Lambert backs $7.7B school bill, explains why he voted for vouchers
Texas governor signs $1 billion voucher bill in milestone for school choice supporters nationally
Two major bills — House Bill 2 and Senate Bill 2 — have now passed in both chambers. HB 2 focuses on public school funding, while SB 2 includes a controversial education savings account (ESA) program, often referred to as a school voucher system. Despite concerns from rural lawmakers about the potential impact of vouchers, Lambert says the most important takeaway is the $7.7 billion investment in public education.
'We wanted to make sure that before we took up and discussed the voucher bill, the ESA and SB2, we had made strong commitments and a strong investment in public education,' Lambert explained.
That basic allotment, increased by nearly $400 per student based on Weighted Average Daily Attendance, now has built-in inflation protection. Lambert noted that about 40% of the increase is now statutorily dedicated to teacher pay and raises.
'There were some additional measures to make sure that even if enrollment drops in some of our schools, which is what we have seen in the last few years, those school districts will continue to be funded. We've ensured, and we have put into statute now, once the governor signs the bill, that those monies will continue to be invested in public education, in addition to the ESA voucher program,' Lambert shared.
Lambert flips to support HB2 after changes to voucher program
Though Lambert previously opposed ESAs, he voted in favor after key amendments were added to protect rural schools.
'It was very hard for me, because I have been a very staunch opponent of the conceptual idea of using public dollars to fund private education. But again, once the amendments were accepted by the governor's staff and the Senate and our House public education committee chairman, then I felt obligated, once those amendments were accepted and put on the bill, I was obligated to support the legislation,' Lambert shared.
He explained that the $1 billion voucher program is divided into tiers—or 'buckets'—starting with the neediest students.
'The lowest bucket is those families with the greatest need, in other words, the lowest income levels, as well as those students with disabilities and special educational needs. Then the buckets increase a little bit up to the final bucket, which is the 20% that basically is the universal one, where any family can apply,' Lambert explained.
He emphasized strict guidelines for how voucher funds can be spent.
'There's still a lot of a lot of things that are restricted, as far as how the money can be spent, how if you're a homeschool kid and your parents want to take you on a ski trip and use the $2,000 voucher, you can't do that. It's got to be used for tuition, for educational supplies. There is just a list of things there that will make sure that the money is being used effectively and efficiently, and will be accountable as far as the taxpayers' funding of that program.'
Rep. Stan Lambert discusses election integrity, school vouchers & future goals for West Texas
Senator Ted Cruz recently stated that competition from voucher programs will improve public schools. Lambert agreed that the competition can improve education, though he believes this is more of an urban issue.
'I think competition can improve and make us better. It gives us a kind of insight as to what others are doing, how they're doing it, and how effective they are,' said Lambert. 'I really think that that though, in West Texas and certainly in our rural areas of the state, we're not going to see as much impact necessarily, because I do think that this is more really of an urban issue, a metropolitan major, major city type issue, versus what's happening in our rural schools. That's why I've been such a strong opponent of a voucher program, because I think that it doesn't really impact what's happening in our schools like Abilene and like Wiley and so forth. While I'm a big supporter of private education, I think we have some private schools in West Texas that are doing a very good job. So I'm not trying to say one is better than the other.'
Lambert also weighed in on testing reform, saying the STAAR test may soon be on its way out.
'The fact that we put so much emphasis and so much weight on one day, one test, that's not fair to our students, it's not fair to our teachers. So, anything we can do to try to move away from that kind of system where we put so much weight on one day of testing,' Lambert said. 'I think that's what we'll see come forward as a result of House Bill 4, which has not been on the floor yet… that will be the way that we address the elimination of the STAAR test and introduce some type of norm referenced testing so that all of our public education, and to some degree, our private schools as well, will be held accountable to. That way, we have at least some metrics, some way of evaluation that makes good sense, and makes us be able to at least have data moving forward as we add an additional program that's going to use taxpayer dollars to fund private schools.'
Just weeks ago, Lambert joined a bill with ACU alum Representative Caroline Fairly — House Bill 1481 — which limits digital device use during school hours.
'There's way too much opportunity for students to pull out their cell phone, to be playing games or to be engaging with social media. I know that's a very controversial issue, because I know parents are concerned about safety and how they could communicate with their child if they needed to, on an as-needed basis,' explained Lambert. 'I went back and watched the layout of representative Fairley's bill in state affairs, it was a pretty lengthy layout where the idea that these devices would not be allowed in classrooms there, there will be some funding that could allow for some type of apparatus in the classroom for those phones to be placed in so they're going to be within reach if there's some type of situation where parents do need to reach their children.'
WATCH: KRBC'S Exploring School Choice in Texas Special
He's also proud of legislation moving forward to strengthen Texas's workforce, especially a bill supporting Texas State Technical College (TSTC).
