logo
This is the real doom loop. It will change everything about life in the Bay Area

This is the real doom loop. It will change everything about life in the Bay Area

The Bay Area is facing a doom loop. It's just not the one we usually think about.
For years we've heard of the potential economic doom spiral circling San Francisco, where a massive city budget deficit fueled by remote work leads to poorer services and even more residents fleeing. But another threat has been building in relative silence.
The Bay Area is getting old fast, and it's accelerating. Though aging is a global trend, the San Francisco metro area — which includes San Francisco, Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo and Marin counties — is already the third-oldest among 20 of the largest regions in the U.S., trailing only two places in Florida. And no other region is growing older at a quicker pace.
That means fewer children, more elderly people and a declining number of 20-somethings. The confluence of demographic shifts will profoundly impact every aspect of life in the San Francisco area. Combined with rising housing costs and growing hostility toward immigration, the graying of cities and towns means the region's continued prosperity is in doubt.
'The aging thing might be the most important thing happening in American society that people aren't paying attention to enough,' said urbanism expert Richard Florida, a professor at the University of Toronto. 'And, in places like the Bay Area where everything's so expensive, it's arguably even more important.'
The Chronicle assigned journalists to explore various manifestations of the region's rapid aging, and will continue to do so through the rest of the year and beyond. We'd also like to hear from readers about their experiences with, and concerns about, the trend.
In Berkeley, we found a once-vibrant neighborhood that is now essentially a retirement community of single-family homes. In Sonoma County, we visited a city with a family-friendly reputation that lost 35% of its children in a decade. In San Francisco, we spoke to bar owners trying to survive a one-two punch: older patrons are spending less while younger guests are drinking less.
It's not all doom and gloom. We also found some industries thriving. A longevity clinic in South San Francisco serves patients who pay as much as $19,000 a year in a bid to live longer. And it's an excellent time to be offering financial services such as estate planning to the elderly.
The great aging of America will touch every community, from coast to coast. But, as it often does, the Bay Area will offer an early look at what's to come, with over half the people in the region's nine counties projected to be cresting 50 by 2055.
So just how old is the region?
Even before the COVID outbreak, the San Francisco metro area was one of the oldest in the U.S. During the pandemic, the metro's median age grew faster than any other major region, jumping from a little over 39 in 2020 to almost 41 in 2024. For context, Houston's number hasn't even reached 36 and Seattle is still approaching 38. Among the 20 largest metro areas in the U.S., San Francisco is now the third oldest, only bested by retirement-focused Miami and Tampa.
S.F. had the biggest increase in median age since 2020
Median age of residents in the 20 most populous metro areas
The San Francisco region is not alone. Every major U.S. metropolitan area has been growing older over the last several decades, with the share of seniors growing faster than the number of children, and most other rich countries are also facing the declining birth rates and longer lifespans that lead to an older population.
Still, the Bay Area is the tip of the cane. While most metros are likely to have more seniors than kids at some point in the 21st century, the San Francisco area is on track to see it happen as soon as the late 2020s.
S.F. now has a similar share of children as adults over 65
Share of residents under 18 and over 65 years in four metro areas from 2005 to 2023
Chart: Nami Sumida/S.F. Chronicle · Source: IPUMS USA, University of Minnesota
The San Francisco area already has the least children of the nation's 20 largest metros. In 2024, less than 19% of the area's population was under 18. And the county of San Francisco is even more devoid of kids, with just 13.5%, the second lowest share of the nearly 150 counties in the U.S. with over 500,000 people, second only to the county made up of Manhattan.
