US dollar suffers worst start to a year since 1973 over Trump tariff concerns
The greenback weakened 10.7% in the first six months of the year compared to a basket of currencies from major trading partners – the worst drop since 1973 when President Nixon stopped tying the dollar to the price of gold.
3 President Trump unveiled harsh tariffs during a 'Liberation Day' press conference in April.
AFP via Getty Images
But its decline could be part of Trump's broader vision to devalue the dollar — an idea floated by Stephen Miran, recently appointed Chairman of the US Council of Economic Advisers in what has been dubbed the Mar-a-Lago Accord.
A weaker dollar makes US exports much cheaper, and could aid Trump's oft-stated goal of boosting manufacturing at home, as well as reducing the nation's trade deficit, the thinking goes.
When he was campaigning for a second term, an official in the first Trump administration told Politico that 'currency revaluation is likely to be a priority' because of 'the viewpoint that [an overvalued dollar] contributes to the trade deficit.'
Trump has not weighed in on the speculation about devaluing the dollar.
'President Trump has repeatedly affirmed his commitment to the dominance of the dollar as the world's reserve currency,' White House press spokesman Kush Desai told The Post on Tuesday.
'Ten-year Treasury yields rallying down nearly 40 basis points since Inauguration Day, four consecutive expectation-beating inflation reports, and the trillions in historic investment commitments that have poured into the United States since Election Day are all indicative of the confidence that investors and markets continue to have in our economy and currency.'
But many experts claim Trump's hefty tariffs are putting pressure on the dollar and forcing global investors to rethink their ties to the currency.
'Trump is definitely playing with fire,' Stephen Miller, a consultant for GSFM, a unit of Canada's CI Financial Corp. in Australia, told Bloomberg.
While a weaker dollar should theoretically help US exporters, there's still a lot of uncertainty when it comes to global trade because of the Trump administration's ongoing negotiations with key nations, which are staring down a fast-approaching July 9 deadline.
The dollar's fall comes after it soared on Trump's re-election win and peaked in mid-January on hopes he would bring a pro-growth mindset to the White House.
3 The US dollar has weakened 10.7% in the first six months of the year when compared to a basket of currencies.
SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
But in April, Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement revealed tariffs that were much stiffer than analysts and economists had predicted, spurring a broad shift away from US investments.
'Full-scale de-dollarization, if it ever comes, is still a long way away,' Rick Rieder, chief investment officer of global fixed income at BlackRock, said in the company's most recent forecast.
But the drop in confidence in the US dollar, which is typically seen as a safe haven asset, is concerning – and could worsen with a rise in government debt, according to Rieder.
Trump's massive budget bill, which is projected to add $3 trillion in national debt, narrowly squeaked through the Senate on Tuesday. It awaits final approval in the House.
3 Investors are fearful that President Trump's tariffs could keep inflation and interest rates higher for longer.
Getty Images
The concerns over higher inflation and debt have have pushed long-term Treasury yields lower. The 10-year yield started near 5% this year and has steadily fallen, reaching 4.267% on Tuesday.
'I think we're going to continue to have this higher pressure on the low end of the yield curve because we haven't really dealt anything away with the deficit or inflation for that matter. In fact, there's more risk now than anything,' Ben Emons, founder of FedWatch Advisors, said on CNBC's 'Fast Money' Tuesday.
