Lee's Summit teen earns Silver Valor Award after saving mans life
We're told his young hero's natural skill and training gave her the confidence to help save a life.
A student who is part of the JROTC program at Lee's Summit High School put that training into action. First responders told her she may have saved a man's life.
Kansas City man convicted in 2021, 2022 murder-for-hire plot
'He came back a couple days later and said, 'You're my angel,'' Lt. Col. Brian Zoellner said.
He is a proud teacher. Last week, Zoellner presented Daiya Brock with a Silver Valor Award.It's a prestigious honor in JROTC for an act of heroism.
'This is pretty much everything that I have worked my years up to,' Brock said.
Joining as a freshman, Brock is now a Cadet Lt. Col. in the program. In February, the teen used that training when a man walked into her place of work, trailing blood.
Brock's co-worker at Habaneros spotted the blood first.
'She seen it and she said, 'Hey, you're bleeding.' She didn't know what to do, and my first instinct was, 'Hey, I'm going to need you to sit down, like, take pressure off of it,'' Brock said.
Brock did not hesitate; she called for towels and told someone to phone 911. She applied a tourniquet and pressure on the man's leg to stop the bleeding.
'As soon as I lifted up those tights, it like all came down. So, I put my hand over it and I was like, 'Hey, I need a towel. And people to get away,'' Brock said.
'I had to kneel in his blood for like 20 minutes straight.'
The district said paramedics later told Brock her quick response may have saved the man's life.
'They said he hit an artery right there on the shin and that could've been a horrible night if I wasn't there to help him,' Brock said.
After Prop A rollback, Missouri Jobs With Justice launches ballot fight
Zoellner said Brock's focus in chaotic situations stands out, noting it's a positive character trait when lives are on the line.
'A problem arises, everyone else is kind of frozen and she just jumps into action and goes, I've got a solution, let's roll with it,' Zoellner said.
Brock plans to go into the military after graduation next year. She wants to be a K-9 Officer.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
04-08-2025
- Yahoo
By bringing back Brock Lesnar amid federal suit, WWE exhumes the ghosts of Vince McMahon's ugly departure
You have to hand it to WWE: It takes one hell of a twist to blow both of your main event competitors out of the water — at least in terms of the conversation online — within minutes of said massive main event finishing. It isn't like we didn't have enough to talk about. We'd already had the confirmation that the John Cena heel turn is done, as the now-former champ brought back his full-color entrance this past Sunday, prompting elation from the live crowd at WWE SummerSlam Night 2. We'd already had Cody Rhodes reclaiming the Universal Championship in a sensational match, turning a page on the events of WrestleMania 41 and giving Cena a chance to show that he can still summon a vintage night at age 48. Then, just as the broadcast appeared to be wrapping up, it happened. That shriek-like guitar lick which can only mean one thing: The return of one of WWE's most dominant — and controversial — talents, 'The Beast Incarnate.' Leaving aside the potential storyline implications for now, it's worth saying that the choice to bring back Brock Lesnar is a bold call by WWE given the former champion's involvement in one of the company's bigger controversies of the 21st century, the Vince McMahon sex trafficking scandal. We should be clear from the off: Lesnar himself is not being sued or investigated for anything. But he is named in an ongoing federal lawsuit against McMahon and WWE, which very much has yet to be resolved. Given that, it's worth a recap of the pertinent facts and how they relate (or not) to Lesnar. In January 2024 — four months after helping to oversee the TKO merger — McMahon resigned from WWE's parent company, following a bombshell report in the Wall Street Journal that a former WWE employee, Janel Grant, filed a lawsuit against the company (as well as McMahon and former WWE executive John Laurinaitis) alleging that McMahon had sexually assaulted and trafficked her. How does that affect Brock Lesnar? As part of its claims against McMahon, the lawsuit alleges that WWE's founder had shared sexually explicit images of Grant with what it called a 'world-famous athlete' and 'former UFC fighter," in order to entice the performer to sign a new WWE contract. While the lawsuit didn't name Lesnar, the Journal was able to look at the specific details and come to the conclusion that it couldn't possibly be anyone else. Grant's legal team have since amended their complaint to explicitly name Brock Lesnar. After the story broke, WWE reportedly shelved a plan to bring