logo
The Three Most Active Early-Stage Fintech Investors

The Three Most Active Early-Stage Fintech Investors

Forbes25-03-2025
Alumni Ventures' CEO Mike Collins, one of the most active early-stage fintech investors
Despite a two-and-a-half-year 'downturn' in the fintech sector, investors are still deploying an average of $7 billion per quarter and the U.S. continues to dominate global fintech investments, representing approximately 45% of total funding in the first half of 2024, according to S&P Global. In Q4 2024, fintech funding grew 17% year-over-year, even as the number of transactions dropped by 28%, reflecting a trend toward fewer but larger deals. So, who is still investing in early-stage fintech startups?
PitchBook shows that the most active early-stage fintech investor in the U.S. right now is Y Combinator, one of the most well-known startup accelerators alongside its peers like Techstars and Plug and Play. In addition to traditional venture firms like Alumni Ventures, Everywhere Ventures and Andreessen Horowitz, the second most active early-stage fintech investors are focused on crypto and blockchain, with firms like Hack VC, MH Ventures and Robot Ventures leading the charge. To understand what top early-stage investors are looking for today, I spoke with three of these.
Mike Collins, founder and CEO of Alumni Ventures, launched the firm in 2013 with a vision to provide retail investors with access to high-quality venture capital opportunities. Having started in venture capital in 1986, Collins was frustrated by the limited investment options available to individuals compared to institutions. His goal was to create a platform where retail investors could easily and lucratively participate in this asset class.
Today, Alumni Ventures is one of the most active venture capital firms in the world, having raised nearly $1.5 billion from over 11,000 investors and invested in more than 1,400 companies. The firm exclusively follows a co-investment model, partnering with leading venture capital firms such as Sequoia. It typically invests between $50,000 and $5 million in early-stage companies, deploying around $250 to $300 million annually.
Collins emphasized that Alumni Ventures does not attempt to time the market, preferring to invest consistently. Its investment thesis prioritizes the size of the problem being solved, the strength of the team, and early traction. A distinguishing factor is its reliance on signals from lead investors—companies with top-tier lead investors often indicate strong potential.
For entrepreneurs seeking investment, Collins highlighted the importance of securing a warm introduction to a venture capital firm, viewing it as a crucial test of an entrepreneur's resourcefulness. He advised founders to thoroughly research potential investors, build strategic connections, and approach fundraising as a structured process requiring persistence and resilience.
Looking ahead, Collins sees major opportunities in fintech through disintermediation, decentralization, and blockchain technology. He believes that innovation will continue to emerge in waves, with each cycle solving new problems and creating further disruptions in the financial sector.
Scott Hartley, co-founder and managing partner of Everywhere Ventures, has built a unique venture capital model focused on a global founder community. Originally established in New York City as a collective of early-stage founders, the firm evolved into a worldwide network of investors and entrepreneurs spanning 30 countries and supporting over 300 portfolio companies.
Hartley explained that Everywhere Ventures began in response to a gap in early-stage funding in New York. Unlike Silicon Valley, New York lacked a deep pool of experienced angel investors in 2017–2018. By pooling capital from founders and operators, the firm created a venture model where experienced entrepreneurs backed the next wave of startups. When the COVID-19 pandemic led to geographic dispersion the firm embraced its global potential, expanding its reach to emerging startup ecosystems worldwide.
The firm operates as a traditional venture fund, with limited partners consisting primarily of founders and operators. Capital is centrally deployed by Hartley and his co-founder, Jenny Fielding, who invest in pre-seed startups with checks ranging from $50,000 to $250,000. They focus on what they call the "table stakes economy," emphasizing fintech, healthcare, future of work and infrastructure.
In fintech, Hartley sees opportunities in infrastructure, cybersecurity, identity management and risk mitigation. With fintech increasingly embedded into various industries, Everywhere Ventures backs startups working on payment systems, fraud prevention and digital identity verification. The firm has invested in Smile ID, an African-based identity management company, and has experience in supporting KYC and security solutions globally.
Hartley highlighted the importance of warm introductions for founders seeking venture capital. While the firm occasionally funds startups from cold outreach, the vast majority of investments come from trusted referrals. He also stressed that a founder's approach to fundraising—speed, preparedness, and transparency—reflects their ability to run a company effectively.
Looking ahead, Hartley remains optimistic about fintech's evolution, particularly in emerging markets. Everywhere Ventures continues to identify opportunities where business model arbitrage, technology shifts and regional advantages create space for the next generation of startups to thrive.
Ed Roman, managing partner at Hack VC, co-leads one of the most active early-stage venture capital firms specializing in Web3 and crypto fintech with over 200 investments on their books. Roman believes decentralized finance represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reshape the financial system, similar to how the stock market emerged a century ago.
Hack VC operates as a conviction-driven investor, leading and co-leading pre-seed, seed and Series A rounds. Last year, it ranked as the second most active crypto VC firm globally, writing checks into high-potential crypto projects. The firm has backed several multi-billion-dollar blockchain protocols, including Movement, a security-focused protocol, Berachain, a fintech DeFi network and Babylon, a platform that enables Bitcoin holders to earn yield while securing other networks.
With such a high investment volume, Hack VC benefits from strong inbound deal flow. The firm's reputation attracts top founders, many of whom come through referrals from other investors, successful entrepreneurs, or Hack VC's own portfolio companies. Roman noted that, compared to mainstream venture capital, early-stage crypto is a smaller industry with fewer active funds, allowing Hack VC to see most promising deals before they hit the market.
When it comes to selecting investments, Roman emphasized the importance of mission-driven founders who are committed to advancing blockchain technology rather than chasing short-term hype. Following the collapse of FTX, he observed that many opportunistic 'tourist' founders exited the space, leaving behind a more dedicated pool of entrepreneurs. Hack VC also leverages its highly technical team to assess complex blockchain protocols, ensuring thorough due diligence.
For founders seeking investment, Roman encourages warm introductions through trusted connections but is also accessible via email and Telegram. He advises entrepreneurs to focus on fundamental infrastructure rather than gimmicky trends, highlighting DeFi, crypto-AI and blockchain infrastructure as the most promising sectors.
Looking ahead, Roman sees major tailwinds for crypto adoption, including regulatory improvements, growing acceptance of stablecoins for global transactions and even political support. With figures like David Sacks shaping pro-crypto policies in Washington, Hack VC believes the sector is entering a new era of legitimacy and innovation. Despite the risks inherent in crypto, Roman remains confident that blockchain technology will continue to revolutionize financial systems over the next decade.
Next, meet 'The Five Most Active Early-Stage Climate Tech Investors'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How (and Why) To Stay in the Market Even at All-Time Highs
How (and Why) To Stay in the Market Even at All-Time Highs

