Shashi Tharoor welcomes US decision to designate TRF as 'global terrorist group'; calls it diplomatic win for India
This follows US President Donald Trump's strong call for justice in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed the lives of 26 people.
Taking to social media platform X, Shashi Tharoor wrote, 'I welcome the US @StateDept's designation of TheResistanceFront, the Lashkar proxy that claimed credit for #Pahalgam, as a terrorist organisation, adding pressure on Pakistan to curb its activities & bring it to heel.'
In another post, Tharoor shared his insights from recent meetings in Washington.
'In my private conversations in Washington, when I asked people bluntly why the US was still allowing Pakistan to get away with providing a safe haven to terrorist organisations, I was pointed to Pakistan's alleged cooperation with the US on counter-terror operations, notably the recent surrender of the individual allegedly responsible for the Abbey Gate bombing that had killed 23 US Marines at Kabul Airport,' the Congress MP stated.
Highlighting the need for consistent global action, Tharoor added, 'Our scepticism about the quality and sincerity of Pakistani actions against terrorism reflects our own experience with those terror agencies that are directed against us, rather than those that the US deems hostile, such as ISIS–Khorasan. This is a step towards bridging the gap in perceptions between the US and us on this. It will help in our efforts to list TRF at the @UN as well.'
The TRF had claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack, the deadliest terrorist strike on Indian civilians since the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Following the incident, US President Trump had personally called Prime Minister Narendra Modi to offer condolences and express unwavering US support in bringing the perpetrators to justice.
On Thursday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio formally announced the inclusion of TRF in the list of designated Foreign Terrorist Organisations (FTOs) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs).
'This action demonstrates the Trump Administration's commitment to protecting our national security interests, countering terrorism, and enforcing President Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack,' Rubio had said.
External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar had raised the issue during recent meetings with Rubio and at the Quad foreign ministers' meeting in Washington, underscoring India's call for coordinated global action against terror proxies like TRF.
Meanwhile, an all-party parliamentary delegation led by Shashi Tharoor visited Washington last month to brief US lawmakers and officials about the role of TRF and Pakistan's continued support for terror infrastructure. The designation is being hailed as a milestone in India-US counter-terror cooperation and a major step forward in holding state sponsors of terrorism accountable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Can Trump really prosecute Obama over the 2016 Russia probe?
US President Trump has endorsed calls by intel chief Tulsi Gabbard to prosecute Barack Obama and top officials over allegations they orchestrated a 'treasonous conspiracy' during the 2016 election. With newly declassified documents and escalating rhetoric, Gabbard claims a 'years-long coup' was orchestrated from the top read more Former US President Barack Obama and US President-elect Donald Trump speak ahead of the state funeral services for former President Jimmy Carter at the National Cathedral on January 9, 2025 in Washington, DC, US. File Image/Pool via Reuters Is there a possibility of legal action against former United States President Barack Obama and senior officials from his administration by President Donald Trump? At the centre of this growing controversy is Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic representative who now leads the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). Gabbard has made extraordinary allegations involving the 2016 US election, characterising the actions of Obama-era intelligence officials as part of a coordinated attempt to undermine the legitimacy of Trump's first election win. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Gabbard's statements have gained traction within pro-Trump circles and prompted direct endorsement from the president himself. Gabbard accuses Obama of orchestrating a 'years-long coup' Gabbard has publicly accused Barack Obama and several of his top national security advisers of participating in what she described as a deliberate and illegal effort to discredit Trump after his electoral win in November 2016. According to her, the effort relied on 'manufactured intelligence' and misrepresented analysis, and was aimed at supporting the idea that Russian interference had handed Trump the presidency. Donald Trump, left, looks on as Tulsi Gabbard speaks at the National Guard Association of the United States' 146th General Conference, August 26, 2024, in Detroit, US. File Image/AP In Gabbard's words: 'The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government. Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.' 'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again. The American people's faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it.' She claimed that the Obama administration's post-election assessment of Russian interference contradicted the intelligence community's consensus in the months before the election, which had allegedly concluded that Russia was unlikely to interfere or influence the outcome. Her office has made available a cache of documents including a partially redacted Obama-era intelligence assessment on cyber threats, and internal memos from senior officials such as then-DNI James Clapper. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Among those named by Gabbard were Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former US Secretary of State John Kerry, former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and Obama himself. Gabbard's team also published commentary alongside these documents, alleging that leaks following a December 9, 2016, meeting of Obama's senior national security team were part of a broader disinformation campaign. The material refers to a memo titled The Russia Hoax, which claimed: 'Deep State officials in the IC [intelligence community] begin leaking blatantly false intelligence to the Washington Post … claiming that Russia used 'cyber means' to influence 'the outcome of the election.'' 