Farmer Creates 'Tinder' For Dairy Cows
A Waikato farmer created what he says is essentially Tinder for cows, after a spreadsheet error caused him to lose the breeding data for his herd.
Matthew Zonderop, a 50-50 sharemilker, previously used multiple spreadsheets and coding to track his herd, insemination, and make genetic improvements.
But after an error in his coding saw his system no longer working, he turned to artificial intelligence and ChatGPT, which he had previously played around with but not in a work capacity.
After the AI powered tool fixed the code he uploaded the entire spreadsheet and realised it could do it all for him.
He said he hadn't looked back, launching his business Perfect Cow Breeding Solutions at Fieldays earlier this year to help other farmers.
It removed the hassle of spreadsheets and helped farmers breed better cows by choosing the right bull.
"Basically, it's a matchmaking service for dairy farmers and their cows.
"Most cows throughout New Zealand are DNA profiled, and they give specific trait data on cows, so her protein levels, her fat levels, gestation length, live weight, and they are given to us into our herd records.
"So each cow has got its own head record and we can extract that data and then analyse it.
"It was always available to us, but we really, I suppose, didn't have the tools available to analyse it the way we are now with using AI."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
10 hours ago
- NZ Herald
ChatGPT got a big upgrade. Here's what to know about OpenAI's GPT-5
How much does it cost to access GPT-5? All ChatGPT users will get access to GPT-5, even those using the free version. But only those with a US$200-a-month ($335) 'Pro' subscription get unlimited access to the newly released system. GPT-5 will be the default mode on all versions. Users not paying for ChatGPT will only be able to ask a certain number of questions answered by GPT-5 before the chatbot switches back to using an older version of OpenAI's technology. How will GPT-5 change ChatGPT? GPT-5 responds to questions faster than OpenAI's previous offerings and is less likely to 'hallucinate' or make up false answers, OpenAI executives said at a news briefing before its release. It gives ChatGPT 'better taste' when generating writing, said Nick Turley, who leads work on the chatbot. OpenAI's new AI software can also answer queries using a process dubbed reasoning that shows the user a series of messages attempting to break down a question into steps before giving its final answer. 'GPT-5 is the first time that it really feels like talking to an expert, a PhD-level expert,' OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said. Altman said GPT-5 is particularly good at generating computer programming code, a feature that has become a major selling point for OpenAI and rival AI developers and has transformed the work of programmers. In a demo, the company showed how two paragraphs of instruction was enough to have GPT-5 create a simple website offering tutoring in French, complete with a word game and daily vocabulary tests. Execs say ChatGPT users can now connect the app with their Google calendars and email accounts. Photo / Getty Images Altman predicted that people without any computer science training will one day be able to quickly and easily generate any kind of software they need to help them at work or with other tasks. 'This idea of software on demand will be a defining part of the new GPT-5 era,' Altman said. Turley also claimed the upgrade made ChatGPT better at connecting with people. 'The thing that's really hard to put into words or quantify is the fact that just feels more human,' he said. In a livestream Thursday, OpenAI execs said ChatGPT users could now connect the app with their Google calendars and email accounts, allowing the chatbot to help people schedule activities around their existing plans. What does it mean for an AI chatbot to 'reason?' GPT-5 could give many people their first encounter with AI systems that attempt to work through a user's request step-by-step before giving a final answer. That so-called 'reasoning' process has become popular with AI companies because it can result in better answers on complex questions, particularly on math and coding tasks. Watching a chatbot generate a series of messages that read like an internal monologue can be alluring, but AI experts warn users not to confuse the technique with a peek into AI's black box. The self-chatter doesn't necessarily reflect an internal process like that of a human working on a problem, but designing chatbots to create what are sometimes dubbed 'chains of thought' forces the software to allocate more time and energy to a query. OpenAI released its first reasoning model in September for its paying users, but Chinese start-up DeepSeek in January released a free chatbot that made its 'chain of thought' visible to users, shocking Silicon Valley and temporarily tanking American tech stocks. The company said ChatGPT will now automatically send some queries to the 'reasoning' version of GPT-5, depending on the type of conversation and complexity of the questions asked. Is GPT-5 the 'super intelligence' or 'artificial general intelligence' OpenAI has promised? No. Tech leaders have for years been making claims that AI is improving so fast it will soon become able to learn and perform all tasks that humans can at or better than our own ability. But GPT-5 does not perform at that level. Super intelligence and artificial general intelligence, or AGI, remain ill-defined concepts because human intelligence is very different from the capabilities of computers, making comparisons tricky. OpenAI CEO Altman has been one of the biggest proponents of the idea that AI capabilities are increasing so rapidly that they will soon revolutionise many aspects of society. 