Are you experiencing extreme weather more? Do NWS cuts worry you? Take our poll.
Severe. Extreme. Unprecedented. More and more, these words seem a routine part of our forecast rather than rare weather events they once described.
It's been four days since the Guadalupe River reached an unprecedented 29 feet, one of the many overflowing waterways in central Texas that devastated the area with severe flooding, sweeping away homes and neighbors as they slept. The death toll has reached 90 people as of July 7, with 10 campers and one counselor from Camp Mystic in Kerry County still unaccounted for. Thunderstorms and heavy rain continue to batter the region, hampering search efforts and increasing the risk of flash floods.
Tropical Depression Chantal has brought severe flooding to North Carolina as it makes its way up the eastern United States, bringing more flood warnings with it. Severe thunderstorms are forecast for parts of the Great Plains and Midwest into Monday evening, while extreme heat is expected to bear down on the Southwest beginning July 8.
A USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll conducted in mid-June found a majority of Americans (58%) fear this extreme weather is getting worse – and will continue to be in the near future. Thirty percent of respondents said they have personally experienced extreme weather events in the previous month – with many citing severe thunderstorms and heavy rainfall, much like those that triggered the rapid flooding in central Texas. (Have you endured severe weather recently? Scroll down to tell us about it.)
And yet, as climate change ravages the country, the Trump administration has cut the very departments Americans rely on: the National Weather Service, the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Who are we supposed to turn to for trusted weather warnings that can save lives, and aid that can help us pick up the pieces when disaster inevitably strikes?
NWS doesn't have enough staff: The NWS is understaffed during hurricane season. It keeps me up at night. | Opinion
What's the weather like where you live? Are you worried about NWS cuts?
This spring, the NWS lost nearly 15% of its workforce – approximately 600 people – due to Trump administration layoffs and early retirement packages, the New York Times reported. NWS offices are understaffed with critical roles unfilled. Furthermore, the Trump administration is proposing massive cuts to the NOAA – the parent agency of NWS – further hamstringing funding and eliminating programs that do crucial climate research. And on top of all that, the president has said he wants to get rid of FEMA altogether.
I don't know about you, but as weather events throughout the U.S. become more catastrophic, none of this makes me feel safer. Or better prepared to weather these storms.
How do you feel? Are you concerned about the accuracy of the National Weather Service or how cuts will impact your forecasts and warnings? Is the weather becoming more extreme where you live? How do you think we should handle it? Are you concerned about the impact of climate change – and do you think there's anything we can do to change it?
Take our poll below. USA TODAY Opinion may use your responses in an upcoming column.
Janessa Hilliard is the director of audience for USA TODAY Opinion and Opinion at Gannett.
You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
37 minutes ago
- USA Today
Tropical trouble could be brewing around Florida, hurricane forecasters say
A broad area of low pressure could develop sometime within the next several days offshore of the southeastern U.S. coast. Another potential tropical disturbance popped up on the National Hurricane Center's tracking chart on Saturday, July 12. For those who watch every potential storm closely, this initial map looks a lot like the first one that popped up for Tropical Storm Chantal. The possible development area swoops from the Atlantic to the Gulf across much of Florida, but this time the system is moving toward the Gulf, and the advisory includes the southern shores of Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. A broad area of low pressure could develop sometime within the next several days offshore of the southeastern U.S. coast, the hurricane center said on the afternoon of July 12. Environmental conditions could become "marginally conducive" for the gradual development of a system within five to seven days as it moves westward across Florida. The chances of development are low, only 20%. If for some reason, a tropical storm does develop, the next name on the list this season is Dexter. "Should development take place on the Atlantic side of Florida, it may once again drift northward toward the U.S. coast," Accuweather said on July 11. The more plausible option is development on the Gulf side, which could be steered westward along the northern Gulf Coast, the weather forecast company stated. Regardless of development, the area of disturbed weather is expected to be a rainmaker in the region. Heavy rain is possible over parts of Florida and the Southeast coast through mid-to-late week, the center stated in the July 12 advisory. Tropical weather watchers say windshear over the Caribbean and dry air and Saharan dust over the Atlantic have helped keep this hurricane season from getting too busy so far. Still Chantal's development put the 2025 hurricane season about a month ahead of schedule. Typically the third Atlantic named storm doesn't form until August 3, according to Phil Klotzbach, a research scientist at Colorado State University, who leads its seasonal outlooks for the Atlantic hurricane season each year. The season was forecast to see above normal activity, however