logo
Why Are Republicans Having Such Problems Doing What Clearly Needs to Be Done?

Why Are Republicans Having Such Problems Doing What Clearly Needs to Be Done?

Epoch Times23-05-2025

Commentary
Why is it such a struggle for Republicans to do what clearly needs to be done regarding taxes and spending?
Let's get to the root of the problem.
I began my work some 30 years ago with a passion to fix what was broken in our nation's low-income communities.
That is, to end the cycle of poverty—children growing up in poor households and remaining poor as adults.
I saw that what was widely accepted as the solution—America's generous welfare state—was the problem.
Related Stories
5/16/2025
4/28/2025
It became clear to me that there is only one path out of poverty: a growing economy to create opportunity and citizens prepared, morally and physically, to participate and work.
President Bill Clinton, in his State of the Union address in 1996, announced 'the era of big government is over.'
Major welfare reform was passed. Aid to Families with Dependent Children was replaced by Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, on which I consulted with Republicans.
When TANF passed in 1996, federal spending as a percent of GDP was a little over 19 percent. When Clinton left office, it was down to 17.5 percent and federal debt was less than 33 percent of GDP.
I offer this as backdrop to the 'big, beautiful bill' with which Republicans are now struggling.
Federal spending is now 23.5 percent of GDP and federal debt is 100 percent of GDP.
I note, once again, that the average real growth of the U.S. economy from 1950–1999 was 3.6 percent per year. From 2000–2024, it was 2.2 percent per year.
Congressional Budget Office projects by 2035 federal spending will reach 24.4 percent of GDP, debt 118 percent of GDP, and growth will be down to 1.8 percent.
It is sufficient indication of how we have lost our way that it takes a book to even describe what is in the 'big, beautiful bill.' The tax code has become a massive nightmare of complexity because it's now a tool for social engineering and political favors rather than the vehicle through which we finance the legitimate functions of government.
Regarding spending, those who cower from making cuts in Medicaid should read my lips. If you care about the nation's poor, let's get our economy growing. And there is only one way to do this: less government, and lower and simpler taxes. Furthermore, is it too much to ask able-bodied adults, getting federal welfare, to work and put some money on the table toward their health care costs?
And, if we're going to be truthful here, let's get it out loud and clear. How can Republicans really claim credibility about wanting to deal with runaway government when the two single biggest government programs—Social Security and Medicare—are not even part of the discussion?
Per CBO, in 2025, Social Security and Medicare will account for more than a third of the 23.5 percent that federal spending is taking from GDP. By 2035, per CBO, Social Security and Medicare will consume 41 percent of federal spending.
The two largest federal programs, both with major fiscal problems, are not part of this discussion, and political leaders want to seem principled?
I ask every Republican to look in the mirror and ask themselves why they are serving.
Realize what I realized more than 30 years ago. Big government does not help but hurts our poor. The way to help the poor is growth, and the way to get growth is to get government out of the way.
Those who signed the Declaration of Independence concluded saying, 'We mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor.'
They courageously affixed their signatures knowing war with the British empire was inevitable.
The nation's present and future is in great jeopardy. We have profoundly lost our way.
Those whose sense of mission is not aligned with the nation's founders should seek a new line of work.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court allows DOGE staffers to access Social Security data
Supreme Court allows DOGE staffers to access Social Security data

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court allows DOGE staffers to access Social Security data

