logo
Man snubs grovelling ex-boss who fired his stepfather over 'trivial' dispute - then begged him for work years later

Man snubs grovelling ex-boss who fired his stepfather over 'trivial' dispute - then begged him for work years later

Daily Mail​23-06-2025
A man has revealed how he got the ultimate payback on his stepfather's old boss by turning him down for a lucrative contract years after the boss had fired his stepfather over a petty disagreement.
Posting to Reddit 's Petty Revenge forum, the man detailed how the tables had turned spectacularly when he found himself in a position of power - and the former boss came crawling back.
'Back in 1997, my step-dad was the operations manager at a company that did telecommunications work,' the man wrote.
'He hired me to work at the company for the summer, but I ended up enjoying the work and made a career out of it.'
Just four months into the job, however, things took an unexpected turn when his stepfather was abruptly fired by the company's owner following a minor disagreement.
Despite this injustice, the original poster stayed on for another 18 months, citing his own frustrations with the company, including being underpaid and denied promised benefits, before moving on to a more promising role with a major telecommunications provider.
Eventually, he climbed the ranks and landed a position where he was in charge of hiring contractors - companies just like the one that had once employed him and his stepfather.
'One day I got a call out of the blue from the owner of the contractor company,' he wrote. The same man who had once sacked his stepfather now wanted to do business with him.
'He wanted to see if he could get on my list of approved contractors and was hoping we could discuss it over lunch,' the man explained, noting that such contracts typically ranged between $75,000 to $200,000 each, and that he handled 20 to 30 projects a year.
It was, in short, a potentially huge payday for the desperate boss.
'I agreed to a lunch date with the owner at a fancy restaurant I always wanted to try,' he continued.
Over lunch, the boss made his pitch, talking up his company's capabilities, its employee-focused values and its record of high-quality work.
'I mentioned that I used to work for his company and he clearly didn't remember my name. I also asked if he remembered the guy who hired me, and he said he did.
'When I mentioned he was my step-dad, the look of panic in his eyes set in. He clearly remembered him.
'I closed out the lunch meeting with a thank you for the food and an apology that my contractor list was full of more capable contractors, but would keep him in mind if something were to change. I never heard back from him again.'
The tale has since gone viral, racking up over 36,000 'upvotes' and sparking a flurry of comments applauding the satisfying twist of fate.
One commenter summed up the mood, writing: 'Be nice to the people you see on your way up. You will see them again on your way down.' Another added: 'Karma is the great leveler in life.'
The boss's reaction clearly struck a chord with many: 'The look of panic - you'll never forget that moment,' one user wrote, while another quipped: 'When karma drops off a nice meal on its way to do its thing, that's a double win.'
Some users were curious to know how the man's stepfather reacted to the poetic justice, only to learn that he had sadly passed away before the fateful lunch meeting.
But the man had shared the story with his mother, who 'got great joy out of it.'
'I just love the fact you're tight enough with your stepdad that you're more than willing to strike out for him,' one person commented.
The original poster replied: 'I lived with him since I was three years old, so for all intents and purposes, he was my dad.
'He is 100 per cent the person I try to emulate in my morals, ethics and how I carry myself. Sadly he passed away several years ago.'
Others reflected on the broader lesson behind the story, praising the man's sense of integrity. 'Karma is very real. Treat people fairly and (usually) it won't come back to bite you,' one person wrote.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

$80 bill for six beers lays bare rip-off Vegas prices as Sin City battles to restore tanking tourism sector
$80 bill for six beers lays bare rip-off Vegas prices as Sin City battles to restore tanking tourism sector

Daily Mail​

time33 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

$80 bill for six beers lays bare rip-off Vegas prices as Sin City battles to restore tanking tourism sector

