National Planning Council organises workshop on Simplified General Census of Population
The workshop focused on the upcoming Simplified General Census of Population, Housing and Establishments 2025, under the theme 'Digital Records, Robust Automation and National Data Partnership'.
This census is the first of its kind to be conducted in Qatar by relying entirely on administrative records without the need for any traditional field surveys. This strategic step aims to modernize the national statistical system and improve the efficiency and quality of data. The new administrative model leverages existing administrative records in government entities, which enhances data reliability and supports planning and decision-making processes at the national and sectoral levels. The implementation phase of the census is expected to begin by the end of this year.
The workshop featured a series of specialized technical presentations by experts from the National Statistics Center, covering key aspects of the administrative census. Topics included the presentation of the national vision and the roadmap towards transitioning to the administrative census model, leading to the 2030 census. Presentations also discussed the technical methodology of the census, and mechanisms of inter-agency integration, data provision requirements, quality assurance and security, in addition to reviewing the role of technical work groups and determining the entities' needs from census data.
The workshop also shed light on the challenges associated with the traditional model, and the role of the modern administrative model in supporting public policies.
Participants included representatives from government data teams, technical groups, and planning and policy departments engaged in administrative records related to population, housing, labor, establishments and economic data.
The workshop opened with a keynote by Director General of the National Statistics Center Ahmad Hassan Mohammed Al Obaidli, who emphasized that the 2025 census constitutes a turning point in the production of official statistics in Qatar, as it is the first census to rely entirely on administrative records, which enhances data accuracy and enables timely access to high-quality information for all government agencies, ultimately strengthening public policy development.
The workshop concluded with a call for strengthened collaboration and coordination among all government entities to ensure the success of the 2025 Census. Emphasis was placed on maximizing the country's advanced digital infrastructure and activating an integrated statistical system that supports decision-makers and fosters a culture of data-driven planning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Who counts in America? Trump wants to decide
Do undocumented immigrants count as people?Anyone watching as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents increasingly bypass due process to detain and deport unauthorised immigrants might assume the Trump administration's answer is a resounding 'no'. Now, regardless of deportation policies, the approximately 11 million unauthorised immigrants in the United States could soon disappear, statistically at least, if Republicans have their way. President Trump recently instructed the US Department of Commerce to prepare for a new census that excludes undocumented immigrants. This marks the latest and boldest attempt by Trump and his congressional allies to alter how the census accounts for unauthorised immigrants. Although not explicitly stated, Trump may be trying to push this off-cycle census through ahead of the 2028 presidential election or even before next year's midterms, which he appears intent on influencing. Assuming Trump was being literal in his social media declaration that 'People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS,' millions could effectively vanish from the official population count. If this incomplete census were used for congressional apportionment, it would reduce representation in Congress and the Electoral College for states with large numbers of unauthorised immigrants. The immediate partisan impact is unclear. According to the Pew Research Center, if non-citizens had been excluded before the 2020 election, California, Florida and Texas would each have lost one congressional seat and Electoral College vote, while Alabama, Minnesota and Ohio would each have gained one. Political gerrymandering would likely shape who benefits from redistricting. Republicans are already aggressively redrawing maps in states like Texas, with possible retaliatory moves in California and other Democrat-led states. Beyond electoral shifts, the broader goal appears to be marginalising undocumented people and punishing 'sanctuary' jurisdictions. This reinforces the Republican narrative that Democrats deliberately tolerate illegal immigration for political gain. Legally, how to count unauthorised immigrants depends on interpreting the Constitution, the framers' intent and the scope of executive authority in conducting the census. Non-citizens have historically been included in the count, and the Supreme Court has never ruled directly on excluding them. However, with a conservative supermajority on the court, there is a real chance the justices could allow it – either by reinterpreting the Constitution's language or deferring to the executive branch. Even if Trump fails to push through a new census, his administration could still suppress the count by other means. During his first term, he tried to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. The Census Bureau stopped collecting this data from all respondents in 1950 and removed the question entirely by 2000, instead gathering it through separate surveys such as the American Community Survey. Many feared its return would deter participation from undocumented, and even legal, immigrants, leading to an undercount. The Supreme Court blocked the effort in 2019, citing insufficient justification. But it left the door open to future attempts with more credible rationales. Socially, the question of how to count non-citizens recalls earlier and sometimes shameful practices in the United States. For much of its early history, significant groups were denied full recognition in the political system despite living in the country. The Constitution's original enumeration formula stated that state populations would be calculated 'by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.' Slave and free states struck the infamous 'three-fifths' compromise, counting enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for congressional and Electoral College apportionment. Meanwhile, 'Indians not taxed' were excluded altogether, as most Native Americans were not considered US citizens despite residing within the country's borders. They were instead seen as members of sovereign nations – such as the Cherokee, Creek or Iroquois – even as their land, rights and dignity were stripped away. Only with the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 were Native Americans granted birthright citizenship and formally included in the population count. These examples show two marginalised non-citizen groups, enslaved Black people and Indigenous Americans, treated in opposite ways: one partially counted, the other excluded. With history offering no clear precedent, today's debate raises valid questions about how non-citizens, including the undocumented, should be represented. One view