
MP cop didn't serve notice as asked. HC tells him to plant 1,000 fruit trees as punishment
The order issued by the Jabalpur bench of the MP High Court stated: 'SHO Ravendra Diwedi, presently posted at police station city Kotwali, has tendered [an] apology for not serving the victim [the HC notice] in time. He has promised not only to pay the cost of Rs 5,000 imposed on him by the Inspector General of Police but also to plant at least 1,000 trees between 1 July to 31 August at Chitrakoot in Satna district.'
In an order issued 24 June, MP High Court justices Vivek Agarwal and Avanindra Kumar Singh directed Ravendra Dwivedi, the station house officer (SHO) of the Kotwali Police Station in Satna, to plant 1,000 fruit trees, including mango, jamun, Mahua, and guava, among others.
Bhopal: Madhya Pradesh High Court, in a unique punishment, has ordered an inspector posted in Satna district to plant 1,000 fruit trees for his failure to pass on an HC-issued notice to a minor victim of a sexual offence.
The order further pointed out, 'Let fruiting trees like mango, jamun, Mahua, guava, etc., be planted and their photograph sent alongside GPS location to the registry, in support of the compliance report.'
The court also directed Ashutosh Gupta, Superintendent of Police (SP), Satna, to inspect the 1,000 planted trees before filing an affidavit, along with the compliance report.
The court ordered inspector Dwivedi to bear the costs of planting the trees, as well as ensure their care for a year, which will be essential for their germination and survival.
A senior police officer with the Madhya Pradesh Police explained that when an accused in a sexual offence challenged any conviction, the court would issue a notice to the victim. 'Through this notice, the victim has an opportunity to be present before the court and make themselves heard. This particular case concerns a sexual offence case from 2018 when the SHO's posting was at the Sabhapur Police Station in Satna.'
'The accused challenged the conviction, and subsequently, the court issued a notice to the victim. But, SHO Ravendra Diwedi failed to hand the notice over to the victim on time. In this regard, the court has pulled him up,' said the senior police officer.
When The Print contacted Ashutosh Gupta, SP, Satna, said, 'We have received the order of the honourable court, and we will be complying with it.'
(Edited by Madhurita Goswami)
Also Read: Madhya Pradesh youth assaulted over 'cow smuggling' succumbs to injuries, another critical

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
41 minutes ago
- The Print
From Gorakhpur to Singapore & Cyprus, Punjab vigilance cites ‘money trail' to seek Majithia's remand
On Thursday, making these submissions in its remand application before a Mohali court, the bureau sought a 15-day remand for Majithia, the brother-in-law of Akali Dal chief Sukhbir Singh Badal. Majithia was arrested from his Amritsar residence Wednesday, after simultaneous raids across 25 locations linked to him by bureau sleuths and the special investigation team (SIT) probing a drugs case against him. The bureau alleged that cash deposits of Saraya Industries, a Gorakhpur-based firm with ties to Majithia, tripled from Rs 40 crore in the financial year 2006-07 to Rs 121 crore in the next financial year, when Majithia had already become a cabinet minister in the then Parkash Singh Badal-led Punjab government. The cash deposits further swelled in the next financial year 2008-09, to Rs 165 crore. New Delhi: Punjab Vigilance Bureau has alleged that cash deposits of a firm with ties to senior Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader Bikram Singh Majithia 'spiked' multifold between 2007 and 2009, and that Rs 161 crore in 'unexplained cash' was deposited into the firm's accounts during the same period. The agency has also alleged that the firm received Rs 141 crore through 'dubious foreign investments from Cyprus and Singapore'. Facilitated by Majithia, more than Rs 540 crore was laundered through illicit channels into the bank accounts of companies, a spokesperson with the vigilance bureau alleged Wednesday. The spokesperson broke the amount down: cash deposits to the tune of Rs 165 crore, Rs 141 crore routed from offshore entities in Singapore and Cyprus, and financial statements of Saraya Industries accounting for an additional credit of Rs 236 crore, without making any disclosures. On the other hand, legal counsels of Majithia—advocates H.S. Dhanoa, Arshdeep Singh Cheema, and Arshdeep Singh Kler—argued that their client resigned as director of the firm, Saraya Industries, and that his role was limited to that of a shareholder, with roughly 11 percent ownership of the company, as inherited from his grandfather. 'The SIT formed to probe the drug case filed three affidavits in the Supreme Court, giving the same set of allegations in the present case. However, as their efforts to present the money as proceeds from drugs did not bear fruit, the same set of allegations has been reproduced as a case of disproportionate assets against my client,' Cheema told ThePrint. Adding, 'He (Majithia) is neither an office bearer nor a beneficiary of the funds received by the company.' The vigilance bureau, presenting grounds for Majithia's arrest, alleged that he, along with his family members, used as many 200 bank accounts in different banks to recoup the Rs 540 crore and that it wanted to take him into custody to ascertain details of the same. 'The investigation has also revealed ownership or beneficial interest in properties, investments, and other financial instruments in the name of third parties, who appear to be benami holders, acting at the instance of the accused,' the bureau alleged in the remand application, a copy of which ThePrint has seen. The agency further argued that since it had to seize and examine the registers of the Gorakhpur-based firm before confronting Majithia with the entries in the registers, his custodial interrogation was essential. According to the vigilance bureau, the suspicious funds Saraya Industries received from 'dubious foreign investments' from Cyprus and Singapore—Rs 141 crore—was settled for Rs 53 crore, less than half the amount, later. Asserting that Cyprus is known as a 'hub of money swindlers', the vigilance bureau further said, 'The accused is required to be interrogated to unearth his illegal connections with such foreign entities. The nature, purpose, and legitimacy of these transactions remain unsubstantiated.' The bureau further asserted that to conduct a proper investigation and to unearth the facts, interrogation was essential and that it would help corroborate the financial trail and beneficiary links. The Mohali court then ordered the remand of Majithia till 1 July, adding that the bureau should produce him before it on 2 July. 'At this stage, the court is required to see whether the custodial interrogation of the accused is required for the investigation to reach its just conclusion or not. Various discrepancies and questionable transactions have surfaced which require thorough investigation. The grounds upon which the police remand has been sought are well founded. The answers to the questions posed by the investigation agency can only be found out during custodial interrogation,' on duty Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Kirandeep Singh observed in the order. Also Read: AAP's old foe Majithia 'knew' he was next, warned CM Mann before arrest—'will make you scream'


New Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Madras High Court upholds Rs 1L compensation to custodial torture victim
Chennai: The Madras High Court has refused to reverse the order of the State Human Rights Commission which awarded Rs 1 lakh compensation to a victim of police torture and ordered recovery of the amount from the salary of an inspector and sub-inspector. A division bench of Justices J Nisha Banu and M Jothiraman recently dismissed the petitions filed by inspector D Babu Rajendra Bose and sub-inspector S Mani who had served during the relevant period at the Puzhal police station. They moved the court seeking to quash the orders of the SHRC passed on November 13, 2018 awarding Rs 1 lakh compensation to Rajinikanth, who was subjected to custodial torture after being secured by the police on December 20, 2013 in connection with a cheating case. The bench said there is no reason to interfere with the order of the SHRC and the consequential order passed by the home department in 2022 to recover the compensation amount from the officers involved. The court observed that the police officers have a critical role in maintaining law and order while upholding human rights.


Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
UP court sentences man to life imprisonment for killing stepmother over dispute
Additional Sessions Judge Gyan Prakash Tiwari also imposed a fine of Rs 10,000 on him for the crime.