'We were very instrumental and very involved in making sure that Texas State Technical College is going to receive a large endowment that will allow them to expand their campuses across the state. We know how good and effective TSTC is in workforce education, and so we've carried that bill through the House. It was just approved the other day with 129 votes in the House. So it'll move to the Senate now,' Lambert added. 'We're excited about what's happening in terms of not just that bill, but many other bills that are addressing the workforce shortages that we have throughout the state… We talked a lot about this over the last interim, about the workforce shortage and how that would be a very significant thing that we would need to address in this legislative session. So excited to see those bills moving forward, and we're looking forward to the next 32 days here in Austin.'
With the session's final weeks approaching, Lambert said lawmakers are bracing for long nights and tight deadlines.
'This is a really critical time in the legislature. We're getting into some deadlines as far as when bills can be heard, how many more calendars we're going to actually see, and we're going to start seeing a backup in terms of the number of bills that are going to be coming out of calendars. There's going to be some long, long nights here in the Capitol, which is fine, that's part of what we signed up to do. I'm very proud of the fact that most of the legislation that we've focused on this session is moving forward.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
4 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Judge Expands Texas AG's Restraining Order Over Texas Democrats' Fundraising
A judge on Saturday ruled to expand a restraining order against former congressman Robert Francis 'Beto' O'Rourke (D-Texas) and his political organization over its fundraising efforts for Democratic lawmakers who left Texas amid a state House battle over redistricting. In the order, Judge Megan Fahey wrote that O'Rourke, also a presidential candidate in the 2020 election, cannot send money out of Texas. She ruled in favor of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, after Paxton sought to remove the charter of Powered by People, the organization headed by O'Rourke.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Who's REALLY ‘destroying democracy' — after failing to win voters legitimately?
'Destroying democracy' — the latest theme of the left — can be defined in many ways. How about attempting to destroy constitutional, ancient and hallowed institutions simply to suit short-term political gains? So, who in 2020, and now once again, has boasted about packing the 156-year-old, nine-justice Supreme Court? Who talks frequently about destroying the 187-year-old Senate filibuster — though only when they hold a Senate majority? Who wants to bring in an insolvent left-wing Puerto Rico and redefine the 235-year-old District of Columbia — by altering the Constitution — as two new states solely to obtain four additional liberal senators? Who is trying to destroy the constitutionally mandated 235-year Electoral College by circumventing it with the surrogate 'The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact?' Does destroying democracy also entail weaponizing federal bureaucracies, turning them into rogue partisan arms of a president? So who ordered the CIA to concoct bogus charges of 'collusion' to sabotage Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, the 2016-2017 transition, and the first 22 months of Trump's first term? Who prompted a cabal of '51 former intelligence officials' to lie to the American people on the eve of the last debate of the 2020 election that the FBI-authenticated Hunter Biden laptop was instead the work of a 'Russian intelligence operation?' Who ordered the FBI to connive and partner with social-media conglomerates to censor accurate news deemed unhelpful to the 2020 Biden campaign? Who pulled off the greatest presidential coup in history by using surrogates in the shadows to run the cognitively debilitated Biden presidency, then by fiat canceled his reelection effort and finally anointed as his replacement the new nominee Kamala Harris, who had never won a single primary delegate? Who ordered FBI SWAT teams to invade the home of a former president because of a classification dispute over 102 files out of some 13,000 stored there? Who tried to remove an ex-president and leader of his party from at least 25 state ballots to deprive millions of Americans of the opportunity to vote for or against him? Who coordinated four local, state and federal prosecutors to destroy a former and future president by charging him with fantasy crimes that were never before, and will never again be, lodged against anyone else? Who appointed a federal prosecutor to go after the ex-president, who arranged for a high-ranking Justice Department official to step down to join a New York prosecutor's efforts to destroy an ex-president, and who met in the White House with a Georgia county prosecutor seeking to destroy an ex-president — all on the same day — a mere 72 hours after Trump announced his 2024 reelection bid? Who but the current Democrats ever impeached a president twice? Has any party ever tried an ex-president in the Senate when he was out of office and a mere private citizen? When have there ever been two near-miss assassination attempts on a major party presidential candidate during a single presidential campaign? Who destroyed the southern border and broke federal law to allow in, without criminal or health background audits, some 10 million to 12 million illegal aliens? Who created 600 'sanctuary jurisdictions' for the sole purpose of nullifying federal immigration law, in the eerie spirit of the renegade old Confederacy? Who allowed tens of thousands of rioters, arsonists and violent protesters over four months in 2020 to destroy over $2 billion in property, kill some 35 people, injure 1,500 police officers and torch a federal courthouse, a police precinct and a historic church — all with de facto legal impunity? How do the purported destroyers of democracy find themselves winning 60% to 70% approval on most of the key issues of our times, while the supposed saviors of democracy are on the losing side of popular opinion? How does a president 'destroy democracy' by his party winning the White House by both the popular and Electoral College vote, winning majorities in both the Senate and House by popular votes and enjoying a 6-3 edge in the Supreme Court through judges appointed by popularly elected presidents? So what is behind these absurd charges? Three catalysts: One, the new anguished elitist Democratic Party alienated the middle classes through its Jacobin agenda and therefore lost the Congress, the presidency and the Supreme Court, and now has no federal political power. Two, the Democratic Party is polling at record lows and yet remains hellbent on alienating the traditional sources of its power — minorities, youth and Independents. Three, Democrats cannot find any issues that the people support, nor any leaders to convince the people to embrace them. So it is no surprise that the panicked Democrats bark at the shadows — given that they know their revolutionary, neo-socialist agenda is destroying them. And yet, like all addicts, they choose destruction over abandoning their self-destructive fixations. Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.


