Republicans plow ahead with anti-abortion agenda in states where voters approved constitutional amendments
Even as Republicans swept into power in Washington in last year's elections, abortion rights supporters found success at the ballot box across the country. But that hasn't deterred abortion opponents.
Republican lawmakers have moved forward this year with bills to restrict abortion in more than half of the states where voters passed constitutional amendments in November to protect or expand reproductive rights.
They've also advanced bills in a bevy of states that would make if more difficult for groups to place similar measures on the ballot in the future. Those efforts extend to three states where amendments to enshrine a constitutional right to an abortion fell short last November.
'The abortion industry's attempts to completely deregulate their industry via ballot measures is putting women and girls in danger,' Kelsey Pritchard, the director of state public affairs for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said in an email. 'Republican leaders in states with pro-abortion ballot measures should be doing all that they can to protect health and safety protections for women and girls.'
Reproductive rights groups say the actions — even if ultimately unsuccessful — amount to an overt rejection of the desires of voters on the issue of abortion.
'Even when their voters made their support of abortion access extremely clear with these ballot amendments, Republicans are still willing to trample them,' said Yari Aquino, who helps advise candidates for EMILY's List, a national group that backs Democratic women who support abortion rights.
Aquino suggested that if conservatives' efforts continue, Democrats would be wise to keep abortion rights at the center of their platform heading into next year's midterms.
'This is why abortion rights and reproductive rights continue to be such a salient issue,' she said.
In Arizona, where voters overwhelmingly chose to enshrine abortion rights in their state constitution five months ago, Republicans in the state Legislature have advanced bills that would create new restrictions on the use of abortion-inducing drugs. Those include the requirement that a doctor must examine a patient before the patient can obtain the drugs. Another bill would ban doctors in the state from introducing abortion care to their patients as a prospective treatment option.
The bill proposes punishing doctors and practices who 'promote' abortion care as a potential treatment option by stripping them of any contracts or funding from any state agencies.
Critics argue the bills are a 'backdoor' way to eliminate Medicaid funding for any practice that even mentions abortion to a pregnant patient.
'Arizonans spoke their voice. They used their voice to say what they wanted,' said Arizona state Rep. Stephanie Simacek, a Democrat who has co-sponsored multiple bills that seek to protect or expand abortion rights. 'This is just another way for [Republicans] to push exactly what they did not get.'
'It's a backdoor way for them to try to come in and overrule the voice of the people here in Arizona,' she added.
Republicans in Missouri are teeing up a ballot measure that would reverse the one voters approved in November that effectively protected abortion rights until fetal viability and undid a near-total abortion ban on the books.
Conservative lawmakers in the state have also introduced legislation that would allow Missourians to wipe out most all of their tax bill if they donate what they owed in state income taxes to pregnancy resource centers, which reproductive rights advocates say are designed to steer pregnant women away from abortions.
In Montana, where voters enshrined abortion access into the state constitution, GOP lawmakers responded by introducing a bill that seeks to make traveling to or from the state for an abortion later in pregnancy a crime punishable by up to five years in prison. The bill, which compared that action to human 'trafficking,' was eventually tabled.
In Colorado, where abortion had already been legal through fetal viability, voters passed a measure to formally enshrine those rights. Republican legislators there introduced a bill that would make bringing a minor to the state for an abortion a felony crime.
Voters in Kentucky, a Republican stronghold that has a near-total ban on abortion, rejected an initiative in 2023 to amend the state constitution to explicitly state that there isn't a right to abortion.
Republican lawmakers still passed a bill that abortion advocates said further narrowed the medical exceptions that had been allowed under the existing abortion ban. Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear vetoed the bill, but Republicans in the Legislature used their supermajority to override it.
Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers in at least 15 states have advanced bills in recent weeks that would make it more difficult for proposed constitutional amendments to qualify for the ballot.
In Arizona, Missouri and South Dakota, legislators are attempting to raise the threshold for passage for ballot measures to 60% from a simple majority.
In those states, as well as Montana, Nebraska, Florida and Arkansas, Republicans have also advanced bills that create more onerous signature requirements for proposed amendments to qualify for the ballot. (Voters rejected amendments to enshrine abortion rights in the constitution in 2024 in Florida, Nebraska and South Dakota.)
Groups that advocate for reproductive rights and for ballot measures said these actions are an effort to roll back voters' rights.
