logo
"It's Basically Scientific Racism": Medical Experts Seriously Hate RFK Jr.'s Shocking Claim About Black People And Vaccines

"It's Basically Scientific Racism": Medical Experts Seriously Hate RFK Jr.'s Shocking Claim About Black People And Vaccines

Yahooa day ago
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Health and Human Services secretary, is making changes that threaten the public health system, from telling lies about the childhood vaccine schedule to replacing credible members of a vaccine advisory panel with people known to spread misinformation.
Groups like the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have spoken out against these changes, and some major medical associations are even suing Kennedy in response to his changes to the COVID-19 vaccine schedule.
Kennedy's attack on vaccines isn't exactly a surprise — he has a history of anti-vaccine remarks, which was a major talking point throughout his Senate confirmation hearings earlier this year. Specifically, his beliefs were front and center during a heated exchange in which Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) brought up a comment that Kennedy once made about vaccinations and the Black community.
In 2021, Kennedy had said, 'We should not be giving Black people the same vaccine schedule that's given to whites, because their immune system is better than ours.'
Related:
Alsobrooks asked Kennedy to explain what he meant by that remark, and he went on to reference a 'series of studies' while saying research shows that 'Blacks need fewer antigens.' (For the record, experts say that this is not true.)
'Right now, how vaccine schedules are tailored is based on things like your age, your exposure risk, if you have other chronic underlying health conditions ― but race isn't one of them, and there isn't research that suggests that it should be,' Joel Bervell, a recent medical graduate and medical myth-buster on social media, told HuffPost.
What especially bothered Bervell about Kennedy's exchange with Alsobrooks was the fact that he doubled down on his comment from 2021.
Kennedy could have used this as an opportunity to admit that he needs to do more research and understand the vaccine schedule, 'but instead, he defended what he said, which I think, for me, that's where the problem lies in,' Bervell told HuffPost. 'Not necessarily the fact of the misinformation is out there, but the fact that he wasn't willing to at least confront it or admit that onstage.'
Below, experts like Bervell share their concerns about Kennedy's statement and how it reflects a larger problematic picture:
Kennedy's comment can be considered 'scientific racism,' experts say.
Related:
'In medicine, in science, we know that race is a social construct, meaning that you can't look at someone's genes and identify what race they are,' Bervell said.
That means differences in vaccine timelines just don't make scientific sense.
'The comment that [Kennedy] made about the vaccine schedule, it's basically scientific racism, which has been debunked,' Dr. Oni Blackstock, a primary care and HIV physician who is the founder and executive director of Health Justice, a racial and health equity consulting company, told HuffPost.
'He's really perpetuating this false belief that Black people are somehow biologically different from white people and, in that way, justifying differential and ultimately unequal treatment for Black people versus white people,' Blackstock added.
'By saying that, he was putting on one of the larger stages in health care this notion that race-based medicine should still exist, when that's actually what many scientists recently have been trying to root out,' Bervell said.
Race-based medicine and scientific racism has led to undertreatment of Black patients, dismissal of pain and even death, Blackstock stressed.
Both experts pointed to real-life examples of this, like the false belief that Black people have better-functioning kidneys than white people. This made it harder for Black people to get the treatment they needed, like kidney transplants, according to Bervell. And this thought pattern isn't from some faraway time ― a medical equation that reinforced this bias wasn't changed until 2021, Bervell said.
What's more, during the 1793 yellow fever epidemic in Philadelphia, Black people were believed to be resistant to yellow fever, which was not true and led to high mortality rates among Black people, Blackstock explained.
'The importance of understanding the problem with the myths is that they can literally lead to regulations being written into medicine that treat populations differently just based on race,' Bervell said. 'It can actually change the care that people receive.'
While it's easy to look at a particular viewpoint as a one-off, medical racism has real-world consequences that irresponsible comments can make worse. Promoting debunked beliefs 'distracts us from really doing the work that we need to do, which is dismantling systemic racism in health care and ensuring that everyone has equitable access to preventive care and treatments that they need,' Blackstock added.
Related:
Such stances may lead to more mistrust in the health care system.
'One thing that is also kind of strange about him [Kennedy] is he's someone who for a long time has said that he doesn't support vaccines,' Bervell said. 'Apparently, now he's changed his mind, but for a long time he said he hasn't supported vaccines, and then he's also saying that Black people should get a different vaccine schedule. So you have to wonder, what is your goal in saying that if you don't even believe in vaccines?'
Bervell said comments like those from Kennedy can sow vaccine hesitancy in the Black population, which is dangerous and can erode trust in evidence-based medicine.
It's not the first time that this has happened, either, Blackstock added. In 2021, Kennedy produced a documentary called 'Medical Racism: The New Apartheid,' which Blackstock said promoted misinformation about health and vaccines to the Black community, along with other marginalized groups.
'It's interesting how some of his efforts have been focused on taking advantage of [and] exploiting the mistrust that some in the Black community have around vaccines and the health care system because of structural racism and medical racism,' Blackstock said.
With misinformation and scare tactics rampant on social media, misinformation from government leaders will only make it harder to tell what's real and what's fake in medicine. Trust needs to be paramount for health care as an institution, Bervell said.
'The trust is already eroded in health care,' Bervell explained. 'We need to have someone that is going to work with scientists, researchers, doctors that are on the ground seeing these problems every day, not someone that's in an ivory tower watching from above without understanding of what's actually happening on the ground.'
Related:
Experts say this rhetoric aligns with messaging from Donald Trump.
Blackstock stressed that while such false beliefs are very problematic, they track with much of the messaging from Donald Trump and his presidential administration.
'It echoes some of the rhetoric that [Trump] has shared around eugenics and immigrants,' Blackstock said. 'He's talked about immigrants having 'bad genes' or 'poisoning the blood of our country.' It just speaks to this idea of racial purity or genetic purity, and this false idea that certain groups of people are inherently inferior or predisposed to certain behaviors because of their genetics.'
And, again, race is a social construct and does not equal genetic differences. 'It's just really shocking that in the year 2025 we are still dealing with these beliefs being propagated that have been around for several centuries that have been used to justify slavery, used to justify inequitable treatment, used to justify forced sterilization,' Blackstock said.
Blackstock added that she thinks individuals get away with this kind of rhetoric because people become accustomed to outlandish comments and bad behavior.
'But we need to really flag this and say this is really dangerous and really concerning rhetoric that can have real health implications,' Blackstock said.
This article originally appeared on HuffPost.
Also in In the News:
Also in In the News:
Also in In the News: Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners
Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners

