Equality Commission to publish guidance on Supreme Court ruling
Northern Ireland's Equality Commission has said it aims to publish new formal guidance in June after the Supreme Court's ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex.
The court had been asked to decide on the proper interpretation of the 2010 Equality Act, which applies across Great Britain, but not in Northern Ireland.
It comes as Fermanagh and Omagh District Council said it would be implementing the provisions of the Supreme Court's ruling across its buildings.
The Equality Commission said it would "advise all employers and service providers, including councils, to review any policies that the Supreme Court judgment may impact on".
"As always, we advise them to come to us for advice relevant to their particular circumstances prior to making any changes," it added.
The Supreme Court ruling has major implications for single-sex spaces in GB, such as female changing rooms and toilets.
BBC News NI's The Nolan Show asked a number of public bodies in Northern Ireland - including health trusts, government departments and councils - how they plan to react to the Supreme Court's ruling.
The Department of Finance, Department for Communities and Department of Health also stated they were considering potential implications.
The Supreme Court ruling gives clarity - but now comes the difficult part
While most council also said they were still considering the ruling's implications, Fermanagh and Omagh said they "will be developing new guidance for the use of changing rooms at leisure facilities and toilets further to the Supreme Court ruling".
The council added that they will "review the equality screening of our policies to identify any anomalies that may have arisen as a result of the Supreme Court ruling".
"Should the screening highlight any particular issues or concerns which require amendment or new policy development, these may be the subject of public consultation."
Alexa Moore is the policy, campaigns and communications manager at the Rainbow Project and said that Fermanagh and Omagh District Council have "jumped the gun".
"It's quite concerning for trans [people], but also wider LGBT communities in Fermanagh because you have to ask the question: 'How is this going to be enforced, are we going to have council workers paid to stand on-site and do genital inspections on people trying to use leisure facilities?'
"It's frankly bizarre and I do think they're really jumping the gun here," Ms Moore said.
In a statement, Omagh Pride said they were "dismayed and angered" by the council statement on the Supreme Court ruling.
"This is yet another decision that would have a deeply adverse impact on trans people, adding to isolation and putting their safety at risk.
"We call on our local elected representatives to immediately and clearly speak out against this statement from Fermanagh & Omagh District Council and to ensure that no changes to policy are implemented which would undermine the rights and risk the safety of trans people."
BBC News NI asked some people out and about in Omagh about the possibility of Fermanagh and Omagh District Council changing its policies.
Mandy McClelland, from Omagh, does not think there should be a "hard and fast rule".
"If you need the toilet – you need the toilet whatever gender you are so that wouldn't bother me in the slightest."
She said would not mind sharing a toilet with a transgender person.
"Live and let live is my motto."
Demi Whelan said if she or her daughter Tilly needed to use the toilet and only the men's was available, they would still use it.
"If it's clean enough for us to use we're going to use it," she said.
"I think if you needed to go to the toilet there shouldn't be any fuss of whether you need to go, if it's available you're more than welcome to use it."
However, Billy Naylor said he does not think a male who has changed their gender to female should be able to use a female bathroom.
"If that's their decision, to be what they want to be, when it comes to public toilets – no, a man's toilet is for a man, a women's toilet is for a woman," he said.
Women's campaigners celebrate court win - but what will it change?
Supreme Court backs 'biological' definition of woman
Transgender guidance scrapped for NI primary schools
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brazil's Supreme Court justices agree to make social media companies liable for user content
BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — The majority of justices on Brazil's Supreme Court have agreed to make social media companies liable for illegal postings by their users. Gilmar Mendes on Wednesday became the sixth of the court's 11 justices to vote to open a path for companies like Meta, X and Microsoft to be sued and pay fines for content published by their users. Voting is ongoing but a simple majority is all that is needed for the measure to pass. The ruling will come after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of possible visa restrictions against foreign officials allegedly involved in censoring American citizens. The only dissenting Brazilian justice so far is André Mendonça and his vote was made public last week. The social media proposal would become law once voting is finished and the result is published. But Brazil's Congress could still pass another law to reverse the measure. The current legislation states social media companies can only be held responsible in those cases if they do not remove hazardous content after a court order. Mauricio Savarese, The Associated Press
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Southern Baptists move to end same-sex marriage in the US
Southern Baptists, whose faith includes over 12 million members in the US, have endorsed a ban to end same-sex marriage in America. The moment marks the first time the group has officially opposed the ruling in Obergefell v Hodges, the 2015 landmark Supreme Court case backing same-sex marriage. The votes on Tuesday came during the annual Southern Baptist Convention in Dallas, Texas, attended by over 10,000 church representatives. Experts say the evangelical group's values have increasingly shifted to align with the Christian right, a branch of conservatism that has gained momentum under US President Donald Trump. The Southern Baptists' resolution does not use the word "ban" directly. Instead, it calls for the "overturning of laws and court rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges, that defy God's design for marriage and family". The resolution also calls "for laws that affirm marriage between one man and one woman". Any legal reversal of the Supreme Court's Obergefell decision would not lead automatically to a nationwide ban of same-sex marriage. Thirty-six states had already legalised same-sex marriage at the time of the ruling, and nearly 70% of Americans still support it, polls show. "What we're trying to do is keep the