Former Colombian president convicted of witness tampering and bribery
The ruling followed an almost six-month trial in which prosecutors presented evidence that Uribe tried to influence witnesses who accused him of links to a paramilitary group.
The 73-year-old — who was president from 2002 to 2010 — faces up to 12 years in prison but a sentencing will be delivered in a separate hearing. He is Colombia's first-ever former head of state to be convicted of a crime.
Uribe is expected to appeal the ruling, having maintained his innocence.
He was not in court in the capital, Bogota, for the verdict as the judge has so far not ordered his arrest. The former president attended the trial virtually and could be seen shaking his head as the verdict was read out.
Uribe is a polarising figure in Colombia, where many credit him for saving the country from becoming a failed state, while others associate him with human rights violations and the rise of paramilitary groups in the 1990s.
Rubio criticises ruling
In her ruling, Judge Sandra Heredia said there was sufficient evidence to find that Uribe conspired with a lawyer to persuade three imprisoned former members of paramilitary groups into changing testimony they had provided to Ivan Cepeda, a left-wing senator.
Cepeda had launched an investigation into Uribe's alleged links to a paramilitary group.
The case dates back to 2012 when Uribe filed a libel suit against Cepeda before the Supreme Court. However, in an unexpected twist, the high court dismissed the charges and instead began investigating Uribe in 2018.
During Uribe's presidency, the Colombian army forced Latin America's oldest leftist insurgency, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), into remote areas and held peace talks which led to the disarmament of more than 13,000 fighters in 2016.
Known for his work ethic and temper, Uribe still has many supporters in Colombia and is one of the fiercest opponents of the current president, leftist ex-guerrilla Gustavo Petro.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reacted to the ruling as it became clear that Judge Heredia would find the former president guilty of bribery.
"Uribe's only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland," Rubio wrote on Monday on X.
"The weaponisation of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges has now set a worrisome precedent."
Colombian President Gustavo Petro defended the ruling. He wrote on X that "a solid justice system" would allow Colombia to emerge from violence.
He added in another message that Rubio was interfering with Colombian sovereignty. "The world must respect Colombia's judges," Petro wrote.
Heredia said that her ruling should not be interpreted as "a victory for anyone" but as "an act of justice".
State crimes
Critics blame Uribe for several state crimes.
According to Colombia's Truth Commission, which was set up in 2017, more than 6,400 civilians were executed by the Colombian army and identified as members of rebel groups by soldiers seeking promotions during the conflict with paramilitary groups.
This phenomenon reportedly peaked during Uribe's government.
Prosecutors accused Uribe of sending lawyers to meet with imprisoned ex-paramilitary members and pressuring them to withdraw testimony they had given to Cepeda.
During the trial, Uribe denied trying to manipulate the witnesses, but acknowledged requesting interviews with them as part of his preparation for the trial. He said this was also done to verify testimony that was also being used in a murder trial against his brother, Santiago Uribe, who was also accused of links to armed paramilitaries.
Cepeda spoke to the press after the ruling and said he would continue to fight for truth and justice for the victim of Colombia's conflict.
"No one can defy or sully the rule of law," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
12 hours ago
- France 24
Could copper tariff hurt US more than Chile?
If not, the South American country should be able to easily find other buyers for a metal deemed critical for the artificial intelligence and green energy revolutions, analysts say. Chile is the largest provider of copper to the United States, whose President Donald Trump announced a punishing levy on the metal starting Friday. Government sources in Santiago told AFP delegations have been talking behind closed doors since Monday, seeking a Trump-pleasing deal that will in effect replace a free trade agreement in place since 2004. Impact on the US The United States imports about 45 percent of the copper it needs for industrial use, according to the US Geological Survey, a government agency. Of that, it gets 51 percent from Chile. According to Trump himself, it is "the second most used material by the Department of Defense" -- used in semiconductors, planes, ships, ammunition, data centers and missile defense systems. Trump "wants to revitalize a domestic industry that has faded and has been overtaken by China and has become reliant on foreign imports," Andy Cole, an analyst with the London-based Fastmarkets price-tracking agency, told AFP. Raising the tariff on imported copper will increase US production costs, which may boost demand for domestically sourced copper. But the United States does not have the capacity to increase its production overnight, and "in the long run the losers will be US consumers if they have the pay more for copper," said Cole. Juan Carlos Guajardo, director of Chilean consulting firm Plusmining, said the United States would need to produce between 600,000 and 800,000 tons of copper per year for its domestic industry, and would not be able to reach that level for "at least 10 years." Impact on Chile Chile is responsible for nearly a quarter of global copper supply, which contributes 10 to 15 percent to its GDP. Its Finance Minister Mario Marcel has warned of "medium-term" damage from a 50-percent tariff, but said the country could mitigate longer-term harms through "market diversification." For Guajardo, this means Chile can "redirect its copper," particularly "to Southeast Asia and India" or even Europe. China is by far the leading buyer of Chilean copper, accounting for 52 percent -- totaling $26 billion --in 2024, according to the South American country's central bank. The United States occupied a distant second place with imports worth $5.8 billion from Chile, followed by Japan with $5.3 billion and South Korea with $2.8 billion. According to Maurice Obstfeld, an economics professor at the University of California, Berkeley, "copper importers other than the US could gain" from the tariff hike. Exception? Chile says it has not been officially notified of the August 1 starting date for a copper tariff, and is still hoping to avoid it. The country's foreign ministry has said "confidential" talks with US delegates would continue to the last minute. According to Marcel, copper itself is not formally on the negotiating table, but will likely be included. "For this type of raw material, exceptions have been made in other agreements," he told Radio Duna earlier this week. After Trump's announcement on July 8, the price of copper soared to record levels in New York. US buyers rushed to stockpile the red metal before August 1, paying prices sometimes as much as 30 percent higher than in London.