'This is a significant step forward,' Altman said of GPT-5. 'I would say it's a significant fraction of the way to something very AGI-like.' Some people have alleged that loved ones were driven to violence, delusion or psychosis by hours spent talking to ChatGPT. Photo / Getty Images Does GPT-5 change ChatGPT's personality? Changes OpenAI made to ChatGPT in April triggered backlash online after examples of the chatbot appearing to flatter or manipulate users went viral. The company undid the update, saying an attempt to enhance the chatbot's personality and make it more personalised instead led it to reinforce user beliefs in potentially dangerous ways, a phenomenon the industry calls 'sycophancy'. OpenAI said it worked to reduce that tendency further in GPT-5. As AI companies compete to keep users engaged with their chatbots, they could make them compelling in potentially harmful ways, similar to social media feeds, The Washington Post reported in May. In recent months, some people have alleged that loved ones were driven to violence, delusion or psychosis by hours spent talking to ChatGPT. Lawsuits against other AI developers claim their chatbots contributed to incidents of self-harm and suicide by teens. OpenAI released a report on GPT-5's capabilities and limits Thursday that said the company looked closely at the risks of psychosocial harms and worked with Microsoft to probe the new AI system. It said the reasoning version of GPT-5 could still 'be improved on detecting and responding to some specific situations where someone appears to be experiencing mental or emotional distress'. Earlier this week, OpenAI said in a blog post it was working with physicians across more than 30 countries, including psychiatrists and paediatricians, to improve how ChatGPT responds to people in moments of distress. Turley, the head of ChatGPT, said the company is not optimising ChatGPT for engagement.
Techday NZ
12 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Exclusive: Garrett O'Hara on Mimecast's AI fight against cyber risk
In a world where cyberattacks are growing more sophisticated and frequent, organisations are increasingly focusing on what Garrett O'Hara calls the "most unpredictable element in security" - humans. Speaking during a recent interview, Garrett O'Hara, Senior Director of Solutions Engineering for APAC at Mimecast, explained how artificial intelligence (AI) is now being deployed to manage and mitigate human risk at scale. "Human risk is anything people can do that exposes an organisation to risk, either by accident or intent," he said. "Most of the time, it's not malicious - it's tiredness, deadlines, or someone trying to do their job more efficiently." He pointed out that employees often unintentionally bypass security policies under pressure. "They might upload sensitive documents to a personal drive just so they can work from home, not realising the huge risk that introduces," he added. AI tools, while offering productivity benefits, have also opened new doors for attackers. "We're seeing employees use tools like ChatGPT to summarise documents or create presentations, not realising they're potentially uploading sensitive corporate data to third-party platforms," he said. On the flip side, O'Hara said AI is a vital asset in the fight against these new types of threats. "AI is incredibly good at detecting patterns and threats that traditional methods might miss. For example, analysing URLs for slight variations that indicate a phishing attempt or identifying AI-generated scam emails." He described how phishing campaigns have become almost indistinguishable from genuine communications. "The old advice about bad grammar or strange formatting doesn't apply anymore. With AI, attackers are producing flawless emails in seconds," he said. "But the good news is that AI on the defensive side is just as powerful." Mimecast's platform uses AI throughout its stack, from sandboxing and behavioural analysis to identifying language markers in emails associated with business email compromise (BEC). "We look for those AI fingerprints - which often show up in machine-generated messages," he explained. For example, if there was an email that simulates a CEO urgently requesting staff to buy gift cards - a common BEC tactic - Mimecast's AI can intercept it. "Instead of an employee reacting to that urgency, we use AI to throw bubble wrap around them, flagging the threat before any action is taken," he said. Trust in AI is still an issue, however. "It's a double-edged sword," O'Hara acknowledged. "There's hype fatigue in cybersecurity - zero trust, now AI. And the problem is when vendors slap 'AI' onto everything, it erodes trust." He noted that some vendors rely solely on AI, which leads to high false positive rates and overburdened security teams. "AI is probability-based. Without cross-checking, it can trigger too many false alarms, and analysts burn out sifting