holds that because only citizens vote, non-citizens should not affect apportionment. The opposing view argues that excluding undocumented immigrants worsens their vulnerability and denies their very existence, even as government policies directly affect their lives. Unauthorised immigrants both use and support public systems. While they are barred from most federal benefits such as Social Security and Medicare, they still access emergency healthcare, school meal programmes and limited housing support. They also factor into education and policing budgets in the communities where they live. At the federal level, immigration policy disproportionately affects states where undocumented residents make up a larger share of the population. At the state level, policies must be shaped with their presence in mind. For example, California now offers food assistance to all elderly residents regardless of immigration status. Undocumented immigrants also contribute to public finances, paying nearly $100bn annually in federal, state and local taxes. This includes more than $30bn for programmes they largely cannot use, such as Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance. In 40 of 50 states, they pay higher state and local tax rates than the wealthiest 1 percent. States' economic contributions to the federal budget are directly influenced by these residents. It makes sense, therefore, to acknowledge them through accurate enumeration. The Trump administration is instead enforcing a skewed, incomplete and politically motivated interpretation of its constitutional duties regarding census-taking and apportionment. This approach could also affect other debates with far-reaching implications. The Department of Justice is urging the Supreme Court to fast-track a ruling on Trump's challenge to birthright citizenship. This is another area where the Constitution appears clear. The 14th Amendment affirms that anyone born in the US is a citizen, with few exceptions, such as the children of diplomats. Trump is also seeking to expand the grounds for revoking naturalised citizenship, a penalty currently applied only in rare cases that usually involve fraud. A narrower definition of who 'counts' in the census could fuel arguments for a narrower definition of who counts as a citizen. Similarly, a policy of excluding non-citizens could encourage efforts to strip citizenship from naturalised or US-born residents in order to exclude them as well. The presence of millions of undocumented immigrants reflects an immigration system that has failed under both Democratic and Republican administrations. Until meaningful reform is enacted, pretending these individuals do not exist is a misguided, politicised and harmful response to the reality of their lives within US borders, regardless of how they arrived. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
4 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump says undocumented immigrants will not be counted in new US Census
Washington, DC – United States President Donald Trump has said that he directed officials to exclude undocumented immigrants from being counted in the Census – a survey of the US population conducted every 10 years. Trump said he directed the Commerce Department, which oversees the US Census Bureau, to immediately work on 'new and highly accurate' survey based on 'modern day facts and figures' and the results of the 2024 elections. 'People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS,' Trump wrote in a social media post. 'Thank you for your attention to this matter!' The next Census is due in 2030, but it is not clear if Trump is calling for a new survey in the near future. During his first term, the US president tried to add a citizenship question to the Census, but his efforts were blocked by the courts. The Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that the US administration failed to provide a 'reasoned' explanation for adding the question. This time, however, if Trump's Census policy is challenged legally, it could go before a more conservative Supreme Court. Trump appointed three justices serving on the court currently. Critics say excluding undocumented immigrants from the Census would violate the US Constitution, deprive local communities of needed federal resources and distort the data used by scientists and researchers. The 14th Amendment of the US Constitution says that congressional representation should be based on 'counting the whole number of persons in each state'. The Census already includes undocumented immigrants in the 'hard to count' category. — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 7, 2025 States use census data to draw congressional districts. A 2023 report by the bureau found that the 2020 Census likely failed 'in collecting data for a significant fraction of noncitizens residing' in the country. On Thursday, several Democrats slammed Trump's decision as unconstitutional. 'The Constitution mandates a census every ten years that counts every single person in the country, regardless of their citizenship status,' Congressman Jerrold Nadler wrote in a social media post. 'When Trump tried to do this in 2020, the courts flat out rejected it. The Constitution is plain and simple: 'whole number of persons.'' Republicans defended the decision, arguing that counting undocumented immigrants rewards states that foster them and distorts congressional representation. ''We the People' means citizens, not invaders,' Congressman Mark Harris said on X, invoking the preamble of the US Constitution. 'Counting illegal aliens in the census disenfranchises Americans and rewards blue states for breaking the law. Let's get a recount — ASAP!!' If conducted in 2030, the next Census will be conducted by Trump's successor, but preparations for the survey start well ahead of time.
Qatar Tribune
23-07-2025
- Qatar Tribune
NPC secretary general reaffirms Qatar's commitment to 2030 sustainable development agenda
The State of Qatar has reaffirmed its strong commitment to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, highlighting its integration within Qatar National Vision 2030 and the Third National Development Strategy (2024-2030). The strategy reflects Qatar's determination to transform global commitments into tangible national progress. This came in the State of Qatar's statement delivered by Secretary General of the National Planning Council (NPC) HE Dr Abdulaziz bin Nasser bin Mubarak Al Khalifa at the ministerial segment of the High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development, held at the United Nations Headquarters in New York. In the same context, the NPC said in a post on its X platform that HE Dr Abdulaziz bin Nasser bin Mubarak Al Khalifa participated in a panel discussion on the sidelines of the High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. The panel discussion focused on demographic resilience and sustainable development. The Council added that Qatar's approach is based on robust data that aligns with the Qatar National Vision 2030, noting that it has already begun to achieve tangible results in the areas of labor force participation, education planning, and sustainable development. During the event, Al Khalifa highlighted several initiatives undertaken by the State of Qatar and the development of a data-driven strategic framework designed to address key demographic challenges, including declining fertility rates, an aging population, and labor market imbalances.
