Must-have item sparks Aussie shopping spree
Retail sales surged 1.2 per cent in June, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the biggest monthly jump since November 2021 when Aussies flocked to stores post Covid lockdowns.
This smashed expectations that retail sales would grow by 0.4 per cent in June.
ABS head of business statistics Robert Ewing said the spike in retail sales was largely driven by end-of-financial year sales and the launch of the latest Nintendo video game console. A large driver of consumer spending was the new Nintendo Switch. NewsWire / John Appleyard Credit: News Corp Australia
'Consumers are targeting sales events with a focus on value for big-ticket items like household furniture, bedding, electronic devices and TVs,' Mr Ewing said.
'Turnover for electrical and gaming retailers was lifted further by the much-anticipated launch of the Nintendo Switch 2, which delivered record sales.'
Spending for the month was driven by non-food related purchasing, led by household goods retailing (up 2.3 per cent) and other retailing (up 1.9 per cent).
There was also a strong bump in department store sales (up 1.9 per cent), and clothing, footwear and personal accessory retailing, which jumped 1.5 per cent. The other key spending driver was end-of-financial-year sales. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire
The ABS says this jump was due to end-of-financial-year sales of winter clothing items.
Food-related spending also rose after a fall last month.
While food retailing bounced back 0.9 per cent, spending in cafes, restaurants and takeaway food services fell 0.4 per cent.
Oxford Economics Australia head of economic research and global trade Harry Murphy Cruise said retail trade data created the perfect trifecta for an August rate cut.
'Just as the RBA looked through the noise in monthly measures of consumer prices, the board will do the same for June's higher-than-expected retail sales print,' he said.
'It's the trend that matters, and on that front, the trend of soft retail sales, labour market weakness and easing inflation make a perfect trifecta for an August rate cut.'
KPMG chief economist Brendan Rynne said the surge in spending showed Australians were still under financial pressure.
'As cost-of-living pressures continue, households are very much vying for bargains wherever they can, with sale items now consuming a far larger portion of our spending compared to just a few years ago,' Dr Rynne said.
'This month's results show despite a lift in household savings in the first quarter of the year, families have sought to tighten their belts further to ensure they're getting the biggest bang for their buck and only buying items they absolutely need, unless it's a one-off purchase.'
Despite the welcome bump for Australian businesses, consumer spending overall remains week.
KPMG points out that on a per capita basis, retail volumes fell 0.1 per cent in the June quarter after falling 0.4 per cent in the previous quarter, reflecting ongoing restraint in consumer spending.
Compared with the same time last year, retail volumes per capita are down 0.1 per cent and are now 6.0 per cent below the June 2022 quarter peak.
But zooming out, KMPG says this is still 3.2 per cent higher than the pre-pandemic level recorded in the December 2019 quarter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The US economy keeps chugging along. Does everyone owe Trump an apology?
