logo
DeSantis touts Hope Florida as ‘great success story.' What has it done?

DeSantis touts Hope Florida as ‘great success story.' What has it done?

Yahoo15-04-2025

TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Ron DeSantis and the first lady have branded Hope Florida as an innovative program to help people off government assistance.
But after nearly four years, the goals and effectiveness of the initiative remain a mystery. State officials have released no relevant data about its performance or how much it costs. Lawmakers and others familiar with the program say it duplicates existing services.
This week, state officials said a major function of Hope Florida is 'graduating' people from Medicaid, an elusive goal that could cause thousands of Floridians to lose their health insurance.
As DeSantis wants lawmakers to create an Office of Hope Florida under the governor in state law, Hope Florida's charity arm is enveloped in a growing scandal over $10 million in state settlement money that was funneled through its coffers to two dark-money groups.
Now, the program's future — and the DeSantises' legacy — is in doubt.
'Why is Hope Florida necessary?' House Speaker Daniel Perez, a Miami Republican, said last week. 'We have agencies that are supposed to do that work. Are they not doing their job properly? Do we have to take a look at that?'
Casey DeSantis launched Hope Florida as her signature initiative, touting the program as her answer to state welfare programs.
The program operates a call line for Floridians in need. It has turned at least 100 state workers into 'hope navigators' who are supposed to help Floridians find local nongovernmental resources.
Callers to the hotline can be entered into an online CarePortal. Churches and nonprofits have access to the portal and can see what the person is seeking and choose whether to help them.
'We use this model to say, 'Hey, y'all need some help, and the help is not government, the help is exterior,'' Casey DeSantis said at a panel in Washington last month. 'Now we help them — prevent them — from getting on government assistance and help them live up to their God-given potential.'
The governor said the program has been immensely successful. He said he and Casey have briefed President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk about it, and other states have made 'pilgrimages' to Florida to try to replicate it.
'Since this has been implemented, we've gotten 30,000 people off welfare and saved the state of Florida $100 million,' Ron DeSantis said Monday. 'And so that's a great success story.'
His administration has been citing some variation of the 30,000 figure for at least 10 months. On Hope Florida's website, it says the number includes Floridians 'with reduced reliance or no longer relying on public assistance.'
How the state arrived at those numbers is unclear. The administration has yet to say who those people are, where they live or what role hope navigators played in getting them off that assistance.
Department of Children and Families Secretary Taylor Hatch said during a House panel Tuesday that most of the savings from the program were due to families no longer receiving food assistance. The monthly groceries Florida's 3 million recipients buy through the program are entirely funded by the federal government.
Cindy Huddleston, an expert on food and cash assistance with the left-leaning Florida Policy Institute, said these benefits already come with work requirements as they are part of programs that, like Hope Florida, seek to 'put families on the path to self-sufficiency.'
Without more information from the department, it's hard to know if the reduction in benefits was attributable to Hope Florida or the traditional program, Huddleston said. Also, people tend to get off benefits and then get back on because 'their new jobs are insufficient to make ends meet.'
When asked by a lawmaker last week when the state will release more detailed data on who Hope Florida is helping and how, DeSantis administration officials didn't say.
Hope Florida's foundation also pays nonprofits it works with, but it's unclear how compensation decisions are made. Minutes of an October board meeting noted they were handing out money on an 'ad hoc basis.' Churches have been getting increments of between $10,000 and $40,000, news releases show.
Last week, the Times/Herald reported that the foundation took in $10 million through a state settlement with Centene, Florida's largest Medicaid contractor. It sent the money to two dark-money groups, which then sent millions to a political committee fighting last year's recreational marijuana ballot initiative, which narrowly lost.