the latest forecast from Klotzbach and his team slightly reduced the number of possible storms. What happened to Tropical Storm Chantal? Chantal formed off the Southeast U.S. coast on July 4, then moved over the Carolinas. Heavy rains flooded parts of North Carolina, claiming six lives. Chantal victims: At least six deaths were reported in flooding in North Carolina The Haw River crested at 32.5 feet, only a third of a foot away from its all-time high, set after Hurricane Fran in 1996, according to the weather service office in Raleigh. Chantal also spawned four EF-1 tornadoes in North Carolina, one each in Mebane, Snow Camp, southern Pittsboro and at the Raleigh Executive Jetport. The highest rainfall totals were reported in Chatham County, where 11.92 inches were reported in Moncure and Pittsboro, where the weather service collected five other rainfall reports of between 10 and 11.5 inches. Dinah Voyles Pulver, a national correspondent for USA TODAY, writes about climate change, violent weather and other news. Reach her at dpulver@ or @dinahvp on Bluesky or X or dinahvp.77 on Signal.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hurricane center eyes potential system to form near Florida
The National Hurricane Center began forecasting Saturday a system to form later this week near Florida with a chance to develop into the season's next tropical depression or storm. In its 2 p.m. tropical outlook, the NHC said it expects a broad area of low pressure to form over the next several days offshore of the southeastern U.S. coast. 'Environmental conditions could become marginally conducive for the gradual development of this system by mid to late next week as the system moves generally westward across the Florida peninsula and over the eastern and north-central portion of the Gulf,' forecasters said, Whether it develops or not, the NHC said heavy rainfall is possible over portions of Florida and the southeast U.S. coast beginning midweek. The NHC gave it a 20% chance to develop in the next seven days. If it were to spin up into a named storm, it could develop into Tropical Storm Dexter. The state was previously doused by rains associated with what developed into Tropical Storm Chantal earlier this month. That storm ended up striking the Carolina coast and dumped flooding rains inland. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration had before the start of hurricane season forecast an expected 13 to 19 named storms for the year, of which 6-10 would grow into hurricanes. Three to five of those would develop into major hurricanes of Category 3 strength or higher. Researchers out of Colorado State University this week, though, updated their forecast for the year saying they expect the season to be slightly less busy than what they had predicted earlier this year. Hurricane season runs June 1-Nov. 30.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump cuts questioned as role of Fema in Texas highlights agency's importance in natural disaster response
As the cleanup continues from this month's torrential rain storms and flooding in Texas that left more than 120 dead, recently departed officials from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) say the organization is dangerously underresourced and overstretched in the event of further natural catastrophes. A mass staff exodus, plunging morale and a loss of key leaders has left the main US disaster-relief organization ill-equipped to cope with an anticipated deadly spate of storms in the current hurricane season, former agency insiders say. Fema's weakness, exacerbated by grant cuts imposed by the Trump administration and the loss of institutional knowledge in strategic leadership positions, will be exposed if the nation is faced with more than one disaster simultaneously, according to Michael Coen, the agency's former chief of staff. Related: Trump tours Texas flood damage as disaster tests vow to shutter Fema In an interview, Coen – who left his post in January after Donald Trump took office – said the officials at Fema had been preparing contingency plans that would enable the agency to meet the demands of hurricane season, which generally runs from early June until the end of November, with fewer resources. 'They understand that they don't have the resources they've had in past years, whether it's funding or even some contracts have lapsed,' he said. 'They are trying to make decisions so that they can handle multiple events at one time.' But since Trump's inauguration, the agency has seen an estimated 2,000 departures through resignations or retirements, which may have rendered it incapable of coping with the widespread carnage likely to be wreaked by a succession of tropical storms. 'I'm concerned that Fema is going to be at a disadvantage because they don't have the resources to respond to the disasters we know could happen, which could be two or three concurrent disasters at the same time,' said Coen. 'Fema has eroded capacity since President Trump became president. Staff have departed. There have been cuts to grant programs and they are going to be running into a financial challenge with the disaster relief fund, because the president hasn't requested supplemental funding from Congress.' Coen – a disaster relief career official who was also Fema's chief of staff during Barack Obama's presidency – said the cuts could mean the agency running out of funds to respond to disasters by the end of this month. 