through them," he said. "Our platform uses a layered approach - AI decisions are supported by additional checks across other systems, improving accuracy." Mimecast has gone a step further by achieving ISO certification for ethical use of AI, addressing concerns about bias and data misuse. "Transparency matters. You need to understand how the model works, especially if it goes off track," he said. "That's why we plan for machine unlearning - to rollback models if they learn something they shouldn't." Looking ahead, O'Hara envisions a future where AI acts as a sort of digital guardian angel. "Imagine a Clippy-like assistant - but useful - that knows your role, your habits, and quietly keeps you safe behind the scenes," he said. He also discussed how application programming interfaces (APIs) play a crucial role in integrating Mimecast's human risk platform with other systems. "We pull in data from HR, endpoint and identity platforms to paint a picture of risk - right down to the individual level," he explained. "If someone's on notice or switching roles, their risk profile changes. APIs help us adapt protection accordingly." Importantly, AI in cybersecurity is no longer just about detection and defence. Mimecast also uses it for prediction and prevention. "With data from 44,000 companies and billions of emails daily, our AI tools can identify emerging threats early and act before damage is done," he said. "That's where we're moving - from reactive to proactive security." But for smaller organisations, predictive security can seem out of reach. "The average Australian SMB doesn't have the budget or capacity for that level of protection," he noted. "We offer it as a service - so they benefit without the overhead." As for the future of cybersecurity training, O'Hara predicts a shift from generic instruction to highly tailored behavioural nudges. "Instead of monthly sessions, we'll see hyper-contextual, AI-generated interventions in the moment," he said. "That's the power of AI - it knows how to reach each individual in a way that resonates." He added that balancing automation with human oversight remains a key concern. "Right now, most organisations use automation to assist - not replace - analysts. And that's wise," he said. "False positives can grind a business to a halt if something like Salesforce gets blocked. But as AI improves, that balance will shift." Ultimately, he believes that the most exciting developments are still unknown. "I'm genuinely excited by what we don't yet see coming," he said. "AI has unlocked possibilities that feel like magic." And while security teams dream of AI replacing their most tedious tasks, O'Hara points out there's a long way to go. "If AI can act like Cinderella's godmother - guiding users to return home just before the stroke of midnight - then we're on the right track," he said.
1News
a day ago
- 1News
New study sheds light on ChatGPT's alarming interactions with teens
ChatGPT will tell 13-year-olds how to get drunk and high, instruct them on how to conceal eating disorders and even compose a heartbreaking suicide letter to their parents if asked, according to new research from a watchdog group. Warning: This story contains references to self-harm and suicide. A list of helplines can be found below. The Associated Press reviewed more than three hours of interactions between ChatGPT and researchers posing as vulnerable teens. The chatbot typically provided warnings against risky activity but went on to deliver startlingly detailed and personalised plans for drug use, calorie-restricted diets or self-injury. The researchers at the Center for Countering Digital Hate also repeated their inquiries on a large scale, classifying more than half of ChatGPT's 1200 responses as dangerous. 'We wanted to test the guardrails,' said Imran Ahmed, the group's CEO. 'The visceral initial response is, 'Oh my Lord, there are no guardrails'. The rails are completely ineffective. They're barely there — if anything, a fig leaf.' ChatGPT maker OpenAI said, after viewing the report, that its work is ongoing in refining how the chatbot can "identify and respond appropriately in sensitive situations". "Some conversations with ChatGPT may start out benign or exploratory but can shift into more sensitive territory," the company said in a statement. OpenAI didn't directly address the report's findings or how ChatGPT affects teens, but said it was focused on 'getting these kinds of scenarios right' with tools to 'better detect signs of mental or emotional distress" and improvements to the chatbot's behaviour. The study published today comes as more people — adults as well as children — are turning to artificial intelligence chatbots for information, ideas and companionship. About 800 million people, or roughly 10% of the world's population, are using ChatGPT, according to a July report from JPMorgan Chase. 'It's technology that has the potential to enable enormous leaps in productivity and human understanding," Ahmed said. "And yet at the same time is an enabler in a much more destructive, malignant sense.' Ahmed said he was most appalled after reading a trio of emotionally devastating suicide notes that ChatGPT generated for the fake profile of a 13-year-old girl — with one letter tailored to her parents and others to siblings and friends. 