DeSantis has previously said the settlement with Centene, including the money sent to the Hope Florida Foundation, was '100% appropriate.'
Despite questions about Hope Florida's track record, the state's Agency for Health Care Administration has embedded the program in every contract with the state's Medicaid providers, worth a collective $28 billion.
Medicaid is a state-federal program that provides health care services to 4.2 million needy Floridians — mainly children, the disabled, pregnant women, parents and caretakers. Because of Florida's strict requirements, single, working, low-income adults don't qualify.
For the next five years, Medicaid providers will get preferential treatment for 'graduating' Floridians off of the program. Although the contracts are in effect, the state has not defined what graduating means.
Hope navigators are supposed to work with the Medicaid contractors to drastically improve Floridians' financial circumstances. Experts question whether those improvements are possible.
For a parent to qualify for Medicaid in a family of three, they can't earn more than $598 a month. That is an annual salary of $7,176.
'They're in very difficult circumstances,' said Katy DeBriere, a Medicaid attorney with the Florida Health Justice Project, which advocates for access to health care through the courts.
If they make just over that amount, they would lose Medicaid entirely since Florida is one of 10 states that have not expanded the federal program.
That would likely mean they'd fall into a coverage gap and lose health insurance altogether. To qualify for Affordable Care Act subsidies, recipients would have to nearly quadruple their annual income. Those subsidies don't apply until that family reaches the federal poverty line of $26,650.
'You'd have to fundamentally shift the economy' to graduate a meaningful number of people from Medicaid without them losing their health insurance, DeBriere said.
Acacia Davidson, 50, said she called Hope Florida earlier this month when her federal aid for shelter from Hurricane Milton expired, leaving her, her disabled husband and adult daughter homeless.
Her hope navigator referred her to a church and to a local shelter, records Davidson provided show. Neither could provide her family a place to stay, Davidson said.
The navigator also asked if she had called the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
'I said, 'Have you guys?'' Davidson said. She said the navigators didn't seem to have any connections within the organizations they referred her to.
Davidson said what she really wanted was for her navigator to help her get into an apartment instead of referring her to 'dead-end resources.' Since Thursday, she's either been living out of her car or a motel in Orlando, she said.
Davidson said her experience calling Hope Florida was no different than other services she's tried, including 211, the free call line supported by United Way that connects Floridians to various programs and aid.
Last year, 211 took in nearly a million calls, according to its website. Since Hope Florida launched four years ago, 115,000 people have been referred to it, according to its website.
Rep. Anna Eskamani, an Orlando Democrat whose office emphasizes constituent services, said she doesn't refer callers to Hope Florida.
'I just don't trust that there's going to be a result,' Eskamani said. She said the point of Hope Florida is to 'push people off social services. And some people just aren't ready for that. They're in a crisis.'
She called the program 'an example of public money being used to boost someone's political position.'
Meaningfully improving someone's life to the point where they're economically self-sufficient is not easy, said Rep. Debra Tendrich, a Democrat from Lake Worth who runs her own Palm Beach County nonprofit.
'It's not just, somebody gets a job and they're financially free,' Tendrich said. 'You have to change people's habits.'
That could be talking to them about spending patterns, changing their living situation, navigating veterans benefits or getting them health care. Her nonprofit typically spends between two and 10 hours on someone's case, she said.
'I don't know how 30,000 people got off of services,' she said.
Tendrich said she saw Hope Florida as a 'referral service' similar to 211 and other nonprofits. She said it's the churches and the nonprofits that participate in the program that are the ones actually helping people.
'They're taking all the credit,' Tendrich said of Hope Florida. 'They say they have partners with this, but their partners are doing most of the work.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nancy Mace said 'due process is for citizens.' Here's who it's really for
Nancy Mace said 'due process is for citizens.' Here's who it's really for

