China has 'genius' stablecoin plan to challenge U.S.
On July 18, President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law. The first major crypto legislation to become a law, it regulates stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar.
For those unfamiliar, a stablecoin is a type of cryptocurrency that strives to keep its value stable, in comparison to usually volatile cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, by being pegged to a fiat currency or a commodity.
Trump believes his latest move would encourage the global adoption of the USD-pegged stablecoins and hence cement the dominance of the American national currency in international trade. The president's enthusiasm is understandable, given that the USD's share in the trade payments has been eroding over the past few years.The Financial Times reported in August 2024 that while the USD payments declined from around 80% in 2010 to 40% in 2024, the renminbi payments rose from nearly zilch in 2010 to around 55% in 2024.
The renminbi or RMB is the national currency of China, the arch rival of the U.S. in trade. As the Trump administration attempts to recover the lost ground with USD-pegged stablecoins, China seems to be planning a similar move despite its skepticism around cryptocurrencies.
On Aug. 6, Financial Times reported that China is planning to launch its first stablecoins pegged to the renminbi. Since the country exercises a crypto ban throughout the mainland, Hong Kong is the testing ground of the project.
The region recently passed a law that lets licensed issuers launch stablecoins backed by any fiat currency. However, the authorities will permit only a 'handful' of licenses starting in 2026, the report added.
How could it impact the dollar?
Stablecoins may look like just another crypto token, but they're actually a powerful tool of monetary influence.
When Tether issues new stablecoins, it backs them with reserves that include real-world U.S. dollar assets. As of June 30, Tether holds over $127 billion in U.S. Treasuries (including $105.5B direct and $21.3B indirect), making it one of the largest holders of American debt globally.
That demand flows straight into U.S. financial markets. It's why Washington, through laws like the GENIUS Act, is embracing USD-pegged stablecoins.
China's crypto dilemma
China's dilemma is crystal clear: how to embrace the crypto economy amid the challenge of controlling its financial system.
The FT report cited Rebecca Liao, CEO at the blockchain firm Saga, who remarked, 'This is not technology that can be centrally controlled... When they invest in this technology it will be taken to places that they do not like.'The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the region's central bank, has also underlined that stablecoins could be used in money laundering. The report said the bank will initially grant a license to only one of China's four dominant state-owned banks.
Private players in China don't want to be left behind either.
JD.com, a prominent e-commerce company, is planning to launch a Hong Kong dollar-pegged stablecoin. The project is already in the pilot phase. Ant Group, an affiliate company of Jack Ma's Alibaba Group, is also eyeing stablecoin licenses in Hong Kong and Singapore.
However, China has been slow to enter the stablecoin race, and it will take a few years for us to know if it will succeed in its quest for de-dollarization.
China has 'genius' stablecoin plan to challenge U.S. first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 7, 2025
This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 7, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The big difference between bitcoin and crypto treasury companies
The future is on off-chain. That's right, we spent the past 15 years telling you to get your money onto 'the blockchain' and now we're telling you to pull it out and put it into Charles Schwab so that someone else can buy those scarce digital assets for you. Of course, I'm talking about this cycle's leverage of choice: digital asset treasury (DAT) companies. Gradually, then suddenly, public markets created a new species of crypto company, DATs. Unlike Tesla or Coinbase who hold bitcoin as part of their operating businesses, DATs exist solely to hold coins on their balance sheet, giving shareholders high-beta exposure to these treasuries. The thesis can be quite compelling: these companies could offer a more capital efficient way for investors to gain exposure to the underlying digital assets. They accomplish this by leveraging capital markets (e.g., issuing shares, issuing convertible notes) to generate revenue to acquire bitcoin, ethereum, solana, etc. But just like not all blockchains are created equal, neither are DATs. With the limited data available so far, it appears that bitcoin DATs are comparatively stable to their volatile crypto counterparts. The mNAV metric is conventionally the most common way to measure a DAT's performance – that is, the company's enterprise value (or sometimes market capitalization) divided by the mark-to-market value of the coins it holds. A 1.0x mNAV means the company trades right at its treasury value; higher than that is a premium – lower, a discount. The data on DATs: bitcoin To compare relative volatility and performance of these DATs, let's take a look at mNAVs for some Bitcoin treasury