It is true that recession fears have subsided, though not entirely. In April, JPMorgan gave the United States a 60 per cent chance of falling into recession this year. By May, after Trump paused most tariffs, the bank had revised that to 40 per cent, where it stands today. But the headline GDP figures are not the full story. And Trump's tariffs – and threats of tariffs – have a lot to do with it. In the first few months of the year, as Trump began announcing border duties and the world awaited his so-called 'Liberation Day' on April 2, America's imports surged, with businesses and consumers rushing to beat the tariffs. Imports negatively affect GDP calculations. As such, GDP contracted by 0.5 per cent. In the most recent quarter, imports fell, and GDP returned to 3 per cent – the same strong growth figures the US posted in the middle of last year, under former president Joe Biden. Contrary to Trump's claims, he did not inherit an economic mess from his predecessor, but one of the fastest-growing developed economies in the world post-COVID-19 pandemic. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell said it was better to focus on the combined growth figures for the first half of the year, to smooth out the volatility, which showed GDP rose at 1.2 per cent – down from an average 2.5 per cent last year. 'The moderation in growth largely reflects a slowdown in consumer spending,' he said on Wednesday. Business investment in equipment and intangibles was broadly up, he said, while activity in the housing sector remained weak. But generally speaking, the economy was solid, though inflation was still 'somewhat elevated'. 'It seems to me, and to almost the whole committee, that the economy is not performing as though restrictive policy is holding it back inappropriately,' Powell said, explaining the bank's decision to leave interest rates on hold at 4.25 to 4.5 per cent – despite Trump's intense pressure to cut. Consumer spending rose 1.4 per cent for the quarter, up from 0.5 per cent, even as Trump's new tariffs are raking in tens of billions of dollars in new tax revenue, and amid significant uncertainty about who is footing the bill and how much more there is to come. 'We're going to look back and either say, 'Wow, the economy was super resilient' … or we're going to say, 'Yeah, you could kind of feel it was weakening'.' Louise Sheiner, Brookings Institution And consumer sentiment, measured by the long-running University of Michigan survey, has bounced back into the 60s from just above 50 points. An update is due this Friday, US time. While tariffs have been in place for months and raised tens of billions of additional dollars for US government coffers, the new tariffs, which go into effect in a week, represent the first time since Trump came to power that there has been the semblance of certainty over what the rates will be – at least for now. Still, the US economy seems to be more robust than the doomsday predictions considered. So, do the world's economists owe Trump an apology? Maurice Obstfeld, of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, says it is too soon to decide. 'These behavioural shifts have made GDP data more volatile than usual,' he says. 'Let's wait for the tariffs to settle down at new, predictable levels and see what happens before we shoot the economists.' Louise Sheiner, an economist at the Brookings Institution, espoused a similar view to The New York Times: 'We're going to look back and either say, 'Wow, the economy was super resilient and these things didn't matter as much as we thought they would', or we're going to say, 'Yeah, you could kind of feel it was weakening'.' Justin Wolfers, an Australian economics professor at the University of Michigan, and a regular critic of Trump's economic agenda, says there is still a decent chance of the US economy heading south later this year. 'When I was asked in the first half of the year for a forecast of the chances of a recession, I was careful to give a conditional forecast: if they go for the 'Full Trump', then 75 per cent, and if they drop their nonsense, then 25 per cent,' he says. Loading 'As it happened, he started with the Full Trump, then TACO'd. So perhaps the correct probability is somewhere between 25 and 75 per cent, and probably something like 40 per cent. That still seems right to me.' The term TACO stands for Trump Always Chickens Out – a popular critique of the president's tendency to make scary announcements, before backtracking or reverting to the norm. 'The idea that a single quarterly reading on a single measure says anything about [the economy being a] miracle or mirage is silly on its face,' Wolfers says. 'The economy isn't as bad as folks forecast, but neither was the actual policy that the White House was telling us we should expect.' In moments of candour, the Trump administration acknowledges American consumers might pay higher prices for some goods, but it is convinced economic growth will compensate. Hassett said as much this week, noting real wages had grown, which 'means people have more money in their pockets than the price increases that they've seen'. Board appointees break ranks Trump is also desperate to stimulate economic growth with lower interest rates, hence his constant badgering of Jerome 'Too Late' Powell to cut the rate. Despite Trump insisting 'there is no inflation' (it is 2.7 per cent), the majority of the bank's board wants to see more data before it makes a move – although the market expects cuts later this year. Loading But for the first time in three decades, two governors dissented from Wednesday's decision. Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman – both Trump appointees to the board from his first term – voted to cut rates by 0.25 points. Both are considered candidates to replace Powell when his term expires next year. [In his dissenting reasons, published Friday in the US, Waller said tariffs only caused a one-off increase in prices, which the bank should 'look through', while soft growth meant monetary policy should be 'close to neutral'. The 'wait and see' approach was overly cautious, he said. Bowman said inflation had fallen - excluding tariff-related increases - and noted the slower growth in private domestic final purchases, a leading indicator of consumer spending.] Arthur Sinodinos, a former Australian ambassador to the US who now works at the Asia Group, says now that Australia's tariff rate has been confirmed at 10 per cent, its main worries will be what impact the tariff regime has on global economic conditions, as well as the US economy.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
The US economy keeps chugging along. Does everyone owe Trump an apology?
