FED Tax break for foreign businesses asked to be extended
The FED allows Irish tax residents who spend time working in specified countries abroad to reduce their income tax liability.
The relief can be applied to up to €35,000 of income annually, potentially saving an individual up to €14,000 in taxes each year.
To qualify, a person must spend a minimum of 30 days working in one of the eligible countries within a single tax year.
First introduced in 1994, the FED was discontinued in 2003 but later reinstated in the 2012 budget by then-Finance Minister Michael Noonan.
At the time, the measure was framed as part of a broader initiative to help Irish companies access and grow in emerging markets.
Initially covering just five nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—the scheme has expanded over the years to include 30 countries.
Additions have focused on Asia and the Middle East, with Singapore, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Bahrain now among the eligible destinations.
The United Arab Emirates currently sees the highest usage of the relief.
The eligibility criteria have also changed.
Originally requiring 60 qualifying days abroad, the threshold was lowered to 40 in 2015 and further reduced to 30 days in 2017 to make it more accessible.
According to figures from 2022—the most recent data available—the relief cost the state €3.2 million. That year, 447 individuals claimed the deduction, down from 720 in 2019.
However, it remains unclear to what extent the pandemic influenced this drop.
The Department of Finance is currently conducting a full review of the FED, with results expected ahead of the budget announcement on October 7.
Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe is expected to reveal any proposed changes at that time.
Stakeholder consultations form a key part of this review process.
According to the Tax Strategy Group, industry feedback so far highlights the importance of FED in encouraging international expansion.
Many stakeholders have called for not only a higher level of relief to better support overseas assignments but also an expanded list of qualifying countries to reflect shifting global trade dynamics.
The same report from the Tax Strategy Group stated that in light of the uncertain global economic conditions, diversifying trade routes is more critical than ever for Ireland's economic resilience.
Speaking at the National Economic Dialogue, Foreign Affairs and Trade Minister Simon Harris echoed this sentiment, stating that trade diversification is becoming increasingly essential.
'There's a real opportunity to be more ambitious in how we explore and enter new markets,' he said. 'This includes efforts within the EU, post-Brexit UK engagement, and tapping into global opportunities. We're supporting Irish exporters to grow their international footprint and make use of existing EU trade deals.'
As businesses face rising costs and geopolitical uncertainty, expanding access to tax incentives like the FED could prove to be a timely move in supporting Ireland's global trade goals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Nearly 500 concerns raised about Irish charities with regulator in 2024
Nearly 500 concerns were raised about registered Irish charities last year, marking a decrease on the number of concerns raised in 2023, according to the latest Charities Regulator annual report. A total of 493 concerns were raised with the regulator in 2024, down from 574 in 2023. Issues around charity governance accounted for most of the concerns raised (42%), followed by issues relating to financial control and transparency (20%). When an issue arises, the Charities Regulator engages directly with the charity to help them resolve the matter voluntarily. However, the regulator will take further action when it is required. Charities removed for failing to file annual reports In 2024, the Charities Regulator closed three statutory investigations. In addition, it took a range of other statutory actions including the removal of 38 charities from the Register of Charities for failing to file annual reports. Each charity is required to file an online annual report within 10 months of its financial year end, and details from these reports are published on the public register. Eight charities were prosecuted for failing to file their annual reports. The national record of Irish-registered charities (the public register), saw a jump of 43% in the number of views of charity records in 2024 (355,145), compared to 248,858 views in 2023. Public demand information on finances and governance The Charities Regulator said the rise reflected growing public demand for access to