June 7 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court is allowing members of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency to access personal Social Security Administration data. On Friday, the Court's six conservatives granted an emergency application filed by the Trump administration to lift an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland. Opposing the injunction were the three liberal justices: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. There are 69 million retirees, disabled workers, dependents and survivors who receive Social Security benefits, representing 28.75% of the U.S. population. In a separate two-page order issued Friday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration for now to shield DOGE from freedom of information requests seeking thousands of pages of material. This vote also was 6-3 with no written dissenting opinions. In the two-page unsigned order on access, the court said: "We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work." The conservatives are Chief Justice John Roberts, and Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Three of them were nominated by President Donald Trump during his first term. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, appointed by President Barack Obama, had ruled that DOGE staffers had no need to access the specific data. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Virginia, declined to block Hollander's decision. The lawsuit was filed by progressive group Democracy Forward on behalf of two unions, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers, as well as the Alliance for Retired Americans. They alleged broader access to personal information would violate a federal law, the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. "This is a sad day for our democracy and a scary day for millions of people," the groups said in a statement. "This ruling will enable President Trump and DOGE's affiliates to steal Americans' private and personal data. Elon Musk may have left Washington, D.C., but his impact continues to harm millions of people. We will continue to use every legal tool at our disposal to keep unelected bureaucrats from misusing the public's most sensitive data as this case moves forward." Social Security Works posted on X: "No one in history -- no commissioner, no president, no one -- has ever had the access that these DOGE minions have." White House spokesperson Liz Huston after the ruling told NBC News that "the Supreme Court allowing the Trump Administration to carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse and modernize government information systems is a huge victory for the rule of law." Brown Jackson wrote a nine-page dissenting opinion that the "Government fails to substantiate its stay request by showing that it or the public will suffer irreparable harm absent this Court's intervention. In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes." She concluded her dissent by writing: "The Court opts instead to relieve the Government of the standard obligations, jettisoning careful judicial decisionmaking and creates grave privacy risks for millions of Americans in the process." Kathleen Romig, who worked as a senior adviser at the agency during the Biden administration, told CNN that Americans should be concerned about how DOGE has handled highly sensitive data so far. She said the personal data runs "from cradle to grave." "While the appeals court considers whether DOGE is violating the law, its operatives will have 'God-level' access to Social Security numbers, earnings records, bank routing numbers, mental and reproductive health records and much more," Romig, who now is director of Social Security and disability policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. When Trump became president again on Jan. 20, he signed an executive order establishing DOGE with the goal of "modernizing Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity." Nearly a dozen DOGE members have been installed at the agency, according to court filings. In all, there are about 90 DOGE workers. DOGE, which was run by billionaire Elon Musk until he left the White House one week ago, wants to modernize systems and detect waste and fraud at the agency. "These teams have a business need to access the data at their assigned agency and subject the government's records to much-needed scrutiny," Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the court motion. The data includes Social Security numbers, date and place of birth, gender, addresses, marital and parental status, parents' names, lifetime earnings, bank account information, immigration and work authorization status, health conditions for disability benefits and use of Medicare. SSA also has data-sharing agreements with the IRS and the Department of Health and Human Services. The plaintiffs wrote: "The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure -- and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it." Social Security Administration Commissioner Frank Bisignano, who was sworn in to the post on May 7, said in a statement: that"The Supreme Court's ruling is a major victory for American taxpayers. The Social Security Administration will continue driving forward modernization efforts, streamlining government systems, and ensuring improved service and outcomes for our beneficiaries." On May 23, Roberts temporarily put lower court decisions on hold while the Supreme Court considered what next steps to take. Musk called Social Security "the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time" during an interview with Joe Rogan on Feb. 28. The Social Security system, which started in 1935, transfers current workers' payroll tax payments to people who are already retired. The payroll tax is a mandatory tax paid by employees and employers. The total current tax rate is 12.4%. There is a separate 2.9% tax for Medicare.

