Childhood cancers which take longest to diagnose revealed in new study
Researchers, led by University of Nottingham, analysed data on 2,000 children diagnosed with cancer between September 2020 and March 2023.
Untreated, tumours grow bigger and can spread around the body, requiring more extensive surgery and more intensive therapies to offer a cure.
On average, children with cancer were diagnosed within 4.6 weeks.
While some children were diagnosed on the same day their symptoms began, others waited up to six years, experts found.
The time to diagnosis was found to be longest among 15 to 18-year-olds, who waited for an average of 8.7 weeks before they were told they had cancer.
And those with bone cancer were found to wait for more than three months on average, or 12.6 weeks.
Meanwhile children under the age of one waited just 3.7 weeks before diagnosis and children with kidney cancer, also known as renal cancer, waited for an average of 2.3 weeks before they were diagnosed.
But they said that overall, half of children and young people diagnosed with cancer in the UK are waiting for four weeks or more to be diagnosed.
They also studied where children were diagnosed and found the majority (67%) were diagnosed after a trip to A&E, after an emergency referral or emergency admission to hospital.
Some cancer types, including bone tumours, soft tissue tumours Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis and brain tumours, were associated with a higher number of medical visits before diagnosis.
Writing in the Lancet Regional Health – Europe, researchers said their work highlights 'disparities for age and diagnostics groups' when it comes to cancer diagnoses as they called for more efforts to 'accelerating diagnosis' for those facing 'lengthy' waits.
They said the findings could help inform health officials as they draw up a national cancer plan for England.
Dr Shaarna Shanmugavadivel, from the School of Medicine at the University of Nottingham, said: 'For the first time, we understand the current landscape of childhood cancer diagnosis in the UK.
'There is an urgent need to focus efforts on young people and tumour types such as bone tumours that are still experiencing lengthy intervals.
'Earliest possible diagnosis is key as time is crucial.
'Untreated, tumours grow bigger and can spread around the body, requiring more extensive surgery and more intensive therapies to offer cure.
'The findings will help focus efforts towards closing the gap for these groups, ensuring more children and young people receive a diagnosis sooner.'
Ashley Ball-Gamble, chief executive of CCLG: The Children and Young People's Cancer Association, and co-author of the study, added: 'It's crucial that we understand why certain groups, such as older teenagers, or those with certain cancers, such as bone and brain tumours, are likely to face a lengthier diagnosis.
'By recognising these differences, we hope to work towards faster diagnoses and improved survival rates.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
44 minutes ago
- The Sun
I stopped screen time for my three-year-old daughter & there's been three HUGE changes in her behaviour – I'm stunned
SWITCHING the TV on or giving your phone to your kid just to have 15 minutes of peace is the daily reality for many families. Whether it's social media, online games or kids' shows - it all adds up and can be very addictive. 2 2 A recent survey found the average child is spending a whopping 45 hours a week stuck indoors – with more than a third of that time staring at screens. A quarter of 2,000 parents said their kids show zero interest in outdoor activities, while indoor habits are dominated by passive pastimes like watching TV (59 per cent), gaming (54 per cent), and scrolling on phones (41 per cent). Excessive screen time, scientists warned, increases the risk of a heart attack, as well as high blood pressure, high cholesterol and insulin resistance among youngsters. But is it possible to get your little ones to spend less time in front of screens - and does it affect their behaviour? According to one mum-of-two, Kirstie Lewis, the answer is yes. Kirstie recently told TikTok users she's stopped letting her three-year-old daughter from watching TV - and there have been huge changes. ''Now, I'm really have to use my brain in terms of creating ideas on how to keep her occupied and busy,'' the mum said in the video. ''But the things I've noticed are quite severe, in a positive way.'' One of the things, for instance, is that the tot is now ''nicer'' and ''kinder'' - to the point, where Kirstie sees her daughter as 'best friend'. ''I want to be around her now - weird,'' said Kirstie who added that the relationship looked very different just two weeks ago. Lydia Bright slammed for 'parent-shaming' as she shares dangerous advice On top of this, the young girl now plays on her own way more than she used to before the screen time ban. ''She's initiating play, she'll go into her playroom, she'll be engaged for longer,'' the mum claimed, noting that in the past her daughter would ''dart from thing to thing''. ''Now, she will stick to a game for a long time. I can walk away and I can have my shower and stuff. ''I still go downstairs thinking 'No, has she pi**ed up the walls?' - no, she's still there drawing or playing. ''This is huge,'' said Kirstie who regularly shares parenting-related content on page, @ kirstielewismumma. According to the mother, the no screen time rule has also bonded the little girl with her sister more - and she'll be interacting with her sibling way more. ''It's so cute. And these are huge things. ''Don't get me wrong, we didn't have tonnes and tonnes of screen time in this house, she doesn't have a tablet, she doesn't have access to our phone.'' How long should kids be on screens? Dr Amanda, who's a parenting expert and child psychologist gave a general guide for