. I've seen it with my own eyes. One woman, although the youngest child, was expected to cook, clean, and iron her mother's clothes while her brothers played video games. I remember her telling me that for Christmas, she received a pack of Oreo cookies while her brothers received something more substantial. Even as an adult, she is expected to solve every family problem. I've also seen this in the classroom when teaching siblings. Although this isn't always the case, I'm much more likely to see a mother struggle to believe her son is doing something 'bad'. 'Not my baby!' is a phrase I've heard from many mothers almost exclusively when I'm calling about their sons. I recently received a video in which a man argued that Black mothers were ruining their sons because they loved on them too much for too long. He argued they are raising boys, not men, and went on to say the mothers wouldn't even date the type of man they are raising. Love is a good thing. It is a crucial thing, but everything in moderation. Love your son, but don't hide him from the real world. Make him work. Allow him to fail. Have the same expectations for success you would have for your daughter. Research shows it is possible to love your children too much. A bit of frustration and struggle in childhood creates adults who are better able to navigate the real world. When kids are overly protected, they struggle on deciding career paths and relationships. Depression, anxiety, and emptiness are all common symptoms. The brother of the woman mentioned earlier is going through this right now. He is 40 years old, living at home, depressed, angry, and with no hope for the future. His sister is independent, career-driven, and financially successful. Is the cliche true? I acknowledge my bubble, and even within that, there are exceptions to the rule. If reading this, I would love to know your experiences, but I did decide to do a bit of research before throwing out my observation. A 2010 study broached this topic. They took 1500 kids with Black mothers, and the results show there are some significant differences between sons and daughters, especially if we ignore boys who are born first. Boys who are born first and girls end up with similar results, but boys who are born later stand out. 'The results showed that later-born boys had fewer chores, argued more with their mothers, lived in less cognitively stimulating homes, and were not allowed to make the same decisions as were the girls or firstborn boys at the same age. The later-born boys were also lowest in achievement and highest in externalizing behaviors.' -source Although again we are working with a smaller sample size, it does suggest there is some truth to the idea that 'boys are being loved too much.' But why do mothers favor their sons? There isn't an easy answer to any of this, but I've found a common thread in my personal bubble and online. There seems to be an attempt to shield these boys from a harsh, racist world. Some people argue Black men have it harder, especially when we look at the prison system. Police brutality is a rampant problem for everyone, but Black people, and especially Black men, are disproportionately the victims. The justice system was built to criminalize and punish Black men to the extreme. From this angle, it isn't hard to see why a mother would want to shield her son from that world. The way a mother perceives the world likely impacts how she treats her son, but the way she perceives Black men will likely have just as much impact. Centuries of propaganda and perhaps personal experiences may teach Black women to believe Black men can't succeed. They are going to end up in a gang, or jail, etc. Why push him to succeed if he can't succeed? One study shows Black mothers have lower expectations for their sons and believe them to be less academically competent. This study consisted of 334 African American mothers from diverse backgrounds. Some were married, some were from urban areas, etc. This supports what I generally see in the classroom. On average, Black mothers are more likely to push their sons when they are athletes. In relation to this mindset, mothers push their daughters so hard because of the same belief, men will fail you. Black women have to be successful, independent, and educated to conquer the world. Men raised by those same parents enter the world with only the goal of surviving and staying out of trouble. Sadly, in many situations, this mindset hurts everyone. Once they grow up, many of these successful daughters are expected to raise these sons, who were never raised by their mothers. Despite my claims here, every situation is different. This isn't an indictment on how anyone is raising their children. I also need to point out while doing research, I saw some pretty negative comments, especially toward Black women. I'm relatively certain those people just look for any reason to attack Black women because the comments didn't relate to the actual topic. To be clear, this is about Black people, and people in general, as a whole. I encourage people to join the conversation, but please keep your unrelated hatred to yourself. Motherhood is hard. They are expected to be perfect and receive most of the blame whenever something goes wrong. In comparison, fathers are rewarded for doing the bare minimum. (Have you ever seen a father go to the grocery store with the kids?) Mothers usually do the best they can with the tools they receive. I doubt any mother is consciously favoring their sons, especially if they understand how it may impact them in adulthood. Hopefully, this works as another tool, something to consider while navigating the most difficult job in the world. This post originally appeared on Medium and is edited and republished with author's permission. Read more of LG Ware's work on Medium. Solve the daily Crossword