'I do think it's related to Treasuries, that if Treasuries get more under pressure, the dollar will get weaker.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
30 minutes ago
- USA Today
Will Trump's big tax bill help or hurt you? Why it could depend on your income
A new analysis found that higher earners stand to benefit most from the Senate's tax bill in the short run, but future generations of all income brackets could be 'worse off.' President Donald Trump's tax bill could make future generations "worse off," no matter their income, according to a new report from the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Like other analyses, the nonpartisan research initiative's latest findings suggest most Americans would see tax cuts, with high-income households – which tend to pay more taxes – seeing the largest gains. Long-term, though, the Penn Wharton Budget Lab's July 1 report projects lifetime losses for all income brackets. "It's still higher-income households that are the winners, especially those who are alive today," said Kent Smetters, faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model. The analysis also found the Senate's version of the tax bill, which narrowly passed on July 1, would lead to higher deficits and slower economic growth compared to its counterpart from the House. The bill heads to the House for final approval. Trump has asked for a final version on his desk and ready for signature by July 4, but acknowledged the deadline may be "very hard to do" as some House Republicans voice frustrations with changes made in the Senate. Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP What's different under the Senate version of the tax bill? The legislation, dubbed the 'One, Big Beautiful Bill' by Trump, would make the 2017 tax cuts from Trump's first term permanent, increase the child tax credit and introduce other tax cuts, including no taxes on tips or overtime wages. To help pay for the cuts, the government would reduce spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps, and make cuts to Medicaid, a program that provides health insurance to more than 71 million low-income Americans. The version in the Senate has some key differences from the House bill, including: "The Senate one makes things more permanent," Smetters told USA TODAY. "On the one hand, we don't have to revisit the same politics in four years. On the other hand, there's a fiscal cost associated with that. That means more debt and more burdens inherited by future generations." More Americans would also lose Medicaid under the Senate's version, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, with an estimated 11.8 million people uninsured by 2034, compared to previous estimates of 10.9 million people under the House's proposal. 5 takeaways: Trump asserts dominance with 'big, beautiful bill' Senate passage Impact on future generations Various analyses suggest Trump's tax bill would reward higher-earning Americans more than their lower-earning counterparts. A June analysis of the House bill by the Congressional Budget Office, for instance, found resources for the poorest would decrease by about $1,600 per year under the legislation, largely due to cuts to Medicaid and food aid ‒ which would be more aggressive under the Senate bill. Meanwhile, the wealthiest would gain about $12,000 on average. Another June report from the Yale Budget Lab suggests the bottom fifth of earners would lose about $560 per year while the top 20% would gain $6,000. But all future generations, no matter their income, would experience lifetime losses, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model. High-income households are set to lose $5,700 under the Senate's bill, while low-income households would lose $22,000. The report points to a reduced social security net and lower wages as the main drivers. Under the House bill, the Penn Wharton Budget Model projected lifetime losses ranging from $500 for high-income households to $15,800 for low-income households. "The future generations, they're going to be worse off. It doesn't matter where on the income bracket they fall," Smetters said. "Ultimately, someone has to pay for (the tax bill), and we're basically passing it on to the next generation." Slower economic growth While the House version showed a 0.4% gain in GDP by year 10, according to the Budget Model's previous analysis, the Senate's version would yield a 0.3% loss. After 30 years, GDP would drop 4.6% under the Senate bill compared to a 1.5% drop under the House version. Higher deficits Primary deficits are projected to increase $3.1 trillion over the next decade through the Senate's tax bill, compared to roughly $2.7 trillion under the House bill, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Other reports have also found a higher debt load under the Senate bill. The Congressional Budget Office projects it would add $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, $800 billion more than the House's bill. And a July report from the Yale Budget Lab says the Senate's bill would add $3 trillion to the debt by 2034, compared to an estimated $2.4 trillion under the House bill. How much do lower-income Americans stand to lose? According to the most recent Penn Wharton Budget Model analysis, the lowest-earning households stand to lose after-tax-and-transfer income in both the short- and long-run, while higher earners would see gains under the Senate bill. Smetters said figures may be slightly adjusted as more information on specific amendments becomes available.
New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
US ready to arm Israel with bunker-busting bombs if Iran goes nuclear
The US is preparing to authorize giving Israel B-2 stealth bombers and 30,000-pound, 20-foot-long 'bunker buster' bombs if Iran resumes its nuclear weapons program, under a new bill proposed by a bipartisan pair of lawmakers. The Bunker Buster Act would allow President Trump to 'take actions to ensure Israel is prepared for all contingencies if Iran seeks to develop a nuclear weapon,' according to Reps. Josh Gottheimer, (D-NJ), and Mike Lawler, (R-NY), who proposed the legislation. 'Iran, the leading state sponsor of terror, and one of America's top enemies, can never have a nuclear weapon. That's why I strongly supported our military actions earlier this month,' Gottheimer said in a statement. Advertisement 'Iran has killed scores of Americans, including our service members, and repeatedly attacked our key democratic ally, Israel. Israel must be able to defend herself against Iran, and ensure that Iran cannot rebuild its nuclear capabilities,' he added. 6 The US is ready to supply Israel with B-2 bombers if Iran restarts its nuclear program. US Air Force 'This bill gives the President the authority to equip Israel with the tools and training they need to deter Tehran and make the world a safer place,' Lawler said. Advertisement B-2 bomber pilots were deployed last month in a historic attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, launching 14 GBU 57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, better known as bunker-buster bombs, onto three separate sites in the country. The US 'totally obliterated' the Iranian regime's nuclear program, President Trump claimed, after the bombs penetrated up to 200 feet below the surface into the underground facilities. 6 Rep. Josh Gottheimer is one of two proponents of the bipartisan bill. Getty Images 6 Rep. Mike Lawler also proposed the Bunker Buster Act. REUTERS Advertisement Israel also took part in the strikes on Iranian nuclear and military facilities. The US had 19 B-2s in operation as of last year, and has not allowed any of its allies to use the stealth bombers. It's the only plane capable of delivering the massive payload. 6 US strikes targeted three nuclear sites in Iran last month. Rob Jejenich / NY Post Design Centrifuges at Iran's underground nuclear site at Fordow are 'no longer operational' following last month's US strikes, the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) Chair Rafael Grossi told Radio France Internationale this week. Advertisement However, there are rumors Iran may have moved its stock of enriched uranium away from the targeted sites ahead of the bombing, which administration officials have vehemently denied. 6 Bunker-busting bombs travel up to 200 feet below the ground. Department of Defense 6 Iran's main uranium enrichment site in Fordow was attacked. via REUTERS Iran may begin enriching uranium again within a 'matter of months,' Grossi told CBS last week. 'The capacities they have are there. They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that. But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there,' Grossi said. 'It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage. Iran has the capacities there; industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again,' he added.