'Later that evening, another leak to the Washington Post falsely alleges that the CIA 'concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened' in the election to help President Trump.' The same document states that on January 6, 2017, the Obama administration publicly released a declassified intelligence assessment that referenced 'further information' suggesting Russian President Vladimir Putin directed efforts to aid Trump's campaign. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to Gabbard, the additional information cited in the assessment turned out to include the Steele dossier, a compilation of unverified claims, some of which were later discredited. How Trump responded Trump has not only endorsed Gabbard's accusations but has taken visible steps to promote the message. Writing on his Truth Social platform, Trump praised a Fox News appearance by Harrison Fields, a Special Assistant in his administration, stating: 'Great job by young and talented Harrison Fields on Fox News. The Panel was fantastic on prosecuting Obama and the 'thugs' who have just been unequivocally exposed on highest level Election Fraud.' 'Congratulations to Tulsi Gabbard. Keep it coming!!!' In a separate post on X, Gabbard wrote: 'For months preceding the 2016 election, the Intelligence Community shared a consensus view: Russia lacked the intent and capability to hack US elections. But weeks after President Trump's historic 2016 victory defeating Hillary Clinton, everything changed.' 🧵 Americans will finally learn the truth about how in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama Administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President @realDonaldTrump, subverting the… — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) July 18, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump also posted a 45-second AI-generated video depicting Obama being arrested in the Oval Office. The video, which originally circulated on TikTok, was uploaded without commentary to Trump's Truth Social account. It began with real footage of Obama stating, 'especially the President is above the law,' followed by various prominent Democrats, including Joe Biden, repeating the phrase 'no one is above the law.' Donald J. Trump Truth Social 07.20.25 06:47 PM EST — Fan Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) July 20, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The scene then shifts to a fabricated depiction of Trump and Obama in the White House, where FBI agents enter and arrest Obama, who later appears in a jail cell wearing an orange jumpsuit. The soundtrack: 'YMCA' by the Village People, a staple at Trump rallies. Where the facts stand Despite the volume of material released by Gabbard and the forcefulness of her claims, multiple previous investigations — both bipartisan and nonpartisan — have offered a more nuanced interpretation of Russia's actions in 2016 and the Obama administration's response. Democratic lawmakers have called Gabbard's report inaccurate and misleading. Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, labelled the allegations 'baseless.' Several reviews, including those by the US intelligence community and the Senate Intelligence Committee, have concluded that while Russian actors attempted to access voter registration data in states like Illinois and Arizona, there was no evidence that vote tallies were altered. Intelligence reports also consistently stated that Russia's primary effort was focused on influence operations — shaping American public opinion through disinformation, fake social media accounts, and leaked Democratic emails, rather than changing the actual results. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A Republican-led Senate report also endorsed the assessment that Moscow's efforts were aimed at damaging Hillary Clinton and benefiting Donald Trump. Among the Republicans on that committee was Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who now serves as US Secretary of State in the Trump administration. A recent CIA review acknowledged concerns about how quickly the Obama-era assessment had been compiled, reported The New York Times. In its wake, the agency referred John Brennan to the FBI for investigation regarding how he managed the preparation of the intelligence conclusions. However, no charges have been brought. One email cited in Gabbard's documentation indicated that Obama requested a comprehensive assessment of Russian interference methods before leaving office, fearing that an incoming Trump administration might suppress or ignore the intelligence findings. US Senator Mark Warner of Virginia responded to the Gabbard report by stating: 'This is one more example of the director of national intelligence trying to cook the books. We're talking about apples and oranges. The Russians were not successful at manipulating our election infrastructure, nor did we say they were.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Warner also pointed out that recent intelligence assessments under Gabbard's leadership still acknowledge that Russia continues to engage in influence operations targeting the United States. A March intelligence report concluded that: 'Moscow probably believes information operations efforts to influence U.S. elections are advantageous,' and that these activities are part of a long-term strategy to undermine confidence in American democracy. The big question: Can Trump legally prosecute Obama? The question of whether Trump can direct federal prosecutors to pursue criminal cases against Obama or his former officials rests not on legal prohibition, but on political precedent. Since US President Richard Nixon resigned amid the Watergate scandal in 1974, successive administrations have generally refrained from overtly influencing prosecutorial decisions at the Department of Justice (DOJ). However, these boundaries are guided more by custom than law. Within the US system, both the Attorney General and FBI Director are appointed by the President and serve within the executive branch. Trump, in his first term, dismissed FBI Director James Comey in 2017 and again replaced Christopher Wray in his second term, putting Kash Patel at the head of the FBI. Legal experts note that if Trump installs loyalists in key roles — including US attorneys and assistant attorneys general — he could wield substantial influence over federal investigations and prosecutions. Critics warn that this may enable Trump to direct legal action against political rivals, including by reopening unsubstantiated allegations or launching new inquiries into figures like Obama, Biden, or former officials involved in the Russia investigation. While the law does not explicitly bar a sitting president from seeking investigations into a predecessor, doing so would test long-standing institutional norms designed to keep politics separate from law enforcement. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's Controversial Pick for Malaysia Envoy to Get Anwar's ‘Due Consideration'