information about registered Irish charities, including their finances, governance and activities, as well as annual report filings. Over the course of 2024, the Charities Regulator "proactively engaged" with charities and charity trustees who were defaulted on their reporting obligations to the regulator. A total of 127 new charities registered in 2024, bringing to 11,445 the total number of registered charities in Ireland at the end of the year. A further 199 charities were deregistered during the year, (including the 38 for failing to file annual reports). Deregistrations can arise for a variety of reasons, such as failure to comply with legal requirements, findings of misconduct, or where the charity ceased to operate or changed its legal form. 'Number of concerns relatively low' Chief Executive of the Charities Regulator, Madeleine Delaney said the number of concerns received by the office remains relatively low every year, considering there are about 11,500 charities in Ireland. "Having said that, the most common issues relate to governance, and a recurring theme is that of dominant behaviour, typically by one individual in a CEO, chair or founder role, who exerts or exercises excessive control over the charity's governance and operations. "This is a challenge, and it's an area that we, as the Charities Regulator, are preparing guidance to support trustees in dealing with," she said. Ms Delaney said most charities in Ireland "work hard to fulfil their charitable purpose while implementing good standards of governance and complying with their legal obligations". "However, for some there is still progress to be made," she added. Charity sector worth €32 billion per year to Irish economy Research by the regulator has estimated that the sector is worth some €32 billion annually to the Irish economy. More than 280,000 individuals are employed by a registered Irish charity, equivalent to almost one in eight workers, and further supported by hundreds of thousands of volunteers. Charities are registered in every county in Ireland. The majority are based in Dublin (3,116) and Cork (1,186), with large numbers also registered in Galway (661), Donegal (510), Limerick (485) and Kerry (433). Minister of State with responsibility for Community Development and Charities, Jerry Buttimer said the report demonstrated "progress" by the regulator to regulate and support the charities sector. "I am confident that the Charities (Amendment) Act 2024 will provide additional transparency, fairness and clarity to charities and their trustees, and to the public," he said. "I also want to acknowledge the hard work of the Board, management and staff of the Regulator for their support and oversight of our charity sector."
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Advisory body warns Government dependence on fossil fuel imports risks disruption and sabotage
Ireland's lack of a strategic fuel reserve leaves the country at risk of disruption and sabotage, the Government has been warned. The warning comes in a report from the National Economic and Social Council (Nesc) presented to Cabinet on Tuesday, which says that Ireland's fossil fuel import-dependency "is a strategic vulnerability". The report says that the fact that Ireland holds no domestic gas reserves "is a particular issue of concern and distinguishes Ireland from most other EU member states". The Department of the Environment's 2023 report Securing Ireland's Gas Supplies identified five strategic risks that could threaten the security of gas supplies to Ireland for both demand-side and supply-side shocks. They included "technical disruption, sabotage and physical attack, reduced availability of gas from the UK, an inability to meet peak gas demand, and geopolitical supply-chain risks for renewables components that present a risk to climate action delivery". In March, the Government approved a plan to develop a State-led liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal, which will serve as the State's strategic reserve. The plan will see a floating storage and re-gassification unit (FSRU) operated by Gas Networks Ireland. Meanwhile at Cabinet, energy minister Darragh O'Brien received Government approval to issue letters to the board of ESB and EirGrid noting the €3.5bn in additional equity to support investment in electricity grid infrastructure over 2026-2030. The investment is split into €2bn for EirGrid, to support the financing of its offshore electricity grid investment plan, and €1.5bn for ESB to support its investment in the onshore electricity grid. Also at Cabinet, it was agreed that four gardaí will be sent to France this summer to assist the French