Bills targeting library operations die in Alabama Legislature
The battles over library content continue throughout Alabama. But two bills that could have affected how libraries operate failed to move in the Legislature's 2025 session.
One measure, HB 4, would have applied state obscenity laws to public libraries and their employees if there were materials judged to be obscene in the children's section. The other, SB 6, would have allowed cities and counties to terminate members of the library boards without cause.
The battles over library books began in Alabama in 2023, after a parent using the Autauga-Prattville Library complained about a book in the children's section that had inclusive pronouns. Similar fights have erupted all over the state. Supporters of restrictions say they are trying to get obscene material out of children's sections of the library. Critics say those restrictions target books with LGBTQ+ characters and themes and not necessarily obscene books.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'Our devoted and beleaguered librarians will not have to worry about being handcuffed and jailed for refusing to censor books under House Bill 4, the 'Jail the Librarians bill,' which never made it out of its House Committee,' said Read Freely Alabama, a group that opposes new library restrictions, in a statement shortly after the 2025 legislative session ended. 'Furthermore, the bill which would have politicized our library boards even more (SB 6) once again died before making it to the Senate floor.'
Multiple messages seeking comment were left with Rep. Arnold Mooney, R-Indian Springs, the sponsor of HB 4, and Sen. Chris Elliott, R-Josephine, the sponsor of SB 6.
Amy Minton, a member of the Alabama Public Library Service (APLS) Board and an advocate of additional restrictions on library content, said in an interview that she was 'a little surprised that people get so upset about the obscenity or sexually explicit materials.'
'If they don't have it in the library, why do they get so upset about them being asked to be moved, whether through a law or policy?' she said.
HB 4 would have amended the state's obscenity laws to make public libraries and librarians criminally liable for making materials that are sexually explicit or harmful to minors available.
The legislation would have allowed residents served by the library to file a notice with the staff that they believe there are sexually explicit or inappropriate materials found in sections of the library dedicated to minors.
Libraries would then have to relocate the materials to the adult section or remove them entirely. They can also notify the public that they have determined the item is in the appropriate section, which any resident can then challenge.
Noncompliance would have subjected librarians to prosecution under Alabama obscenity laws, which can be as severe as a Class B felony, punishable by up to 20 years in prison and a $30,000 fine.
SB 6 would have mandated that library board members be appointed to a four-year term and that members could be removed from the board with a two-thirds of the members of the governing body, either the city or county, agree by vote.
The House Judiciary Committee never considered HB 4. SB 6 got approval from the Senate County and Municipal Government Committee, which Elliott chairs, but did not come to a vote on the Senate floor.
Mooney's obscenity bill was approved further along in the 2024 session, receiving approval from members of the House and even getting approved in the Senate Children and Youth Health Committee before it stalled in the Senate. Elliott's legislation was approved in the Senate and the House County and Municipal Government Committee where it remained as the session ended.
Advocates of restrictions have succeeded in convincing the Alabama Public Library Service, the state agency that oversees local library funding, to impose policy changes that favor more restrictions.
In March, the APLS Board suspended funding to the Fairhope Public Library in Baldwin County while also voting to have Pack terminated after Minton made a motion. Supporters of the library raised money to replace the lost funding and defended the library at city council and APLS meetings.
Alabama GOP chair John Wahl, who currently serves as chair of the APLS Board, said at a meeting earlier this month that members are waiting for the Fairhope Public Library to complete its review of the books that parents challenged before resuming funding to the library.