New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Disgraced ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner makes blunt prediction about Zohran Mamdani, top Dems in NYC mayoral race: ‘It's inevitable'
Top New York Democrats will swallow hard and eventually endorse lefty socialist Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani for mayor, ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner predicts. Weiner, the convicted perv whose own career crashed amid sexting scandals, said it was 'inevitable' that the nation's leading Democrats in Congress — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries — would eventually back Mamdani. 'At the end of the day, people like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, they are going to have to endorse the nominee of their party [Mamdani],' Weiner said Sunday on 'The Cats Roundtable' radio program on WABC 770 AM. 6 Ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner predicts New York Democrats will eventually endorse Zohran Mamdani for mayor. AP 6 'At the end of the day, people like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, they are going to have to endorse the nominee of their party [Mamdani],' Weiner said on 'The Cats Roundtable' radio program. Getty Images 'I think it's inevitable,' he told host John Catsimatidis of the two lawmakers from Brooklyn. Some moderate Democrats who detest Mamdani's views will not endorse him — but Schumer and Jeffries as party leaders can't avoid the spotlight, he said. 'Some people can stay on the sidelines, and I think you're going to see a lot of people do that. but the leaders of the party, which Chuck and Hakeem are, are caught between the devil and the deep blue sea,' he said. 6 'They don't want to harm their moderate candidates all around the country, which are the ones they need to take back the House and Senate,' Weiner said about why Schumer and Jeffries have not endorsed the democratic socialist yet. REUTERS 'They've got the Democratic Party, who's now chosen their nominee,' Weiner said. Top Dems like Schumer and Jeffries have been dragging their feet on endorsing Mamdani to avoid harming moderate members of their party in the 2026 midterms, Weiner opined. 'The reason Chuck and Hakeem have been so slow to endorse Zohran is because they don't want to harm their moderate candidates all around the country, which are the ones they need to take back the House and Senate,' he said. 'That's a political question for them.' 6 According to Weiner, 'unfortunately, or fortunately … I think we're going to have Zohran Mamdani as the mayor in New York City.' James Keivom Republicans are already trying to link their Democratic rivals to Mamdani in this year's municipal elections across the Empire state. Weiner also predicted that Mamdani, as the Democratic nominee, will win the mayoralty. 'Unfortunately, or fortunately … I think we're going to have Zohran Mamdani as the mayor in New York City,' he said. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Catsimatidis noted that two other Democrats are running as independent candidates in the November election — incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who didn't run in the June Democratic primary, and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who lost badly to Mamdani in that race. But Weiner dismissed their chances at winning while running on independent ballot lines in the general contest. Weiner attempted his second comeback, running for a City Council seat in District 2 on Manhattan's East Side in June, but lost badly to Assemblyman Harvey Epstein. 6 Weiner, whose career crashed amid sexting scandals, attempted his second comeback by running for a City Council seat in District 2 on Manhattan's East Side in June, but lost. Paul Martinka Weiner's downfall began in 2011, when he resigned from Congress after admitting he'd sent salacious selfies to at least six women. He then saw his comeback campaign for mayor in 2013 go down in flames when it was revealed he resumed the pervy activity using the pseudonym 'Carlos Danger.' Weiner later developed a months-long online relationship with a 15-year-old girl, whom he asked to dress up in school uniforms and be part of 'rape fantasies,' prosecutors charged. He pleaded guilty to sexting with a minor and did some prison time. His scandal-scarred baggage and criminal conviction may make him unelectable — but Weiner suggested his more moderate brand of politics played a role. 6 Weiner had previously resigned from Congress after admitting he'd sent salacious selfies to women. Angelina Katsanis/AP 'Right now, the Democratic Party in a lot of parts of New York … is very, very left to the point of falling off the edge of the cliff,' he told Catsimatidis. Many mainstream or moderate Democratic lawmakers are 'looking over their shoulders wondering if the next AOC [Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez] or Zohran Mamdani is going to be coming out of the woodwork to win in a primary,' Weiner said. While leftist or Democratic socialist candidates have won some races, they haven't shown yet that they can govern effectively, he said. 'The one thing that the left hasn't shown that they can do – if you look at Chicago and San Francisco – they haven't shown that they can govern yet,' Weiner said. 'The bigger problem is what outcomes are we going to get as citizens and taxpayers if these candidates are successful? Unfortunately, it looks like we're going to find out in New York City.'