Of course, the Bay Area isn't uniformly elderly. Certain parts of the region — such as around the UC Berkeley and San Francisco State campuses, the city's Marina neighborhood and parts of downtown Oakland — are quite young.
Conversely, some areas are exceptionally old. Two Berkeley neighborhoods, Thousand Oaks and Northbrae, have median ages nearing 60. What makes these places remarkable is that, unlike most older communities, they don't include nursing homes or senior care centers. Most of the residents have been living there for over 20 years, according to a Chronicle analysis of census data.
Marin and Sonoma counties are also particularly old, with median ages of 48 and 44, respectively, placing them among the 25 oldest out of the nearly 300 counties in the U.S. with over 250,000 people.
Over the next several decades, the Bay Area is expected to age rapidly. Projections from the California Department of Finance suggest that about half of the people in the region's nine counties will be over 50 by 2055, with a median age of 51 or higher in San Francisco and San Mateo counties.
The area is expected to get a bit younger again after 2055, when most of the baby boomers have passed, but that's 30 years away.
The Bay Area will witness seismic changes brought by aging, including burdens on Social Security, emptier classrooms and a shallower labor pool, experts say.
The region will need more senior housing and services like home health aides, a difficult lift in an area with some of the nation's highest construction costs and a labor shortage for skilled caregivers. 'We have to grapple with the fact that this is the future,' said Stacy Torres, a UCSF assistant professor of social behavioral sciences and an expert on aging.
Public schools, already struggling with pandemic enrollment losses, may increasingly shutter, making it even more difficult to raise kids in the city and threatening more educators' jobs. And while powerhouses like Stanford and UC Berkeley are drawing plenty of applicants, colleges like San Francisco State and the University of San Francisco have seen enrollment declines since the pandemic, chipping away at the Bay Area's role as an education hub and the growth of its well-educated labor force.
The economy could stagnate further as a lack of young workers and stalled population growth cause 'downward pressure' on both labor supply and consumer demand, said Jeff Bellisario, executive director of the Bay Area Council Economic Institute, a business-backed think tank. A reduction in the number of young people is already hurting some businesses — seen in the struggles of bar owners — and could exacerbate a shortage of skilled workers.
Ted Egan, San Francisco's chief economist, notes that the number of younger people without college degrees was already dropping before COVID, while educated young people continued moving in, many for tech jobs. But post-pandemic, the number of educated young people has also declined.
To make matters worse, when residents do decide to have kids, they become more likely to leave the city, according to surveys. 'It's a major trigger point,' Egan said. 'People bump into space limitations in a rent-controlled apartment.'
For those lucky enough to be homeowners, California's landmark property tax cap, Proposition 13, has kept annual increases low. But there's a downside: studies show a 'lock-in' effect that discourages homeowners from moving out and potentially downsizing, constraining the supply of new listings. That has helped fuel both San Francisco's aging-in-place trend and the brutally expensive housing market.
Meanwhile, fertility rates are down in Mexico and China, two major sources of immigrants to the Bay Area. President Donald Trump has also singled out those countries in his immigration crackdown. 'I don't see immigration as a permanent source of population growth for the city if the underlying economics don't change,' Egan said.
Bellisario and Egan don't think aging will lead to the region's demise, particularly because it's a global trend. Instead, it's likely to spur broader efforts to adapt and adjust society.
'Does it break the region's economy?' Egan asked. 'It hasn't yet.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stressed adults rely on pacifiers to soothe themselves: ‘I feel a sense of safety from childhood'
Stressed adults rely on pacifiers to soothe themselves: ‘I feel a sense of safety from childhood'