'Fema is currently supporting the state of Texas with the flooding and the urban search and rescue. But if in a week or two they also have to respond to a hurricane in the Gulf coast or an earthquake on the west coast, Fema is not going to be able to meet the expectations of the American people.' The concerns over Fema's state of readiness come amid signs that Trump may have had a change of heart about the agency's future after months of signaling that he favored its abolition. Last month, he said the administration planned to 'phase out' Fema after the current hurricane season to put more responsibility on individual states to respond to disasters. He previously described the agency – established in 1979 by Jimmy Carter with the goal of coordinating the US government's response to disasters – as 'not good' and said he would 'recommend that Fema go away'. But ahead of Trump's Friday visit to the worst-hit Texas flood areas, White House officials indicated that eliminating Fema entirely was no longer under consideration, the Washington Post reported. The newspaper quoted an unnamed official as saying changes would probably amount to 'rebranding' the agency while stressing the leadership role of the states in disaster response. Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary – who has overall responsibility for Fema and has chaired a review council looking into the agency's future – said in the wake of the Texas floods that Fema would be 'eliminated as it exists today and remade into a responsive agency', a hardline stance that nonetheless stopped short of abolition. Coen said the Texas floods had proved Fema's worth: 'This flood is a defining moment and brings clarity for the necessity of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Fema is an essential agency for the federal government to support states and support the American people in their greatest time of need.' But he said grant cuts had rendered it less effective and may have caused 'an unnecessary loss of life' in the Guadalupe River area of the Texas Hill Country, the worst-hit flood region. 'One of the grant programs they cut was the Building Resilient Infrastructure Communities, which was a program that would have funded things like the siren system to line a river like the [Guadalupe] in Kerr county,' he said. 'Not that many people needed to lose their lives if more mitigation measures had been put in place. With the president cutting a grant program that provides federal funding to increase mitigation in the country, it only is foreboding for the future on what could happen to other communities if they don't mitigate and they don't have access to federal funds.' The picture of an agency undermined by the Trump administration's hostility was corroborated by a former mid-level Fema official, who told the Guardian that staff had left because they felt disrespected. 'It's no secret that a lot of high-level leaders have left the agency,' the ex-official said. 'It's clear that Fema has lost a lot of leadership capability.' Among those who have left are Tony Robinson, who was Fema's head administrator for the region that includes Texas, as well as his deputy. Also recently departing was Robert Samaan, the administrator for the region that covers Florida and several other states in the hurricane-prone south-east. 'Those are two of the three most critical regional administrators for hurricane season, and for them to leave at this time leaves people shaken for sure,' the former staffer said. 'The lack of experienced leadership is certainly going to hamstring efforts. It's not to say that there aren't other good leaders who will step up. But LinkedIn is littered with people whose names I knew who have left.' The departure of 16 senior executives was announced on a single day in May. Compounding the problem is the damage to the morale of those remaining from what insiders say is the scornful attitude of Noem and Fema's acting administrator, David Richardson, a former marine artillery officer with no previous experience in disaster management. Richardson, who has been in the post since May, caused a stir among senior staff when he said during a briefing that he did not know there was a hurricane season. It was unclear if the comments were meant as a joke. Richardson was installed after Noem ousted his predecessor, Cameron Hamilton, after he told a congressional hearing that he did not favor Fema's abolition. The new administrator also threatened to 'run right over' any staff members who resisted reforms. 'I, and I alone in Fema, speak for Fema. I'm here to carry out the president's intent for Fema,' he reportedly said. Coen affirmed the picture of staff leaving due to fears for Fema's future. 'The reason many employees have departed since January 20 is because they had a fear that they were going to lose their job,' he said. 'Also, they didn't feel respected by the current administration. The current employees still there are supporting each other, but if they feel they are not getting support and understanding of how much they sacrifice when they go to disasters, it does have an impact on their mental health and wellbeing.' Noem, meanwhile, has drawn criticism for issuing a decree requiring that any expenditures or contracts worth $100,000 or more are submitted to her for prior approval – a requirement that critics say could impede rapid disaster response. 'Typically, pre-Trump, a decision like that would come at a much lower level than the secretary of homeland security so you could get out and mobilize,' the former official said. 'It's just unconscionable that you would centralize a decision like that, [which] truly, on reflection, would have led to the loss of life, or at least the loss of the ability to find the remains of the victims.' The Department of Homeland Security has publicly defended the directive as necessary to root out 'waste, fraud and abuse' and deliver 'accountability' to US taxpayers.