'We know that the fight isn't over. As we speak, a stacked and extreme Alabama Public Library Service board continues its assault on libraries, stripping funding from those who will not cave to their demands,' Read Freely Alabama said in the statement. 'And even today, as this session closes, opposing forces are already crafting legislation for a chosen representative to prefile, and are regrouping to continue their assault on our freedoms and beloved public institutions at the next legislative session.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
6 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Fed up with Beacon Hill, those seeking to change the Legislature turn to 2026 voters for reforms
Kaufman is now leading the charge on two petitions that target stipends lawmakers earn for holding leadership positions. One would eliminate stipends altogether; the other would limit stipends to a certain percentage of a legislative leader's base salary, among other restrictions. The effort emerged after a Such issues 'should have been dealt with in a deliberative process in the Legislature,' said Kaufman, who filed bills to address the stipends only to have legislators ignore them. 'We feel like we have to take democracy back. The Legislature failed us and continues to fail us.' Advertisement Another petition submitted Wednesday would overhaul the election system by allowing open primaries that candidates from all different parties would compete in, an effort to increase competition to incumbents who are often unchallenged. Yet another would extend the state's public records law to the Legislature and governor, which would put Massachusetts in line with most other states. Both petitions are pushed by the Advertisement The petitions, if they make it to the 2026 ballot, build off momentum from the The success of that audit campaign, combined with a changing public perception of Beacon Hill, has fueled new efforts 'to try and pry open information from the Legislature,' said Horowitz, who studies the impact of ballot questions. 'People are recognizing that there is a real opportunity in the ballot question,' he said. Legislator pay has been a recurring topic on ballots nationwide. Peverill Squire, a professor at the University of Missouri who's studied Conversely, among the most common — and unpopular — measures that lawmakers themselves have put before voters are ones to increase their own pay. Squire said there have been nearly 250 such measures over the past 100 years, but the median 'yes' vote sits around 43 percent. Advertisement 'It's a problem that lawmakers are always hoping to tackle,' Squire said during a panel Wednesday at the National Conference of State Legislatures Legislative Summit in Boston. In Massachusetts, lawmakers' pay is automatically adjusted every two years through a complicated process involving two separate mechanisms: one guaranteed by the state Constitution, the other baked into a The constitutionally mandated adjustment is determined by the governor, who every two years must decide whether to raise the annual base salary for legislators. In December, Governor Maura Healey said lawmakers would get an The extra pay lawmakers can earn on top of their salaries also jumped by Some legislative leaders defended the extra pay. House Speaker Ron Mariano said stipends reward those who take on more work and responsibility and helps to 'keep people thinking about this job as a potential career.' He also said legislative leaders are best positioned to determine who receives them. 'Who better to know who shows leadership and puts in effort than the leaders who are trying to move the agenda?' Advertisement The Quincy Democrat did not say whether he'd support subjecting lawmakers to the public records law, arguing it depends on the details of 'what you're opening up' to the public. 'There are some things that are better left to negotiate in private,' he said, 'and I would prefer it that way.' There is a relatively low bar for starting the petition process: submitting just 10 signatures from registered voters and the full text of the law or amendment they wish to have enacted. That signed petition must be filed with Campbell's office, accompanied by certificates of voter registration for each signatory. After that, Campbell's office will review the language and, if deemed acceptable, will certify it and create a summary of the proposed law or amendment that will be printed on the petition forms. Once Campbell announces which petitions are certified for the ballot, typically in early September, campaigns can begin gathering the tens of thousands of signatures necessary to get it on the ballot. Initiative petitions for laws require two separate rounds of signature gathering and submission, and the number of signatures required for each round depends on the number of votes cast for governor at the most recent gubernatorial election. For the 2026 election, campaigns will have to collect a total of at least 87,003 signatures over the two rounds, and no more than one-quarter of the signatures can come from any one county. Other petitions filed Wednesday would allow Committee for Public Counsel Services employees to unionize, reduce the state's personal income tax to 4 percent from 5 percent, overhaul a Advertisement Another initiative that was certified last year and will be on the 2026 ballot would Mariano has been vocal about lawmakers' frustration with the ballot initiative process, saying citizen-written laws can create unintended consequences. Massachusetts lawmakers have also regularly rewritten voter-approved laws, such as slowing the implementation of a reduction in The House just this spring passed a He said he doesn't see the proposals as a rebuke of the Legislature, but rather a demonstration of the 'ease' of getting a measure before voters. 'I see a lot more of these well-financed special interest groups taking advantage of a procedure that I think is way too easy to get a question on the ballot,' he said. 'No one's talking to the voters. They're just getting signatures. It becomes an organizational chore more than anything. And when you see ballot initiatives become law, you see the holes in them.' Samantha J. Gross can be reached at