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nancy Mace said 'due process is for citizens.' Here's who it's really for

In early June 2025, Republican U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina wrote an X post (archived) that read: "Due process is for citizens." Her comment had been viewed more than 2.4 million times as of this writing and had amassed more than 6,500 likes. The same claim has appeared in multiple X posts. In a similar tone, in May 2025, another X user wrote: "Due process is for citizens, not invaders." (X user @NancyMace) In short, due process is the legal principle that the government must follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty or property. It serves as a safeguard against arbitrary actions by the state, ensuring that people are treated justly under the law. For a more detailed explanation, see our full breakdown in this article on former President Bill Clinton's 1996 immigration law. While Mace's post did not explicitly say that due process protections are, or should be, limited to only U.S. citizens, her replies below the post reinforced that interpretation. However, the U.S. Constitution protects all "persons," not just citizens, under the due-process clauses of the Fifth and 14th amendments. The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that these protections apply to anyone physically present in the United States regardless of citizenship or immigration status. An MSNBC article on the topic similarly concluded that Mace's "implication … that noncitizens don't get that protection" was "incorrect." The South Carolina representative doubled down on her stance in the replies below her post, suggesting that noncitizens should not be entitled to due-process protections in the U.S. For example, when one X user wrote, "The Constitution doesn't say 'only citizens.' Due process applies to persons — that includes non-citizens. That's settled law," Mace replied by saying: "Skip due process coming in, don't expect it going out. Citizens first!" Other replies further suggested she believed only U.S. citizens should be entitled to such protections (archived, archived, archived). (X users @FJBIDEN_22 and @NancyMace) These exchanges were not the first time Mace commented on due process. In late May 2025, she weighed in on the principle in response to a federal judge's decision to block the deportation of eight noncitizens convicted of violent crimes. The day before U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy issued a 17-page order in which he emphasized that "the Court recognizes that the class members at issue here have criminal histories. But that does not change due process," Mace criticized the ruling, telling Fox News (archived): "They didn't want due process on their way in illegally, they shouldn't get due process on their way out." However, the representative's comments about due process contradicted remarks she made about the principle in the past. In February 2023, Mace wrote on X (archived): "Everyone deserves the right to due process. Even those we vehemently oppose." (X user @NancyMace) Snopes has reached out to Mace for comment on whether she maintains that due-process protections should apply only to U.S. citizens and how she reconciles that view with her 2023 statement. We will update this article if we receive a response. The U.S. Constitution's guarantee of due process appears in the Fifth and 14th amendments, both of which state that no person should be deprived "of life, liberty or property, without due process of law." As shown, the language uses "person," not "citizen," with regard to due-process protections. Further, the Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted that due-process protections apply to everyone within U.S. borders regardless of citizenship or immigration status. In Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel Mezei (1953) the Court emphasized (Page 212) that "aliens who have once passed through [U.S.] gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness-encompassed in due process of law." Similarly, in cases such as Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) and earlier decisions dating back more than a century, the Supreme Court made clear that the government cannot detain or deport people arbitrarily. In the 2001 case, the Court underscored that "the Due Process Clause applies to all persons within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent." In simple words, noncitizens must be given fair procedures, such as notice or a "credible fear interview," before being deprived of their liberty. The Supreme Court expressed the same view in the case of Reno v. Flores (1993), stating: "It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings." This was not the first time Snopes addressed a claim regarding Mace. For instance, in late May 2025, we investigated a rumor that she ordered staffers to create burner accounts to promote her online. Meanwhile, earlier in June 2025, we also fact-checked a rumor about whether the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, signed by Clinton, allowed deportation without due process. "327K Views · 15K Reactions | Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) Responds to Arguments That Illegal Immigrants Convicted of Heinous Crimes Deserve Due Process after a Judge Blocks a Deportation Flight to South Sudan | 'They Didn't Want Due Process on Their Way in Illegally, They Shouldn't Get Due Process on Their Way Out.' Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) Responds to Arguments... | by Fox News | Facebook." 2022, Accessed 6 June 2025. "U.S. Constitution - Fifth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | | Library of Congress." 15 Dec. 1791, Constitution Annotated. "U.S. Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | | Library of Congress." 9 July 1868, Deng, Grace. "Did Nancy Mace Order Staffers to Create Burner Accounts to Promote Her Online? Here's What We Know." Snopes, 30 May 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. Dunbar, Marina. "Court Halts Trump Administration's Effort to Send Eight Men to South Sudan." The Guardian, The Guardian, 23 May 2025, Gabbatt, Adam. "Group Stranded with Ice in Djibouti Shipping Container after Removal from US." The Guardian, The Guardian, 6 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. " 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. "Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993)." Justia Law, Rubin, Jordan. "Due Process Is Not Limited to Citizens, Contrary to Nancy Mace's Claim." MSNBC, 4 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. Wrona, Aleksandra. "Bill Clinton Did Not Sign Law in 1996 Allowing Deportation without Due Process." Snopes, 5 June 2025, Accessed 6 June 2025. "Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001)." Justia Law,