National Police and the Gendarmerie during the tourist season in Mont-Saint-Michel and Giverny in Normandy during July, August, and September. Similar deployments were made to France over the last three years, with gardaí deployed to France involved in general patrolling, in uniform, in the company of French officers. They will not have police powers while in France, and their role will be to assist in any interactions with Irish citizens who are victims of crime or who are involved in crimes. They will also assist with engagement with other nationalities where the first language is English. Two gardaí have already been deployed, and in total four gardaí will be deployed, with one based in Mont-Saint-Michel and three based in Giverny. Accommodation and food is to be provided by the French authorities.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, July 30th: On tariffs, jobs and houses, protest voices, and bargain cycle lanes
Sir, – Early days to assess the EU/US proposed trade deal but one thing is clear. The EU side has made major concessions. They have accepted a 15 per cent tariff on most exports from the EU to the US, but no similar tariffs must apply to US exports to the EU. Under the deal, the EU has also agreed to invest $600 billion in the US economy and to buy $750 billion of energy from the US over the next three years. No similar commitments apply it seems on the US side. This outcome partly reflects the difficulty of getting sufficient agreement among member states on a tougher stance to be taken by the EU, Ireland being one of the main countries opposed to adopting a stronger EU position and thereby weakening the overall EU negotiating stance. READ MORE A much bigger issue though is the unstated (in public) threat of the US withdrawing its security guarantees for Europe, something almost unthinkable before the present administration came to power. The consequences of this for Ukraine and Europe (including Ireland) would be incalculable and worth avoiding, if necessary, by making major concessions on the trade front. From a US viewpoint, a reasonable expectation perhaps given its commitment of equipment and personnel to European defence. Until Europe is less dependent on the US to guarantee its security, it will have a weak bargaining hand when it comes to trade. – Yours, etc, JOHN O'HAGAN, Department of Economics, Trinity College, Dublin. Sir, – Faced with the threat of 30 per cent US tariffs, the EU blinked. To shield its economy – notably the German and French car industries in my opinion – it settled for 15 per cent across-the-board tariffs and to boot, tossed in a few more sweeteners to American firms. Whatever became of the much-touted Anti-Coercion Instrument, the EU's so-called 'big bazooka'? The Irish Government, meanwhile, has put a sunny gloss on the deal – especially regarding pharmaceuticals. Yet Trump has made it plain, pharmaceuticals is next in his sights, and the agreement itself is vague. When the day comes, I'd be surprised if our EU partners show much solidarity with Ireland's pharma sector, given past criticism of the tax incentives to lure it here in the first instance. Yes, EU leaders faced a dilemma. But the leverage wasn't all entirely with America. US trade with the EU exceeds $600 billion annually, dwarfing the projected $90 billion in tariff revenue. The EU may have deemed it impolitic to press that point – but I've no qualms about confronting economic aggression. I'll be steering clear of overpriced coffee, fizzy drinks, forgettable burgers, and smartphones still awaiting meaningful AI – not to mention FSD cars that still need drivers. If dollars speak louder than diplomacy, let mine do the talking. – Yours, etc, JOHN McCRORY, Lucan, Dublin. Sir, – I read with interest the response of different European leaders to the proposed EU-US trade agreement. Let's call a spade a spade. US president Donald Trump's bullying tactics have worked to such an extent that some leaders now consider 15 per cent tariffs on EU goods to the US a successful outcome. The tariffs on many US goods to EU will be zero. Reciprocal rates how are you? – Yours, etc, BRIAN MANGAN, Ferns, Co Wexford. Sir, – I see that as part of the tariff agreement, Europe will purchase $600billion of US armaments. Presumably this will largely eliminate the large US deficit (in goods). If/when this happens will the one-sided tariffs fall away? Clearly, that von der Leyen one is a fearsome negotiator. – Yours, etc, BRIAN MURPHY Carrickmines Wood, Dublin 18. Sir, – Relief at the conclusion of an EU-US trade deal is understandable but to me it seems premature. Europe has made a huge concession to the United States