New York Post

time31 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Stressed adults rely on pacifiers to soothe themselves: ‘I feel a sense of safety from childhood'

When the going gets tough, the tough … pop in a pacifier? That's the surprising stress-busting move thousands of young adults in China are making — swapping melatonin and meditation for an adult-sized binky. Once a niche quirk, the silicone soothers are supposedly now big business on Chinese e-commerce giants like Taobao and where they are priced anywhere from a budget-friendly 10 yuan ($1.40) to a luxury 500 yuan ($70). They're sold as sleep aids, stress relievers, even smoking-cessation tools — and shoppers are gobbling them up. Some online sellers move thousands each month, according to the South China Morning Post. And the fans aren't shy about why. 'When I'm under pressure at work, I feel a sense of safety from childhood,' one Chinese buyer said, as reported by the outlet. But not everyone's clapping for the comeback kid of the baby aisle. Marketed as sleep aids, stress busters, and quit-smoking sidekicks — and shoppers are sucking them up. LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS – Dr. Tang Caomin, a dentist in Sichuan, warned SCMP that 'if you sleep with a pacifier in your mouth, it can interfere with breathing, and in the worst case, there is a risk of suffocation.' The doctor also cautioned that prolonged use can mess with your bite, strain your jaw and even disrupt sleep. The trend isn't staying swaddled in China, either. TikTok is sucking it up — literally — with videos of American adults pacifying themselves in traffic, at work, or in the throes of burnout. In the comments section of a TikTok by @thebentist, one user swore, 'I just use an adult pacifier it hasn't moved my teeth been using them for 4 years.' Another doubled down: 'Just get an adult pacifier I use one! And the ADHD tip it works!!(for me).' Others admitted, 'we gotta do what we gotta do to keep focused. over bite or not getting stuff we need to get done. Lol,' while one confessed, 'im so ashamed, I've been addicted for 23 years, my entire life.' Some naysayers chimed in with alternatives — 'if you want something in ur mouth, chew gum. if you want to suck on something (like a pacifier) have a sucker [lollipop].' TikTok is sucking up the trend — literally — with clips of adults binkying through traffic jams, office stress, and full-blown burnout. Phuri – Meanwhile, beneath a related and recent clip about the trend from @theageaustralia, commenters offered everything from mock psychoanalysis — 'RIP Sigmund Freud you would've loved whatever this is' — to personal testimony: 'I have been using an adult pacifier for 4 years now and I have no dental problems..' One summed it up bluntly: 'It was cheaper than a mouth guard and didn't make me want to claw my teeth out trying to sleep.' And it's not the only sign that young adults are craving a softer landing in the real world. As previously reported by The Post, some members of Gen Z are flocking to 'Adulting 101' crash courses, desperate to learn how to change a tire without FaceTiming their dads, how to read an electric bill without crying and/ or how to fold a fitted sheet without having an existential crisis. Overall, it looks like growing up may be hard — but for some, giving it the pacifier treatment is a lot easier to swallow.

ACA premiums set to spike
ACA premiums set to spike

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

ACA premiums set to spike

The proposed rates are preliminary and could change before being finalized in late summer. The analysis includes proposed rate changes from 312 insurers in all 50 states and DC. It's the largest rate change insurers have requested since 2018, the last time that policy uncertainty contributed to sharp premium increases. On average, ACA marketplace insurers are raising premiums by about 20 percent in 2026, KFF found. Insurers said they wanted higher premiums to cover rising health care costs, like hospitalizations and physician care, as well as prescription drug costs. Tariffs on imported goods could play a role in rising medical costs, but insurers said there was a lot of uncertainty around implementation, and not many insurers were citing tariffs as a reason for higher rates. But they are adding in higher increases due to changes being made by the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress. For instance, the majority of insurers said they are taking into account the potential expiration of enhanced premium tax credits. Those subsidies, put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, are set to expire at the end of the year, and there are few signs that Republicans are interested in tackling the issue at all. If Congress takes no action, premiums for subsidized enrollees are projected to increase by over 75 percent starting in January 2026, according to KFF. But some states are pushing back. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R) on Wednesday called on the state's insurance commissioner to disapprove the proposed increases from Centene and Blue Cross Blue Shield. The companies filed increases of up to 54 percent and 25.5 percent, respectively, she said. 'Arkansas' Insurance Commissioner is required to disapprove of proposed rate increases if they are excessive or discriminatory, and these are both,' Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. 'I'm calling on my Commissioner to follow the law, reject these insane rate increases, and protect Arkansans.'

Huge cuts to mRNA research spark fears about future pandemics
Huge cuts to mRNA research spark fears about future pandemics

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Huge cuts to mRNA research spark fears about future pandemics

