Irish presidency poll reveals just how tuned out of the process people are
candidates for the presidency
finally stuck their heads above the parapet, today's Irish Times/Ipsos B&A poll finds that nobody has really caught fire with the public at this early stage.
In so far as there is a frontrunner, it is the Fine Gael candidate
Mairead McGuinness
. She was confirmed in that position last Tuesday, though apparently plans no active campaigning until September. Asked who they would 'probably vote for', 14 per cent of respondents plumped for McGuinness; she was the only candidate to get into double figures.
As expected, McGuinness's strongest supporters are Fine Gael voters, among whom 37 per cent say they will probably vote for her. More surprisingly, perhaps, she is also the favourite choice of Fianna Fáil voters, as 25 per cent favour her. That is more than the 17 per cent who nominate
Bertie Ahern
and 9 per cent who say Micheál Martin would get their vote. The very low level of support for Martin suggests that Fianna Fáil voters want him to continue as Taoiseach.
Independent TD
Catherine Connolly
attracts the support of 9 per cent of respondents – a decent, though hardly show-stopping, performance. She scores strongly among voters of the left-wing parties – except for Sinn Féin voters, where only 5 per cent of respondents favour her.
READ MORE
Instead, Sinn Féin voters would vote for Mary Lou McDonald (33 per cent), far ahead of Michelle O'Neill (6 per cent) and Gerry Adams (3 per cent).
[
Mairead McGuinness leads in presidential election poll but public imagination yet to be caught
]
Perhaps the most instructive finding in the presidency poll relates to the number of people who said 'none of the names so far appeal to me' (18 per cent). Similarly, 20 per cent of the electorate said they were not sure how they would vote. To say the race is wide open at this stage is something of an understatement.
Finally, voters are roughly evenly divided on whether they would like the next president to be a current or former politician, or someone from a non-political background – 43 per cent prefer a politician, with 41 per cent saying they would like a non-politician.
The poll also asked about the potential next leaders of the three big parties. For each of Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Sinn Féin, respondents were asked if the current leaders were to step down, who they would like to see as the next leader.
As you might expect, the 'don't knows' were relatively high, but some clear preferences emerged.
In Fianna Fáil, the leading contender is Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan, who is favoured by 16 per cent of voters. He is followed by Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers on 13 per cent and Minister for Transport Darragh O'Brien on 9 per cent. A fifth of voters (20 per cent) favoured someone else, while a hefty 42 per cent said they didn't know.
Among Fianna Fáil voters, however, O'Callaghan has a clear lead with 32 per cent support, ahead of Chambers on 21 per cent and O'Brien on 15 per cent.
There is a clear favourite in Sinn Féin. Finance spokesman Pearse Doherty is the choice of 28 per cent of all voters to succeed Mary Lou McDonald, followed by Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill on 17 per cent and housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin on 9 per cent. Just 16 per cent say they would like someone else, while 35 per cent say they don't know.
Doherty is also the strong favourite among Sinn Féin voters, where he wins 42 per cent support.
In Fine Gael, there also is a clear favourite: Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe is the choice of 29 per cent, followed by Helen McEntee on 12 per cent and Jennifer Carroll MacNeill on 8 per cent. 'Don't knows' are at 35 per cent and 16 per cent say they would like someone else.
Among Fine Gael voters, the choice is even more overwhelming: 50 per cent say they would like Donohoe to be leader if Simon Harris stepped down.
There is further good news for Donohoe when voters were asked how they rated the performance of Cabinet Ministers.
[
The presidency is not a Rose of Tralee contest for over-35s
Opens in new window
]
Voters rate him ahead of any of his colleagues – and far ahead of most of them. Asked if they thought each Minister was doing a good job, a poor job or if they had no opinion, Donohoe – who has recently been warning of the need for a cautious and prudent budget, pledging to end the one-off giveaways of recent years – was the standout performer.
The popularity of Donohoe at a time when he is warning of the need for budgetary prudence suggests a certain degree of nervousness about the country's economic prospects, but also confidence in the Minister for Finance to manage the potentially difficult times ahead.
Almost half of all voters (48 per cent) said he was doing a good job, with 26 per cent saying he was doing a poor job and 26 per cent not sure. That gives Donohoe a net positive rating of 22 points – along with the lowest number of don't knows.
Just five other Ministers have net positive ratings, while two had neither positive or negative net ratings – net zero, if you like.