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How (and Why) To Stay in the Market Even at All-Time Highs

One of the most famous mantras in the investment world is to 'buy low and sell high.' With the S&P 500 setting record after record in 2025 — and valuations reaching stratospheric levels — it might seem like buying now is the exact wrong thing to do. Read More: Find Out: But there are still compelling reasons to stay in the market, even at all-time highs. Here's why — and how you can do it. The Market Consistently Makes New 'All-Time' Highs Markets don't go up in a straight line, but history shows the S&P 500 has always gone on to make new highs, no matter how severe a bear market it endures. The fact that the index is at an all-time high as of July 2025 means that by definition, all of its past bad days and bad years are now in the rear-view mirror. Investors who have held on — or even added to their positions — during prior downturns have been handsomely rewarded with the highest price in the index's history. Discover More: Market Technicians Love New Highs Technical research interprets past trading patterns to predict future market movements. Many technicians view a new market high as a 'breakout,' indicating future upside to come. Numerous other factors can help support this prediction, such as rising trading volume and increasing market breadth, but in its most simplistic form, technical analysis usually views a fresh market high as an indication that prices will continue to go higher. Timing the Market Leads To Underperformance If you could always buy at the stock market's low and sell at its high, yes, you'd have a great trading record that would significantly outperform the overall market. But history, along with the shattered portfolios of numerous traders before you, shows that doing that consistently is all but impossible. A more likely scenario is that you emotionally panic and sell your positions when the market is crashing and then start investing again after the market has made significant gains — right before the next bear market. Another common scenario is that you fear the S&P 500 is 'overvalued' and you sell all your positions as the market goes higher and higher. Missing out on even a few of the best days in the market is enough to keep your portfolio in a perpetual state of underperformance, but it's a relatively common occurrence among those trying to time the market. What Can You Do? Investing at market highs is something of a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it's a great time to be invested in the S&P 500, because it means your portfolio should also be at all-time highs. However, it can also be a bit nerve-wracking because valuations are stretched to their limit, and the market is 'priced for perfection' — meaning everything has to continue doing well to support those lofty prices. As fear of losing money is generally greater for investors than the joy from profiting, it's natural to feel a bit queasy when market prices are high. For most long-term investors, the best strategy is to stay the course. By investing consistently, regardless of the S&P 500's current condition, you end up with an average price that smooths out the market's ups and downs. If the market continues to go higher, you'll keep profiting from your investments, even the ones you made at a 'high' price. If the market falls, your ongoing investments will pick up shares at lower prices, leading to even greater profits in the future. Many advisors recommend that investors increase their contributions while markets are falling so they can benefit even more from 'on-sale' share prices. While perhaps not a perfect system, consistent investing is a much better option than trying to time the market based on emotion and instinct. That has proven time and time again to be a losing game in the long run. More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth Mark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on How (and Why) To Stay in the Market Even at All-Time Highs

Why Investors Never Seem To Earn the ‘Average' Market Return
Why Investors Never Seem To Earn the ‘Average' Market Return