It is true that recession fears have subsided, though not entirely. In April, JPMorgan gave the United States a 60 per cent chance of falling into recession this year. By May, after Trump paused most tariffs, the bank had revised that to 40 per cent, where it stands today. But the headline GDP figures are not the full story. And Trump's tariffs – and threats of tariffs – have a lot to do with it. In the first few months of the year, as Trump began announcing border duties and the world awaited his so-called 'Liberation Day' on April 2, America's imports surged, with businesses and consumers rushing to beat the tariffs. Imports negatively affect GDP calculations. As such, GDP contracted by 0.5 per cent. In the most recent quarter, imports fell, and GDP returned to 3 per cent – the same strong growth figures the US posted in the middle of last year, under former president Joe Biden. Contrary to Trump's claims, he did not inherit an economic mess from his predecessor, but one of the fastest-growing developed economies in the world post-COVID-19 pandemic. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell said it was better to focus on the combined growth figures for the first half of the year, to smooth out the volatility, which showed GDP rose at 1.2 per cent – down from an average 2.5 per cent last year. 'The moderation in growth largely reflects a slowdown in consumer spending,' he said on Wednesday. Business investment in equipment and intangibles was broadly up, he said, while activity in the housing sector remained weak. But generally speaking, the economy was solid, though inflation was still 'somewhat elevated'. 'It seems to me, and to almost the whole committee, that the economy is not performing as though restrictive policy is holding it back inappropriately,' Powell said, explaining the bank's decision to leave interest rates on hold at 4.25 to 4.5 per cent – despite Trump's intense pressure to cut. Consumer spending rose 1.4 per cent for the quarter, up from 0.5 per cent, even as Trump's new tariffs are raking in tens of billions of dollars in new tax revenue, and amid significant uncertainty about who is footing the bill and how much more there is to come. 'We're going to look back and either say, 'Wow, the economy was super resilient' … or we're going to say, 'Yeah, you could kind of feel it was weakening'.' Louise Sheiner, Brookings Institution And consumer sentiment, measured by the long-running University of Michigan survey, has bounced back into the 60s from just above 50 points. An update is due this Friday, US time. While tariffs have been in place for months and raised tens of billions of additional dollars for US government coffers, the new tariffs, which go into effect in a week, represent the first time since Trump came to power that there has been the semblance of certainty over what the rates will be – at least for now. Still, the US economy seems to be more robust than the doomsday predictions considered. So, do the world's economists owe Trump an apology? Maurice Obstfeld, of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, says it is too soon to decide. 'These behavioural shifts have made GDP data more volatile than usual,' he says. 'Let's wait for the tariffs to settle down at new, predictable levels and see what happens before we shoot the economists.' Louise Sheiner, an economist at the Brookings Institution, espoused a similar view to The New York Times: 'We're going to look back and either say, 'Wow, the economy was super resilient and these things didn't matter as much as we thought they would', or we're going to say, 'Yeah, you could kind of feel it was weakening'.' Justin Wolfers, an Australian economics professor at the University of Michigan, and a regular critic of Trump's economic agenda, says there is still a decent chance of the US economy heading south later this year. 'When I was asked in the first half of the year for a forecast of the chances of a recession, I was careful to give a conditional forecast: if they go for the 'Full Trump', then 75 per cent, and if they drop their nonsense, then 25 per cent,' he says. Loading 'As it happened, he started with the Full Trump, then TACO'd. So perhaps the correct probability is somewhere between 25 and 75 per cent, and probably something like 40 per cent. That still seems right to me.' The term TACO stands for Trump Always Chickens Out – a popular critique of the president's tendency to make scary announcements, before backtracking or reverting to the norm. 'The idea that a single quarterly reading on a single measure says anything about [the economy being a] miracle or mirage is silly on its face,' Wolfers says. 