The worst performer was the Minister for Housing James Browne. Just 15 per cent of respondents felt he was doing a good job, with 59 per cent saying he was doing a poor job. Just over a quarter (26 per cent) were unsure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
40 minutes ago
- Irish Times
More than half of Irish estate agents see house prices levelling off soon
Irish home prices are expected to rise by a further 5 per cent over the next 12 months, amid ongoing supply shortages, according to a survey of estate agent members of the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland (SCSI). Joe Brennan reports on the predicted growth. However, 60 per cent of those polled see prices levelling off soon, with a further 18 per cent saying that they have already peaked – after a dozen years of continuous growth. Joe Brennan also reports on Goodbody Stockbrokers making a number of senior hires in a bid to boost the business. A number of staff left the organisation's investment banking area in late 2023, during and after a redundancy programme. Among the appointments is Stephen Kane, a former corporate finance director with the firm, who left in October 2023 for householder Cairn Homes. READ MORE In her latest column, Pilita Clark writes about the really concerning thing about the Coldplay concert scandal. This scandal, of course, concerns the former CEO of tech company Astronomer, who was caught with his arms wrapped around the company's head of human resources. Their embrace was captured on the big screen at the band's concert in Boston and has gone viral. Pilita Clark addresses the barrage of fabricated online statements purporting to be from those with insight. 'Some governments are trying to legislate against this muck, notably in the EU. The Coldplay couple — and the misleading maelstrom that followed their exposure — are a reminder that many more authorities need to join them,' she says. The co-founder of Dublin restaurant group Kinara and president of the Restaurant's Association of Ireland, Seán Collender, revealed the details of the impact of rising input costs that are leaving hospitality businesses on 'an extremely fine line'. 'These are huge, huge costs and we don't sell gold bars, we sell food,' he told Hugh Dooley. We need to enact a specific legal mandate, in the overriding national interest, to drive forward critical projects and avoid the endless round of planning applications, appeals and judicial reviews. Had we done that for the metro, it would have been finished a decade ago, writes John FitzGerald in his weekly column. 'But unless the planning system is reformed, I'm unlikely during my lifetime to ride the metro or drink Shannon water from my tap,' he says. How will the updated National Development Plan shape Ireland in years to come? Listen | 35:59 In 2025, it is both remarkable and disappointing that progress in tackling the gender gap in leadership is taking a backwards step in Ireland, with a 24.8 per cent year-on-year drop in women hired into top jobs here. There are no women leading any of the major Irish companies listed on stock markets, writes Sue Duke , vice-president of global public policy at LinkedIn, in our Business Opinion slot. If you would like to read more about the issues that affect your finances, sign up to On the Money , the weekly newsletter from our personal finance team, which will be issued every Friday to Irish Times subscribers.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Every Irish person contributes €53.20 a month to the EU. We should be prepared to pay more
The European Commission's publication of its draft of the union's €2 trillion 2028-2034 budget, the Multiannual Financial Framework ( MFF ), once again opens up a tortuous two years of likely acrimonious budget negotiations. Twenty seven states and the European Parliament must unanimously agree – in talks as complicated as four-dimensional chess – a new package of political imperatives, from defence, immigration, climate change, industrial innovation and inflation to safeguarding historic programmes such as CAP and cohesion. By all appearances, this will be an utterly impossible reconciliation. Helping to steer a path towards it will be the onerous central challenge of next year's Irish presidency . And complicating that challenge for cash-strapped Dublin negotiators will be a plethora of threats to programmes that are particularly important to us to us – CAP; changes to delivery mechanisms; new demands such as defence; and arguments about the scale of increasing burdens on budget net contributors. In truth, according to Zsolt Darvas from think tank Bruegel , MFF spending needs to double to finance the climate transition and pay off its Covid-19 debts. His views echo those in an important report last year from former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi, calling for an additional €800 billion a year of private- and public-sector investment to revive Europe's economic competitiveness. READ MORE The commission's budget is more modest, some €1.816 trillion (plus €165 billion in pandemic recovery debt repayments), up from the current 1.1 per cent of union gross national income to 1.15 per cent. And all at a time when member states are all adamant they will not pay a penny more, although commission president Ursula von der Leyen insists unconvincingly their contributions do not need to go up. [ The Irish Times view on the EU budget: major barriers to getting an agreement Opens in new window ] Irish farmers should be pleased to see direct income payments to farmers ring-fenced. However, agricultural economists here worry that rural development and environmental support payments are to be hived off into a broader regional fund pot and are likely to be squeezed – similar to the cohesion fund for poorer regions, which was once an important Irish staple. MEPs from the regions are also already screaming blue murder at the 'renationalisation' or centralisation of regional funding – 27 national