back Lesnar for the 2024 Royal Rumble. Since then, he's been gone from WWE programming, though not entirely persona non grata — Lesnar's old matches have recently been posted to the company's YouTube channel, for example, and he still gets mentioned from time to time on commentary. But he hasn't appeared in-person. At 9.45 p.m. local time Sunday in New Jersey, that all changed when Lesnar made his unannounced return to attack Cena, presumably setting up a match for Aug. 31's Clash in Paris event or Crown Jewel: Perth later this year in October. It was an explosive end to what was already a massive weekend in the pro-wrestling calendar. But what will it mean for WWE and Lesnar? Again, Lesnar himself isn't in any legal jeopardy, and we can probably assume from his return that the WWE doesn't see any risk of that situation changing soon. (Indeed the Wrestling Observer Newsletter has reported that WWE's legal team came to that conclusion four weeks ago.) Of course, that doesn't mean they're not risking any reputation fallout by working with Lesnar. We can see from Grant's lawsuit (which has been the subject of some stellar reporting from Brandon Thurston) that the descriptions of Lesnar's alleged actions are fairly vulgar, to say the least. It isn't implausible that brand sponsors carry out their own risk assessment. There will inevitably be awkward questions to come at press availabilities and the danger that conversations get out of hand on social media. What we can safely say from Sunday night is that WWE has decided that working with Lesnar — a massive draw, in anyone's estimations — is worth risking that kind of backlash. In fairness, it isn't like WWE CCO Paul Levesque hasn't been asked about Lesnar in the recent past. Last year, he told the Daily Mail that WWE would be 'open' to a return provided that Lesnar was interested. At last night's post-show, he suggested that it was Cena's desire to work with Lesnar once more that tipped the balance. As for the lawsuit itself, there's no confirmation (yet) that it will go to trial. TKO continues to say they treat any allegations seriously, while McMahon has claimed that the case is a 'smear campaign.' Laurinaitis has since settled with Grant out of court. Lesnar has never made a public comment. No doubt some will link Lesnar's return to WWE's increasing willingness to alienate some parts of his fan base (for example, by promoting Levesque's appearance at the White House last week). But, in truth, the sheer star power of the man probably meant that a return was more likely than not in the long run. 'It's about John being able to go out the way he wants to go out,' said Levesque on WWE's Sunday night post-show, suggesting that the bigger story is what will happen in the ring with Cena and Lesnar. He's certainly right that it will be a massive event — but he's kidding himself if he thinks it will be the only story.
Yahoo
05-06-2025
- Yahoo
ROTC instructor sues SJSD over firing
ST. JOSEPH, Mo. (News-Press NOW) — A former ROTC instructor who was fired in 2024 has filed a discrimination lawsuit against the St. Joseph School District. Master Sergeant Jamaal Anderson served as an instructor for Benton High School's JROTC program. Anderson alleges he was placed on leave on April 29, 2024, was given a letter of suspension and told to not to go on school property. His contract was not renewed for the 24-25 school year. According to Anderson's lawsuit, he was diagnosed with prostate cancer and underwent surgery in March of 2022. The lawsuit contends that Anderson informed the district that there would be times when he would need to leave class to use the restroom or miss work abruptly. The lawsuit states that Anderson was told that SJSD would not accommodate such breaks. Jamaal Anderson lawsuitDownload Anderson also alleges he was not permitted to take time off to attend doctor's appointments. The lawsuit also said Anderson's absences led to poor classroom and extracurricular event ratings by his district supervisors, which eventually led to his suspension. News-Press NOW did contact SJSD Superintendent Gabe Edgar, who stated, We are aware of this. However, because it's a personnel matter, we will not comment." The day after his suspension was announced, students and cadets spoke out against the move. "This makes all of us mad because he always stands up for what he believes is right and treats everyone with respect,' one student said. Anderson's lawsuit also referenced an incident at Lafayette that occurred in May 2023. Students allegedly "wrapped Anderson's car in paper and wrote racial slurs and drew offensive pictures on the paper. Anderson contends the school district should have filed charges against the students but failed to do so. Although no dollar amount was specified in the suit, Anderson does ask for actual and punitive damages.