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said his government will give 'due consideration' to President Donald Trump's pick as ambassador, seeking to balance relations with Washington and domestic ire over some of the potential envoy's political commentary. Anwar has faced pressure to reject the nominee, Nick Adams, an Australian-American commentator and a self-described 'alpha male' Trump supporter. Critics within the Muslim-majority country have labeled him Islamophobic, citing his social media posts supporting Israel, and pointed to his enthusiasm for racy restaurant chain Hooters as out of sync with its cultural norms. 'The government will give it due consideration while maintaining good relations between Malaysia and the United States,' Anwar told reporters Friday, state-run Bernama reported. He added it was too early to comment further. Rejecting Adams risks complicating Malaysia's efforts to negotiate with the Trump administration to lower its threatened 25% levy, scheduled to start Aug. 1. The Southeast Asian nation is also seeking to ease Washington's concerns over suspicions it's been used to divert sensitive technology to China, circumventing US regulations. Adams has sought to assuage concerns, addressing Malaysians in an X post last week, saying 'I can't wait to experience your noble culture and learn much from you.' His appointment still needs to be confirmed by the US Senate, where Trump's Republican party holds a slim majority. He could face a rocky hearing there, where the president's pick to serve as ambassador to neighboring Singapore struggled to answer questions about the city-state and its ties to Washington. Malaysian government spokesperson Fahmi Fadzil has said that the country has the right to reject the ambassador, but that it hasn't received an official notice regarding the nomination, according to Bernama. 'Malaysia deserves better,' Kasthuri Patto, a Malaysian lawmaker in the ruling Democratic Action Party, allied with Anwar, said in a statement Wednesday, accusing Adams of 'sexism, misogyny and religious bigotry.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Twice axed from the CPM Politburo, V S Achuthanandan marched to the beat of his own drum
With a deeply ingrained habit of taking principled stands and sticking to his guns, V S Achuthanandan remained a rebel throughout his political life, twice getting removed from the CPI(M) Politburo for going against the party line. Achuthanandan died here on Monday at the age of 101. For VS, as the former Kerala Chief Minister was popularly known, the first major defiance of party line came as early as 1962 during the India-China war that divided the Indian Communists. VS was among the Communists jailed in the Thiruvananthapuram Central Prison. His plan to donate blood as well as money earned from the sale of rations from jail to Indian soldiers did not have the party's consent and was construed as helping the government. The party found Achuthanandan's approach anti-Communist, and he was demoted from the central committee to the district secretariat, where he spent a year. In 1988, when the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government led by E K Nayanar explored establishing a nuclear power plant in Kasaragod, the pro-Left Kerala Sasthra Sahithya Parishad stood against the move. VS, despite being the party's state secretary, stood with the Parishad, inviting party censure. Two years later, when CPI(M activists abducted two party councillors of the Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation, the then party general secretary, E M S Namboodiripad, asked Achuthanandan to settle the issue. But for five days, Achuthanandan, then the state secretary, did not move. After consulting Nayanar, the CM, a judicial probe was ordered. Following this, the CPI(M)'s central leadership summoned the entire state secretariat to Delhi, where Achuthanandan was censured. In the last two decades of his active political life, VS faced the party's ire mainly due to intra-party feuds in which he found himself at the opposite end of the leadership. After the CPI(M) state conference in 1998, he was censured for orchestrating the removal of rivals, mainly CITU leaders, from the state committee. For several years, one of his bitter rivals in the party was Pinarayi Vijayan, the current CM. The intense factionalism got so bad in 2007 that the CPI(M) removed VS, the CM at the time, from the Politburo in what is one of the rarest punishments in the party. The leadership also suspended Vijayan. Six months later, both were reinstated, but rebelliousness continued to be irresistible for VS, then in his eighties. In 2009, when the SNC Lavalin corruption scandal hit the CPI(M), VS questioned the party's stand that the case against then state secretary Vijayan was fabricated and politically motivated, and wanted his younger colleague to step down. This again put him on a collision course with the party leadership, and VS was again removed from the Politburo. A member of the party's supreme body since 1980, the veteran leader never managed to get back to it after that. This, however, did not stop Achuthanandan's run-ins with the CPI(M) leadership. In 2012, the party publicly censured him for criticising it following the murder of rebel T P Chandrasekharan by a CPI(M)-backed gang. VS, the Opposition leader at the time, had alleged that the party was involved in the conspiracy behind the murder in May 2012. In October that year, the Central Committee publicly censured VS for attempting to visit Koodankulam to express solidarity with the anti-nuclear plant agitators. The next censure came in 2013 on the eve of his 90th birthday, again for raking up the SNC Lavalin case. In a TV interview, the former CM criticised the party's stand on the issue and for favouring Vijayan. The last time the party cracked the whip on Achuthanandan was in 2017, two years before he retired from active life following a stroke. At the time, the Central Committee pulled him up for repeated violations of party discipline and organisational principles. On several occasions, Achuthanandan's rebellious nature eclipsed the party at crucial moments. When a bypoll to the Neyyattinkara Assembly seat was held on June 1, 2012, VS left the party red-faced by visiting Chandrasekharan's wife. In February 2015, when the party's state conference was in progress in Alappuzha, Achuthanadan walked out in protest against an attack from rival delegates and the party secretariat passing a resolution against him for an anti-party stand.