'Ballot measures have been a lifeline to working people in red and purple states, allowing them to make change even when politicians fail to represent their interests. Legislators are trying to systematically take that power away,' Kelly Hall, the executive director of the Fairness Project, a nonprofit organization that helps progressive groups advance citizen-led ballot initiatives, said in a statement.
'This is their playbook,' Hall said, adding that when 'politicians know they can't win with voters on the issues, they try to change the rules of the game.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Onion
13 minutes ago
- The Onion
Democrats Back Resolution Thanking Federal Agents For Handcuffing Alex Padilla
WASHINGTON—After he was forcibly removed from a press conference held in Los Angeles yesterday by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Democrats in the House of Representatives backed a resolution Friday that thanked federal agents for handcuffing Sen. Alex Padilla (D-CA). 'We express gratitude to law enforcement for bravely apprehending a sitting U.S. senator who expressed dissent in a public forum,' read the resolution, which won the support of 75 Democrats and praised both FBI and Secret Service agents for risking their lives to throw Padilla to the ground, handcuff him, and drag him outside. 'Every day, these brave officers stand in the line of fire to protect us from individuals who dare to exercise free speech. Thankfully, they were able to stop the senior senator from California before he could ask any difficult or probing questions on behalf of his constituents. We stand behind them, no matter which elected officials they may choose to assault, injure, or imprison.' Democrats also voted to give Noem a special commendation for bravely protecting authoritarianism in the face of danger.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kansas court halts gender marker change restrictions
KANSAS (KSNT) – The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) announced in a press release that it has won a court case that barred Kansans from changing their gender markers on their driver's licenses. A Kansas state appeals court stated the Kansas Department of Revenue may resume allowing Kansans to change their gender markers on their driver's licenses, according to the ACLU. Kobach has 30 days to file an appeal in the case. 'This decision recognizes that the Attorney General failed to show any harm at all in allowing transgender Kansans the same personal autonomy, privacy, and dignity that all Kansans have,' said D.C. Hiegert, Civil Liberties legal fellow for the ACLU of Kansas. 'Being required to use a license with the wrong gender marker has already meant that transgender Kansans have been outed against their consent in their daily lives. We commend the incredible courage and sense of community our clients have had in standing up to this attack on all of our fundamental rights.' Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach filed a lawsuit in 2023 to prevent transgender people from changing their gender markers, citing the recently passed Senate Bill 180 that defined biological sex. A trial judge granted a temporary injunction in March 2024 blocking gender marker changes while the case moved forward, according to the press release from the ACLU. AG Kobach rejects Gov. Kelly's requests to join funding lawsuits The ACLU was allowed to intervene in the case in August 2023 as it raised questions about the constitutionality of SB 180, which establishes definitions of 'male' and 'female' in the state's statutes. 'The Governor has stated that SB 180 changes nothing with respect to drivers licenses and birth certificates. That is nonsense. The Legislature passed SB 180 and overrode Governor Kelly's veto specifically to ensure that those documents reflect biological sex at birth. The Governor doesn't get to veto a bill and then ignore the Legislature's override. She is violating her oath of office to uphold Kansas law. We will see her in court.' Kris Kobach, Kansas Attorney General wrote on June 29, 2023 The ACLU said the Court of Appeals didn't find that changing gender markers would impair criminal identification and that Kobach didn't have evidence to support his interpretation of S.B. 180. Kansas political divide intensifies as leaders support or condemn President Donald Trump 27 News has reached out to the Kansas Attorney General's Office for a statement on the recent court decision and will add it to this article after it is released. In the past, opponents of a gender marker ban have argued it raises privacy concerns. An example would be the employment process. People are usually required to submit proof of identity and employment authorization, including a birth certificate. If the gender listed on the birth certificate doesn't match an individual's identity, information about them being transgender may be outed. For more Kansas news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news in northeast Kansas by downloading our mobile app and by signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track Weather app by clicking here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Washington Post
15 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Suing Trump is key issue in Va.'s Democratic attorney general primary
President Donald Trump's massive cuts to the federal workforce have become the backdrop to the Democratic primary for attorney general in Virginia, with both candidates in the race criticizing Attorney General Jason S. Miyares (R) for not challenging the administration's moves in a state that hosts much of the federal government's infrastructure and nearly 200,000 of its employees.