JD Vance says it was a 'huge mistake' for Musk to go after Trump with Epstein accusation
JD Vance says it was a 'huge mistake' for Musk to go after Trump with Epstein accusation

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

JD Vance says it was a 'huge mistake' for Musk to go after Trump with Epstein accusation

Vice President JD Vance told comedian and podcast host Theo Von on Saturday that Elon Musk made a "huge mistake" by accusing President Donald Trump of being implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein files. Vance warned that Trump and Musk being embroiled in a "blood feud" with one another will be bad for the country and will likely not end well for the Tesla CEO either. "I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the president like that. And I think that if he and the president are in some blood feud — most importantly — it's going to be bad for the country, but I think it's going to be, I don't think it'll be good for Elon either," Vance argued. 'Gone Too Far': Gop Lawmakers Rally Around Trump After Musk Raises Epstein Allegations Musk referenced Jeffrey Epstein in relation to Trump on Thursday as part of a larger attack against the president and Republican leaders over their budget reconciliation bill. "Time to drop the really big bomb. [Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" Musk wrote on X. "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." Read On The Fox News App Vance told the comedian Trump "didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein" and that his loyalties will always be with the president. He noted that he hopes Musk will eventually "come back into the fold," but doubted the possibility of that coming true after his tweet accusing Trump of being involved with Epstein. Click Here For The Latest Media And Culture News When asked by Von why he believed Musk's "feelings were hurt," Vance speculated that the culmination of the violent threats against him and his company, paired with Congress' budget reconciliation bill, may have pushed him over the edge. "His businesses are being attacked nonstop. They're literally like firebombing some of his cars," he pointed out. "So I think part of it is this guy got into politics and has suffered a lot for it. But I mean, and I get the frustration there… Congress, you got this spending bill. But the main purpose of the bill is not actually spending or cutting spending, though it does cut a lot of spending." The vice president acknowledged Musk's concerns over the spending bill that allegedly started the feud between the two and noted that disagreements over its contents likely caused some "frustrations." "The main purpose of the bill is to prevent the biggest tax increase, but I understand — it's a good bill — it's not a perfect bill," Vance said. "The process in D.C., if you're a business leader, you probably get frustrated with that process because it's more, you know, bureaucratic. It's more slow-moving. So I think there's just some frustrations there." Fox News' Elizabeth Elkind, Deirdre Heavey and Alex Miller contributed to this article source: JD Vance says it was a 'huge mistake' for Musk to go after Trump with Epstein accusation

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return ‘wasn't my decision,' Trump says
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return ‘wasn't my decision,' Trump says

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return ‘wasn't my decision,' Trump says

President Donald Trump said Saturday that the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia — the Salvadoran man who was illegally deported in March — was not his decision. 'That wasn't my decision,' Trump said in an interview with NBC News. 'The Department of Justice decided to do it that way.' Abrego Garcia was flown back to the United States on Friday to face federal human trafficking charges in Tennessee, after prosecutors unveiled the indictment this week. It comes months after the Trump administration admitted it had mistakenly deported him — which the Supreme Court declared was illegal, ordering the government to 'facilitate' his return — leading to an intense political and legal firestorm throughout the country over the ethics of the administration's mass deportation policy. 'It should be a very easy case' for federal prosecutors, the president told NBC News. Trump said that he did not talk to Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return. Despite the high court's order, Trump officials have for months resisted bringing Abrego Garcia back to the U.S., arguing it was out of their hands as he was in Salvadoran custody. 'There is no scenario where Abrego Garcia will be in the United States again,' Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told lawmakers last month. The Trump administration repeatedly labeled Abrego Garcia as a violent gang member, which his family and lawyers have flatly denied and a federal judge labeled as 'a vague, uncorroborated allegation.' Lawyers for the administration called his deportation 'an administrative error,' but did not immediately facilitate his return, despite the Supreme Court instructing them to. Intense backlash followed, including Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) traveling to El Salvador to meet with him and demand his return. Republicans, in turn, bashed Van Hollen and Democrats for defending him. Abrego Garcia's lawyers have urged the public to treat the allegations with suspicion. 'They'll stop at nothing at all — even some of the most preposterous charges imaginable — just to avoid admitting that they made a mistake, which is what everyone knows happened,' Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, one of his lawyers, told reporters Friday. 'He's not going to be convicted of these crimes,' the lawyer added. 'There's no way a jury is going to see the evidence and agree that this sheet metal worker is the leader of an international MS-13 smuggling conspiracy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store