Fox News
30 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump says his relationship with one-time rival DeSantis now a '9.9'
They were bitter Republican rivals a year and a half ago, but President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis were all smiles this week, as the two appeared side-by-side for the opening of a new migrant detention center in the Everglades. "The relationship between the governor and the president is fantastic," DeSantis communications director Bryan Griffin told Fox News Digital. Griffin spoke with Fox News Digital the day after Trump and DeSantis, along with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, toured what's being called "Alligator Alacatraz," a detention center quickly constructed on a remote airstrip that's surrounded by alligator-infested swamps. DeSantis, the two-term conservative governor who unsuccessfully ran against Trump for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination, used emergency powers to seize the land and speed construction of the facility, with encouragement from Trump and his administration. "Ron worked beautifully with Kristi (Noem) and all of the people at Homeland Security and got it done in how many days, Ron?" Trump said as he turned to the governor while answering reporters' questions. "Eight days, a new facility was up and running," DeSantis responded. Following his 2022 gubernatorial re-election landslide, DeSantis moved toward running for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination and formally launched his White House bid in the spring of 2023. But even before he announced his candidacy, DeSantis was repeatedly attacked by Trump and his political allies. The long-term targeting of the governor proved successful. DeSantis was considered Trump's top threat among the field of Republican White House hopefuls. But the governor saw his support deteriorate, and he ended his presidential bid in January of last year, after a disappointing second-place finish in the Iowa caucuses, far behind Trump. DeSantis immediately endorsed Trump, helped raise money for the then-former president's general election campaign, and gave a well-received speech last summer at the Republican National Convention in Milwuakee, Wisconsin. Asked about his relationship with DeSantis, Trump told reporters, "I would say it's a 10. I think it's a 10," before adding "maybe 9.9 because, you know, might be a couple of little wounds." DeSantis has been extremely aggressive in assisting Trump in his sweeping immigration crackdown. The governor signed stiff immigration measures into law earlier this year, after a compromise with the Republican leaders of the Florida legislature was brokered, which brought to an end a weekslong standoff over dueling bills. "This is going to be a force multiplier," DeSantis told Fox News late last week. "We're happy to work with the federal government to satisfy President Trump's mandate." And the governor, during his Fox News interview, suggested that the president visit the facility. "An invitation from me: We can land Air Force One right there no problem," DeSantis said. "I think the president would be impressed with what the guys are doing out here." Trump, at the event, highlighted that "Ron and I have had a really great relationship for a long period of time. We had a little off period for a couple of days, but it didn't last long." The president added that he and the governor have a "lot of respect for each other." DeSantis returned the praise, noting that "you can call him [Trump] anytime and he wants to be helpful for governors." But some top figures in Trump's political orbit, including White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, may still hold unflattering opinions of the governor. Wiles was once a top DeSantis political advisor before a very bitter falling out. And in a sign of political friction, Trump-ally Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida also attended Tuesday's event. Donalds earlier this year launched a bid to succeed the term-limited DeSantis in Florida's 2026 gubernatorial election, and he landed Trump's endorsement even before he announced his candidacy. DeSantis' wife, Florida first lady Casey DeSantis, has been mulling a run for governor of her own, and her husband earlier this year said she would be a worthy successor. Asked by reporters if Casey DeSantis should run for governor, the president would only say "we get along great." Ron DeSantis quickly interjected, noting that "I endorsed him immediately, in January 2024. I raised one of his PACs millions and millions of dollars."
