£2.5bn from Chelsea sale ‘still not handed to Ukraine war victims three years on'
Three years after Roman Abramovich 's forced sale of Chelsea Football Club, the £2.5 billion generated remains inaccessible for its intended purpose – humanitarian aid in Ukraine.
A legal adviser has confirmed the funds are "still locked up," despite the pledge to benefit victims of the war.
Abramovich, placed under sanction by the Government in 2022 due to his links to Russia 's invasion of Ukraine, committed the proceeds of the sale to a charitable foundation.
However, the funds remain unavailable, raising questions about the delay and the complexities of transferring such a substantial sum under the current geopolitical circumstances.
The deal, at the time, was one of the most complex in the history of sport.
At the time, a spokesperson for Abramovich said that an independently-managed foundation was being set up to oversee the proceeds of sale.
Lyra Nightingale, a legal adviser at Redress, an organisation helping deliver justice and reparations for survivors of torture and challenging impunity for perpetrators, said the funds remained unused and there had been 'no clear reason from the Government as to why that is so'.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Ms Nightingale said: 'Around three years ago now, Abramovich … was being subject to these Russian sanctions … and he was granted a licence to sell Chelsea Football Club.
'The proceeds of that were to go for the benefit of Ukraine.
'(But) three years later we're still waiting.
'And there is no clear reason from the Government as to why that is so. (It's) still locked up. That money has been expressly committed to humanitarian purposes in Ukraine.
'We don't know why it's stuck. There's a real lack of transparency and over three years of campaigning for that money to go where the Government said it would go, that has still not happened.'
The House of Lords European Affairs Committee has previously reported the cash was frozen in a UK bank account amid 'disagreement' about where it should be spent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Almost 1500 buildings in Scotland ‘at risk' from cladding
Latest estimates indicate the cladding remediation programme could cost £1.7 billion over a 15-year period. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Almost 1,500 buildings in Scotland are "at risk" from cladding which has yet to be removed, despite the Grenfell Tower disaster, the Scottish Liberal Democrats said. There are about 13,400 blocks of flats higher than 11 metres in Scotland , according to figures published by the Scottish Government this month. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However new figures show that an estimated 1,260-1,450 of them need remedial work to alleviate external wall system (EWS) life-safety fire risk. In statistics published by the Scottish Government in Scotland's cladding remediation programme, it was said that by April 30 , two single building assessments (SBAs), based on specification published in June 2024 , had been completed and a further 13 assessments had been started. By April 30 , two completed assessments identified that remedial works were required, and work had begun for one but not the other, the statistics showed. In June 2024 , the Housing (Cladding Remediation) ( Scotland ) Bill was passed, giving ministers powers to "to assess and remediate certain types of buildings with unsafe cladding". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On Friday the Scottish Government said latest estimates indicate its cladding remediation programme could cost £1.7 billion over a 15-year period. About 250 of the residential high-rise buildings in Scotland may require work to alleviate external wall system (EWS) life-safety fire risk, while 1,020-1,200 of the mid-rise residential buildings require work to alleviate the same issue, according to a breakdown of the figures. In contrast, by May 2025 in England , 2,477 buildings identified with unsafe cladding have started or completed remediation works, representing 49% of buildings within the programme. There is a target to complete the remediation of high-rise buildings by 2029 and for mid-rise buildings to have either been completely remediated by the date, or to have a plan in place with a date set. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Of these, 1,652 buildings (33%) have been completed, according to UK Government statistics published in May. Scottish Liberal Democrat communities spokesman Willie Rennie MSP accused the Scottish Government of "refusing to set" a similar deadline. He said the remediation work was happening "inexplicably slowly" and called for progress. Mr Rennie said: "In the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower disaster, ministers should be bending over backwards to remove unsafe cladding. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "But these figures show that the SNP are nowhere: they have made next to no progress, leaving so many homeowners and residents in a distressing limbo. "The Scottish Government have repeatedly failed to appreciate the dangers posed by certain building materials. "They have refused to set a deadline for removing cladding and they have taken an unbelievably blase approach to the problems of RAAC concrete. "The SNP have acted inexplicably slowly. They must urgently step up the pace in remediating at-risk buildings and keep everyone who is potentially affected informed and updated on progress."