The Hill

time16 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners

President Donald Trump's plans for 100% tariffs on computer chips that aren't made in the U.S. are stoking confusion among businesses and trading partners — boosting stocks for leading semiconductor companies while leaving smaller producers scrambling to understand the implications. The U.S. imports a relatively small number of chips because most of the foreign-made chips in a device — from an iPhone to a car — were already assembled into a product, or part of a product, before it landed in the country. 'The real question everybody in the industry is asking is whether there will be a component tariff, where the chips in a device would require some sort of separate tariff calculation,' said Martin Chorzempa, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Trump said Wednesday that companies that 'made a commitment to build' in the U.S. would be spared the import tax, even if they are not yet producing those chips in American factories. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.' Wall Street investors interpreted that as good news not just for U.S. companies like AMD, Intel and Nvidia, but also for the biggest Asian chipmakers like Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company that have been working to build U.S. factories. But it left greater uncertainty for smaller chipmakers in Europe and Asia that have little exposure to the AI boom but still make semiconductors inserted into essential products like cars or washing machines. These producers 'probably aren't large enough to get on the map for an exemption and quite probably wouldn't have the kind of excess capital and margins to be able to add investment at a large scale into the United States,' Chorzempa said. The announcement came more than three months after Trump temporarily exempted most electronics from his administration's most onerous tariffs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of autos and contributed to higher inflation. Chorzempa said chip tariffs could again raise prices by hundreds of dollars per vehicle if the semiconductors inside a car are not exempt. 'There's a chip that allows you to open and close the window,' Chorzempa said. 'There's a chip that is running the entertainment system. There is a chip that's kind of running all the electronics. There are chips, especially in EVs, that are doing power management, all that kind of stuff.' Much of the investment into building U.S. chip factories began with the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022, providing more than $50 billion to support new computer chip plants, fund research and train workers for the industry. Trump has vocally opposed those financial incentives and taken a different approach, betting that the threat of dramatically higher chip costs would force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up prices for electronics.