and got nothing in return. Giving way to a bully is never a wise move as the likelihood is they will only come back for more. –Yours, etc, RONAN MURPHY, Greystones, Co Wicklow. Investment, housing and jobs Sir, – I too agree with Michael Gilmartin (July 26th) and Enda Scanlon (July 28th). Ireland has focused on attracting ever more inward investment over many years without weighing up the cost. It has become clear that these large multinationals are now the ones calling the shots and the current impetus to improve infrastructure appears to reflect their demands to a greater extent than those of our own citizens. How did we end up giving 50 per cent of our power supplies to data centres in Dublin? Ireland is a small country. We seem to think that our limited natural resources are inexhaustible. They are not. Our focus on financial wealth has resulted in rapid population growth. This has put overwhelming stress on our land, our water, our nature and our biodiversity. It is making daily life more challenging and putting decent housing out of reach of so many. – Yours, etc, CAROL SCOTT, Shankill, Dublin 18. Dancing feet Sir, – There is an old Irish phrase: 'Up here for thinking, down there for dancing'. Michael Flatley should stick to the dancing. – Yours, etc, TONY CORCORAN, Rathfarnham Dublin 14 Voices of protest on Gaza Sir, – Chris Fitzpatrick has correctly pointed out (Letters, July 28th) that Israel's campaign in Gaza in response to the appalling Hamas attack of October 7th has become, in its ferocity and forced starvation, a travesty of the Judaism that the ruling coalition government pretends to represent. But his impression that there are no Jewish voices of protest is not correct. Among the Jewish lobbies that have long opposed Israel's stance and advocated the two-state solution are Britain's Jews for Justice for Palestinians, who march in the current London demonstrations, and the Europe-wide network, JCall. The American equivalent, JStreet, is increasingly influential. Earlier this week, the American Jewish Committee, along with the Reform Movement, the largest Jewish denomination in America, issued statements declaring Israel 'culpable' in its Gaza campaign. In Israel this week, the prominent Jewish human rights organisation, B'Tselem, and the Physicians for Human Rights Israel both specifically labelled Israel's actions as 'genocide'. Former Israeli prime ministers, Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert, in print and in television interviews, have characterised Israel's Gaza campaign as war crimes. And Israel's liberal daily newspaper Ha'aretz continues to report with total honesty on events in Gaza and the West Bank, and carries every day several op-ed pieces which nothing in these islands can rival for vituperation. Why is all this so little known? Perhaps partly because in newsworthiness it cannot compete with stories of bombing and starvation; and partly because it can make no impression whatever on a regime that is blind to all but its fanatical fantasies. Only determined action by the international powers might have an effect. But, rhetoric aside, I suspect they may be too distracted by presidents Trump and Putin to get around to that. – Yours, etc, LOUIS MARCUS, Dublin 16. Sir, –I was troubled by two letters published on July 28th that, while expressing concern about Gaza, shifted focus on to Jews around the world, urging them to speak out or risk complicity. This places moral coercion on Jews solely because of their identity – something we should not accept, and indeed don't accept, when applied to other groups. Criticism of Israeli policy is not only legitimate, it is regularly voiced by Israelis and Jews globally, including many who strongly support the country. But when Jews are called upon to denounce Israel solely because they are Jewish, it echoes a troubling pattern. One letter also quotes Jewish scripture to suggest Jews have failed their own values: a rhetorical move with a long and damaging history in Christian Europe, even if unfamiliar to many Irish readers. Definitions of anti-Semitism used by the Irish Government and leading academics distinguish clearly between criticism of Israel and collective blame of Jews. I hope future letters will reflect that distinction. – Yours, etc, YOTAM GARDI, Inchicore, Dublin 8. Sir, – Sally Hayden's article 'From a viewing platform in Israel, ' war tourists' pay to see Gaza's ruins,' (July 28th) is an example of investigative journalism at its best. The Israeli mindset is now so far down the rabbit hole of ethnic cleansing it beggars belief. Even the last line where one of the complaints, from people coming to view the