parents who wish to limit screen time. Age 1-3 years old How long: 5 minutes per year of life in one sitting Dr Gummer says: "If you are really hoping your child will learn from the screen time they have then one rule of thumb is that on average children can concentrate for 5 minutes per year of their life (i.e. 15 minutes at age 3)." Age 1+ How long: 1 hour per day Dr Gummer says: "For younger children we feel that around 1 hour per day is a sensible limit to aim for on a regular weekday. "Once you add together time on mobile devices, TV, computers and other devices with screens this may not seem like much (and remember children may get screen time at school)." Age 2+ How long: 2 hour per day Dr Gummer says: "Various sources including the American Academy of Paediatrics recommend no more than 2 hours per day (for children aged 2 and over)." Children of all ages Over two hours a day is excessive usage Dr Gummer says: "A recent study saw some detrimental effects in teenagers that used more than 3 hours per day of screen time and consider this 'excessive usage' Up until recently, the three-year-old would have her breakfast with a show in background on the telly. The tantrums, she went on to add, have also practically vanished and are now ''non-existent''. ''I thought she's gonna go mad - but no, she hasn't. She's asked me once or twice.'' Kirstie said: ''I ain't saying no screen time ever again - I'm thinking maybe it needs to be like a treat and not an everyday thing. ''And when she does get it, it's limited. ''I ain't judging if you use screen time, I'm really, really not. I'm not one of these people who are going to judge you for having a tablet or doing screen time. ''But I'm saying if you're struggling with your toddlers behaviour, try and cut out some screen time and see what happens.'' Fellow parents share their experience Since being uploaded on the platform, the clip has racked up more than a whopping 75k views in just five days. Dozens of parents flooded to comments to share their experience - and it seemed that many of them agreed. One mum wrote: ''Needed this today! I did it so successfully for a week and then gave it back now it's going again her tantrums.'' Another chimed in: ''I'm on day 3 of no screen time with my 3 year old. Massive changes. A lot more calmer. Less tantrums and not speaking to me like a teenager.'' ''Honestly this makes me so relieved that I'm doing the right thing!'' a mum said.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Heavy flow? These cute sleep shorts will have your back (and your sheets) all night long
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more Hey sister, that time of month got you down? Us too, but keep reading. Women of all ages deal with monthly cycles and the side effects that come with them, but the dreaded ' time of the month' starts long before becoming an adult. For teen girls, there is nothing worse than period anxiety, and thanks to this cool brand we just found, there may finally be a solution that actually works and looks good doing it. Super Leakproof® Sleepover Boxer Sleepovers just got a whole lot cuter (and less stressful!) with these brand new boxers. Kt. by Knix just launched all new lounge boxers that make the perfect PJs, and they come in black and a pink striped version. Both pairs have built-in leak protection that feels seamless with every wear. $39 Shop Knix is an intimates brand that is changing the narrative around periods with its innovative Leakproof Underwear. And now their little sister brand Kt. by Knix, is doing the same. With school, friends, sports, (and boys!) in the mix, there is a lot on teens' minds — but bleeding through shouldn't be one of them. That's why Kt. by Knix came out with a genius solution — the Super Leakproof Sleepover Boxer. These trendy sleep shorts are perfect for the whole year and come in two styles, black and striped pink. Made from a butter-soft fabric blend that includes polyester, the stylish shorts don't just have your teens back with bleeding but with looking cool too. Whether you are staying home or headed to a sleepover, the Super Leakproof Sleepover Boxer seriously has you covered with a capacity to hold between 7-9 large tampons' worth of blood. Parents everywhere are turning to Kt. by Knix for accessible solutions to appropriately and confidently addressing periods. As girls' bodies change, the last thing they should feel is embarrassment, which is why the Super Leakproof Sleepover Boxers are such a game-changer. Super Leakproof® Sleepover Short Looking for a way to stay protected all night long? These cutie sleep shorts may be it! The stretchy bedtime shorts come in over five colors and even fun prints, too. They are made with breathable Nylon and are equipped with a leakproof pad that can hold the equivalent of 5.5 super tampons! $45 Shop First Period Kit Bye-bye bleeding — hello freedom! Go to school, practice, and beyond stress-free this year with undies that just GET it. Plus, with this kit, you get more than just underwear — you also get a pair of the famous leak-free sleepover shorts. $144 (was $192) Shop So how does it work exactly? All of Kt. by Knix products have an innovative leakproof strip made with a certain level of absorbency in mind to match each individual girl's flow. The fabric used is a super soft bamboo-made material that not only protects the wearer, but wraps them in all-day comfort too. If you are looking to really set your teen up for success, we suggest adding a few other selections to the cart as well. Our picks are the Super Leakproof Sleepover Shorts and the First Period Kit. Whether your teen is hitting the field for practice, headed to their first school dance, or hanging out with their besties — their period should not be a roadblock. Kt. by Knix is a great place for your teen to find support without compromising cuteness and comfort! The school year is right around the corner, so get ready for sleepover season NOW with the Kt. by Knix Super Leakproof Sleepover Boxer, and while you are at it, add some other goodies into the cart too — trust us, your teen will be thanking you.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Warning after woman left with agonising blisters from picking blackberries which could have KILLED her