SNAP beneficiaries in Florida will no longer be allowed to buy these popular foods
SNAP beneficiaries in Florida will no longer be allowed to buy these popular foods

Miami Herald

time16 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

SNAP beneficiaries in Florida will no longer be allowed to buy these popular foods

SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) beneficiaries in Florida will no longer be able to purchase a range of foods considered to have low nutritional value starting January 2026. Sugary drinks like sodas and energy drinks are included in the list of prohibited foods for SNAP beneficiaries in Florida. Candy and prepared desserts will also not be purchasable with the EBT card, which is automatically reloaded each month with SNAP assistance. The federal program, administered by the states and benefiting nearly 42 million low-income Americans, already prohibited the purchase of prepared meals, personal care products, alcoholic beverages, cigars and tobacco with SNAP benefits. In response to criticism that the program allows the purchase of 'junk food,' the Department of Agriculture granted 12 states permission to approve waivers and expand the list of foods that cannot be bought with SNAP. The first to make the waivers were Nebraska, Iowa, Indiana, Arkansas, Idaho and Utah. Florida, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Colorado and West Virginia joined on July 4, as announced by Agriculture Secretary Brooke L. Rollins, alongside Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services. The USDA is providing states with greater flexibility to manage their programs through the approval of SNAP Food Restriction Waivers, which restrict the purchase of non-nutritious products like sodas and sweets, according to the Department of Agriculture's website. These waivers are a crucial step to ensure taxpayer dollars provide nutritious options that improve health outcomes within SNAP. In Florida, the SNAP program assists 3 million low-income individuals. The average monthly benefit for each user is $184. In Miami-Dade County, nearly a quarter of households rely on SNAP to pay for their groceries –- the fifth highest rate of any county in Florida, according to Census Bureau data. The One Big Beautiful Bill includes cuts to SNAP benefits totaling $287 billion over the next 10 years. It also expands work requirements for older beneficiaries and some parents.

Fact Check: Did Trump Say Kids to Only Attend School 6 Months Out of Year?
Fact Check: Did Trump Say Kids to Only Attend School 6 Months Out of Year?

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Fact Check: Did Trump Say Kids to Only Attend School 6 Months Out of Year?

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Rumors are circulating social media that President Donald Trump has said children should only attend school six months of the year. The Trump administration has embarked upon major changes to American education. In March, 2025, Trump signed an executive order to begin "eliminating" the Department of Education (DOE), marking a major change in the federal oversight of schools. A litany of concerns about the state of American education was compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic and the disruption that followed. A 2024 report from the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE), a research group at Arizona State University, found that the average American student is "less than halfway to full academic recovery" from the impact of the pandemic. In January, a report from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) found that the reading and math skills of fourth and eighth grade students have declined in multiple states to below the national average. However, in June of this year, Gen Z students reported their most positive evaluations of schools in years. The standard U.S. academic or school year can vary slightly depending on the state, but the majority of states require 180 days per school year. The state with the lowest mandated school days is Colorado, which requires 160, while Kansas requires 186, according to the Pew Research Center. The Claim On TikTok, claims that Trump is trying to change the school year, making it only six months, have swept across the app. The claims differ slightly in different videos. Some social media users claim that Trump has announced this change, while others claim that he is actively trying to pass a law. One video, shared to TikTok by the account @uiort05 features a talking head of a man over images of Trump. That video has the text overlay "Donald Trump just announced kids only attend school 6 months Out of the year," and goes on to count six months of the school year as being from August to January. That video has been viewed over 200,000 times as of reporting. The audio of that TikTok has been widely shared across the platform. Another video, from the account @solyapp, claims "Donald Trump is tryna pass a law where kids only have to go to school for six months." That video has been viewed over 400,000 times as of reporting. Both of those videos were made by adults, not school aged children. The Facts The claim is false. There has been no wider reporting about the post, which would be the case if it were real. There is no record of Trump saying anything about changing the school year. The minimum amount of time that school must be in session is set by individual states, not the president. As it stands, children attend school for roughly 180 days each year. Per day, that amounts to six months. In practice, factoring in weekends and breaks for holidays, the total number of days is spread across approximately nine months, with the school year generally beginning either in late August or early September and ending in late May or early June. The TikTok from @uiort05 states in the description, "disclaimer for entertainment purposes only," indicating that it is false. The Ruling False. Trump has not said anything about changing the school year to six months. There is no evidence of the claims. The initial claim came from a source that is not reputable. FACT CHECK BY Newsweek's Fact Check team

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store