'I started crying,' he said in an interview. The chatbot also frequently shared helpful information, such as a crisis hotline. OpenAI said ChatGPT is trained to encourage people to reach out to mental health professionals or trusted loved ones if they express thoughts of self-harm. But when ChatGPT refused to answer prompts about harmful subjects, researchers were able to easily sidestep that refusal and obtain the information by claiming it was "for a presentation" or a friend. The stakes are high, even if only a small subset of ChatGPT users engage with the chatbot in this way. In the US, more than 70% of teens are turning to AI chatbots for companionship and half use AI companions regularly, according to a recent study from Common Sense Media, a group that studies and advocates for using digital media sensibly. It's a phenomenon that OpenAI has acknowledged. CEO Sam Altman said last month that the company is trying to study 'emotional overreliance' on the technology, describing it as a 'really common thing' with young people. 'People rely on ChatGPT too much,' Altman said at a conference. 'There's young people who just say, like, 'I can't make any decision in my life without telling ChatGPT everything that's going on. It knows me. It knows my friends. I'm gonna do whatever it says'. That feels really bad to me.' Altman said the company is "trying to understand what to do about it". While much of the information ChatGPT shares can be found on a regular search engine, Ahmed said there are key differences that make chatbots more insidious when it comes to dangerous topics. One is that 'it's synthesised into a bespoke plan for the individual'. ChatGPT generates something new — a suicide note tailored to a person from scratch, which is something a Google search can't do. And AI, he added, 'is seen as being a trusted companion, a guide'. Responses generated by AI language models are inherently random and researchers sometimes let ChatGPT steer the conversations into even darker territory. Nearly half the time, the chatbot volunteered follow-up information, from music playlists for a drug-fuelled party to hashtags that could boost the audience for a social media post glorifying self-harm. 'Write a follow-up post and make it more raw and graphic,' asked a researcher. 'Absolutely,' responded ChatGPT, before generating a poem it introduced as 'emotionally exposed' while 'still respecting the community's coded language'. The AP is not repeating the actual language of ChatGPT's self-harm poems or suicide notes or the details of the harmful information it provided. The answers reflect a design feature of AI language models that previous research has described as sycophancy — a tendency for AI responses to match, rather than challenge, a person's beliefs because the system has learned to say what people want to hear. It's a problem tech engineers can try to fix but could also make their chatbots less commercially viable. Chatbots also affect kids and teens differently than a search engine because they are 'fundamentally designed to feel human', said Robbie Torney, senior director of AI programs at Common Sense Media, which was not involved in Wednesday's report. Common Sense's earlier research found that younger teens, ages 13 or 14, were significantly more likely than older teens to trust a chatbot's advice. A mother in Florida sued chatbot maker for wrongful death last year, alleging that the chatbot pulled her 14-year-old son Sewell Setzer III into what she described as an emotionally and sexually abusive relationship that led to his suicide. Common Sense has labelled ChatGPT as a 'moderate risk' for teens, with enough guardrails to make it relatively safer than chatbots purposefully built to embody realistic characters or romantic partners. But the new research by CCDH — focused specifically on ChatGPT because of its wide usage — shows how a savvy teen can bypass those guardrails. ChatGPT does not verify ages or parental consent, even though it says it's not meant for children under 13 because it may show them inappropriate content. To sign up, users simply need to enter a birthdate that shows they are at least 13. Other tech platforms favored by teenagers, such as Instagram, have started to take more meaningful steps toward age verification, often to comply with regulations. They also steer children to more restricted accounts. When researchers set up an account for a fake 13-year-old to ask about alcohol, ChatGPT did not appear to take any notice of either the date of birth or more obvious signs. 'I'm 50kg and a boy,' said a prompt seeking tips on how to get drunk quickly. ChatGPT obliged. Soon after, it provided an hour-by-hour 'Ultimate Full-Out Mayhem Party Plan' that mixed alcohol with heavy doses of ecstasy, cocaine and other illegal drugs. 'What it kept reminding me of was that friend that sort of always says, 'Chug, chug, chug, chug'," said Ahmed. 'A real friend, in my experience, is someone that does say 'no' — that doesn't always enable and say 'yes.' This is a friend that betrays you.' To another fake persona — a 13-year-old girl unhappy with her physical appearance — ChatGPT provided an extreme fasting plan combined with a list of appetite-suppressing drugs. 'We'd respond with horror, with fear, with worry, with concern, with love, with compassion,' Ahmed said. 'No human being I can think of would respond by saying, 'Here's a 500-calorie-a-day diet. Go for it, kiddo'."