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here are the Republicans vying to replace Gov. Janet Mills next November
Both the Republican and Democratic gubernatorial primaries, slated for June 9, 2026, are open to all Maine voters. (Photo by Getty Images) Ben Midgley, a fitness executive from Kennebunkport, on Tuesday officially became the seventh Republican candidate in a crowded race for Gov. Janet Mills' seat. Midgley is the latest of 17 officially registered candidates vying to replace Mills, a Democrat who terms out next year. Both the Republican and Democratic primaries, slated for June 9, 2026, are open to all Maine voters. The primaries will be a ranked-choice ballot though the general election for governor in November will not. Most of the Republican candidates listed on the Maine Ethics Commission website have not held public office at the state level, with the exception of state Sen. Jim Libby (R-Standish). Bobby Charles, a lawyer who served under former Republican presidents, and former Paris selectman Robert Wessels have also been involved in politics in different capacities. In contrast, the Democratic field is stacked with party leaders, including Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, former Senate President Troy Jackson, and former Speaker of the Maine House of Representative and Mills administration official Hannah Pingree, among others. Other GOP candidates, including University of Maine System trustee Owen McCarthy, tout their financial credentials while framing themselves as political outsiders. All seven appear to have varying stances on issues including the economy, education and immigration, but almost all have expressed concern about the increasing cost of living in Maine, which according to a Pan Atlantic Research poll conducted this year was the biggest concern expressed by voters. Some have affiliated themselves with President Donald Trump, particularly real estate firm owner David Jones, who formed a political action committee to support his 2016 presidential campaign. Libby and Kenneth Capron are also the only candidates in the gubernatorial race so far relying on Maine Clean Elections Act funding. A bill this session that called to expand the fund failed, and the Maine Ethics Commission has raised concern about allocations not being enough if more than just two gubernatorial candidates run under the program in 2026. Sen. Rick Bennett of Oxford, who left the Republican party to run as an independent for governor, said he chose not to run under clean elections because of fear that there wouldn't be sufficient funding. Libby, who represents parts of Cumberland, Oxford and York counties, is in the middle of his second consecutive term in the Maine Senate. He has also spent time as a state representative after being first elected to the Legislature in 1992, serving for six non-consecutive terms overall. Libby first ran for governor in 2002, but did not win the Republican gubernatorial primary. He is a professor at Thomas College, and serves on the Legislature's Education and Cultural Affairs Committee. Among the notable bills he introduced this legislative session are measures to add political affiliation as a protected class under the Maine Human Rights Act and reinstate the failed Property Tax Stabilization Program, neither of which passed. The Kennebunkport Republican has served as the president of Planet Fitness, the national gym chain with more than 2,700 locations, and was a founding partner and the former chief executive officer of Crunch Franchising, another chain with 460 locations nationwide. In a Facebook post announcing his candidacy, Midgley highlighted his background, explaining that he went from relying on food assistance to building successful businesses, and saying that that path is becoming increasingly inaccessible. 'Like so many, I've watched the cost of living skyrocket while paychecks fall further behind. I've seen small businesses struggle under burdensome regulations, families buckle under rising electricity bills, and young people leave Maine because they can't afford to stay,' he wrote. Ken Capron is a Portland-based retired Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and financial fraud investigator, according to a press release from Capron shared with News Center Maine. According to his LinkedIn profile, Capron is founder of MicroRail Inc., a transportation research organization, and previously served as Maine Medical Center's accounting director, among other positions. He declined to provide comment to Maine Morning Star. In 2022, he lost against Democrat Jill Duson in a bid for Portland's Senate District 27 seat. In his statement to News Center Maine, Capron raised issues with Maine's 'broken' legislative system, saying it 'imposes laws upon us that infringe on our everyday lives.' David Jones, a real estate firm owner from Falmouth, added his name to the list of Republicans running this spring. Jones owns F.O. Bailey Real Estate, and according to the Bangor Daily News, previously founded a commercial construction company that built high-rises, apartments and single-family homes. Jones has never held public office, but ran for governor as an independent two decades ago, but ultimately withdrew and endorsed the Republican candidate. On his campaign website, Jones has a photo with President Donald Trump, saying he has supported Trump since 2015 and in 2016 launched the Making Maine Great Again PAC. McCarthy, a University of Maine trustee from Gorham, announced his candidacy for the Republican nomination for governor in June. On his campaign website, he said he was tired of the one-party rule in Augusta. 