Byju's co-founder Divya Gokulnath says personal attacks ‘unfair', adds: ‘If we were sitting on millions of dollars…'
'If we truly had hundreds of millions of dollars, we would have had no trouble affording legal representation', Divya Gokulnath claimed in an interview with news agency ANI.
Divya Gokulnath told the agency that lawyers are demanding 'millions of dollars' in fees to represent them in US courts. She stated, 'Today, in the US, judgements are passed back to back to us by one court. Because we don't have representation.'
'I'll show you emails where they say, give us a million dollars. Lawyers are saying, Give us a million dollars or we won't represent. Where do I get the million dollars from? If we were sitting on 533 million dollars, this would not be the situation, right? We would have been fighting in the courts. We would have thrown money at lawyers,' she added.
Notably, BYJU'S is fighting legal battles over unpaid debts across courts in the US and India.
She further called 'personal attacks' on her and Byju Raveendran 'unfair'.
'Honestly, I don't care about the money. It comes, it goes. And Lakshmi can come and go. Saraswati is with us. Goddess Saraswati is always with us. For me, it's about the tarnishing which has happened, which I feel is so unfair,' she said.
Gokulnath added, 'It was all about what we could do for our country. And not what the country can do for us. So we are a made in India, made by Indians, proudly made for the world's product, service, company, people, students-first company.'
She added that while many entrepreneurs move abroad to pursue their ventures, the couple's vision was to build BYJU'S as a homegrown "Make in India" success story.
'At the time when people were going abroad and setting up their companies because that was much more lucrative, we resisted it. We said, no, this has to be a make in India story. We will make our products in India. We will give our services from India and we will be an example for the world in education. Because education belongs to India,' Gokulnath said.
Divya Gokulnath also alleged that a targeted campaign of intimidation and pressure tactics was mounted aimed at isolating her husband, Byju Raveendran, by threatening those close to him, including family members, colleagues, and even legal counsel.
Referring to incidents where unknown individuals reportedly visited the homes of management personnel, Byju Raveendran, the founder and the CEO of BYJU's, expressed concern, stating, "People get scared when somebody walks in, intrudes into a home in the context of not having answers."
Despite all these troubles, Gokulnath asserted that it is the truth and the final mission that bind all of them together.
"I think indirectly that's what they're trying to say. They're saying stand-off, or maybe create a lot of reputational damage so that you say, okay, you know what, I'll stay out of this. It's not going to happen because there is something, there is truth that binds all of us together. There is the final mission that binds all of us together," she asserted.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
‘90% of India makes less than ₹25,000…': Jay Kotak slams ₹50,000 minimum bank balance rule
ICICI Bank is facing heat after hiking its savings account minimum balance by 5 times, and this time veteran banker Uday Kotak's son Jay Kotak has spoken up against the move. In a post on X without explicitly mentioning the ICICI Bank minimum balance hike, Jay Kotak said 90 per cent of Indians make less than ₹ 25,000 a month. 'Every Indian must access our financial sector. 90% of India makes less than ₹ 25,000 a month. A ₹ 50,000 minimum balance implies a sum equal to ~94% of Indians monthly income is to be left with the bank at all times, else a fee!,' he said. Jay Kotak, who leads Kotak Mahindra Bank's digital banking arm Kotak 811, said digital first is the way to go. 'Implication: physical cost to serve may be high. Digital first is the way. If banks don't do it, fintechs will. Banking should be for all Indians.' The ICICI Bank minimum balance for savings account has been hiked from ₹ 10,000 to ₹ 50,000 for urban accounts. MAB (Minimum Account Balance) for semi-urban locations and rural locations have also been increased five times ₹ ₹ 25,000 and ₹ 10,000, respectively, according to information available on the ICICI Bank website. Non-maintenance of ICICI Bank minimum balance will attract penalty, the bank said. The lender will charge 6 per cent of the shortfall in required MAB, or ₹ 500, whichever is lower, if you stay in an urban area and cannot maintain ₹ 50,000 account balance. The changes are applicable to ICICI Bank savings accounts opened on or after August 1. The minimum balance remains ₹ 5,000 for old customers in rural and semi-urban areas. For old urban customers, the minimum account balance should be maintained at ₹ 10,000. The ICICI Bank minimum balance hike was criticised by many, with social media users calling the move discriminatory and elitist. A user wrote, 'In a country where 23 crore people live below the poverty line, ICICI thinks ₹ 50,000 is a 'minimum'. Masterstroke!' In a letter to the finance secretary, 'Bank Bachao Desh Bachao Manch' termed the private lender's decision as "unjust and regressive". 'This retrograde decision undermines the principle of inclusive banking,' the forum's joint conveners, Biswaranjan Ray and Soumya Datta, claimed.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
R Ashwin asks CSK for clarity on his role in IPL 2026, open to part ways