companies first: [Micro]Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR): 1.58x Semler Scientific (NASDAQ: SMLR): 1.04x Metaplanet (OTCMKTS: MTPLF): 1.14x Nakamoto Holdings (NASDAQ: NAKA) is currently trading at about ~1.0x of their current disclosed holdings of 21 BTC ( this is before their anticipated ~$726m smash buy purchase) Data from Blockworks Treasury Dashboard Pulling data from we see that Bitcoin treasury companies range between 0.9x – 1.6x mNAV. Overall Bitcoin treasuries have an average ~1.3x mNAV with tight variance. Bitcoin treasury mNAVs have shrunk since U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs have eaten into these stocks' premiums, but the premiums are still there for many bitcoin DATs. The data on DATs: crypto Now, let's look at the ETH, SOL, and SUI treasury companies (using a dataset and PIPE structure breakdown from BitMEX Research): ETH DATs: BitMine Immersion Technologies (NASDAQ: BMNR):1.9x Dynamix Corporation (NASDAQ: DYNX): 0.16x (a massive discount, however this is a pending merger) SOL DATs: Upexi, Inc (NASDAQ: UPEXI): 1.2x DeFi Development Corp (NASDAQ: DFDV): 1.8x. SUI DATs: Mill City Ventures III (NASDAQ: MCVT) 1.8x (with advisor warrants that arguably 'encourage volatility,' per Bitmex) We see a much wider range of mNAV for non-BTC DATs, from 0.16x to 1.94x and an interquartile range of 0.98x – 1.69x. BitMEX research explains that management teams of crypto DATs are incentivized to increase assets under management as their compensation is usually a function of a percentage of the treasury. Less liquid cryptoassets tend to be more price reflexive when a DAT comes along and smashes buy, and stocks themselves can be highly volatile, even by bitcoin treasury company standards. Even with 2025's limited data on DATs, we see that non-BTC treasury companies are less tightly clustered and have wider ranging mNAVs compared to their BTC counterparts. Do bitcoin treasury and crypto treasury investors want the same thing? The comparison suggests we're seeing two very different market structures emerge under the DAT umbrella. My interpretation is that Bitcoin DAT valuations cluster tightly because they are larger, more liquid, and increasingly plugged into institutional flows. Just like Bitcoin, they've matured into more predictable vehicles for investors seeking exposure to Bitcoin through equity markets. Non-Bitcoin DATs are less liquid, contain assets that are themselves more volatile than BTC, and investors have lower long term confidence in the underlying assets. I mean… does anyone actually want to own SOL in 10 years? If not, then why are some of these management comps extended for 3 decades? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Evercore adds Affirm to its Tactical Underperform list
-- Evercore ISI added Affirm Holdings (NASDAQ:AFRM) to its Tactical Underperform (TAP) list, citing stretched valuations and the stock's sharp rally heading into next week's earnings. Affirm shares have surged 115% since April and 18% since the start of August, making it the best performer year-to-date under Evercore's coverage. Analysts said the run-up leaves 'the risk/reward less favorable heading into next week's print than it was a few weeks ago.' The broker highlighted that Affirm is trading near its recent peak valuation of high-20s next twelve months (NTM) EV/EBITDA, while management's traditionally cautious stance limits the likelihood of guidance exceeding consensus estimates. Still, Evercore maintained its Outperform rating on the stock, describing the TAP call as tactical rather than a change in its longer-term view. 'We still believe AFRM has the best risk platform in the space and will benefit over the longer-term from penetration in new verticals and geographies as well as product expansion,' the analysts led by Adam Frisch wrote. Investors are awaiting Affirm's fiscal fourth-quarter earnings on Aug. 28, when management will outline fiscal 2026 guidance. Evercore expects guidance to be broadly in line with consensus, with gross merchandise volume (GMV) seen growing 27% ex-Walmart and revenue less transaction costs (RLTC) margin at 3.9%. The firm noted risks tied to potential GMV declines at Walmart (NYSE:WMT), which accounts for about 5% of Affirm's volume, after competitor Klarna expanded its OnePay offering. Analysts also pointed to a margin dynamic. Notably, lower Walmart volumes could prove accretive given the partnership's lower economics, though this might be offset by the continued growth in 0% annual percentage rate (APR) loans. Over the past four quarters, Affirm has averaged a Revenue Less Transaction (JO:NTUJ) Costs (RLTC) margin of 4.1%, above management's 3-4% target. 'We expect a 3.9% RLTC margin for FY26 (down 14bps YoY and in line with consensus) but note that could prove a little conservative with continued execution,' analysts said. Related articles Evercore adds Affirm to its Tactical Underperform list After soaring 149%, this stock is back in our AI's favor - & already +25% in July 7 Undervalued Stocks on the Rise With 50%+ Upside Potential Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sale of Boston Celtics is finalized, with Bill Chisholm taking control of the NBA's most-decorated franchise
BOSTON (AP) — Sale of Boston Celtics is finalized, with Bill Chisholm taking control of the NBA's most-decorated franchise.