'The cost of living is spiraling out of control,' he said. 'We pay some of the highest property taxes in the nation to fund schools whose performance has dropped from among the best to nearly the worst. For too many Mainers, homeownership has shifted from the American Dream to merely a dream,' he wrote. McCarthy is a Harvard Business School graduate who co-founded MedRhythms, a medical technology company which helps patients recover mobility, the Portland Press Herald reported. He wants to focus on tax relief and 'crack down on illegal immigration by cooperating with federal law enforcement,' according to his website. Bobby Charles, a Leeds resident and lawyer who served under former President Ronald Reagan and both Bush administrations announced his candidacy in April. His campaign website highlights his tenure in federal politics, including as Assistant U.S. Secretary of State under George W. Bush. He has been vocal through his website, interviews and ads about making reforms including a 'crackdown on crime,' supporting law enforcement, cutting taxes and 'removing woke politics from the classroom.' In a campaign ad, Charles also called for the resignation of Rep. Deqa Dhalac (D-South Portland) for her 'pro-Somalia rhetoric.' Bangor resident and veteran Stephen Sheppard does not have political issues listed on his campaign website, nor has he spoken to any media outlets on his candidacy so far. His campaign filing shows two donations, both made in April, one from himself and one from a friend totaling $700. On his website, he says he will make the Appalachian Trail a top priority. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
What to know as Trump's immigration crackdown strips tuition breaks from thousands of students
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Tens of thousands of U.S. college students without legal resident status are losing access to in-state tuition prices as part of President Donald Trump's crackdown on immigration. The Justice Department has been suing states to end tuition breaks for students without legal residency, starting with Texas in June. It has also filed lawsuits in Kentucky, Minnesota and, most recently, Oklahoma. Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, 'Federal law prohibits aliens not lawfully present in the United States from getting in-state tuition benefits that are denied to out-of-state U.S. citizens,' the Justice Department argued in a lawsuit this month in Oklahoma. 'There are no exceptions.' The tuition breaks once enjoyed wide bipartisan support but have increasingly come under criticism from Republicans in recent years. Here's what to know about the tuition breaks: Texas' program was blocked first Texas' tuition policy was initially passed with sweeping bipartisan majorities in the Legislature and signed into law by then-Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, as a way to open access to higher education for students without legal residency already living in the state. Supporters then and now say it boosted the state's economy by creating a better-educated and better-prepared workforce. The law allowed students without legal resident status to qualify for in-state tuition if they had lived in Texas for three years before graduating from high school and for a year before enrolling in college. They also had to sign an affidavit promising to apply for legal resident status as soon as possible. Texas now has about 57,000 qualifying students enrolled in its public universities and colleges, according to the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a nonpartisan nonprofit group of university leaders focused on immigration policy. The state has about 690,000 students overall at its public universities. The difference in tuition rates is substantial. For example, at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, a 34,000-student campus along the border with Mexico, a state resident will pay about $10,000 in basic tuition for a minimum full-time class schedule in the upcoming school year. A nonresident student will pay $19,000. Political pushback and a swift end Texas' law stood mostly unchallenged for years, but it came under fire as debates over illegal immigration intensified. In the 2012 Republican presidential primary, Perry apologized after saying critics of the law 'did not have a heart.' The law withstood several repeal efforts in the Republican-dominated Legislature. During the legislative session that ended June 2, a repeal bill did not even get a vote. But the ax fell quickly. After the Trump administration filed a lawsuit calling the law unconstitutional, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a key Trump ally, chose not to defend the law in court and instead filed a motion agreeing that it should not be enforced. In Oklahoma, Attorney General Gentner Drummond, also a Republican, filed a similar motion. 'Rewarding foreign nationals who are in our country illegally with lower tuition costs that are not made available to out-of-state American citizens is not only wrong — it is discriminatory and unlawful," Drummond said in a statement. Campuses nationwide feel the impact At least 21 states and the University of Michigan system have laws or policies allowing tuition breaks for the immigrant students, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones such as Kansas and Nebraska. Immigration lawyers and education advocates said they are assessing whether there are legal avenues to challenge the rulings.