New Delhi [India], August 11 (ANI): Chennai Super Kings (CSK) veteran spinner Ravichandran Ashwin has asked CSK for clarity on how they intend to use him in the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2026, as per ESPNcricinfo. According to ESPNcricinfo, Ashwin has told the franchise he doesn't mind parting ways with them if he doesn't fit their plans. Ashwin was picked by CSK at the mega auction 2025 for ₹ 9.75 crore. He played nine fixtures for Chennai Super Kings in IPL 2025, taking seven wickets and conceding runs at an economy rate of 9.13. This IPL was also his costliest year as he went for 9.12 runs an over, the first time that his economy went past 8.49. The deadline for releasing players usually depends on when the auction takes place, which hasn't been finalised for IPL 2026 yet. Although there is a mini auction every year, the mega auction happens only once every three years. Anytime between November and February is when it is typically held. As Ashwin jokingly stated during his interview with Sanju Samson, a player trade can occur no more than a week prior to the auction. Ashwin is the fifth-highest wicket-taker in the IPL with 201 scalps in 239 matches at an average of 30.94. Before rejoining CSK in 2025, he played for the now-defunct Rising Pune Supergiant, Kings XI Punjab (now Punjab Kings), Delhi Capitals, and Rajasthan Royals. CSK have other calls to make as well, including captaincy, which MS Dhoni took over mid-season after Ruturaj Gaikwad injured himself. Earlier, Rajasthan Royals (RR) captain Sanju Samson had informed the franchise that he wants to be released ahead of the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2026 auction. Samson conveyed his decision to the RR management soon after the conclusion of IPL 2025. While the Royals held their season review meetings in June, they haven't yet responded to Samson's request. Samson was among six players retained by the Royals before the previous mega auction, with a price tag of ₹ 18 crore. The others were Yashasvi Jaiswal, Riyan Parag, Dhruv Jurel, Sandeep Sharma and Shimron Hetmyer. (ANI)
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Should Trump Have Imposed Tariff On India Over Russian Oil? Survey Finds...
America shouldn't have imposed tariffs on India over its exports of oil from Russia, a survey by a US-based think tank found. While 53 percent of respondents said the move was wrong, 43 percent were for it, the survey by the Democracy Institute showed. US President Donald Trump last week ordered steeper tariffs on Indian goods over New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil, opening a new front in his trade wars. Trump's additional 25-percent tariff on Indian goods, set to come into place in three weeks, stacks atop a separate 25-percent duty. This takes the level to 50 percent for many products - among the highest on any American trading partner. "Given American voters' strong support for protectionist tariffs in principle, that's a surprising response," said Patrick Basham, founding director of the Democracy Institute and its lead pollster. The respondents were evenly divided (44% to 44%) on the question of whether Trump's new tariffs were good for America. Mr Basham noted that, "Although Americans remain steadfast in their support of Trump's tariffs as an instrument of industrial policy, they are unimpressed by his increasing use of tariffs to leverage geopolitical decisions on his allies." A majority (53 percent) of the sample also said that they cared about America's image in front of the Indian government and the people. Earlier, Trump had remarked that India was a "dead economy" and that he didn't care how New Delhi dealt with Moscow. "I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care," Trump had said in a social media post on August 3. After imposing the staggering 50 per cent duty, Trump ruled out any trade talks between the two countries until the tariff issue was resolved. "No, not until we get it resolved," Trump said in the Oval Office in response to a question on whether he expects more trade negotiations with India after doubling the tariffs on Indian imports to 50 per cent. An overwhelming number (64%) of the respondents believed that India's growing economic influence globally was a "good thing". Prime Minister Modi was perceived as leading a successful government and a reliable ally, according to the survey. A large majority (59 percent to 38 percent) of the respondents said that PM Modi's leadership was good for America. The only negative response, as far as India is concerned, was over a question on the H-1B visa. More than 60 percent supported ending the H-1B professional visa programme that currently sees lakhs of highly skilled Indians employed in American businesses. "The argument that H1-B visas prioritise foreigners, especially Indians, over American workers, and thereby take jobs away from Americans, resonates very strongly with the American people," observed Mr Basham. The telephone survey was conducted among 1,500 likely American voters between August 3 and August 5. The government today said that nearly 55 percent of India's merchandise exports to the US will be subject to the tariff imposed by the Trump administration. "The Department of Commerce is engaged with all stakeholders, including exporters and industry, for taking feedback of their assessment of the situation," Pankaj Chaudhary, junior finance minister, said in a written response. The Ministry of External Affairs hit back at the US for targeting it over Russian oil imports, terming the move "unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable".