plans would replace more than 500 current programmes. They are alarmed it would substantially reduce regional autonomy and funding which makes up more than one-third of the current budget. Von der Leyen's juggling trick also involves fancy footwork in respect of expanding the union's 'own resources' – or funding from non-member state sources. Such taxation needs to be targeted so that it does not impinge on the domestic tax base and revenues of governments. Most controversially this time is the suggestion of levying a tax on companies with a net annual turnover of at least €100 million. This is expected to generate only €6.8 billion but is already facing determined opposition. Speaking like an Irish finance minister, Germany's chancellor Friedrich Merz has warned that 'there is no question of the EU taxing companies, as the EU has no legal basis for this'. Other proposed new 'own resources' include taxes targeting electric waste (around €15 billion annually), tobacco products/companies (€11.2 billion), a carbon border tax (€1.4 billion), and a tax on revenues generated by emissions trading (€9.6 billion). EU capitals will also worry how the new budget would affect the politically sensitive difference between national contributions and receipts. [ Proposed €2tn EU budget would increase funding for defence Opens in new window ] From 1973 to 2018 Ireland was a net recipient, in nominal terms, of more than €40 billion in EU funds. By 2023, 10 countries, including Ireland, were net contributors, and 17 were net beneficiaries. Top of the net contributors were Germany (€19.8 billion), France (€9.3 billion), with Ireland in eighth place (€1.3 billion). Poland was the top net beneficiary, receiving €7.1 billion. Ireland was second in net contribution per head, at €240 per person. Courtesy of our growing relative wealth (measured dubiously by 'GDP per cap') we displaced Luxembourg in 2024 in paying the most to the EU budget on a gross per capita basis – with every Irish person contributing some €53.20 a month to the union's coffers compared to the EU average of €25.20 and Germans' €29.70. Bulgarians contributed €10.70 a month. Net cash contributions have been seized on by many national politicians and the press as evidence that the countries of the supposedly indolent south are unfairly milking the system at the expense of fiscally responsible northerners. But the real benefits of membership to the countries of the north amount to far more than can be measured by such direct transfer figures. Apart from the progressive aims of redressing EU-wide economic imbalances, helping poorer neighbours and levelling the playing field, the EU provides huge indirect and non-cash benefits disproportionately to net contributing members such as Ireland. These include financial rewards from the European Central Bank in maintaining financial stability and financial returns, valuable access to the single market and research grants through the Horizon programme. Making the political case for increasing our contribution yet again will not be easy but it must be done.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Delay of law proposal adds to uncertainty around redress for clerical abuse survivors
A proposal for a law that would allow religious organisations to be held liable for abuse by their members will not be considered by the Government until 2027 at the earliest. Many religious organisations are unincorporated bodies. This means they as entities cannot be sued and their assets may be beyond the reach of the courts if and when one of their members are found liable for damages against child sex abuse survivors. Individual members of such religious bodies can face legal action, but case law shows it can be difficult to legally pursue the organisation itself for redress. There are concerns about how the State will recoup redress funds from religious bodies for a scheme being considered for survivors of sexual abuse in schools. READ MORE If set up, it would likely be the largest and most expensive redress scheme in the history of the State. Since 2022, the Law Reform Commission (LRC) has been considering whether the Government should legislate to give unincorporated associations, such as voluntary religious orders, their own legal personality or set out another way by which they may be held liable. Minister for Education Helen McEntee has said: 'The Government will review any recommendations made by the commission in its final report, with a view to introducing any necessary legislative or administrative changes in due course.' However, a spokesman for the LRC said its report on changing the legal status of bodies such as religious organisations will not be ready before the end of next year. 'The report about the liability of unincorporated associations is being scoped at present. We do not yet have a completion date but we do not expect it to be published before the end of 2026,' the spokesman said. Labour Party leader Ivana Bacik has expressed concern about whether a delay in progressing such a law would stymie the ability of the Government to access religious organisations' assets, or the lay-run trusts that their assets may have been transferred to. Ms Bacik said her party is trying to bring forward a Bill that would allow civil proceedings to be taken against unincorporated bodies like religious orders. It would allow any damages awarded in such cases to be recovered from a religious organisation or from 'associated' trusts. The same law, if passed, would also add a one-year extension to the normal limitation period provided for in the statutes of limitations. The Labour Party leader said this was to allow any proceedings that the Bill would cover to be brought within 12 months of it being enacted. She recently personally handed a copy of the Bill to the Attorney General. Given the upcoming Commission of Investigation into historic abuse in schools, the Government cannot afford to 'sit back and wait' for the LRC report to finish, she said.