'The economy isn't as bad as folks forecast, but neither was the actual policy that the White House was telling us we should expect.' In moments of candour, the Trump administration acknowledges American consumers might pay higher prices for some goods, but it is convinced economic growth will compensate. Hassett said as much this week, noting real wages had grown, which 'means people have more money in their pockets than the price increases that they've seen'. Board appointees break ranks Trump is also desperate to stimulate economic growth with lower interest rates, hence his constant badgering of Jerome 'Too Late' Powell to cut the rate. Despite Trump insisting 'there is no inflation' (it is 2.7 per cent), the majority of the bank's board wants to see more data before it makes a move – although the market expects cuts later this year. Loading But for the first time in three decades, two governors dissented from Wednesday's decision. Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman – both Trump appointees to the board from his first term – voted to cut rates by 0.25 points. Both are considered candidates to replace Powell when his term expires next year. [In his dissenting reasons, published Friday in the US, Waller said tariffs only caused a one-off increase in prices, which the bank should 'look through', while soft growth meant monetary policy should be 'close to neutral'. The 'wait and see' approach was overly cautious, he said. Bowman said inflation had fallen - excluding tariff-related increases - and noted the slower growth in private domestic final purchases, a leading indicator of consumer spending.] Arthur Sinodinos, a former Australian ambassador to the US who now works at the Asia Group, says now that Australia's tariff rate has been confirmed at 10 per cent, its main worries will be what impact the tariff regime has on global economic conditions, as well as the US economy.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
'Wake up call': Securty expert says Australians must take security more seriously following ASIO boss' espionage warning
Strategic Analysis Australia founder and Director Peter Jennings told Sky News host Steve Price that comments made by the boss of ASIO should be a wake-up call to all Australians on the threat foreign espionage poses. ASIO chief Mike Burgess at a conference in Adelaide revealed foreign espionage was costing the Australian economy $12.5 billion a year as he unveiled the inaugural cost of espionage report. Reacting on Sky News on Friday, Mr Jennings told host Steve Price that it was not surprising. 'This is industrial level espionage and intellectual property theft," he said. 'And of course it's being directed against Australia because we're a high technology country with very significant alliance relations with the United States and other developed economies, and it will be happening all the time.' Mr Jennings said that Australia needed to be taking steps to protect its military and economy from people who were looking to take advantage of the situation, adding that businesses needed to be aware of the risks they are facing. 'Mike Burgess touches on this in his speech as well, how naive Australians are to imagine that it couldn't possibly happen here or it wouldn't happen to my business,' he said. 'And Mike actually quotes Australian officials saying, oh, well, no one would be interested in going after my information. This is industrial level espionage and intellectual property theft' Mr Burgess on Thursday said "Many entities do not know their secrets have been stolen, or do not realise they've been stolen by espionage, or do not report the theft.' He also said that there were many countries that were committing this espionage. 'The obvious candidates are very active – I've previously named China, Russia and Iran – but many other countries are also targeting anyone and anything that could give them a strategic or tactical advantage, including sensitive but unclassified information.' Mr Burgess also said that he could not understand why some people were mentioning on social media that they carried a security clearance. "On just one professional networking site, the profiles of more than 35,000 Australians indicate they have access to sensitive and potentially classified information. Around 7,000 reference their work in the defence sector, including the specific project they are working on, the team they are working in, and the critical technologies they are working with," he said. "Close to 400 explicitly say they work on AUKUS, and the figure rises above 2,000 if you include broader references to 'submarines' and 'nuclear'.