A six-pack of beers for nearly $80 has shed a shameful light on the tanking tourism industry in Las Vegas. A horrified visitor posted the staggering $76.99 bill for a bucket of six Coors Light while partying at the Flamingo pool in the middle of the city's famed Strip For 24 cold ones the bill was an extortionate $290.00 - a markup of nearly 15 times its usual $20. 'I can't keep going here,' the partier who filmed his menu said as he listed off the pricey options. Cases of Topo Chico or Truly hard seltzers, which typically cost around $30 to $35, were also sold for almost $300. For drinkers who want a mixed cocktail, a large Bloody Mary would set them back $40 per drink. And six shots, a total of just nine fluid ounces, costs $99.99 in the party hub on the Vegas strip. Food options at the pool weren't any more reasonable, with a chicken tender platter or a cheeseburger slider plate running up to $89.99. 'Get ready to spend if you want to go to the Go Pool,' the shocked partier added. It comes after a new report to Las Vegas's Convention and Visitors Authority warned the number of airline passengers arriving at the city will continue to plummet in the coming months. The tourism body was told in the report by Ailevon Pacific Aviation Consulting that capacity rates at the gambling hotspot's Harry Reid International Airport are forecast to drop dramatically in the second half of 2025. They warned the number of inbound passengers will plunge to around 95,000 seats per day for the rest of the year - a worrying prediction that represents a 2.3 per cent fall from 2024 numbers. The decline is largely fueled by an 18.5 per cent drop in traffic from Canada, which typically provides the largest share of international visitors to the Nevada city, according to the Las Vegas Review Journal. The loss of Canadian tourists has canceled out gains from other continents, including a 31.7 per cent increase in airline capacity from Asia and a 21.6 per cent increase jump from Europe excluding the United Kingdom. The report cemented a steep decline in tourism to Las Vegas, with previous statistics from April showing it was losing upwards of 300,000 visitors per month since the start of 2025. The number of Canadian passengers flying to Las Vegas fell to an average of 2,412 per day this year, according to the report. This has been blamed by some on the election in January of Donald Trump and his threats to make Canada the 51st state. Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority president and chief executive Steve Hill told the Journal he was hearing from many angry Canadians about the president. 'There's an awful lot of the anecdotal conversation around Canadians being angry and upset about tariffs and talk around annexing the country,' he said. 'We've seen consumer confidence numbers drop pretty significantly over the past couple of months.' In May, the World Travel & Tourism Council reported that the U.S. was set to lose $12.5 billion in international visitor spending this year. 'While other nations are rolling out the welcome mat, the U.S. government is putting up the "closed" sign,' Julia Simpson, the council's president and chief executive, said in a news release at the time. Another reason for the recent drop in Las Vegas is due to a maintenance issue with Spirit Airlines, the second busiest carrier at Reid International Airport. The maintenance issues have grounded 50 planes in Spirit's fleet, which has significantly reduced its capacity, according to Ailevon Pacific Aviation Consulting senior director Joel Van Over. 'They have an issue with their (jet) engines,' Van Over said. 'They have to pull that engine off the plane, fix the cracks, put it back on the plane, and that whole process takes about 300 days. 'So obviously they can't just do a plane a year because it would take them 100 years to get that done.'

Starbucks sets ambitious goal to up their earnings and improve customer experiences
Starbucks sets ambitious goal to up their earnings and improve customer experiences

Daily Mail​

time33 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Starbucks sets ambitious goal to up their earnings and improve customer experiences

Starbucks is making a bold promise to tackle customers' biggest gripe - no order will take longer than four minutes to make. America's biggest coffee chain has lost millions of customers in the past year, many fed up with high prices or shoddy stores. But, by Starbucks' own admission, most had grown weary of waiting 20 minutes for a drink. CEO Brian Niccol, poached from Chipotle in the fall, is rolling out a new 'Green Apron Service' to tackle this and other customers moans. Baristas now have a target that no custom drink should take more than four minutes. The key to cutting wait times is Starbucks' biggest hiring spree in history - which will add as many as 85,000 workers across its 17,000 U.S. locations. When Niccol's announced the recruitment blitz at a huge Starbucks convention in Las Vegas in June, the 14,000 stores managers in attendance roared their approval. Five years ago, Starbucks stores averaged 23 employees. Cost-cutting has since trimmed that number down to 18 to 19 - four to five fewer workers per location. Niccol said: 'It's centered on putting enough partners on the roster in the stores and then deployed correctly so they can provide that customer connection, that experience, that frankly Starbucks really was founded on.' Restoring pre-Covid staffing levels would mean hiring between 68,000 and 85,000 people across all U.S. stores. Even focusing solely on the 11,000 company-owned locations, the increase would still be a massive 44,000 to 55,000 hires. The new hires are expected to support Starbucks' efforts to bring back a more personal touch - including a new policy asking baristas to handwrite notes on customers' cups. The former Chipotle boss has embarked on a series of plans to return Starbucks to its original 'third place between home and work' concept. Coffee drinkers have turned away from the chain in recent years, put off by high beverage prices, long wait times, and impersonal experiences. Niccol has set about axing complicated drinks from Starbucks menus and instead asking staff to put messages on customer's coffee cups and scaling back promotions. The plan will help address the major customer pet peeve of long wait times. It will also likely be popular with front of house employees who have complained of chronic issues with understaffing, which compounds the backlogs. Restoring pre-Covid staffing levels would mean hiring between 68,000 and 85,000 people across all US stores. Even focusing solely on the 11,000 company-owned locations, the increase would still be a massive 44,000 to 55,000 hires. The new hires are also expected to support Starbucks' efforts to bring back a more personal touch — including a new policy asking baristas to handwrite notes on customers' cups. The former Chipotle boss has embarked on a series of plans to return Starbucks to its original 'third place between home and work' concept. Coffee drinkers have turned away from the chain in recent years, put off by high beverage prices, long wait times and impersonal experiences. Niccol has set about axing complicated drinks from Starbucks menus, asking staff to put messages on customer's coffee cups and scaling back promotions. The plan will help address the major customer pet peeve of long wait times before getting their hands on a coffee. It will also likely be popular with front of house employees who have complained of chronic issues with understaffing, which compounds the backlogs. Another change is Starbucks' decision to axe mobile and pickup-only stores. All 80-90 locations will either shutter or be converted to traditional coffeehouses by next year. Other changes include removing new uniform rules which have previously resulted in baristas threatening to quit. However, the changes were not enough to improve Starbucks' sales, which declined for its sixth straight quarter. Both its global and North American sales dipped by two per cent - higher than price drops anticipated by Wall Street.