carnage, consisted of the potholes on the road leading to the viewing platform! – Yours, etc, JUDY BURKE, Rosscarbery, Co Cork. Sir, – In 1847, at the height of the Irish famine, Charles Villiers, the Earl of Clarendon, was appointed the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland. He arrived during the second year of the Great Hunger. His reports on the scale of the crisis were regularly discounted by a government that deferred to the permanent head of the Treasury, Sir Charles Trevelyan. Despairing of effective famine relief, Clarendon suggested to the prime minister, Lord Russell, that 'there is not another legislature in Europe that would disregard such suffering as now exists in the west of Ireland or coldly persist in a policy of extermination'. Unfortunately, had Villiers been writing today about Gaza, the word 'genocide' would replace 'extermination' and every legislature in Europe would, in fact, be guilty of disregarding such suffering! – Yours, etc, COLIN P DOHERTY, Head of School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin 2. Bargain cycle lanes Sir, – Olga Barry asks if the €45 million allocation for the 6km cycle lane between Dundrum and Dún Laoghaire will make it the most expensive cycle lane ever built in Ireland (Letters, July 28th). In fact that dubious record surely goes to the 6km cycle lane between Clontarf and Connolly Station which cost an astonishing €70 million to complete before it opened last year, after two years of endless disruption to local residents. The Dundrum to Dún Laoghaire project would appear to be a bargain by comparison. – Yours, etc, BARRY WALSH Clontarf, Dublin 3. The BBC and radio silence Sir, – Well, the BBC have done it! They have taken away BBC's Radio Three and Four, unless one is living in the UK. As an Irish person who has listened to these stations all my life I am feeling bereft. How that leaves the millions of British citizens around the world I can only imagine, and I wonder why on earth this decision has been made. From a purely selfish viewpoint I shall miss these stations terribly during the day. For the summer one looks forward to the Proms on Radio Three, and now I shall have to do without them. With failing eyesight I watch very little television and anyway my love of radio has always superseded any other form of entertainment. Oh BBC, what were you thinking of? – Yours, etc, ITA McCORMACK, Maynooth, Co Kildare. Diamond cutters Sir – Sunday's All Ireland football final was a wonderful occasion but who came up with the idea that the diamond patterned cutting of the grass was a good idea? For those of us watching on TV, and doubtless for those on the upper tiers of the stand, the pattern was confusing and headache-inducing. – Yours, etc, JOHN MacKENNA, Royal Oak, Co Carlow. Busy busy, must fly Sir, – As the manager of a unit in a large organisation, one of the ways in which I judged the enthusiasm of the members of my team was the speed with which they walked down a corridor. ( 'The greatest part of any job is learning to look busy, ' July 26th). Those who walked slowly were rarely upgraded to positions of responsibility. –Yours, etc, FINBAR KEARNS, Piercestown, Co Wexford. Lucia Joyce and Carl Jung Sir, – It was nice to see modern dancer Lucia Joyce, who was celebrated as 'l'Irlandaise' in 1920s Paris, make an appearance in Frank McNally's Diary (July 25th) celebrating Carl Jung's 150th birthday on July 26th. Lucia, who described Jung as 'that big fat Swiss Man trying to get hold of my soul', would have turned 118 on the same day. The cult psychotherapist must have got a shock when this cosmic coincidence of birth dawned on him. He too suffered from psychosis, like his mother. He also wrote of his own fear of 'doing a schizophrenia', and boasted two personalities (his own contemporary self, and Zarathustra). Could his dismissal of Lucia's lost poetry as 'psychotic', therefore be considered a case of kettle calling the pot black? James Joyce considered the same writing to be 'anticipations of a new literature'. As for Lucia's 'diagnosis', she had as many as she had doctors. One concluded: 'Whatever it is she will soon get over it.' Whatever the correct diagnosis, Lucia certainly was an artist ahead of her time, in the wrong gender, and ultimately had to pay the price of definitive incarceration and erasure. We can't turn the clock back, but on her 118th birthday, why not reclaim her legacy as a groundbreaking artist, who struggled perhaps with at least as many mental health challenges as the widely celebrated big old fat Swiss man who failed to get hold of her soul. – Yours, etc, DEIRDRE MULROONEY, Lower Grand Canal Street, Dublin 2.