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision this week to cancel hundreds of millions of dollars in mRNA vaccine funding will leave the United States unprepared for the next pandemic and other public health emergencies, public health experts warned. 'I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions—but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives,' President Trump's former surgeon general Jerome Adams said in a post to X. 'mRNA technology has uses that go far beyond vaccines… and the vaccine they helped develop in record time is credited with saving millions.' The first COVID-19 mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna hit the market in 2021, just a year after the virus first appeared. Vaccines typically take years to develop, but the mRNA shots were developed in record time due to a massive influx of funding from the first Trump administration, dubbed Operation Warp Speed. The COVID shots proved safe and effective, and helped bring about an end to the pandemic. Experts say mRNA technology has the potential to revolutionize treatments for evolving pathogens, especially bird flu, because the platform can be easily modified. On Tuesday, Kennedy cancelled $500 million worth of contracts related to mRNA vaccine research being funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. Instead, he said the agency will focus on platforms with 'stronger safety records.' Public health experts point out that reviews of the hundreds of millions, if not billions, of doses of mRNA shots administered worldwide have found very few adverse events. 'It's pretty clear that the administration, or at least the secretary, has a political vendetta not just against vaccines but against mRNA in general,' said Jeff Coller, a professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University. Coller said the move will put the U.S. behind other nations in biomedical research and sends a 'clear message' to scientists and the industry that it is not wise to invest in mRNA technology because if they do, they will likely not receive funding or approval from the federal government. Jennifer Nuzzo, a professor of epidemiology and director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University School of Public Health, told The Hill that the cancellation is a threat to national security, as it opens the U.S. to future public health emergencies caused by biological warfare. 'One of the ways that we deter that from happening is to say the United States is absolutely committed to preparedness,' Nuzzo said. 'When we take them off the table and leave nothing in their place, we basically signal to our adversaries that we are no longer interested in defending ourselves.' In the long run, Nuzzo said, winding down research efforts on mRNA vaccine platforms will stifle medical innovation coming out of the U.S., including new treatments for diseases like cancer. 'It's troubling on a number of fronts,' she said. MRNA vaccines work by sending instructions to cells to make a specific type of protein found on the outer membrane of a virus. The body's immune system is then able to recognize that protein as something foreign and will create antibodies to fight it. That same general approach could be used to help potentially vaccinate someone against a particular cancer, according to Nuzzo. 'Cancers have a genetic signature,' she said. 'We don't know what's going to happen but there are some preliminary studies that suggest it could be a very promising way to treat cancers.' None of the canceled contracts directly deal with cancer research, but the move will likely cause a chilling effect among researchers that ultimately impacts cancer-related work, said Michael Osterholm, founding director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy and member of the Vaccine Integrity Project. 'I think you're going to see anyone who is willing to invest in mRNA technology, pulling back, if not completely, getting out of this business,' he said. 'This is terribly unfortunate, given that we have a number of other infectious diseases for which this vaccine platform was being explored in terms of taking on other infectious diseases and including some cancer vaccines.' Kennedy is deeply skeptical of vaccines in general, and mRNA vaccines in particular. In 2021, he falsely said the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was the 'deadliest vaccine ever made.' Kennedy has also been facing pressure from fellow anti-vaccine activists for not doing enough to keep mRNA vaccines off the market. He was criticized earlier this year when the Food and Drug Administration approved Moderna's updated COVID-19 vaccine, even though the agency limited its use in children. In a video posted to X on Tuesday, Kennedy falsely claimed mRNA shots don't protect against respiratory viruses and don't work if a virus mutates. 'One mutation and the vaccine becomes ineffective,' Kennedy said. Following the announcement, public health experts urged Congress to restore funding towards mRNA vaccine research, with some calling it an 'assault' on federal vaccine policy. 'The HHS Secretary continues a mindless assault on sound federal vaccine policy,' said Robert Steinbrook, director of the Public Citizen Health Reseach Group. 'The mRNA vaccine platform was essential to rapid vaccine development and deployment during the COVIVD-19 pandemic and remains essential to preparing for future public health emergencies.' But the full extent of Kennedy's move isn't known. A Moderna spokesperson told The Hill that they were not aware of any new award cancellations since their contract to help develop an H5N1 bird flu vaccine was canceled in May. Gritstone Bio, another company on the HHS list of cancelled contracts, ceased operations earlier this year after the company filed for bankruptcy in 2024. A spokesperson for Tiba Bio said HHS's decision to terminate their BARDA contract 'comes as a surprise' since its contract was for a therapeutic, not a vaccine, and it does not use mRNA technology. Instead, it uses a method called RNA interference, which the FDA approved to treat some diseases in 2018.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store