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
What Rachel Reeves can learn from Donald Trump
Photo byNext week, Rachel Reeves will publish the Government's Spending Review, outlining the financial settlement for the coming three years. As she makes her final decisions (they always go to the wire) she might consider lessons from an unlikely source: the US President. In recent months, Donald Trump has taken to trashing areas of deep US strength that were taken for granted so completely that they were invisible to most. Trump has done Reeves a favour, by paving paradise and putting up a parking lot. His actions are a reminder of the importance of investing in the unseen infrastructures that enable prosperity. The British Academy has just published a series of papers exploring what might pull the UK out of its long period of low productivity. The UK has powerful legal, financial, cultural and scientific institutions, but we're not good at organising the economy around our greatest strengths. We have a large population of skilled workers, for example, but they are unevenly spread and mismatched across regions. We do not make the most of our institutional, human and physical capital. Reeves has an opportunity to invest in these strengths and to make the UK more prosperous over the long term. In the US, the government is currently experimenting with the opposite approach. Trump has taken an axe to America's historic strength in research by attacking universities including Harvard, and cutting or freezing research funding. R&D is one of the drivers of long-term prosperity, and the US will be poorer as a result in the medium term. By many measures the UK already punches above its weight when it comes to R&D, particularly in universities. Reeves needs to continue investing in this long-term source of growth, and also find a model for the universities where much of this research is conducted to be financially stable. The Government has recently focused on heavy investment in advanced or 'frontier' technology but a significant share of innovation in the UK's services-dominated economy is not especially high-tech. We innovate well through the humanities, social sciences and the arts, in processes and services, as well as we do in cutting-edge technology. Trump has also reminded us of the dangers of unpredictability. A country whose word cannot be relied upon will suffer economically – even if it is currently the dominant power. The UK faces rather different challenges to the US on the global stage, in that we are not large enough to act unilaterally or bilaterally, nor are we still a member of a major economic bloc. But our deep roots in multilateralism mean we have an opportunity to become the world's most dependable broker. We have an historic role in shaping the major international organisations and we have substantial knowledge of global institutions and international legal norms and practices. In turbulent times this institutional infrastructure is something in which we should invest, with a strategic narrative that the UK economy remains open to the world. Our relatively stable political landscape, strong institutions and low levels of corruption are not just part of the furniture – they are a source of comparative advantage in an increasingly turbulent world. The openness of our economy is an opportunity to attract and develop human capital. We have a valuable infrastructure of knowledge and finance that is well equipped to support and commercialise innovation. The UK government has struggled in its first year to find a positive narrative, to move beyond dealing with a difficult economic inheritance. The public knows we have an economy that has suffered long-term stagnation and that we face mounting geopolitical uncertainty. The Spending Review should be couched in a narrative of investing in the UK's comparative strengths and its deep assets, in the infrastructure that is needed to help secure longer-term growth and resilience. If she can do this, the Chancellor might be even able to say that despite the tight economic circumstances, it is the Biggest, the Best, and the most Beautiful spending review ever. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe [See also: Rachel Reeves should fear the bond market vigilantes] Related
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Japan confirms China's aircraft carrier sailed east of Iwo Jima for first time
TOKYO, June 9 (Reuters) - The Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning sailed through waters east of the island of Iwo Jima in the Pacific Ocean for the first time, Japan's top government spokesperson said on Monday. Japan would strengthen surveillance and gather necessary information, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi told a regular press briefing in Tokyo. Japan has also sent "an appropriate message" to China, Hayashi said without elaborating. Iwo Jima is located 1,000 km (620 miles) south of Tokyo. A statement by Japan's Joint Staff showed over the weekend that the Liaoning, accompanied by some other ships, sailed in the sea within Japan's exclusive economic zone near Minamitorishima, a remote island east of Iwo Jima. Japan had also confirmed fighter jets and helicopters taking off and landing from Liaoning in the waters southeast of Iwo Jima on Sunday.