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why Investors Never Seem To Earn the ‘Average' Market Return

Over the short-term, it's entirely possible to beat the return of the stock market, as measured by the S&P 500. The return of the S&P 500 index is a weighted average of its individual components, meaning by definition some of the stocks within the index outperform the 'average' return — and if you're an investor owning one of these stocks, you can beat the market average, as well. Find Out: Read More: But over the long run, topping the 'average' market return is exceedingly hard to do. Research from J.P. Morgan Asset Management shows that over the 20-year period from 1998 to 2017, the S&P 500 returned an average of 7.1% annually, while the average investor only posted gains of 2.6% annually, barely above inflation. Why the huge discrepancy? Here are the main reasons why it's so hard for investors to outperform. They Don't Stay Invested Investing can be an emotional business. When the market rallies, investors can get euphoric, throwing additional money in right as the market peaks. On the flip side, many investors get nervous and panic when the market sells off by 20% or more, dumping their stocks as the market approaches a low. Investors that merely hold onto their positions and ride them out for the long-term have a much better chance of matching or beating market averages than those who let emotions dictate their strategy. Try This: They Try To Time the Market The market typically undergoes a correction of 10% or more roughly every 2.5 years, while bear markets, defined by a drop of at least 20%, generally happen about every six years, according to American Century Investments. Theoretically, if you can sell your positions before these major market drops and buy back in at market lows, you could easily outperform the market. But the reality is that timing the market with precision is exceedingly hard to do. In most cases, those who try to make a living timing the market get whipsawed and end up underperforming the market averages. This is due in part to the fact that the bulk of market gains come from just a few days. From Jan. 1, 1999 through Mar. 31, 2025, a $10,000 investment in the S&P 500 index would have grown to $71,309, according to FactSet. But missing even a few of the best market days would result in considerably lower returns. Here's how much you'd have if you missed the best 10, 20, and 30 best days in the market over those past 26 years: Missing 10 best days: $32,682 Missing 20 best days: $19,242 Missing 30 best days: $12,298 Trying to time the market and missing even a few of the best days will annihilate your long-term returns. They Chase Hot Trends It takes patience to succeed at investing. Those who trade in and out of stocks trying to catch lightning in a bottle may succeed over the short run, but it's almost impossible to keep that up over time. Unfortunately, the popularization of 'meme' stocks and other trendy investment options in the financial press and on online message boards makes it seem like 'everyone else' is getting rich off these investment fads. This can instill a 'fear of missing out' (FOMO) among investors who may view 'buy-and-hold' as 'boring,' when in reality, slow and steady wins the race over the long run. They Pay Fees One advantage the market average will always have over investors is that it isn't susceptible to management fees. This requires investors to actually outperform the market simply to 'break even.' Even a low-cost S&P 500 index fund that charges a minuscule 0.03% management fee will significantly eat at returns over time. If you put $100,000 into such a fund and the index earns a 10% average annual return for 30 years, you'd come up about $15,000 short of the index. If you paid a 1% annual fee, which many actively managed equity funds charge, the shortfall would reach over $418,000. It's Hard To Pick Winning Stocks One way to avoid mutual fund and ETF fees is by owning individual stocks bought through a zero-commission broker. However, picking individual stocks comes with its own level of difficulty, as well. While owning individual stocks can lead to outperformance, it requires a level of skill that's hard to come by. One academic paper by Hendrik Bessembinder, Te-Feng Chen, Goeun Choi and K.C. John Wei found that from 1990 through 2018, 56% of U.S. stocks underperformed the essentially risk-free one-month Treasury bill. That's a terrible record and means that a handful of stocks provided the bulk of market returns — and picking the wrong ones could lead to definitively sub-par results. More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact Retirees10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on Why Investors Never Seem To Earn the 'Average' Market Return

Apollo Gives Highside $500 Million to Build Choice's Everhome Suites
Apollo Gives Highside $500 Million to Build Choice's Everhome Suites

Skift

time2 hours ago

  • Skift

Apollo Gives Highside $500 Million to Build Choice's Everhome Suites

The DJIA rose 35 points on Friday, while Nasdaq fell 88, the S&P 500 fell 19 points and the 10-year treasury yield was up .04 to 4.33%. Lodging stocks were mixed. Deutsche Bank predicted that October would be a make-or-break month for sentiment on the hotel REITs. They noted 2Q25 may have had mostly beats, but the majority of the REITs lowered guidance for 3Q below Wall Street estimates while saying they thought 4Q would be the uplifting quarter. DB said they see reasons to believe that, while at the same time, plenty of reasons to be skeptical. The net result is they believe the Hotel REITs are a stock pickers' group, even more than usual. Their top picks remain Ryman Hospitality and Host Hotels. DB lowered price targets on RLJ and Summit Hotels by -$1, to $9 and $8, respectively. Cinnamon Beach Vacations announced that select rental properties are available on Homes & Villas by Marriott

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store