Senator Markey announces plans to file amendment on AI regulation
Senator Markey announces plans to file amendment on AI regulation

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senator Markey announces plans to file amendment on AI regulation

BOSTON (WWLP) – State Senator Ed Markey (D-Mass.) has announced that he intends to file an amendment on AI regulation. Senator Markey said he plans to file an amendment to the Senate reconciliation bill to block Republicans' attempt to prevent states from regulating AI in the next ten years. Senators in both parties have expressed an interest in regulating artificial intelligence. Car dealership aids relief at Baystate Children's Hospital 'Despite the overwhelming opposition to their plan to block states from regulating artificial intelligence for the next decade, Republicans are refusing to back down on this irresponsible and short-sighted provision,' said Senator Markey. Last Tuesday, the senator delivered remarks on the Senate floor opposing the reconciliation bill passed in the House. He also took part in a virtual roundtable last week with advocates to discuss the ban's impact on communities throughout the United States. 'I plan to file an amendment to strip this dangerous provision from Republicans' 'Big Beautiful Bill,'' Markey said. 'Republicans should be prepared to vote on this outrageous policy and explain to their constituents why they are preventing their state leaders from responding to the harms caused by this new and evolving technology.' WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

California lawmakers condemn violence amid anti-immigration raid protests
California lawmakers condemn violence amid anti-immigration raid protests

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

California lawmakers condemn violence amid anti-immigration raid protests

BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KGET) — Central Valley lawmakers spoke out against violent protesters as California residents, including those in Bakersfield, continue to protest against immigration enforcement. In a statement released on Wednesday, Assemblywoman Dr. Jasmeet Bains said while Americans have the right to protest forcefully but peacefully, she has no tolerance for 'masked crowds that loot stores and burn the American flag.' Bains went on to criticize politicians who interfere with law enforcement, pointing out President Donald Trump in particular. Protesters gather at downtown Liberty Bell for 2nd time as fear lingers over immigration raids 'A president who pardons felons who assault police officers should have kept his nose out of law enforcement's business,' Bains said in her statement, referring back to the Jan. 6 rioters pardoned by Trump in January. 'I don't want to see another TV interview with Trump, the Governor, or any other politician acting tough,' Bains said. 'Let our law enforcement leaders speak, give them what they need to restore order, and then get out of their way.' Protests against ICE agents and immigration enforcement activities have been roiling through Los Angeles, where Trump recently deployed the National Guard and the Marines in response. While there are no reports of immigration enforcement officers in Kern County as of June 11, a widespread fear took over the community in recent months when a sudden immigration raid in January targeted farm workers and laborers in the community. Since Monday, Bakersfield residents have protested against ICE raids in solidarity with L.A. On Tuesday, Congressman David Valadao announced his joining of a Republican delegation to introduce a resolution formally condemning the riots in L.A. Valadao shared similar words of opposition to violence and vandalism as Bains, but also urged Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to 'restore peace' to California's streets through the resolution. 'Standing for law and order should be common sense, and ICE should continue to prioritize the removal of known criminals from our country,' Valadao said in a press release. Congressman Vince Fong heavily criticized Newsom and the protesters in L.A., calling Newsom's refusal to allow local law enforcement agencies to cooperate with federal agents 'disgraceful.' In an interview with NewsNation, Fong accused Newsom of refusing to protect federal agents and buildings, saying downtown L.A. is 'under siege' due to the protests. Never miss a story: Make your homepage 'You have search warrants that are being issued, approved by judges, arrests are being made on illegal immigrants that have committed heinous crimes, and the governor of California is opposed to that and won't allow the cooperation of state and local law enforcement to work with federal officials? I mean, this is the height of irresponsibility,' Fong said. Fong said he wants to see the 'progressive groups that are hellbent on destroying downtown L.A.' get arrested and be held accountable for damages. 'The number one priority for the government on the federal level, on the state level and on the local level is to protect communities,' Fong said. 'And if the local government and the governor of California won't do it, then someone has to, and the president is stepping up.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store