BRITS have been warned after a woman was left with 'agonising' blisters having gone blackberry picking which could have killed her. Nature lover Sue Harries suffered extreme pain after a toxic plant left her covered in a horrifying rash. 2 2 The 53-year-old was collecting the berries near her home in Wales when her arm brushed nearby hogweed and was touched by its toxins. Sue didn't spot anything wrong straight away but was later covered in blisters and in "agony" as the wounds developed. A rash came up around two hours after touching the toxic plant and later spread all up her arm and onto her back. Sue said that two weeks after the hogweed horror she is still reeling from the affects of the plant - and was told that if she had eaten blackberries touched by the plant her airways could have closed. She said: "Even now, my arm is burning, literally burning. I didn't feel anything at the time, I must have just brushed past it. "I went to my doctor a week later because I've been in and I honestly mean it, I've been in agony with it. "I just want people to know about it because I never knew it was toxic and I wouldn't want anyone else to go through this." Sue has now been told to keep her arm out of the sun for at least four months and ensure she wears factor 50 sun cream or keep her affected limb covered for at least the next five years. Sue, of Mayals, Swansea, brushed against the hogweed - which is officially known as Heracleum sphondylium - and has toxic sap, stems, leaves and fruit which can leave lasting damage. In June last year, Jenson Price was left with agonising blisters when he brushed past giant hogweed. Boy, 9, left with horrific burns and blisters after brushing past 'Putin' toxic plant while playing football in the park The nine-year-old had come into contact with the plant while running to fetch the football during the kickabout with his friends in Ryhope Park, Sunderland. The toxic sap from the plant increases the sensitivity of the skin to sunlight, often leading to burns - and sometimes blindness. While in June 2022, Ella, a 22-month-old toddler, was rushed to hospital having touched giant hogweed. Ella was taken to two hospitals, North Tees and James Cook, but doctors and medics were unable to determine what had caused such injuries. The tot required intensive treatment, doctors had to burst her blisters, carve away her dead skin, and finally bandaged her hands. A similar incident occurred the same year when Chavana Neuweg's six-year-old daughter suffered poisoning from a hemlock plant growing in their garden. The young child suffered a severe rash and trouble breathing, resulting in a trip to the hospital. Dog owners have also been warned about the dangers the plant poses to our furry friends. Hogweed can tower up to 16ft tall, according to the RHS, with long green stems with purple blotches, huge branches of small white flowers and green leaves. Mike Duddy, of the Mersey Basin Rivers Trust, previously said: "Giant hogweed was without a shadow of a doubt, the most dangerous plant in Britain". It is native to the Caucasus but was introduced to Britain as an ornamental plant in 1817, and its spread has now gotten out of control. Everything you need to know about giant hogweeds Giant Hogweed may look impressive but any contact with the sap of this plant can cause serious injury, particularly to your skin. What does Giant Hogweed look like? When fully grown, giant hogweed is aptly named. The plant can grow up to 25ft tall, with long green stems, purple blotches, and huge branches of small white flowers and large green leaves. The plant's flower heads bloom in June and July and can reach up to 2ft across. Giant hogweed can be mistaken for other plants such as cow parsley, cow parsnip, Queen Anne's Lace or elderberry as the flowers look similar. Their size when fully grown is very helpful for identifying the harmful crop. Why does Giant Hogweed cause rashes, burns and blisters? Giant hogweed stems have fine needle-like hairs that can cause extreme irritation. While the sap in giant hogweed contains a chemical called furanocoumarins. When this toxin comes into contact with the skin, it binds with DNA in skin cells, causing them to die. The sap reacts with the melanin in your skin and removes protection that patch has from UV light, causing photosensitivity (where the affected area becomes highly sensitive to sunlight), resulting in nasty burns, lesions and blisters. Those burns can last for several months and, even once they've gone, skin can remain scarred and sensitive to sunlight for years to come. If the hairs of the giant hogweed plant or its sap come into contact with your eyes, they can even cause temporary or even permanent blindness in severe cases. How do I treat burns from Giant Hogweeds? The NHS website advises that if you come into contact with giant hogweed and you get a burn, you should wash the affected area with soap and water and then cover it, keeping it out of natural or artificial light. If blisters appear, do not burst them! If the blisters are extensive, seek medical attention. Should you get sap in your eye, flush the eye with a large amount of water and seek medical attention. If you begin to feel unwell after contact with giant hogweed, speak to your doctor. Ensure you thoroughly and quickly wash the clothes you were wearing when you came into contact with the plant. And if you're concerned that a child has come into contact with, or ingested giant hogweed, seek medical attention immediately