Trump hiked tariffs on US imports. Now he's looking at exports – sparking fears of ‘dangerous precedent'
Trump hiked tariffs on US imports. Now he's looking at exports – sparking fears of ‘dangerous precedent'

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Trump hiked tariffs on US imports. Now he's looking at exports – sparking fears of ‘dangerous precedent'

Apple CEO Tim Cook visited the White House bearing an unusual gift. 'This box was made in California,' Cook reassured his audience in the Oval Office this month, as he took off the lid. Inside was a glass plaque, engraved for its recipient, and a slab for the plaque to sit on. 'The base was made in Utah, and is 24-karat gold,' said Cook. Donald Trump appeared genuinely touched by the gift. But the plaque wasn't Cook's only offering: Apple announced that day it would invest another $100bn in US manufacturing. The timing appeared to work well for Apple. That day, Trump said Apple would be among the companies that would be exempt from a new US tariff on imported computer chips. The Art of the Deal looms large in the White House, where Trump is brokering agreements with powerful tech companies – in the midst of his trade war – that are reminiscent of the real estate transactions that launched him into fame. But in recent days, this dealmaking has entered uncharted waters. Two days after Cook and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang had a closed-door meeting with Trump at the White House. The president later announced Nvidia, along with its rival Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), will be allowed to sell certain artificial intelligence chips to Chinese companies – so long as they share 15% of their revenue with the US government. It was a dramatic about-face from Trump, who initially blocked the chips' exports in April. And it swiftly prompted suggestions that Nvidia was buying its way out of simmering tensions between Washington and Beijing. Trade experts say such a deal, where a company essentially pays the US government to export a good, could destabilize trading relations. Martin Chorzempa, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said that it creates 'the perception that export controls are up for sale'. 'If you create the perception that licenses, which are supposed to be determined on pure national security grounds, are up for sale, you potentially open up room for there to be this wave of lobbying for all sorts of really, dangerous, sensitive technologies,' Chorzempa said. 'I think that's a very dangerous precedent to set.' Though the White House announced the deal, it technically hasn't been rolled out yet, likely because of legal complications. The White House is calling the deal a 'revenue-sharing' agreement, but critics point out that it could also be considered a tax on exports, which may not be legal under US laws or the constitution. The 'legality' of the deal was 'still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce', White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters this week. Nvidia and AMD's AI chips are at the heart of the technological arms race between the US and China. Nvidia, which became the first publicly traded company to reach a $4tn valuation last month, creates the essential processing chips that are used to run and develop AI. The US government has played a role in this arms race over the last several years, setting regulations on what AI chips and manufacturing equipment can be sent to China. If China has less computing power, the country will be slower to develop AI, giving a clear advantage to the US. But despite the restrictions, China has been catching up, raising questions on how US policy should move forward. 'They haven't held them back as far as the advocates had hoped. The US has an enormous computing advantage over China, but their best models are only a few months behind our best models,' Chorzempa said. For US policymakers, 'the question they've had to grapple with is: Where do you draw the line?' The AI chips Nvidia and AMD can now sell to China aren't considered high-end. While they can be used for inference on trained models, they aren't powerful enough to train new AI models. When announcing the deal with Nvidia and AMD, Trump said the chip is 'an old chip that China already possesses … under a different label'. This is where a major debate on AI policy comes in. Those who take a hardline stance on the US's relationship with China say that allowing Chinese companies to purchase even an 'old chip' could still help the country get an advantage over the US. Others would say a restriction on such chips wouldn't be meaningful, and could even be counterproductive. To balance these two sides, the Trump administration is asking companies to pay up in order to export to China – a solution that people on both sides of the AI debate say is a precarious one. 'Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance AI capabilities,' said John Moolenaar, a Republican US representative from Michigan, in a statement. But Trump's gut-reaction to dealmaking seems focused on the wallet. On Wednesday, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent praised the arrangement and suggested it could be extended to other industries over time. 'I think that right now this is unique, but now that we have the model and the beta test, why not expand it?' he told Bloomberg. Julia Powles, executive director of the Institute for Technology, Law and Policy at the University of California, Los Angeles, said the deal opens up questions of whether similar pressure can be applied to other tech companies. 'What other quid pro quo might be asked in the future? The quid pro quo that would be of great concern to the [tech] sector is anything that reduces their reputation for privacy and security,' Powles said. 'That's thinking of government like a transactional operator, not like an institution with rules about when, how and for what it can extract taxes, levies and subsidies.' But that seems to be how the White House runs now. When explaining to the press how he made the deal, Trump said he told Huang: 'I want 20% if I'm going to approve this for you'. 'For the country, for our country. I don't want it myself,' the president added. 'And he said, 'Would you make it 15?' So we negotiated a little deal.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store