conversation alive," Andrew Walker, an ethicist at a Southern Baptist seminary in Kentucky who wrote the resolution, told the New York Times. Although the resolution is non-binding, it comes from a large, influential faction of President Trump's base and sends a direct message to the White House. Eighty-five percent of white evangelical Protestants are likely to be Republican voters, according to a 2024 Pew Research survey. "I think there is a confidence that (Trump) will have their backs," Kristin Du Mez, a Calvin University history professor specializing in religion and politics, told the BBC. "In some ways, it's an uphill battle," she said. "But I do think they sense that there's been this shift, that there may be a window opening, and that they think this is the right time to press this issue." She described a "transactional element" to the relationship between evangelicals and Trump, whose Supreme Court nominations helped end national abortion rights. Evangelicals also played a "very prominent" role overturning Roe v Wade, the landmark Supreme Court ruling that protected abortion for nearly 50 years before it was overturned in 2022, said Ms Du Mez. She said she believes evangelicals may be using the same blueprint to end same-sex marriage. "I know some of the leaders have pointed to Roe v Wade as a model of the need to play the long game," she said. Trump's message on same-sex marriage has been mixed over the years, telling CNN in 2015 that he supported "traditional marriage" then, in a 60 Minutes interview in 2016, saying he was "fine" with same-sex marriage. In his second term, however, he has launched a campaign against diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) with multiple directives targeting LGBTQ groups. This includes banning transgender people from serving the military, and revoking a Biden-era executive order preventing discrimination "on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation". Fear and anxiety in LGBTQ communities have grown as a result, leading some international organisations to boycott World Pride in Washington DC this year. And although public support largely remains behind same-sex marriage, the Southern Baptists' resolution has added to LGBTQ groups' sense of alarm. "This is a very visible example of how attacks on the LGBTQ+ community as a whole have intensified, even as politicians take aim at transgender people as a tactic to divide us," Laurel Powell, Human Rights Campaign communications director, said in a statement to the BBC. "We will never stop fighting to love who we love and be who we are."
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
I told you GOP would come for marriage. Southern Baptists just proved my point.
I told you GOP would come for marriage. Southern Baptists just proved my point. | Opinion The majority of Americans support marriage equality for LGBTQ+ people. Republicans don't seem to care about that. Show Caption Hide Caption Organizers say political pressure is motivation to continue celebrating Pride Organizers say political pressure is motivation to continue organizing and celebrating Pride, although some corporate support dwindles. The Southern Baptist Convention, the largest Protestant denomination in the U.S., passed a resolution opposing same-sex marriage and transgender rights. This resolution aligns with efforts by some Republicans to overturn the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage. While public support for same-sex marriage remains high overall, support among Republicans has declined in recent years. Southern Baptists are officially taking a stand against LGBTQ+ rights, sending a concerning signal about where the country could be headed. On June 10, thousands of pastors and members of the nation's largest protestant denomination voted on a resolution to support efforts to overturn same-sex marriage. Along with opposing gay marriage, the resolution calls for the defunding of Planned Parenthood, rails against 'transgender ideology,' and opposes commercial surrogacy. That's a lot of animosity packed into one declaration. But it's one that Republicans seem increasingly interested in supporting. What's scary is that there are currently efforts to bring same-sex marriage back to the Supreme Court with the intention of overturning Obergefell v. Hodges. Republicans in the Idaho House of Representatives passed a resolution earlier in 2025 to ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decade-old ruling. Eight other state legislatures introduced similar measures affecting the legality of same-sex marriage. It's not just outrageous that so many legislative officials are trying to do away with gay marriage. It's terrifying to the LGBTQ+ people you know. The Southern Baptist resolution is a harrowing sign of the legal fight that could be around the corner. Opinion: A trans athlete won in California. Her peers cheered – and exposed the truth. Polling says gay marriage is popular. Do Republicans care? Same-sex marriage still has majority support in the United States, according to polling. Gallup conducted a survey in May 2025 that found that 68% of respondents believed that same-sex marriages should have the same rights as traditional marriages, compared with 29% of people who disagreed. While that's a hopeful number, there are some caveats. Support for gay marriage has decreased from 71% in 2023. Republican support has dropped to 41% from 55% in 2021 and 2022, and is now the lowest it's been since 2016. Opinion: Republicans are going after marriage. LGBTQ+ people like me tried to warn you. Now that a denomination with nearly 13 million members is coming out against gay marriage, I fear that we will continue to see a decline in support. Even if gay marriage retains support, the Supreme Court already went against popular opinion when it overturned Roe v. Wade. In his opinion on that issue, Justice Clarence Thomas said he believed the court should reconsider Obergefell. He said the quiet part out loud. What happened to 'love thy neighbor'? Guess not if they're LGBTQ? While I grew up within a different denomination, my childhood in North Carolina was spent around Southern Baptists. I have attended their services; I have been to their funerals. I know LGBTQ+ people who were raised in their churches, and my heart breaks for them and their families. While Christianity has become burdened by dogma and interpretations, the most important lesson, the one that is universal, regardless of your denomination, is that you're supposed to love your neighbor as you love yourself. To me, this means wanting them to have the same rights as you have, including in your marriage. It is shameful that Southern Baptists have lost sight of this message and instead want to advocate for fewer rights for LGBTQ+ people. But it's not surprising given where Trump's Republican Party is trending on the topic. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno
