Small boat milestone reached faster under Starmer than any other PM
Education minister Baroness Jacqui Smith described the number of crossings as "unacceptable" and a "very big challenge", attributing the issue to criminal gangs enabled by the previous Tory government.
Labour has implemented a new "one in, one out" returns deal with France and a scheme to detain and deport small boat migrants, with some due for return within weeks.
Charities, including the Refugee Council, urge the government to expand safe and legal routes to the UK, arguing that individuals undertake perilous crossings out of desperation.
Experts suggest that small boat arrivals are on an upward trend, potentially leading to record numbers in 2025, and that efforts to disrupt smuggling gangs may not be fully effective due to their adaptability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
9 minutes ago
- Spectator
Young people are becoming increasingly authoritarian
'It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except for all those other forms', Winston Churchill once declared in the House of Commons. Britain may not feel like much of a free country at the moment, with protestors being arrested for holding placards and the police hauling people away in the dead of night for choice social media posts. But it is still a democracy at least, and an alright one at that. It seems though that many young people do not agree. Polling this week shows that one third of 18-30 year olds are increasingly in favour of authoritarianism. They would prefer an authoritarian system led by a decisive figure, even if it meant sacrificing some democratic freedoms. Dissatisfaction can be found across the political spectrum, with 33 per cent of young Labour voters leaning towards authoritarianism, whilst it is half of the Reform voting youth. As victims of a two-year lockdown, a childhood in the murky waters of the financial crash, and facing the employment Armageddon of AI and a rising jobs tax, is it any wonder that so many young people feel this way? They have had a rum deal of it in a very broken Britain. Not only are their phones and bags increasingly at risk of being pinched, but they can hardly afford to go out, with the price of a pint in London surging to £6.75 on average, or half an hour of minimum wage work (if they can even find a job). Infantilised by a government which seeks to tax, regulate, and throttle their ambition with red-tape and bluster, many cannot even get on the housing ladder after years of working. If democracy isn't delivering, why would you even sign up to fight? One recent survey showed that 30 per cent young people wouldn't don their helmets even if Mr Putin was sending his troops to Dover. Many instead are voting with their feet and moving to to the low-tax Middle Eastern autocracies. However, the radicalisation of young people is not just about the slow immiseration of Britain, with declining living standards and crumbling infrastructure. Myriad videos now appear on people's screens of shop-lifters, bike thieves and illegal immigrants entering the country with ease. And when this immiseration culminates in a young professional having their phone swiped from their hands on their walk to the office, they are told not to worry about it as crime is going down. The lurch towards authoritarianism is not a deep-seated yearning for jack boots, five year plans, or Volkswagen Beetles. It comes from a frustration that the British state, no matter its majorities or might, cannot fix the very basics. When a young person looks down at their Instagram in their ninth hour of their wait in a dingy NHS reception room, at the spotless pavements of Dubai, or the autonomous vehicles of China, is it any wonder they yearn for a government that can actually do something? With the recent spate of headlines about civil breakdown in Britain, propelled by migrant crises, rape gangs, and a neutured government, some politicians have started to listen. Reform's approach is to appeal to this era of youthful discontent with a cabinet made up of professionals, rather than sitting politicians, as in the United States. Likewise, it wants to clear out the top-brass of the civil service to remove bureaucracy. Reform's position is more authoritarian than our current system, but it could feasibly work (if you can find civil servants who are willing to legislate themselves out of a job). Will that be enough for the growing number of authoritarian young people? For many, Britain has been broken for as long as they can remember. It does need 'restoring' as some have proposed, as that would just start the cycle of decline again. For this group, the edifice must be torn down entirely. And they are willing to give up the freedoms enjoyed by previous generations if it means the government works again. Should this happen, blame would lie squarely at the feet of the inhabitants of Whitehall and Parliament. For those in favour of classically liberal values, as well as free expression and fearless journalism, it is essential that we win over this growing minority of young people. But for our side to be victorious, we must push for government to work, urgently, before it is replaced by something rather more authoritarian.
Spectator
9 minutes ago
- Spectator
Rachel Reeves should be brave and raise income tax
The Chancellor Rachel Reeves is having trouble making the numbers add up. The deficit just keeps getting worse. The public sector unions are demanding more money and Labour backbenchers are protesting that cuts are unacceptable. Meanwhile, the bond markets are insisting that borrowing has reached its limit. Still, never mind. It seems that Reeves is cooking up a clever wheeze to get herself out of a tight spot with a raid on inheritance and capital gains tax. There is just one snag: it is very unlikely to work. Has the Chancellor learnt nothing from the catastrophe of her first Budget? Whether it is £30 billion, £40 billion, or even £50 billion, it does not really matter. It is clear that by the autumn Reeves will have to raise a lot of extra revenue. With a promise not to raise income tax, VAT, or employee's National Insurance, she is scrabbling around for something to fill the 'black hole'. According to reports today, she has decided on one answer. She will tighten the rules on inheritance tax so that people can no longer give away assets seven years before they die tax-free. And she will increase Capital Gains Tax (CGT), potentially making it equal to income tax. Either will mostly be paid by the people 'with the broadest shoulders'. Problem solved. Here's the catch, though. Just like her first Budget, a set of badly designed, fiddly taxes on 'wealth' will end up backfiring on her. A lifetime limit on gifts will be hugely unpopular, with every Christmas present you give to your children being monitored by HMRC. Just like the row over scrapping the winter fuel allowance, the backlash this will generate will most likely mean it has to be scrapped within months, and it will hardly raise any cash. At the same time, pushing up the rate of CGT will simply drive entrepreneurs abroad, just as her raid on the non-doms has done. Even worse, given that CGT is basically a voluntary levy – it only becomes due when you sell an asset – a 45 per cent rate will lead to lower revenues while making the UK even more unattractive to investors than it already is. Just as seriously, by flagging the tax rises, Reeves is encouraging people to give away their money now, or sell their assets before the rate increases. This also happened when she threatened higher levies in advance of introducing them last year. Given that the Labour government wants to increase public spending significantly, Reeves should be honest about it and add 2 per cent to the basic rate, as well as the higher rates, of income tax. Instead, she keeps trying to find a clever way out of the corner she has boxed herself into, and it keeps going wrong. Her first Budget was a catastrophe – and it now looks certain that her second one will be just as bad.
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Policing minister admits disinformation could still spread under suspect ethnicity guidance
Disinformation could still spread regarding suspects arrested under new guidance for police, the policing minister has said. Police forces have been told to consider disclosing suspects' ethnicity and nationality to the public when they are charged in high-profile and sensitive cases. It comes after authorities were accused of covering up offences carried out by asylum seekers, and in the wake of riots following the Southport murders, which were partly fuelled by social media disinformation. Asked whether withholding a suspect's nationality and ethnicity until they are charged, rather than when they are arrested, means disinformation could still spread as it did following the Southport murders, Dame Diana Johnson agreed. The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) guidance reaffirms that it is not the role or responsibility of the police to verify a suspect's immigration status, and the Home Office should decide if it is appropriate in all the circumstances to confirm immigration status.