France 24
13 hours ago
- France 24
Trump administration pushes to reverse scientific ruling behind climate regulations
President Donald Trump 's administration on Tuesday moved to reverse a foundational scientific determination that underpins the US government's authority to limit greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles and, more broadly, to combat climate change. Speaking at an auto dealership in Indianapolis, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin argued that the 2009 Endangerment Finding was based on flawed reasoning and had inflicted serious economic harm. "If finalized, today's announcement would amount to the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States," said the former Republican congressman. He was joined by Energy Secretary Chris Wright, a former fracking company CEO, whose department published a climate science study cited in the EPA action. The proposed reversal -- first announced in March -- will be subject to a 45-day public comment period and is certain to face legal challenges. While Zeldin cast the move as a way to undo what he called the " Biden - Harris administration's electric vehicle (EV) mandate," revoking the Endangerment Finding could also unravel the legal basis for a wide array of climate regulations, including those on power plants and oil and gas operations. In his remarks, Zeldin accused the EPA under former president Barack Obama, a Democrat, of making "mental leaps" in determining that heat-trapping gases posed a threat to public health and welfare. The EPA said in a press release that the finding had "been used to justify over $1 trillion in regulations" and undoing it would save $54 billion annually. A 302-page document outlining the rationale for the revocation makes a number of bold claims around climate science, including the assertion that "extreme weather events have not demonstrably increased relative to historical highs," citing the Energy Department report. It also speaks about the "beneficial impacts" of carbon emissions on plant growth and agricultural productivity. The Endangerment Finding was grounded in overwhelming scientific consensus and peer-reviewed research. It followed a landmark 2007 Supreme Court ruling that found greenhouse gases qualify as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act and directed the EPA to revisit its position. Transportation accounts for 28 percent of US greenhouse gas emissions -- more than any other sector. If it were a country, the US transportation sector would rank as the fourth largest emitter of greenhouse gases globally, while the power sector would be fifth. Legal battle looms Environmental groups and states are expected to swiftly sue. The case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court, which may need to overturn its own 2007 precedent to side with the current Republican administration. Dan Becker of the Center for Biological Diversity told AFP the Endangerment Finding has survived multiple legal challenges by industry over the years, "but this time, it's the government itself mounting the attack." "Hopefully they will recognize that this is science and not politics -- that there was a good reason for that precedent and no good reason to revoke it," said Becker. "But this is a very political court." He added that the administration's cost-saving arguments were misleading, pointing to official data showing that rules now targeted for repeal saved the average American driver $6,000 in fuel and maintenance over the lifetime of vehicles built under the standards. Camille Pannu, an environmental law specialist at Columbia University, told AFP the Trump administration had failed to present robust legal arguments grounded in scientific evidence in its proposal. "I think they're hoping they can just refuse to regulate for four years and do crazy things during that time while it's all tied up in court," she said. Since returning to office, Trump has withdrawn the US from the Paris Agreement and launched a sweeping campaign to expand fossil fuel development. The announcement comes as tens of millions of Americans are baking under a brutal heat dome in the Southeast, while climate-fueled flooding earlier this month killed more than 100 people in Texas.
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Deadly Russian air raids hit Ukraine as Trump warns of sanctions
01:35 29/07/2025 France leads UN talks on Israel-Palestine two-state solution 29/07/2025 China: Deadly floods hit the north of the country 29/07/2025 France: Paris election shows split in the Republican party, Culture Minister and ex-PM to face off 29/07/2025 How Claude Monet's masterpiece named Impressionism? 29/07/2025 Colombia ex-president Uribe guilty in bribery trial 29/07/2025 Turkey battles wildfires, arrests suspects as heatwave grips Mediterranean 29/07/2025 Thailand and Cambodia ceasefire holds as wary displaced villagers return home 29/07/2025 Heavy rain causes flooding, evacuations and at least 38 deaths around Beijing region 29/07/2025 100-year-old Frenchman breaks skydive record with family