CBS News
30-05-2025
- CBS News
Attorneys scramble to help migrants detained outside Denver immigration court
Fears and nerves shook up some families at Denver immigration court on Thursday, after immigration advocates learned one family was detained by immigration agents after the family attended their scheduled immigration hearing. "It was a family of three with a small child clutching to his father's neck," said Emily Brock, Deputy Managing Attorney with Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network's Children's program. CBS Brock arrived at immigration court as the family of three was being taken into ICE custody, but she said they could not do anything to stop the process. Instead, her organization scrambled to get immigration attorneys to show up and help prevent others from being detained. "This is a new trend that is happening nationwide, and now we've seen it in Denver," said Brock. Brock said arresting people at courthouses is a new ICE tactic to detain and expedite the removal process for more migrants, amid the Trump Administration's latest quota to arrest over 3,000 migrants a day. "Generally, the advice is if you are set for a hearing in immigration court, you need to appear for that hearing because otherwise, if you don't show up, you can be ordered removed for not showing up," said Brock. "So, just by clearly not showing up, you can get a removal order, and that makes you at a greater risk for enforcement action." CBS Typically, when a migrant appears before the court in a removal hearing, they may get the chance to have their case dismissed by a judge. This is generally a positive thing. However, having a case dismissed may now be used against the individual. "This is where I think the surprise comes in and why we scrambled. Now, a dismissal means that they can be arrested as they leave the court and be placed in these expedited removal proceedings," said Brock. "Some people don't understand, they haven't been able to talk to an attorney about what this means," said Immigration Attorney Cristina Uribe Reyes. It is why immigration lawyers like Reyes stepped up to help educate families who went into court. Some advocates even handed out fliers, urging families entering into court to know their rights beforehand. "A lot of these cases are at the last stage where they're just waiting for their final hearing to present the case," said Reyes. "Now, we're having to start all over again from step zero when they get detained." A spokesperson with the Department of Homeland Security issued this statement in response to these increased detainment measures by ICE: "Secretary Noem is reversing Biden's catch and release policy that allowed millions of unvetted illegal aliens to be let loose on American streets. This Administration is once again implementing the rule of law. Most aliens who illegally entered the United States within the past two years are subject to expedited removals. Biden ignored this legal fact and chose to release millions of illegal aliens, including violent criminals, into the country with a notice to appear before an immigration judge. ICE is now following the law and placing these illegal aliens in expedited removal, as they always should have been. If they have a valid credible fear claim, they will continue in immigration proceedings, but if no valid claim is found, aliens will be subject to a swift deportation." An ICE spokesperson also issued their own statement: "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is executing its mission of identifying and removing criminal aliens and others who have violated our nation's immigration laws. All aliens in violation of U.S. immigration law may be subject to arrest, detention and, if found removable by final order, removal from the United States, regardless of nationality. For operational security and for the safety of our law enforcement personnel, ICE does not confirm, deny, or otherwise discuss ongoing or future operations. The agency publicly announces operational results when appropriate." While it is unclear if ICE agents will come back and detain more families exiting court in the days to come, Brock said the challenge is having enough manpower to be available to help families after losing federal funding to support some of their programs. "When the contracts for the legal orientation programs were canceled, we had to cut back on staff, we had to reallocate staff members to other programs, and so we aren't necessarily able to be here 24/7 or have the presence that we used to be able to have," she said. She said families can and should ask for more time in their cases if the judge moves to dismiss, or oppose dismissal, and have the chance for their cases to be heard without the fear of being taken into custody. The biggest message to families, however, is that they still should show up to their scheduled court hearing. "This is an attack on due process, and all it's going to do is ferment fear in the community," said Brock.
