US State Dept probes Harvard over visiting scholar programme
AFP
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday launched an investigation into Harvard University's ability to sponsor visiting students and academics, part of a continuing crackdown on the elite institution.
Since taking office in January, Trump has repeatedly accused Harvard and other top US universities of having a "liberal" bias, accusing some of "antisemitism" to cut federal funding and demand greater oversight.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the latest investigation would examine whether the university was complying with regulations in the Exchange Visitor Programme.
That included probing whether the university was "conducting their programmes in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States."
"The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students," he said in a statement.
Harvard has so far defied Trump's calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and "viewpoint diversity."
Trump has cut federal grants for Harvard and tried a host of different tactics to block the institution from hosting international students.
The administration has sought to remove Harvard from an electronic student immigration registry and instructed embassies to deny visas to international students hoping to attend the Massachusetts-based university.
The administration insists its moves are legally justified over Harvard's failure to protect Jewish students, particularly amid campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza.
Harvard has sued the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies to block the efforts, arguing they are illegal and unconstitutional.
The Ivy League institution has also sued to restore more than US$2 billion in frozen funds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
UAE denies Sudan's claim of destroying Emirati plane with mercenaries
DUBAI: The United Arab Emirates has dismissed Sudan's claim that its forces destroyed an Emirati plane allegedly transporting Colombian mercenaries. Sudan has been embroiled in conflict since April 2023, with its military accusing the UAE of backing the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Sudan's state TV reported on Wednesday that the air force struck an Emirati aircraft at Nyala airport in Darfur, killing at least 40 people. 'The allegations are entirely false, lack any evidentiary basis, and represent a continuation of Sudan's disinformation campaign,' a UAE official told AFP. A Sudanese military source claimed the plane was 'bombed and completely destroyed' while landing at the RSF-controlled airport. State TV alleged the aircraft had departed from a Gulf airbase, carrying foreign fighters and military supplies for the RSF. Nyala airport has faced repeated Sudanese army airstrikes in recent weeks. Army leader Abdel Fattah al-Burhan has accused the UAE of supplying drones and weapons to the RSF through the airport. The UAE denies these allegations despite reports from UN experts and US officials. 'It is significant that a warring party is making these claims, given its direct involvement and incentive to distort facts,' the UAE official stated. – AFP
The Star
40 minutes ago
- The Star
Trump calls on 'highly conflicted' Intel CEO to resign over China ties
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump on Thursday demanded the immediate resignation of Intel's new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, calling him "highly conflicted" due to his ties to Chinese firms and raising doubts about the future of the American chip icon. A change in leadership could pile pressure on the company as it pushes through a major strategic reset started by Tan that aims to slash costs by shrinking its workforce and halting construction on some of its planned manufacturing plants. Trump's comments came a day after Reuters reported U.S. Republican Senator Tom Cotton had sent a letter to Intel's board chair with questions about Tan's ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former firm Cadence Design. Reuters reported in April that Tan - himself or through venture funds he has founded or operates - invested in hundreds of Chinese companies, some of which are linked to the Chinese military. "There is no other solution to this problem," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform, knocking shares of Intel down around 4% in U.S. premarket trading. Intel is a key pillar of U.S. efforts to boost domestic chipmaking and last year secured nearly $20 billion in grants and loans, the largest federal award under the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, to subsidize leading-edge semiconductor production. Intel and Tan, who took over the CEO role in March after the ousting of his predecessor Pat Gelsinger late last year, did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. An Intel spokesperson said in a statement on Wednesday that "Intel and Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the U.S. and the integrity of our role in the U.S. defense ecosystem." The company said it would address the matters in the letter with the Senator. The Intel CEO invested at least $200 million in hundreds of Chinese advanced manufacturing and chip firms between March 2012 and December 2024, Reuters reported in April. A source familiar with the matter had at the time told Reuters that Tan had divested from his positions in entities in China, without providing further details. Chinese databases reviewed by Reuters at the time had listed many of his investments as current, and Reuters was at the time unable to establish the extent of his divestitures. Once the dominant force in chip-making, Intel has in recent years lost its manufacturing edge to Taiwanese rival TSMC. It also has virtually no presence in the booming market for artificial intelligence chips dominated by Nvidia. To revive Intel's fortunes, Tan has set a goal of slashing the chipmaker's workforce to 75,000 people by year-end, a reduction of around 22%. Intel also vowed to take a more disciplined approach to manufacturing investment. (Reporting by Aditya Soni in Bengaluru, Doina Chiacu and Brendan O'Brien; Editing by Anil D'Silva)
New Straits Times
40 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Less punitive than feared, says expert on impact of US' planned tariff on Malaysia's semiconductor exports
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia's risk exposure to the United States' proposed 100 per cent tariff on semiconductors may be lower than feared, said CGS International head of research Jeremy Goh. Goh said the bulk of the country's chip exports come from US-based companies, which could be exempted from the measure. "Roughly two-thirds of Malaysia's semiconductors come from US-based companies. "There's quite a high chance that these US-based companies will of course commit to expand in American soil to avert these semiconductor tariffs. "It's still a very developing situation, but I don't think it's as scary and as punitive as that 100 per cent tariff deadline sounds," he said during the Economic & Market Outlook panel session at the Invest Shariah Conference 2025. While the proposed tariff has raised concerns, Goh believes the actual impact could be less severe than the headline number suggests, especially given the exemption criteria outlined by US President Donald Trump. Trump planned to impose a tariff of 100 per cent on semiconductor chips imported from countries not producing in the US or planning to do so. He said the new tariff rate would apply to all chips and semiconductors coming into the US but would not apply to companies that had made a commitment to manufacture in the US or were in the process of doing so. "From Trump's statements, he did say that if the semiconductors are coming from US or US-based companies… "These companies have committed to expand in US soil, or are already in the midst of expanding in, thus they would be exempted," he said. Goh added that Malaysia's direct market exposure to the US is minimal, despite the country being a major export destination. "Thirty per cent of our exports goes to US, our second-largest export destination, but at the stock market level, that exposure is much lower. "We found that in terms of our coverage universe, only 2.4 per cent of the aggregate revenue is derived from US "As for the FBM KLCI, the 30-key stock index, only about 0.5 per cent of its revenue comes from the US. "So the direct US exposure of our local stock market is relatively much more muted compared to the overall economy. That's the second so-called saving risk that we have," he said. With ongoing efforts by the Malaysian government to seek clarification from the United States Trade Representative (USTR), Goh believes the outlook remains manageable. Meanwhile, CGS International chief economist Nazmi Idrus said the tariff, if implemented, could spell trouble for Malaysia's export-reliant economy. "Half of our products are actually being sold in the US and there will be more impact on the Malaysian economy because we are quite reliant on US products," he said. He warned that the move could further fracture the global trade landscape, accelerating shifts in supply chains and trade flows. "You're likely to see some changes in the global supply chain going forward. It's probably going to benefit the US more than other countries," he said. According to Nazmi, the US currently enjoys tariff advantages in many overseas markets due to relatively lower import duties. This could push more countries to favour American goods at the expense of regional trading partners. "So what happened now is that because we are still lower our tariff levels in the US, US products have more advantage in other countries. "So probably a lot of countries will start to import a lot more of US products and a lot less on their national trading partners," he added. Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz said Malaysia had sought clarification from the US over thecproposed 100 per cent tariff on imported semiconductor chips. He cautioned that such move could adversely affect one of the country's most critical export sectors. He said the government had contacted both the US Trade Representative and the Department of Commerce this morning to obtain an official statement on the matter.
